Monthly Archives: March 2010

It’s about protection in these uncertain times: Mortgage rate worries force many to bite the long term bullet

Our American neighbours are suffering in large numbers.

Foreclosures and bankruptcies abound and there is rumour that the worst of the mortgage foreclosures is far from over. Another wave is predicted as the freeze that is in effect wears out it’s welcome.

Millions more in the U.S. could find themselves homeless.

While Canadian bankers will assure the mortgage taking public that the Canadian situation is not like that in the U.S., the truth is we are heading into a global economy, with the powerful at the helm not caring about Canadian “mortgage” sovereignty, let alone national freedom.

While the banking structure in Canada is more secure, the lending principal of allowing huge debt based on low prime lending rates has put many of us in a vulnerable position. If rates are allowed to dramatically rise, where will we stand?

Is the Canadian economy really booming? To answer that, can we trust the Obama administration that claims the U.S.  unemployment rate  is  approximately 10%? Realistically, the unemployment rate is over 20% as many have dropped out of the system. A simple calculation and the integrity of truth is in question. Including those that have left the system would be a truer picture of the economic situation.Therefore, if you can’t trust the little things, how do you trust the bigger ones? In short, can we trust politicians from anywhere to tell us the truth?

So with our strange global economic turmoil, ordinary borrowers that have never locked in are now  feeling compelled to do so.

They say the Canadian economy is booming, and with higher demand for just about everything in this country, economics 101 would suggest that prices are bound to increase. With inflation comes correction – higher interest rates- not just in the short term.

The banks are suggesting while longer term rates are heading upward due to the ties to the bond market, the short term rates will be affected by the prime lending rate changes that will come if inflation continues.

And what worries me the most is the thought that we could all be getting setup.

In the U.S., some less than ethical bankers have been accused of creating the very housing bubble that has now claimed so many family homes. Goldman Sachs has been accused of short selling the very mortgage market they were lenders in. Talk about the ability to control the variables to ensure success. If there was ever a conflict of interest, that would be at the forefront of concern. Yet Goldman Sachs and other banks involved in the correction do not seem to be having to pay the piper.

The world is changing. Derivative scandals have plagued much of Europe in the same way, with Greece. Spain and Iceland at the top of the news. Bankers yet again investing in promises, when the taxpayers are left to bail them out.

If there was ever a reason to accuse a setup that would do it. The people of Iceland had little control over the banks investing heavily in foreign markets, and most only learned of the trouble when the bill came due.

If the globe’s economy can be manipulated and controlled on both sides without seeming regulation, then what chance do we as the average mortgage holder stand if they try to pull a fast one on us in Canada?

Now, what is even more scary is the attitude of our Prime Minister. Stephen Harper has sold his economic upbringing down the river, and joined the band of borrow hardy, global trusting souls that are buying into the worldly idea that the planet as a whole is better off if we all join the same economic pot.

Coupled with this is the concern that the single largest taxation potential, Global Warming (aka Climate Change) stands to control everything from industrial growth to the toothpaste you have in the cupboard. And, with Bill C-6 perched as a freedom stripping tool, the green police will have warrant-less access to your dwelling. No search warrant will be required, reminiscent of the days of Hitler.

Climate Change continues to be under the microscope yet it is business as usual for Harper, Obama, and the rest of the G20. We therefore must question our own government and it’s leadership. Strange things are happening in countries around the globe at the top leadership levels.

Without industrial growth protection, where will Canada stand at the mercy of those who could care less of our well-being?

Back to mortgage rates.

In the U.S. with the mortgage bubble, the people who borrowed suffered. The banks told them all would be okay, yet the reality was the banks involved seemed to know what they were doing – stripping the wealth from the people.

If you want to gain power as a global elite, you must kill all sources of economic independence. What better way than to drive people from their homes and into bankruptcy by making promises the market could not keep.

With folks moving to higher rate, fixed interest mortgages , more profit and power to the banks is assured. Can we trust the powers that be at the top of the lending food chain? Did they trust the same leaders in the U.S.?

Borrowers may be more secure for five years, but all the while losing more cash flow to interest payments. What about everything else?

What if green taxes add more to the cost of living? Mortgage payments usually only represent 20 to 25 percent of net cash flow (income) coming into a household, and this is why people should not feel financially secure if the mortgage alone is paid off.

We as the middle class are ripe for abuse. We are putty in the hands of the financially powerful. We can be played and manipulated by the powers of taxation, inflation and wage freezes.

If we lock in to the higher mortgage rates, there is still little security in believing we are bullet-proof.

But, locking in for many is the only controlled variable that can guarantee us some level of security.

The fate of the Coyotes is clear as mud: Ellman looks to cash in on parking

Round and round we go, where this team stops, nobody knows.

Could the on ice success of the Phoenix Coyotes have anything to do with a constant dose of appreciation for still being in existence?

It kind of reminds me of the saying you don’t know what you got till it’s gone.

