Monthly Archives: February 2010

Hockey’s political battle: This “howl” would have been over a long time ago without it

So, on friday the Goldwater Group will be back in court to fight the subsidies of the Phoenix Coyotes yet again. Tireless aren’t they?

Goldwater is the republican watchdog group founded by Barry Goldwater, and since then few could argue about the support of Ron Paul, the only republican that can apparently speak politics and common sense at the same time.

Before you challenge the here we go again – off to politics land, let’s look back on the Coyotes battle, recapping some observed facts.

Jim Balsillie waived his money at the NHL some time ago, and for Phoenix… what, 9 months ago? Somewhere around that time, anyhow.

Jerry Moyes knew something was amiss in the NHL the owners were not being treated fairly. We had the vote of 26-0 against Balsillie’s supposed “poor character” by the NHL’s Board of Governors, but later we found comments from the owners (at least one) that it was not about or against Balsillie. Oh really, so why the 26-0 vote?

Goldwater was Balsillie’s only hope in court, because without the “political” battle of the watchdogs against a city that was hanging on to the losing team at all costs, concessions would have been granted 9 months ago, and in the words of a Toronto sports writer, we would have gotten out the salami and cheese, licked our wounds, and like a double play quickly ending the World Series, we would have been left with our mouths hanging open. “That’s it? No more? But, but, but, what about the offer from Balsillie? It was so much more.”

Without the political battle we so direly want as sports fans to avoid, the game would have been short-lived. Yes, Balsillie’s entire case was based on the Goldwater battle against concessions.

Now, we have the Ice Edge boys ready for battle again on Friday this week? And, what’s the issue? Oh yeah, the Goldwater group pit bulls are yet again looking to quell the hope of Glendale to offer concessions. It looks like the disguise is in the parking fees that Ice Edge hopes will yield in the neighbourhood of $15 million per year.

The team’s average attendance, no doubt padded to look better,  like the U.S. economies “  true” unemployment rate, is reportedly sitting at 11,000. I’d say about 6,000 short of okay. And, without researching, can we safely say they are still baking hotdogs and brewing beer, T-shirts, or Miley Cyrus tickets to attract attendance? Is it the same old same old?

Is it the same, “same old” in Tampa, but with the exception of the NHL meeting the payroll à la, oops, didn’t we see that in Phoenix? Yes, the same pattern.

And how are the owners doing in Tampa? Making money with a half empty arena? Are they still hanging in their pretending that their ownership actually matters? Don’t they get it yet. Voting 26-0 against Balsillie and letting a fellow owner like Moyes hang out to dry in an attempt to ask for it not to happen to them is ridiculous.

The owners really don’t get it?

Who will be the next owner to realize it is just their money that the “system” of sports monopoly wants. When will they get it that there is an infrastructure of sports based on politics and foreign investment so entrenched that they are no different than the average American taxpayer that is footing the bill for the banker bailout scam between the foreign controlled U.S. Federal reserve, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan and others.

When will the owners understand why Abu Dhabi remains interested in how the Ice Edge boys “look” going into the next battle?

For that matter, when will hockey fans stop wondering when Gary Bettman is going to “get it”, and move some of the failing teams to Canada? Bettman is carrying out the orders of the foreign bankers. I would show you the Ron McLean video again, but apparently it violated YouTube copyright laws. Gosh, how convenient.

So when we started our investigation we saw quickly that the battle of hockey in the NHL was all about politics. It stated with the obvious Glendale city, extended to the State when we brought Phoenix and CityNorth in, and has extended to the national monopolization of sport.

Wait, let me change that. It has extended to a global monopolization of sport. We touched on this a bit already, and there are some good people out there hockey land, like my friends that can elaborate.

A reliable source that cannot be divulged has brought the word about sports monopolization.

So when the boys from Ice Edge just happened to come on the scene, they brought with them more than memories from White House visits. They brought a history of playing in the club. No, not the hockey club, but the club of political maneuvering.

Ice Edge has a history and connections with military development and spending, sharing that space with some boys from Abu Dhabi.

They are entrenched. They are the chosen ones to keep the “plan” in focus.

