So, on friday the Goldwater Group will be back in court to fight the subsidies of the Phoenix Coyotes yet again. Tireless aren’t they?
Goldwater is the republican watchdog group founded by Barry Goldwater, and since then few could argue about the support of Ron Paul, the only republican that can apparently speak politics and common sense at the same time.
Before you challenge the here we go again – off to politics land, let’s look back on the Coyotes battle, recapping some observed facts.
Jim Balsillie waived his money at the NHL some time ago, and for Phoenix… what, 9 months ago? Somewhere around that time, anyhow.
Jerry Moyes knew something was amiss in the NHL the owners were not being treated fairly. We had the vote of 26-0 against Balsillie’s supposed “poor character” by the NHL’s Board of Governors, but later we found comments from the owners (at least one) that it was not about or against Balsillie. Oh really, so why the 26-0 vote?
Goldwater was Balsillie’s only hope in court, because without the “political” battle of the watchdogs against a city that was hanging on to the losing team at all costs, concessions would have been granted 9 months ago, and in the words of a Toronto sports writer, we would have gotten out the salami and cheese, licked our wounds, and like a double play quickly ending the World Series, we would have been left with our mouths hanging open. “That’s it? No more? But, but, but, what about the offer from Balsillie? It was so much more.”
Without the political battle we so direly want as sports fans to avoid, the game would have been short-lived. Yes, Balsillie’s entire case was based on the Goldwater battle against concessions.
Now, we have the Ice Edge boys ready for battle again on Friday this week? And, what’s the issue? Oh yeah, the Goldwater group pit bulls are yet again looking to quell the hope of Glendale to offer concessions. It looks like the disguise is in the parking fees that Ice Edge hopes will yield in the neighbourhood of $15 million per year.
The team’s average attendance, no doubt padded to look better, like the U.S. economies “ true” unemployment rate, is reportedly sitting at 11,000. I’d say about 6,000 short of okay. And, without researching, can we safely say they are still baking hotdogs and brewing beer, T-shirts, or Miley Cyrus tickets to attract attendance? Is it the same old same old?
Is it the same, “same old” in Tampa, but with the exception of the NHL meeting the payroll à la, oops, didn’t we see that in Phoenix? Yes, the same pattern.
And how are the owners doing in Tampa? Making money with a half empty arena? Are they still hanging in their pretending that their ownership actually matters? Don’t they get it yet. Voting 26-0 against Balsillie and letting a fellow owner like Moyes hang out to dry in an attempt to ask for it not to happen to them is ridiculous.
The owners really don’t get it?
Who will be the next owner to realize it is just their money that the “system” of sports monopoly wants. When will they get it that there is an infrastructure of sports based on politics and foreign investment so entrenched that they are no different than the average American taxpayer that is footing the bill for the banker bailout scam between the foreign controlled U.S. Federal reserve, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan and others.
When will the owners understand why Abu Dhabi remains interested in how the Ice Edge boys “look” going into the next battle?
For that matter, when will hockey fans stop wondering when Gary Bettman is going to “get it”, and move some of the failing teams to Canada? Bettman is carrying out the orders of the foreign bankers. I would show you the Ron McLean video again, but apparently it violated YouTube copyright laws. Gosh, how convenient.
So when we started our investigation we saw quickly that the battle of hockey in the NHL was all about politics. It stated with the obvious Glendale city, extended to the State when we brought Phoenix and CityNorth in, and has extended to the national monopolization of sport.
Wait, let me change that. It has extended to a global monopolization of sport. We touched on this a bit already, and there are some good people out there hockey land, like my friends that can elaborate.
A reliable source that cannot be divulged has brought the word about sports monopolization.
So when the boys from Ice Edge just happened to come on the scene, they brought with them more than memories from White House visits. They brought a history of playing in the club. No, not the hockey club, but the club of political maneuvering.
Ice Edge has a history and connections with military development and spending, sharing that space with some boys from Abu Dhabi.
They are entrenched. They are the chosen ones to keep the “plan” in focus.
So, if you are a sports fan dancing around poor attendance and are still thrashing Gary Bettman, you just don’t get it yet do you?
If you are looking for logic to eventually slip in to the mindset of an NHL that cares more about strategic locations than profit, think no more. It was never about what made sense from a hockey market perspective. And until we treat the disease the symptoms will not go away.
Politics and hockey. The powers that be had a plan, and hell or high water they have to continue the charade, taking money from whoever is crazy enough to give it to them.
Is it wrong for people to share information and ideas in quest of truth? Would a government with hidden agendas want to disguise national security concerns in an attempt to censor and control our ability to discuss the issues of our day?
Could the message embodying the President’s speech of May 29th, 2009 be the underlying precursor when an agenda reaches critical mass?
It was 6:30 AM this morning, and this site was visited by a cyber security company from Washington, D.C.. For “privacy reasons” I will not disclose the name of the company, but I googled the company name that had a very official, “cyber-security” flare to it. Put it this way – it got my attention. According to their site, they are the “World Leader in Cyber Intelligence”.
Again, the company doing the search is based in Washington, D.C., and I have had visits to this site in the past from the CIA, the Justice Department, and the Executive Office of the President. Those visits occurred on the heels of our investigation of potential corruption in hockey. Now, how would discussion of hockey bring in the dogs?
Remember, there was an investigation and a sharing of information on this blog – not phishing, hacking, or tapping credit card information. Certainly not a cyber threat by definition, and not warranting a visit from the CIA. Wouldn’t you agree?
Strangely, the hockey investigation led me to discover that for years, Alex Jones was conducting a similar “corruption investigation” on a much broader scale, with greater consequences. My search for truth was Jones’ search on a micro scale, but with striking similarities. Corruption in any form, it would seem, has similar qualities.
But, back to this “cyber security firm” checking us out this morning…
I, in turn, googled this “invader of my space”, and on their website I came across the document of the speech delivered by the President in May, that is linked here (or the video here). Could there be a link between this company and the government of the United States? Well upon looking a little closer, there is evidence available to suggest the taxpayers of America are paying to have the government keep an eye on them by this very same company. So, why would this company make a special visit to a little blog like makeiteighteh.com, wasting the taxpayers money?
And more importantly, should it dissuade a blogger from investigating and sharing honest information as we have done on this site? Heck no!