Although it seems unlikely the team will ever completely disband, I am sure the uncertainty of the situation has kept the players on their toes. As the team looks to do well in the upcoming playoffs, their destiny off ice is still in big question.

The NHL should be thanking Jerry Moyes for putting the team into Chapter 11. We have said it before, but without bankruptcy the question remains whether the albatross lease at Jobing.com arena would ever have had a chance to be broken. Ironically, the NHL is suing Moyes for the trouble. I say, what trouble?

If I didn’t have a chance to judge Mr. Moyes’ good character over all these months I would swear there would be a good opportunity to be part of the charade and help the “team” break the deal at Jobing.com arena. To a sales agent, what would that assistance be worth in dollars and cents?

No, we have had far too much exposure to all kinds of relationships. Moyes just wasn’t in on the party.

Now, his ex-partner Steve Ellman who owns the Westgate shopping district is looking at the opportunity cost of all those taken parking spots and is smelling the “dough ray me” money. But, the boys at Ice Edge would prefer to not have him join the bridal party. After all, they want the parking revenues themselves. Ah, memories of CityNorth. Parking, like gold is getting scarce and commanding great attention in this recession.

And, should things not go well in Glendale, let’s not forget about the Great White Knight of the North.

The man in Canada that is worth several billion dollars in his own right, David Thomson with ties to the Manitoba Moose is looking as the Knight in the wings, ready to bail out the NHL, but don’t ask Bill Daly to confirm that.

You could confirm with Daly that the lease can be broken in late June to July 1 though. That much he will disclose.

Daly said on CJLC 590 AM that under the Coyotes Chapter 11 reorganization a team owner has until June 30 or July 1 to void certain contracts. Daly said the Coyotes long-term arena lease with the city of Glendale is one of those transition contracts. “That contract can be terminated,” Daly said.

Join a few dots and you start to get the picture.

And, no article on the sale of the Coyotes would be complete without mention of Jerry Reinsdorf who seems to like a winner. This might explain why he might be back in the hunt too, with relocation clause and concession demands firmly in hand.

Keep it up fellas. The Coyotes might win the Stanley Cup to take their minds off their troubles.

I could learn to forgive and forget: The first decent idea in almost a year

Bring 'em home David (Thomson)!

Rumours abound:  Thomson could be the Winnipeg backup plan….either way, the NHL is feeling repentant about the injustices served to Manitoba

Apparently there is more than one billionaire in Canada.

His name is David Thomson, and he is interested in moving the Coyotes to Winnipeg if the deal with either Reinsdorf or Ice Edge falls through. He already has ties to the Manitoba Moose:

The National Hockey League is working on a backup plan with Toronto billionaire David Thomson and Winnipeg-based True North Sports and Entertainment that could send the Phoenix Coyotes back to Canada if a deal with Ice Edge Holdings or Jerry Reinsdorf to keep the team in Arizona falls through.

Two sources with knowledge of the Coyotes finances and ownership said a deal between Thomson and the NHL has been completed in principle and could have the Coyotes back in Winnipeg next season if necessary. Thomson, also considered a possible buyer of the Atlanta Thrashers, is a partner in True North and chairman of Thomson Reuters. True North owns the Manitoba Moose of the American Hockey League and MTS Centre in Winnipeg, which seats 15,100

In prudent fashion, Bill Daly made it known that the “rumour” that Thomson was the backup plan was false. Because if this wasn’t the party line, then the hope of finding an owner in Glendale would be a lot tougher. To find that suitor, the stands need to keep filled, as it has attracted the bushes to move, and heads to pop out.

The report, published in Monday’s online edition of the Phoenix Business Journal, said a deal with Jerry Reinsdorf to buy the Coyotes and keep them in Glendale could hinge on a clause that would allow the owner of the Chicago Bulls and White Sox to move the team if its bottom line doesn’t improve.

The report went on to say that the NHL is in negotiations with Toronto billionaire David Thomson and Winnipeg-based True North Sports and Entertainment on a backup plan which could see the Coyotes move back to Manitoba’s capital.

“At this point in time the National Hockey League has no ‘deal’ in place to move the Coyotes’ franchise to Winnipeg — or to any other city for that matter — in the event a transaction cannot be timely consummated in Glendale,” NHL deputy commissioner Bill Daly said in a statement Monday night.

 

I could learn to forgive and forget.

If the NHL can see the error of their ways and repent – with full regret – for taking away a franchise that a city in Canada just loved, I could find it in my heart to regain a soft spot. Heck, I might even decide to tune in and wonder like a child again.

Don Cherry’s story aired on CBC is giving me reason to long for hockey again. I can’t help but admire his fortitude and bravery enduring the trials and tribulations he went through, along with his wife Rose, in the days in the minors. But I’m willing to bet, as tough as it was, Don appreciated every memory. Would he change it? Maybe, but I would argue, why?

So, if you like me smell the smoke that has been smoldering since a politician in Glendale mentioned the team was destined back to Canada if concessions could not be granted, there has got to be a flame there somewhere.

And that same flame might just rekindle the love for a game that will always be Canadian.

