Sadly, it seems the quest to abolish freedom, and to give government control and policing rights is an attempt tp supersede constitutions the world over.

And they call that the new world order.

According to George Bush Sr, they will be successful in it’s implementation.

Civil unrest and austerity are all part of the plan. Rioting and looting as allowed to go on in England designed to bring in more police state tactics.

Awareness and bringing the truth counters their plan.

As for BILL C-6, it was an unconstitutional bill as it was written in its original form, without the amendments. Illegal. The Health Minister never mentioned this, did she?

BILL C-6 without the amendments, should have been thrown out of Parliament if any of the MPs actually read the bill rather than taking the name of the bill at face value. You see, the trick of nomenclature was used. This Bill hid behind the noble name The Canadian Consumer Product Safety Act. The Senate took action thank goodness. They realized that BILL C-6 was going to be a legislative and Constitutional disaster if passed without amendments.

The Health Minister is furious that the Senate was sending BILL C-6 back to Parliament to accept their amendments. This is why I am convinced Stephen Harper prorogued Parliament; to drop the bill and reintroduced it in March. Harper is under pressure to harmonize our health and consumer product laws with the EU and Australia and New Zealand amongst other countries under the direction of the World Trade and World Health Organizations to name a few influential global bodies.

If BILL C-6 was passed, we would have had a Health Canada STASI. Health Canada’s department would have had the right to enter any home and business any time of the day or night based upon suspicion from a neighbour/ informant that they held information and/or products that were related to the “endangerment” or “safety risk” of Canadians.

Under BILL C-6 in its original form, no warrant to enter in or on property (commercial or residential) was necessary from a judge. Health Canada’s would have been allowed to go to any “peace officer” or official to have this search and seizure warrant issued.

If BILL C-6 was passed in its original form, then anything removed from the offending site would have been in the inspector’s possession until Health Canada felt they were ready to be returned to the owner.

One’s company information could be shared with “foreign governments” and one would have had no right to defend oneself with a lawyer or court within the court of law for any of the above actions taken by Health Canada. Worst yet, the alleged “offender” would not be allowed to apply for an Access to Information Request.

Now how Unconstitutional was that?!

It was an illegal BILL because it infringed upon our Constitutional and Charter Rights and Freedoms.Consumers who did not read BILL C-6 or the draft discussion paper about it that was available on nhppa.org, disregarded it because the name of the bill sounded reasonable.

Also, those citizens concerned about natural health companies coming under fire who wrote their MPs to complain, were dumbfounded by the MPs response. Members of Parliament would argue back that natural health products would not have been included because the bill exempted food, natural health products, alcohol and tobacco.

However, few Canadians understand that Ministers can change Acts by using an Order in Council a.k.a. Ministerial Change!
it can be changed on any given day by simple regulatory changes ordered by the Minister of that department, in this case the Minister of Health. BILL C-6 did not clearly exempt natural health products as long as it was not exempt from an Order in Council! Sneaky stuff.

Unfortunately, we are going to have to listen to Health Canada and media rhetoric about dangerous baby cribs and toys all over again and how child safety is more important than human rights to privacy, security and the court of law. Can we not have all forms of protection under the one bill? Of course we can! Sadly these days, it seems governments are afraid of freedom. It is easier for them to control freedoms than to allow a society to grow and innovate while under the wonderful inspiration of the Constitution.