And, should it stop others from sharing information of vital interest in the same way? Again, not a chance!
In the speech of May 29, 2009, Obama made some very interesting comments, none moreso than this:
Let me also be clear about what we will not do. Our pursuit of cybersecurity will not — I repeat, will not include — monitoring private sector networks or Internet traffic. We will preserve and protect the personal privacy and civil liberties that we cherish as Americans. Indeed, I remain firmly committed to net neutrality so we can keep the Internet as it should be — open and free.
Was this “promise” before or after the arrival of Cass Sunstein?
I would consider the use of my blogging rights as “internet traffic” and my right to convey opinion and share any facts as they surface. In short, the “information superhighway” as it was once known can link up opinion and allow people of the world to view small issues or large issues alike. And when the current issues are on a global scale, and of global concern, we can help each other compare notes.
It is up to us, the free on the internet to ensure the President of the United States, and the Prime Minister of Canada continue to allow our liberties to flourish. We must continue to speak strong and loud, and refuse to be intimidated.
We must refuse to allow the twisting of truth; where those expressing opinion and sharing ideas can be viewed as bringing “weapons of mass disruption”. And, it is time we remind President Obama of his promise to allow free speech in every form to continue.
For this war is about knowledge, and the seeking of truth! If our governments have nothing to hide, they should have no reason or interest in censoring honest people simply because they choose to hold their governments accountable.
And we must wake up to the reality that we are the ones under watch. We, the people with the ability to think for ourselves.
Stephen Harper is under fire in Canada for the prorogue of Parliament until after the Olympics. Protesters and the opposition party are taking full opportunity to voice their displeasure and objection
The issue of contention are the torture allegations in Afghanistan, but the bigger issues should be Harper’s role in selling out Canada to the New World Order…..and yesterday’s visit to the Davos World Economic Forum in Switzerland in showing his true colors, and the reason climate change legislation and Bill C-6 go hand in hand in the global plan
Torture allegations in Afghanistan are mirror symptoms of the similar issues facing our American cousins. Harper has recently attempted to control the media by allowing his entourage to censor who gets to ask questions. This led to journalist walkouts in press conferences, and was a sure sign something is just not right . This kind of thing cannot help but remind us of the visuals of Al Gore refusing to answer the tough questions on climate change, and the removal of reporters at the hand of Gore’s henchmen. Yes, we in Canada are experiencing the beginning of the rude awakening.
Harper has shown a lack of concern for Canadian political procedures with the prorogue of government until after the Olympics. How special it now appears that Harper has been all the while busy at his real job – working the propaganda that is part of the” puppet leadership” and ensuring the agenda of the globalists is on track for Canada.
So, in keeping, our Prime Minister was in Davos Switzerland yesterday to push the agenda. The Canadian Press headlines assuring us there is no question of Harper’s true allegiances, ” ‘Enlightened’ foreign policy required, Harper tells world”.
It might as well have read, “Welcome to the belly of the beast Canada”.
Yesterday, as reported in CP, Harper defended his position of short-sightedness on the climate change issue. And in doing so, he slipped up on the issues he faces to get around the Canadian Constitution and the laws surrounding it.
You see, there are little issues like banking regulations and protectionism, not to mention freedoms and liberties, and yes, our nasty little sovereignty.
According to Harper, those countries belonging to the G20 should make sure any discussions are “less about narrow self-interest in sovereignty’s name”.
Oh, that dirty, get in the way of progress thing known as sovereignty. How inconvenient for leaders like Harper in Canada, and Obama in the United States. Ironically, Cass Sunstein was quoted once as saying the real value of Barrack Obama is in his thorough knowledge of the U.S. Constitution. I suppose you need a thorough knowledge of that which you need to “get around”, don’t you?
Stephen Harper claimed there would be “long-term benefits” of globalization, and the “short-term costs” should be ignored, as he is fully aware of the dramatic economic impact it would have on the country.
And so, the sales job begins in Canada – pushing the foreseeable “promised land” at the price of liberty and economic independence. Our Prime Minister is poised to suggest that Canadians should role over, and throw away our sovereignty and independence in hopes that “they will take care of us” in the new, global world.
Of course that would be the sales point. The promise of something better at the price of what we have. The two birds in the bush will be given to us, if only we will give up the bird we have in our hands.
Don’t believe it Canada. Don’t fall for the trick of the eugenists that will strip us of our rights, freedoms, and be responsible for deciding who among us lives or dies.
Yesterday we spoke on “critical thinking” and it’s importance. There are no conspiracy theories but rather a series of facts that produce a picture. When looking at evidence, think of it this way. You have just bought a 1000 piece puzzle and dumped it on the table. Start looking for the pieces that fit.
Well, when we hear that there is a “global agenda” we need to look beyond the United States into other countries. Our country, Canada is showing mounting evidence to suggest we are part of that bigger puzzle. When we explore further, we can see evidence in other countries. Look to Iceland and Australia that have been the subjects lately and nurture an ability to be that critical thinker you need to become.
The New World Order is being disguised as climate change and consumer protection legislation (Bill C-6) in Canada, and we need to expand our protests to include the entire puzzle - not just the evidence as exposed, in detainee torture and the prorogue of parliament.
Mainstream media seems to have issue with expansion on the underlying motives and reason. It’s time to help them along.
Obama may be brilliant at painting solutions that in fact will further bury the U.S. economy, and the American dream…..more devastation in disguise
The Obama solution and goal is to create jobs that are directly controlled by the state, and small business will continue to suffer…..taxing the banks will further tighten credit
Where will this end? It is certainly painful to watch. Dressing up the pig does not change the fact that it is still a pig
Tired of hearing the rhetoric?
Well, that would make two of us.
The clichés of old hold merit over time because wisdom is behind them. Like, “a penny saved is a penny earned”, or “a bird in hand is worth two in the bush”. Good clichés that indeed are based on experience, the school of hard knocks, and wisdom.
The American people are waking up. We in Canada may also be waking up too. I am keenly watching world events as best I can to see how the “conspiracy theory” fits compared to the rhetoric of what they would give as an explanation.
Focusing on Obama’s State of the Union address, I am sure many could analyze every breath and word better than I, and in fact I could not bring myself to watch. Instead, I read a couple of analyses provided by journalists, and now feel impelled to put in my two cents.