So, if you are a sports fan dancing around poor attendance and are still thrashing Gary Bettman, you just don’t get it yet do you?

 If you are looking for logic to eventually slip in to the mindset of an NHL that cares more about strategic locations than profit, think no more. It was never about what made sense from a hockey market perspective. And until we treat the disease the symptoms will not go away.

Politics and hockey. The powers that be had a plan, and hell or high water they have to continue the charade, taking money from whoever is crazy enough to give it to them.

Waking up to “cyber-veillance” and the “weapons of mass disruption”

Is it wrong for people to share information and ideas in quest of truth? Would a government with hidden agendas want to disguise national security concerns in an attempt to censor and control our ability to discuss the issues of our day?

Could the message embodying the President’s speech of  May 29th, 2009 be the underlying precursor when an agenda reaches critical mass?

 

It was 6:30 AM this morning, and this site was visited by a cyber security company from Washington, D.C.. For “privacy reasons” I will not disclose the name of the company, but I googled the company name that had a very official, “cyber-security” flare to it. Put it this way – it got my attention. According to their site, they are the “World Leader in Cyber Intelligence”.

I am concerned but not intimidated; that an innocent little blog site  like mine would be of interest of cyber-security issues. Here is the actual search by this company that was used to investigate my site.

Again, the company doing the search is based in Washington, D.C., and I have had visits to this site in the past from the CIA, the Justice Department, and the Executive Office of the President. Those visits occurred on the heels of our investigation of potential corruption  in hockey. Now, how would discussion of hockey bring in the dogs?

Remember, there was an investigation and a sharing of information on this blog – not phishing, hacking, or tapping credit card information. Certainly not  a cyber threat by definition, and not warranting a visit from the CIA. Wouldn’t you agree?

Strangely, the hockey investigation led me to discover that for years, Alex Jones was conducting a similar “corruption investigation” on a much broader scale, with greater consequences. My search for truth was Jones’ search on a micro scale, but with striking similarities. Corruption in any form, it would seem, has similar qualities.

But, back to this “cyber security firm” checking us out this morning…

I, in turn, googled this “invader of my space”, and on their website I came across the document of the speech delivered by the President in May, that is linked here (or the video here). Could there be a link between this company and the government of the United States?  Well upon looking a little closer, there is evidence available to suggest the taxpayers of America are paying to have the government keep an eye on them by this very same company. So, why would this company make a special visit to a little blog like makeiteighteh.com, wasting the taxpayers money?

And more importantly, should it dissuade a blogger from investigating and sharing honest information as we have done on this site?  Heck no!

And, should it stop others from sharing information of vital interest in the same way? Again, not a chance!

In the speech  of May 29, 2009, Obama  made some very interesting comments, none moreso than this:

Let me also be clear about what we will not do.  Our pursuit of cybersecurity will not — I repeat, will not include — monitoring private sector networks or Internet traffic.  We will preserve and protect the personal privacy and civil liberties that we cherish as Americans.  Indeed, I remain firmly committed to net neutrality so we can keep the Internet as it should be — open and free.

 

Was this “promise” before or after the arrival of Cass Sunstein?

I would consider the use of my blogging rights as “internet traffic” and my right to convey opinion and  share any facts as they surface. In short, the “information superhighway” as it was once known can link up opinion and allow people of the world to view small issues or large issues alike. And when the current issues are on a global scale, and of global concern, we can help each other compare notes.

It is up to us, the free on the internet to ensure the President of the United States, and the Prime Minister of Canada continue to allow our liberties to flourish. We must continue to speak strong and loud, and refuse to be intimidated.

We must refuse to allow the twisting of truth; where those expressing opinion and sharing ideas can be viewed as bringing “weapons of mass disruption”. And, it is time we remind President Obama of his promise to allow free speech in every form to continue.

For this war is about knowledge, and the seeking of truth! If our governments  have nothing to hide, they should have no reason or interest in censoring  honest people  simply because they choose to hold their governments accountable.

And we must wake up to the reality that we are  the ones under watch. We, the people with the ability to think for ourselves.