Monthly Archives: November 2009

Johnny come lately

Wait folks, we have international peace talks that tend to be tied into the deals of America, and potential Arab investment in America’s infrastructure. At least that’s what appears as we delve deeper into the activities of Mubadala  (growing by leaps and bounds) and Related Companies, and the powerful in America making deals with those from Abu Dhabi. Read on…..

netanyahu and abbas together

Get along my friends!

Could this be fueling, in part, the direction of the current talks?

What got me thinking?

Someone from the John Buck Company was on the site today checking out the article on some notes on IFG.

How is John Buck (& co.) tied in with the Reinsdorf family?

Not sure, but they do have this muckety relationship.

John Buck is more tied in with Mubadala, who has interest in Related  Companies, and has much in common that way to a mutual friend of Reinsdorf, namely Dell.

Come to think of it, how exactly did MSD Capital come to the financial rescue of the Coyotes anyhow? Doesn’t that seem a little odd unto itself? And how about those strangehold loan terms?

There is a connection worth taking a longer look, so let’s…

The big boys are all teaming up with Related, and the friendship is getting tight.

 Mubadala  became  involved  with John Buck, by, in 2008, forming John Buck International.

Mubadala also has a 17% stake in ALDAR Properties, Abu Dhabi’s largest real estate development company, as well as stakes in New York-based Related Companies and has entered into a partnership with Asia’s largest real estate group, CapitaLand.

Privately-held, TJBC brings decades of expertise to John Buck International having developed over 28 million square feet of premium commercial space across the United States.

Remember, Related Companies was bought into as well by Michael Dell, and was part of the CityNorth fiasco in Phoenix.

And the intertwining gets moreso, as Mubadala is a computer component supplier of, you guessed it, Dell:

A large chunk of MSD’s real estate action occurs through Related Companies, a development firm with claims on a number of prominent properties. In 2007, MSD Capital, Goldman Sachs and Mubadala Development pumped $1.4 billion into Related. Mubadala is also a large investor in Advanced Micro Devices, one of Dell’s main chip suppliers.

But the real bacon is in land development as the computer industry takes a beating.

And not surprisingly Related started out with government projects:

Founded as Related Housing Companies in 1972 by Stephen M. Ross, the company began by developing government assisted housing developments

Government certainly continues to be a boon for developers it seems.

 We also had the City of Phoenix on the site the other day checking out why the taxpayers of Glendale deserve full disclosure of the hockey team’s impact on the city.

Okay, so Mubadala with ties to Related Companies in Phoenix’ CityNorth, and part owner of John Buck International, and checking out the situation with Reinsdorf’s IFG and Glendale?

Right….

How related to the situation is Related Companies anyhow?

How tied into the United Arab Emirates is the U.S., where Obama would not apparently make eye contact with Netanyahu, but was having a gay ol’ time with Abbas?:

Abbas and Obama

Abbas and Obama

Not so with that bloody terrorist Abbas, hatchet man for terror-master AIDS riddled pedophile Yasser Arafat.

Where is this going? No idea.

What does it have to do with hockey? No idea again.

All I know is there are an awful lot of American reasons to support the money from the Arabs when it comes to what we have just read.

Abu Dhabi and the millions of reasons to form development alliances? And according to the New York Times, it has become significant.

“Such riches, coupled with the more-aggressive stance being taken by ADIA and other sovereign funds, has raised concern that these investors will wield their wealth for political as well as financial reasons.”

….Known as ADIA (pronounced ah-DEE-ah), the fund recently formed a small team that is now buying big stakes in Western companies. This unit masterminded ADIA’s $7.5 billion investment in Citigroup, the largest U.S. bank, in November (2008). It has also taken a large position in Toll Brothers, one of America’s biggest home builders.

Even those in government have questioned some questionable power plays, especially related to Citigroup:

Several in the U.S. Congress have demanded closer scrutiny of these firms, their practices, and their tax status. Yet many of these investments, such as Abu Dhabi’s stake in Citigroup, came at crucial times, when little other financing was available, to help stabilize firms in tough financial straits.

Mubadala was also mentioned with ties to the ever growing Carlyle Group, that so many prominent U.S. names are attached to. That will definitely be worth a future look (check this Amazon.com review of an interesting book written by another guy named Craig (Unger)).

When you are a country in economic trouble as the U.S. currently is, you sure could use continuing support of those Arab rich guys that are buying into your country in a big way!

And what is the problem? Well, just like private corporations “owning” the government of states like Arizona with infrastructure, what happens when foreign interests take over those corporations? Speaking of Abu Dhabi’s spending spree (2008):

Details about the true extent of its assets are scarce and its nearly impenetrable cloak of secrecy has fueled suspicions about the government’s intentions. News of sovereign wealth funds looking to purchase stakes in U.S. firms has prompted fears in some quarters that foreign investors might be seeking to quietly take over companies or to purchase influence.