Conspiracy theory would tell us that the Cap and Trade legislation on the heels of Climate Change in Copenhagen is a move to quell industrial growth. In fact, it would be a means for the globalists to squeeze out growth. And that lends itself to the question for Obama: How can he push cap and trade at the same time as saying job growth is important? The more top-heavy government control the less industrial growth, the more loss of jobs, etc. The words sound good, but where is the savvy, and the plan? And. let’s remember a vision here. Remember Obama making that special trip to Copenhagen to mirror the words of Al Gore – “the science is settled”?
Science inherently is never settled. But, if you have an agenda to push through that means you want to tax industry out of existence and create control then you would be impelled to sell it. Science can be settled if you really need it to be, even if it isn’t, right? Even if science is never truly settled it is convenient for Obama to be on the same page as Gore. But what is the reason?
Would Obama’s “settled climate issue” be tied to a relationship with Gore and others, including Maurice Strong and others at the U.N. that have a “different agenda” than that of promoting job growth in America? Sure. “You cannot serve two masters” – another great cliché that fits here.
Obama is calling for new jobs but the rhetoric is not met with a clear plan. Slashing taxes to companies that promise to keep jobs in America to the companies that take the jobs offshore, is confusing in light of the G.M. bailout that saw billions of dollars go to offshore G.M. plants (Brazil), removing jobs from America. In short, are the taxpayers paying to have jobs leave America? And yes, that was a government decision. G.M. is owned by the government now.
More government intervention in industry seems to be the goal. Again, climate cap and trade legislation is by design. Give the government’s ”buddies” the work, like that window company that was promoted by the White House. Who was that great window maker again? John Stossel can tell us. Yes, “crony capitalism” at it’s finest. Imagine how happy the other window makers were to learn that the company of choice gets free advertising and promotion. And wasn’t there a huge conflict of interest between White House rep responsible for the environment and owner of that very same company? Seems a little shady. No, wait. Seems ‘a lot’ shady.
So, if you have an in, you get the business. Can we also assume that if you aren’t “in” the cap and trade taxes that would be imposed on your little company could get a little costly? Could we also assume a legislation of this magnitude and power could easily create a situation where government has a hand in everyone’s pie?
A rapid rail transit system is to create thousands of jobs? For how long, and at what social cost? Again, is this support for capitalism and small business, or promotion of state-run infrastructure? Leading to independence or reliance on the government to “take care of us”? Obama jobs lead to state control and dependence on government.
Tighter restrictions on banks will lead to passing on whatever the cost to the people. How does that correct the issue? How will this free up necessary capital and force banks to lend to small business to ensure growth, expansion, even survival?
Again, rhetoric sounds great. Dressing up the pig to look better and more digestible. At the end of the day, the pig is still a pig.
State- run this, and state-run that. Yeah, communism at it’s finest.
Keep a close eye on the rhetoric won’t you? Become a critical thinker. Get in the game, so to speak.
How is Obama going to put substance into the rhetoric? Is there a finish line that he needs to cross, and is he giving lip service to bide time to quell public unrest and distrust?
Why stop spending in a year? The economy needs an overhaul now. Stimulus and one-off “project spending” are band-aids to structure issues. You cannot dress the pig up and expect it to become something different.
Maybe by next year the “real agenda” will be nearer and the president will not have to act on any spending cut. Thepoint of no return will surely be that much closer. If they keep telling us of the Global agenda, why not be honest and tell the people how they see the people’s role in the new world? Why pretend sovereignty is still in the picture?
Think of your own family. If you are on the verge of bankruptcy you wouldn’t say we need to cut spending – but let’s wait till next year. Well, would you? Just let me buy a new car, do the basement, and put in that humongous plasma T.V. dear! We are not completely out of credit. They will still lend to us! Okay?
A smoker may say, yes I will quit; just not now. Are we to believe him? It’s akin to saying get off my back, I have an agenda to fulfill, and the bankruptcy of the nation may just be what it is. And, while we still have nations willing to lend us money , I am going to continue to tap it out. Awesome concern for the future of Americans, Mr. President. Who cares what happens in a year, right? It may not matter.
Obama has never owned a business, nor has he had experience with the challenges it presents.
And, to that end. What agenda is the President of the United States really for? When big pharmas and Wall Street funded his entry into the White House, how can he turn his back on them? And, how can he shut the door on more of the same lobbyist system for the future candidates? I guess once your in, then you might as well lock the door.
Under the breath the global power elite sneak in the world order vision, and then tell folks they are crazy if they try to piece together the information to suggest how the agendas of nations are leading up to it. And remember, Al Gore is in this mix, along with Arnold Schwarzenegger. Oh, and don’t forget that little support and special trip to Copenhagen by the U.S. President. If he was truly concerned for the people, he would not have supported the unsettled science now would he? Gosh golly gee, that is a sure-fire sign there is a second master, and a second agenda. The agenda in the U.S. may just be how to sell more devastation by disguising the cash pig as something edible.
Obama criticized the political right and left for not getting along, and this is the reason the people of America are not served properly. Wait. I get it. When you cannot make sleazy back room deals to buy votes, and hold closed-door meetings to push through legislation, it is prudent to turn that on the political structure and blame the republicans for not agreeing to a process that they were never really a part of. The opposition party was never considered. Their opinions didn’t matter until the “Boston Tea Party”, that is otherwise known as the senate election in Massachusetts.
For critical thinkers, and the staggering numbers of people joining this group, this has become an extremely frustrating state indeed.
In Canada, with Bill C-6 and the prorogue of parliament issues, we are getting suspicious as well.
We are the people. We are the underdogs.
And, who says politics isn’t a game? It’s time to cheer for ourselves – the underdogs.
It’s time for freedom to rise up and show “the government machines” who is boss.
Being sincere is good, but there is always the element of not being completely right…..you can be sincerely wrong too! There is a bigger evil than the one in front of you boys….
There is one thing we can likely all agree on – the world is definitely changing. But how much and for what purpose? Who is “controlling” our future, and the future of our children? Should we be comforted or afraid? Should we allow it, or should we stand up and object?
And what exactly should we do to show our displeasure?
On yesterday’s Alex Jones radio show, Jones ranted for a substantial time against Glenn Beck. I cannot say exactly what may have set him off, but I can tell you what disappointed me. You see, Glenn Beck was talking about the friends of the White House on his show yesterday, and he mentioned one of Obama’s men as a 9/11 truther.
Van Jones years before his entering his White House role, was reportedly willing to sign a petition on seeking truth on the events of 9/11
Van Jones has had wild political views , and I don’t think many would argue he is a “means to an end” kind of guy when Robert Gibbs, the White House spokesman said:
What Van Jones decided was that the agenda of this president was bigger than any one individual.
And this is where Beck sees a clear and present danger. Because Van Jones would be willing to step down, sacrificing himself so to speak for the “cause”, would he get angry at a President that decided to go to the “center” as Beck would say? Is he radical enough to not be able to accept a “soft” President?
Beck takes it to an extreme when he says he is a danger to the President. That’s a pretty bold statement. Equally as bold, Alex Jones blasted Beck for not being sincere, even if we can all hope he was at least “sincerely” wrong.
Is this what “infighting” looks like? Having the people who are seeing the light shine brightly and those that haven’t got the bigger view yet attacking each other? Should we condemn those that may not see it exactly as they do, but there are signs they are coming around?
There is a saying that makes a lot of sense. Reformers need to bring the truth, but they must bring the truth in love.
I appreciate both views – Jones’ and Beck’s, but what I find hard to appreciate is “attacking” and assuming that there is always some form of manipulation going on. I believe Beck is sincere in his beliefs, but not at Jones’ level. The reason Beck is not seeing the bigger picture is evidenced by the facts, and the common denominator between Beck and Jones - Lord Christopher Monckton.
Here is where I believe Beck is shy on the bigger vision. As Beck continues to look at the “progressive movement” in the U.S. as the enemy, he may have forgotten to investigate into the bigger, “global” issue. In short, where Jones explains it all, Beck has developed tunnel vision.
If Alex Jones is right, then the federal reserve is controlled by the Bilderberg Group, who are in turn working with the IMF (International Monetary Fund) and the World Bank. The presidents are “puppets”, controlled by this offshore criminal cartel, and whether it is democrat or republican, they are bought and sold politicians.
The fact that Obama is pro Wall Street is a strong counter to what he should stand for, which supports Jones’ broader picture. The “global” in Global (World) government also supports Jones’ views, where again Beck has not delved. No Beck, has remained contained to the United States. Where I thought he might have been heading in a “global way” is abruptly halted where his views of 9/11 come in.
Glenn Beck, in short needs to now study 9/11 to get the important link. When Silvertein in the video below makes mention that WTC building 7 was “pulled”, he in doing so admitted that there were explosives in place to take the building down.
This alone gives strong evidence to support pre planning and intent. With 9/11, the Patriot Act was instigated, and the victims of the Patriot Act are the people of America. Glenn Beck needs to look at this in order to understand how the government can control the people of America better with the Patriot Act. And, he needs to dig as deep into this area as he has in the study of the Progressive movement and communism.
Van Jones is a human being with thoughts. We may not agree with his seemingly radical leftist views, but he was also able to assess the events of 9/11 and see that there was something tremendously wrong.
Glenn Beck has said that a year ago he would not have envisioned himself doing what he is doing now to challenge the White House. Alex Jones it would seem has viewed this as a right wing focus, where he is not getting it, or he has been set up to drive the right wing agenda.
Despite it all, I only see two men. One sees the bigger, global picture, and the other has drifted with tunnel vision, focusing only on the United States.
But I do see two sincere men. And I do wish they would not “judge”.
We need to unite and share information to make the cause succeed, and I believe Beck may see the bigger light with the proper nurturing. That is, if he can handle it.
Beck is doing okay but needs to keep a more open mind. When he says kids go to school to learn how to think, then they should be free to be critical thinkers about 9/11. Don’t label them “9/11 truthers” as if being a putdown designed to tell us all how to think.
Same goes for Alex Jones. He says he brings us the information so we can decide for ourselves, but then tells us what to think of Beck.
Which is it boys? Don’t demean your messages – just bring them. We will decide.
Should we think we are safe in Canada? No Patriot type act? Really? Is Bill C-6 the “foot in the door” to fewer freedoms in general?
If you are radical and communist enough, you might want to call President Obama. He will likely have an important, power- filled office for you to fill. And if you doubt that, just talk with Cass Sunstein, the appointed regulatory czar.
Censorship gone wild. That is the issue we are facing, or should I say the poor people of the United States are now facing. But will we in Canada be next?
The Obama administration is making George W. Bush look like the nice uncle that brings a toy every time he shows up. The level of insanity is breaking new, disturbing ground.
I remember where I was on 9/11, speaking with my wife as the news and image of the burning tower was on the television. And, as we were discussing how bad it seemed, we watched in horror as the second plane hit the other tower.
We all know that three buildings all falling “straight down” was met, understandably so, with many questions as people questioned the coincidental nature of many aspects of the day.
It is understandable, all things considered, to have a lot of questions as to who was ultimately to blame for the events of 9/11. The questions are very valid, and the concerns are real, including why the evidence was kept secret, and why an official investigation didn’t start for hundreds of days after that historical, law altering day. The sad result was thousands dead, and the Patriot Act, which means the end of liberty.
The Patriot Act, among other things has allowed the federal U.S. government to detain someone indefinitely without reason. The government would not have to prove a case or provide evidence against a detainee under the terms of the act. Goodbye habeas corpus. And, for this reason, 9/11 continues to surface as the single most impactful and questionable in history. People should have a right to discuss it, investigate for themselves, and have the right to question the “official story”. Enter liberty death part two.
Cass Sunstein: Obama continues to parade radicals to offices that will mock America
The American people have now another nightmare to swallow – the removal of ability for free thought and free speech. And the man who will be responsible for this is the appointee to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. The man’s name is Cass Sunstein, and he has had some crazy ideas over the years. Watch this video from Michael Savage to start:
Paul Watson, a writer of Infowars.com has done an incredible job bringing this article to readers, outlining the new “censorship” model that will effectively end any verbal opposition to the federal government. For this, I am in shock and feeling very sad for the people of America.
It is so obvious to me that the Federal Government in the U.S. has gone absolutely insane with power, and more scary, the direction to communism is obvious.