Cloak of secrecy? Sounds like the secret of who holds those arena bonds, doesn’t it?

Politics and economics at it’s finest.

Let me guess, the land development subsidies will somehow get miraculously overturned and be back on track for Related and others?

Just sayin’…….(gulp)

Could it be the infrastructure growth of America and the development in Arizona is like a loose thread? Pull it, and you start to unravel a bigger issue?

The next thing we might find out is a rich Arab guy holds the secretive Jobing.com arena bonds! The way this has played out it wouldn’t surprise me, and in fact it would lend itself to explaining why so many can’t seem to get their jobs done, including a certain judge in Glendale. The ultimate ruling could have been made in a week after the case started, and the outcome smells of politics

Politics and hockey mixing in a “different” way perhaps?

And when you have two friends of Reinsdorf both with ties to Mubadala and Related Companies, and tied in with land development subsidies, what are the odds that Reinsdorf is the favorite to assume whatever comes of the Phoenix Coyotes?

When there is lots at stake in keeping these issues hush hush, a court may be manipulated and so can others to position an asset where it needs to go.

Just seems strange that’s all. Well, doesn’t it?

Why did you have to come along Johnny? Could of saved me a whole lot of info I really didn’t want to see.

Oh, I get it now…

Reading the Hamilton Spectator today shed some additional consideration on the issues facing the Coyotes in Glendale.

What if there are no owners that can be found to take on the Coyotes? Relocation.

What if there is a buyer interested? Concessions.

No matter how this is sliced, the City of Glendale must come up with a magic act and offer some form of concessions.

But, are they able to?

What has changed from the summer as far as subsidies being a no, no?

Any new lease is technically a subsidized lease if it contains an ability to get out of it.

If Ice Edge is so certain they want to keep the team in Glendale without requesting a lease out-clause in case things go south, how come we have the Toronto Argonaut owners bailing out of the Ice Edge group and looking to go solo?

Ice Edge never has seemed to have the support of the NHL but at the same time they seem to represent the only close chance of keeping the team in Glendale.

There has been too much ignoring to suggest the NHL is serious about Ice Edge and it may just be because they genuinly want to make a desert deal.

Here is where the problem lies for Glendale.

The NHL is really in full control, because they can go through the motions and pretend to want to help Glendale keep the team, all the while having the right to approve ownership and terms. In other words, they can manipulate the situation much like they did when they didn’t want Balsillie in the picture. Where there’s a will there’s a way.

Now that they control ownership, why in the world would they want to take a chance on a market that has never made money, and is proving how pathetic it is despite the team’s decent start.

The success of the Coyotes on the ice, coupled with the near ridiculous attendance is making the strategy obvious.

The NHL can move the team, acquire a generous expansion fee, and pretend they did all they could.

Glendale will suffer the loss of the franchise, have lost out on the $50 million they could have received from Balsillie, and are likely seeing the writing on the wall too.

Be careful who you look at as friend is the lesson.

City of Glendale wonders about the $64 million question (and perhaps the $50 million opportunity lost)

The other day, the City of Glendale came along yet again and looked at the article on the $64.5 million question. You know, the big question of who holds the Jobing.com arena bonds?

marketing-101

Square peg, round hole?

Well, they did.

I wonder what really is going through city officials’ minds as they watch the Coyotes fans speak with their wallets. Last night, a reported attendance figure of 5,855 represents a small spit in the bucket of the attendance required to keep the team in Glendale beyond the one year.

Are we to believe the new owners (the NHL) will really try to find buyers that want to take significant, endless losses? Please!

That $50 million in retrospect of the last few games must be looking pretty good right now. But it isn’t ever going to be offered again. Get over it Glendale.

The sales taxes you must have reaped from the 5800 fans last night must have solved your budget woes, right?

The reality is, the location of the arena was a poor choice. It will not and has not created the revenue opportunities you as a City envisioned, and now the reality is even far worse than you could have possibly imagined.

If a family from dowtown Phoenix is going to come and watch a game in Glendale, don’t expect them to hang around for a snack at a restaurant later. But, had you taken the advice of Jerry Moyes, and Beacon Sports, you might have realized that a lot more concerts instead of hockey would have been a much better deal.

For one, people like to drink before and after concerts, and they tend to eat in restaurants to talk about the show afterwards. Because they drank, they are not likely to leave like that hockey watching family.

Rumour has it that Jobing.com arena is one of the best concert venues in North America, something to be exploited.

As a City, Glendale would be wise to bid adieu to the Coyotes, and hire a PR firm that specializes in attracting artists and can promote concerts, and with a little ingenuity, playing on the strengths of what works would be a far better idea than trying to hold onto something that doesn’t.

The NHL should take note too, and put hockey where it works.

But, there is just no convincing some people, is there?

Maybe, you could ask every single fan to pay $250 per seat, for all 40 games, and you would then only lose about $20 million a year.

Yep, you blew it Glendale. But you already know that by now, don’t you?