May sanity rise in the nation of the U.S., and people take the necessary steps to take this madman and the rest of the administration out of power.
And this is not a “conspiracy theory”, it’s a fact. Perhaps my dog should take Mr. Sunstein to court. I guess he couldn’t argue with my dog’s right to do that now could he?
We know who George Washington was, but do we know about the mission of George Washington Hunt? His is a story worth telling. What would drive a man to dedicate his life to a cause he considers worth risking his life for?
George Washington Hunt had just lost a son, and was on a mission years ago to get his other son a job in the environmental industry. What happened to him was a prophecy fulfilled. He was allowed into a meeting with the Global Elites’ – a meeting that would change his life forever.
But, according to Hunt, he was prepared and already knew about the “mission” he would eventually be destined for after an encounter with God.
In this encounter decades earlier, God advised Hunt that some day he would be put in the path of the “ravenous beasts of the world“, and when it actually happened, Hunt knew his role, and his life mission from that point forward.
As a very brief overview, George Hunt describes the Global Elite he was involved with as eugenists, looking to reduce the population of the world by at least two billion. They were to work toward the complicated system of removing bank competition, and eventually reduce the banking system to one world bank, responsible for everyone. All the while, doing the equivalent of “rape and pillage” – taking without compensation all that represented wealth.
If one was to challenge the bank, they would be cut off, and would not be able to buy or sell anything. Creating masses at the mercy of the few in power would be the goal, and as we are seeing in the U.S. this is a process that is well underway,gaining ground at an alarming pace. In fact, if what Hunt was told years ago by this group comes true, the monetary system of the world is to collapse by 2012, and the system of “buy/sell” control would be in full swing.
If this is sounding like Biblical scripture, it is. It is supporting the bigger picture that world events are supporting.
My name is George Hunt and I was an official host at the UNCED 4th World Wilderness Congress. I am educating the public to understand that a secret bank was set in motion by international financier Edmond de Rothschild. The bank will eventually be the only bank to exist as banks merge with one another into a larger bank. As the large and small banks topple toward large banks, where will it stop? The ultimate bank may be the Bank privee Edmond de Rothschild which was created in Geneva, Switzerland, a month after the aforementioned UNCED Wilderness Congress was held. It is presently known as the World Conservation Bank.
The bank will promote conservation but judge the hypocrisy of UNCED’s Maurice Strong, Rothschild’s right hand, as he brazenly attempts to circumvent Colorado water laws and ruin valuable farmlands. The bank utilizes the media to spread environment fears too. Spreading these fears will justify monstrous, inoperative, greenhouse effect projects for the greed rich and fat contracts. Some scientists have stated that they have serious questions concerning the lack of scientific methods and false or inadequate presumptions may have been used in the environment studies.
Please keep an open mind when you watch these video series, starting with an overview of the Climate Change (Global Warming) movement and what it means. From the show, “Conspiracy Theory”:
And, yesterday, Hunt was interviewed by Alex Jones:
On yesterdays Glenn Beck Show, Glenn discussed the “redistribution of wealth” disguised as the Health Care Bill. Could it be really the stripping of wealth so mankind is equally poor and at the mercy of the powerful?
Beck also criticized the other “plays” the government is making to strip wealth and equalize the people. All profits are subject to taxation it would seem, except the Federal Reserve’s. This would be in keeping with the “conspiracy fact” as Hunt would put it, to channel wealth to the global bankers.
In Australia we have farmers that are losing their farmland to the environmental movement. This too would be in keeping with the theory that the global elite want to take over assets. Much like Goldman Sachs was able to kill the competition of banks in the U.S. after the housing bubble. Goldman Sachs “shorted” the housing market because they knew the bubble would bust, and leave many banks in trouble. Consolidating the banking industry in a move to eventually get to the elusive “one” ?
Here is a clip on the Australian farmer Peter Spencer on a hunger strike. Remember, the climate change carbon taxes are in deep question, after the leak of emails from researchers who blew the whistle on the scam, known as ClimateGate.
We briefed on the issue of “eminent domain” in our previous discussions on how many sports owners made lots of money from the obtaining of land. One of these owners was George W. Bush, when he sold the Texas Rangers Baseball team. Now however the stakes appear higher.
Lord Monckton, former adviser to Margaret Thatcher and Climate Change opponent for many years has argued that the carbon scam will allow the governments of the world to take over farm land from farmers with taxation and land use laws, similar to the issues that are now affecting the farmers of Australia.
The effect will be fewer farms, creating a food shortage that Monckton advises will drive up global food prices and create death to third world countries by the hundreds of millions, and billions of people.
Incidentally, these people appear to be viewed by the elitists as “cannon fodder with bloated bellies”.
What seems to be happening right now is the process on steroids. The U.S. is invading countries more numerous than any time in the past, which would appear in an attempt to cut off the oil routes to Russia and China. Could the ultimate goal be to use the Saudi oil as a sanction to these countries to make them comply with the global government model?
The U.S. has more job growth in government jobs than manufacturing as Glenn Beck has pointed out, and eventually the unions that are being favoured, as well as the public employees will have no trough upon which to feed. There will be no manufacturing left to create the money for taxation. Eventually, as Beck would say, the machine will have to start to eat itself.
And, on that note, Northcom, it has been claimed, is awaiting the violent revolution of the American people. This too is expected from the global elitists, that know, according to George Hunt, that it will take more tragic events and “infighting” to shape the masses - the “cannon fodder” to where they can be handled easily.
To further support the notion of global eugenics, we can see evidence in the U.S. health care bill. It would seem the support of abortion and euthanasia principles are attached to the current bill. The point that needs to be made is this power in the wrong hands could be devastating, from forcing abortions, to cutting off health care as proposed. The “cutting off” of care is found in the bill under when the “medical board” will decide if an individual will be allowed to be treated for his or her condition. There will no longer be a choice to get the best health care. Apparently, the patient’s physician will not have a say either, only the panel. So, what if the panel for cost or other reasons gets more sticky, and makes more decisions to cut off care? The power of God in the hands of man is a scary thought, isn’t it? If there is no alternative that can be afforded anymore, the state will have full control whether a man has an opportunity for life. Where does the government think they have the right to decide whether someone lives or dies?
As an investigator I look at various sources and paint a picture. I did it for the Phoenix Coyotes case, and now, the investigation of hockey made it clear there was something more sinister in the bigger picture. We will continue to see how current world events fit this model. You might agree there seems to be much at stake for us all.
And, I don’t know about you, but I prefer to think of myself and others as children of God. Where we are assured that God loves us all so much, that He has even counted the number of hairs on our heads.
And for those people who think they can decide who gets to live and who gets to die I would say one thing to them.
Why do they think they should be superior to us?
And finally this needs to be said.
No matter how difficult life is, we all deserve to be treated equally. This should not be confused with taking from the rich and giving to the poor. For in a generous world that cared for those less fortunate, we would not have a situation where there is a chance a very few can dictate who lives and who dies.
If you are struggling in any way as an honest person, you already have much more than those that have monetary wealth, but have lost their souls in the process.
And Ron Paul could be the mild-mannered nice guy that is the “easy in” for mainstream media to bring the change in news reporting on the “real” state of the Union
In the U.S. and Canada, have you ever noticed that there is a blur between political party lines, and how a government that takes over is in essence no different than the one being replaced?
We tend to look for change by voting for the best opposite, but are we really getting the opposite view in the supposed opposing party?
We can all see that things do not change. Often they get worse. Are we being fooled to pick Coke or Pepsi political parties when they both have the same underlying purpose? Can there be hope for us without new blood?
Well, in the U.S. there is a resurgence of liberty. This is being propogated by the Tea Party Group. Freedoms and the support of the U.S. Constitution are at the root. But do not think you will find much support for this group in the mainstream media though.
Glenn Beck mentions Time Magazine’s 2009 a Year in Pictures as he points out that there were no pictures of the Tea Party Group. Of obvious interest reflecting a changing year in politics, the obvious question is, why not?
Are we to believe the Tea Partiers are an insignificant force in the U.S.? Well, Congressman Ron Paul is getting major support in the media now, and has been regularly appearing on major news stations and journals as being right. Wow! Ron Paul has professed his critical assessment of U.S. politics for the past 30 years and he was viewed as a crazy radical, with strange ideas.
That was then, this is now. Larry King has Ron on his show regularly. And, MSNBC just a couple of days ago interviewed Paul, and in this segment he discusses the “no difference” aspect of the two major parties in the U.S..
As Paul explains, what’s the point of voting for John McCain who still supported the bank bailout? When the bailout was a bad idea, what’s the point when both parties support it? Is that going to affect true change in a country that should be concentrating on the welfare of its’ citizens when they seem more worried about sending money to offshore interests disguised through the private Federal Reserve system? Heck no.
As said so well,
Give me control of a nations money supply, and I care not who makes it’s laws. Mater Amschel Rothschild, founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty.
Maxwell Smart made a "good call" when he said there is Kaos in the world that chooses to use it's powers for "evil and not niceness"
Ben Bernanke is the head of the Federal Reserve, and he has said if you audit the Fed, it (the audit) will shut it down. His argument is that you cannot have Congress setting fiscal policy. Why not? Fiscal Policy makes or breaks the welfare of it’s citizens. Is it much better to have large offshore private bankers determine the fate of Americans? And, the bigger question is, what if these power elite decide to use this power and control, in the words of Maxwell Smart, “for evil and not niceness”?
The Rothchild family is at the root of the Bilderberg Group. Is it a coincidence they are in control of the money supply of the U.S.? It is a family preocupation to control the fate of the country.
Here is Ron Paul on the Fed:
And a more in depth argument by Ron Paul can be found here.
We had better pay attention to the fate of the U.S. and their freedoms as being fought for by the Tea Partiers, as we all know how “tied to the U.S.” our economy is. And, let’s not forget this is fast becoming a Global Economy, and the Global Government is forming. Some like to call it the New World Order. Whatever you call it, the theme is becoming the same – the stripping of soveignty and individual rights. You need not look farther than the headlines to see evidence – from full body scanners at the airports, to parents getting arrested in the U.S. for home-schooling their kids. Yes I did say “arrested”. For shame on those parents, eh?
Now this article is called the “plays the thing”, a play on Shakespearean jargon. Well again, when we looked at U.S. politics the question to the voters is what flavor do you want? You will still get cola, but will it be Pepsi or Coke?
If they are both so similar you can’t tell the difference, are we getting duped to believing we have a voice? Are there ”plays” going on between parties to justify the means, and the means are from one outside influence? Are the parties a distraction to hide the true drive to affect an agenda that is worldwide in scope? Would that explain why President Obama and Prime Minister Harper seem to be close in attitude towards Constitutions and censorship of media? Yes, it would. And would it be a coincidence? No, it would not. Not if there is a “global” agenda by the power elites.
Let’s look at some current examples.
We have Dick Cheney criticizing President Obama for being too soft on terror. What effect will this have? Will it give Obama the excuse he needs to not look like the bad guy when he takes away more human rights? It would seem so. How about the public outcry and the admission that “they messed up” and didn’t follow the procedures and look at the evidence and information to know the underwear bomber would be a threat? Will that create the panic and expectation that the Obama administration needs to instill more right stripping procedures and laws? Oh yes it will.
And isn’t it great that the public cries out for more rights violations.
With fewer and fewer rights and a world government, where are we heading?
The world’s a stage. The players between political parties, since no different at the end of the day have full opportunity to fool us, and the criticism a “stage” to evolve a “process”.
What is the ultimate process? That is the question.
We know now that it involves less liberty, more rules, more taxes, and ultimately the governments telling us what we can and cannot do.
That’s scary. But more disturbing when we realize the world government will be a bureaucracy and not “elected” by the people.
That would sure give the unethical and disturbed a playground to impose bad things on people now wouldn’t it?
When it comes to Stephen Harper’s latest censorship attempts to avoid the big issues to come, whose facts are then justified the most?
Is it Alex Jones and the New World Order, or is it Glenn Beck, whose view of his country’s government is leading to communism? Censorship is a common bond between the Obama White House and Stephen Harper’s new censorship strategy…..will it work and will we, the people continue to “not care”?
Who’s your daddy Stephen?
Stephen Harper: Censoring reporters? Preparation for the big issues when our liberties are stripped.
Stephen Harper has said that the Canadian citizens really do not care about some issues that are being controlled by his party. At least, that’s what he hopes is the case because what comes next may be uncomfortable if we decide to actually wake up to the evidence.
What seems strange is not strange at all. Harper is using a media charade, and twisting the truth, as part a a strategy to instill censorship so that when the bigger picture materializeshe can get away with ignoring it and hoping we won’t care.
And where are we seeing the same thing? Oh, that’s right, in the U.S.
In a similar strategy his “colleague” Obama is working the New World Order plan as well. Censorship and media control, coupled with disregard for the political processes and bi-passing of the Constitution.
Harper doesn’t want us as Canadians to wake up to the circumstances that will innevitably be imposed on us. And, don’t think when the U.S. collapses we won’t be on the radar in short order either.
Okay, let’s have a look at this situation.
Harper is controlling who can ask questions in the media? Whaaaa? Does that make sense? No, of course not. Well, it depends if you take this from an isolated issue, or if you ft it into our New World Order theory. Incidentally, the “New World Order” is not a theory – it is an admitted fact by all the politicians. Just to be clear here.
Harper is setting up censorship because there is an agenda that will be criticized as it become better known. It will not get any easier and he is preparing now for a “strategy” to control what the ”public sees” in mainstream press. Now that should scare the heck out of you!
Why the secretive nature? Why does he tie in journalists being able to answer questions to the notion that Canadians don’t care? What does one have to do with the other?
Does Harper know of the journalists that are going to “catch on” to the agenda, imposing a threat? Will certain media see through the rhetoric? Likely yes! And for that he wants to censor their ability to voice their questions to solidify a “case” that could be made against his government.
Harper sure drinks a lot of water in this press conference doesn’t he? A little dry mouthed when the issue of censorship arose, eh?
We can see the strategy playing out in the U.S., as Obama has gone against promises of CSPAN coverage of all important issues. He promised that the people of the United States would be part of any process to ensure government transparency. An obvious lie that is justified in the mindset of left wing radicals.
Now, in the United States, Obama is supported by the radical leftists because they believe that the “ends justify the means”. They want socialism. If they have to ram health care and all other legislation down the throats of the House and Senate, oh well, that’s justified. Their ideals meet the method, regardless of the “rules” or democracy.
That’s right house speaker Nancy Pelossi. What he (Obama) said on the campaign trail is pure means to an end garbage. Give the people what they want to hear and get him in. Then, shut the people out so you can fulfill what has never been the agenda of the people, but the agenda of a bunch of left wing (communist) political nutjobs.
Ironically, the joke is on the leftists that honestly believe they are doing the country some good. The truth is it will ensure economic failure of America, and they are too idealistic to see the truth. There is also an agenda of the New World Order that is playing the leftists like puppets.
Yes, there is a bigger picture. The leftist elites will all be fooled when America goes completely bankrupt, and the pensions payments to even the political elites will be impossible. That’s right. The joke will be on them.
It is the conservative right wingers in the U.S. that are screaming bloody murder. But, there are democrats jumping ship too, as it has transcended party lines, and is just plain political suicide. Democrats from both congress and the senate have bailed and will not seek re-election.
Who is Harper’s real boss?
Well, if Harper is a conservative, he has a different set of issues to pull off what his “bosses” need him to do. It is no longer a party issue. It is no longer him working conservative views. No. Now it is Harper working for the New World Order heads – the offshore bankers that have given us everything from Climate Change cap and trade to the full body scanners in the airports. Incidentally, as admitted by CTV News, these scanners were ordered months ago. Funny, the underwear bomber only came on scene on Christmas day! Hmmm! Could we be led to believe that there was a plan and they just needed the excuse? Right, the underwear guy, with no passport and film crew. Silly me! Now, would this planning ahead of the scanners support sudden terror leading into the decision or support Alex Jones’ warnings over the years? Tough one – not!
So, when Harper seems a little odd to close off the reporters from his supposed political side, he is actually preparing for the coming onslaught that will be the stripping of rights of those that have put him in office in the first place. That’s right – the people who elected Harper into power will be taxed up the wazzoo, and we in the middle class won’t know what hit us. Harper is no longer working for the people of Canada. He knows it, and is strategizing how to deal with it. Phase one – cut off the media that represents the biggest threat. The Conservative view when “socialism” takes over.
The good news is that the media in Canada seems to be less “in bed” with government as are the propaganda machines in the U.S. Good for the media here!
Let’s take another look at two incredible media powers in the U.S. that are applying heat to the issues that by design will also affect us here. That’s right, you are not living in a bubble and you had better pay attention.
Don’t play into Harper’s strategy that he hopes us accomodating Canadians are known for.
Fitting the facts into the bigger puzzle: The media “guys” putting on the heat in the U.S.
When you are monitoring a theory to see if the facts support the bigger suspected agenda, you will tend to take these facts as they arise and see if they fit into the particular puzzle to support your theory.
Alex Jones, the government watchdog of corruption in the United States for the past 20 plus years, has taken fact after fact, government document after government document, and pieced it into the picture that started to form. He of course is not alone, as many experts have been doing this along with him for years, writing books and the like.
So, as evidence and issues arise, Jones has continued with incredible accuracy to tell his listeners what the issue or circumstance means. Eerily, Jones seems to hold merit. One of his guests wants to do a documentary on him that will be entitled “Alex in Wonderland” – a humorous reflection on his accuracy despite how far fetched it may seem at first listen.
Now, Glenn Beck and the multi billion broadcaster FOX News has taken on their government for what Beck explains is an arrogant push to communism.
That’s right, you heard correct – communism.
If you are in your forties you will remember from your youth how almost impossible that would sound for the U.S., because baby boomers grew up with the influence that communism was as far as being American (or Canadian) as could be possible. Communism was looked down on with incredible disdain by Americans, and usually when mentioned, there would be the ever present mention of “we are free” and “we have liberty”. “Give me liberty or give me death”, remember?
Well in the Home of the Brave and land of the free, it would seem censorship by the current President is being instigated, and as Beck has pointed out, the White House does not want to recognize Fox as a news source because they have caught on. Thanks Obama. What happened to transparency you promised and all issues to be discussed on CSPAN?
Fox is a news source all right, just not patsies for government propaganda. No Fox is representing the people now, and it is refreshing. You see, when liberty is at stake it is not a question of liberal versus Conservative. That is a luxury that cannot be afforded when serious problems arise. It’s time to unite, party affiliation aside.
Glenn Beck started out by a “break it to us gently approach”, but he knows there is so much more than “communism” that is the issue, and how do I know this? Well, Beck had Lord Monckton on his show in the past, and Beck himself has mentioned the ridiculousness of Climate Change, which has been proven bogus by fudged documents and strategy.
The researchers themselves admittedly “fudged” the facts to support the global warming effect, when in fact, the actual results showed a cooling off. Cooling is the true state of the planet, and in fact, there is a greater chance of an ice age as the next major climate issue.
The bottom line on climate is that the power elite of the world would have us believe that man can control mother nature, and we are sadly giving ourselves way too much credit. The truth is we cannot – that is unless you look to Alaska and the HAARP project run by the U.S. Government.
Climate Change legislation will be imposed by a bureacratic, non-elected board that we will not have any control over. They will effect the de-industrialization of industry, and impose taxes on families that do not meet the “green” rules that will be imposed. They will in essence do what the New World Order wants – to destroy the middle class of the remaining free world, and climate legislation is a guise to hide world government. They will destroy the economies of the United States and Canada. This, coming at a time when the U.S. is already on the verge of collapse.
How bad is it?
If you look at the U.S. debt clock, every minute there are two bankruptcies and one foreclosure. Yes, every minute!
Hyperinflation: where the printing of more and more money leads to the devaluation of currency - the issue now in the U.S.
The U.S. is completely tapped out of money.
Tax revenues are a good trillion dollars less than spending per year. Try that in your own household. You know what would happen!
Each citizen, including all children (every person in the U.S.) owes over $340,000 of government debt. It doesn’t take an economist to realize they are bankrupt already. A family of six would be responsible for almost $2 million alone. How will they get out of this?
In this insanity, why is the U.S. government rolling out the plan for heaps of more government jobs, and reckless spending? That is like adding water to a sinking ship. There is a plan – just not what is good for American citizens.
Two ways and neither good
As Beck’s show has pointed out, the government has two options at this moment – continue to print money and create “hyperinflation”, or stop printing money so the government cannot meet it’s social obligations (or debt for that matter), and create a depression so great that, in Beck’s words would be 100 times greater than the Great Depression itself.
I won’t continue for now, but realize this – my theory is that Beck and Jones are closer on the issues than one might think at this point – Beck is just taking it one step at a time, but trust me he will get there!
And for us in Canada, we are being conditioned to “take it”, as Harper starts his censorship strategy. When the “stuff” hits the fan, you will then understand why he doesn’t want to answer tough questions.
The questions so far are not even close. The biggest questions we should have for Harper are these:
Who is Harper working for – Bilderberg or the Canadian people?
What is ourgovernment doing about the world takeover disguised as Climate Change legislation?
These are huge, and we had better get ready to “get interested”. Let’s not play into our puppet Prime Minister’s hand. He has sold out his country for personal gain – and the “facts” going forward will prove it! If he refuses to listen to the people as a sign that starts with our media, then it’s time he goes!
In the NHL we had Jerry Moyes stripped of his rights, and served a proxy to relinquish any remaining rights in hope that he would not put his hockey team into bankruptcy.
An asset that Moyes had was virtually proven to be worthless to him as far as gaining anything from the “fire sale” situation he was put in.
In our attempt to tie in the problems in America and the world, to that of the issues in the NHL, there are parallels that do indeed transcend the NHL with similar issues.
Look at the issues of the bondholders of Chrysler that were messed over compared to the union, that Michael Barone eloquently described with the words that now stick, a “Gangster Government”.
Yes, a Gangster Government is underway in the United States, and the politicians and powers that be are hoping that the public blindly trusts their elected officials to do what is right by them.
If enough confusing legislation is rammed to Congress at the last minute the hope must be that the politicians will not have enough time to pay attention and will, in essence give up, succuming to the “numbing” of the barrage of tyranical rule.
In the youtube video below, pay careful attention to the parallel situation as described of the unfair treatment of some GM dealers over others. Who you know, and Monty, let’s make a deal comes to mind. What happened to fair and equitable treatment?
Pay attention to a GM dealer that was slapped a piece of paper, relinquishing her of her assets in the dealership; having to give up the service contracts; and not being able to sell off pieces of her asset- Jerry Moyes’ situation, but in a different industry.
Does this not sound like the “rent a turkey” franchises that the NHL imposed on Jerry Moyes, as he tried to maximize the value of his NHL team by selling to the highest bidder?
Does it not bring back the issues that some owners were treated better, without proxy, not by due process of circumstances, but by relationship, and possible power plays? The comparison of Jerry Moyes’ NHL imposed proxies to the NHL helping of Tom Hicks when he decided not to pay his bills. Six months of takeover planning behind Moyes’ back compared to the treatment of Hicks, that had the NHL bending over backward in his defense.
Sorry if I'm so tainted I don't just see a fan of the Sox in this picture !
How about the concession demands of Jerry Reinsdorf, chosen by the NHL as the suitor for the team, when Jerry Moyes could not get concessions on the table with the City of Glendale? Does that not sound like one GM dealer being favoured over another, and given another chance for redemption?
We could go on and on, but you get the point.
Whether it is the government buying off or otherwise making side deals outside the law, or the NHL interpreting and abusing its constitution, the reality is the gangster nature of both are meant to help one at the expense of the unfair abuse of another, and that is not acceptable. That truly is tyrannical and gangster in nature, and the sooner we all see that the picture is being painted both in industry within, and country, and world as a whole, we will never be able to stop it.
It’s time to wake up to the reality of the little and big picture, and tell the powers that be that the jig is up!
Watch videos at Vodpod and other videos from this collection.
SocialVibe
Peter Puck
For those old enough to remember Peter Puck, he is our symbol of when hockey was pure and innocent.
When Canadians could relax on a Saturday Night, listen to the HNIC theme song, and enjoy the family's company while watching the game.
See the video collection below to see some nostalgic Peter Puck videos that will bring us back, and that kids' of all ages can embrace even today.
email Peter Puck at: admin@makeiteighteh.com.