I have never been to Winnipeg, but I feel impelled to go there. I feel a drive to take a trip and smell the fresh air, talk to the residents, and especially would love to take in a game of NHL hockey, savouring the atmosphere that has been waiting to return for far too long.

If the Arabs in Abu Dhabi could only understand: This game means so more than just return on investment to Canadians.

Winnipeg, I have said before, is as Canadian as maple syrup, Tim Horton’s and road hockey.

We need them and we need them to get hockey back!

I could respect the NHL if they make that move.

I really could.

More: Bobcat and Brunt discuss it with Daly

Constitutional expert, and ex-judge, Andrew Napolitano speaks out on U.S. Healthcare and loss of liberty

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Book: "Lies the Government told you" (Currently #13 on the NY Times Bestseller list)

Judge Napolitano is the legal analyst and Constitutional expert for FOX News. In this interview of March 25, 2010 with Alex Jones, Napolitano talks on the lies the government tells you, why you can expect them, and how we know they lie.

Regarding votes in the House and Senate, Napolitano has the support of Ron Paul, who has the foreword in his book.

According to the judge on politicians and the need to know how they vote on issues:

If we want to vote the bums out, at least we will know who the bums are

Napolitano sees the U.S. heading into a police state, with warrantless arrest. He sees the healthcare system as a means of : a) control; b) a means to know where we are and what we are doing; and  c) to develop a “permanent underclass” dependent on the government.

He also sees elections in the future based on this corruption where the votes will go to whoever gives the voter the “biggest piece of the pie”.

How far back does the “fake, propaganda news” go?

Good God, how far back does the duping go?

Again, the question is – where were you during the 1990 – 1991 War in the Gulf?

Life altering, wasn’t it?

All eyes were glued to CNN as we witnessed a real live war.

CNN’s ratings were at an all time high, as we all tuned in to get the “real” story.

Actually, there is a different real story. It was leaked by someone at CNN.

In this clip, please note that the scene appears to be outside. If you watched this at the time, you will recall this (just let it sink in). Warning: Anger is likely to set in as well. You see, the war was a life altering event, much like 9/11. To later find out that the reporting was staged can be disturbing.

The reporters grabbing gas masks and old army helmets were in an attempt to sell us on Saddam’s threat of using gas and chemical weapons.

Interesting that when you watch old shows you think how it could be possible it seemed so real? Same goes for this set that was actually in the basement of a hotel.

First watch the full version, and the second clip is Alex Jones breaking it down for us.

Here is an excerpt from the poster of the first clip worth consideration:

Charles Jaco was the CNN reporter famous for covering the 1990 Persian Gulf War.

The first part of this video shows the stage set he was on, and he was clowning around with fellow CNN staff. The Saudi Arabian “hotel” in the background were fake palm trees and a blue wall in a studio. This clip was leaked by CNN staff.

The second part of this video was a live CNN satellite feed recorded onto VHS showing the final cut. Charles Jaco was wearing a different jacket, but he had the same act. The acting was terrible as Charles Jaco wore a gas mask, and his fellow correspondent Carl Rochelle wore a helmet. The sirens and missile sound effects are part of the stage set. The camera never pans out or shows the sky.

These clips are the highest quality of this newscast and behind the scenes.

Yes, Charles Jaco was a reporter for CNN. Google his name and read the results.

This is the reason why I don’t trust mainstream news. It is all theater and it’s completely staged. I only use the news as a guide to get an idea of what is going on, and then I do further research myself.

You can start your own research by visiting my website http://www.patriotportal.yolasite.com

I also suggest reading the books of Edward Bernays to learn how the media and government fool the masses on an unprecedented scale.

This video is FAIR USE depicting an historical event. I encourage this video to be downloaded, and re-uploaded to other websites to get more people to see this.

Charles Jaco currently works as a reporter for FOX 2 NOW in Saint Louis, Missouri.

So, if you are paying good money to watch CNN and still think of it as real news let this sink into your psyche. You were played, and so was I.

For God’s sake Canada, don’t “look wistfully”; it’s an ‘Obama-nation’ in disguise!

President Obama mocked his critics of healthcare reform by commenting there were no meteorites crashing to earth, and in fact is was a nice day. People, Obama countered, still had their doctor. Sure -  for now.

The U.S. healthcare should not be looked on by Canadians with admiring eyes. Oh contraire – it is a sham designed by the large insurers in the country to monopolize healthcare, provide insignificant benefit, and work with the government to ensure any ‘expensive’ individuals can be carefully and selectively excluded.

Forget insurance contracts that guarantee the conditions that treatment must be given, there will be “death panels” to decide if chronic and critical illnesses are worth covering.

So, we should make a point of telling this to Dr. Brian Day, in B.C., who considers the private model a champion to his quest to allow individuals to move to the front of the queue by paying extra to have treatments performed outside the system.

While Americans can come to Canada and pay for treatment (and get preferential treatment), Canadians, it is argued by Day, cannot.

Dr. Day, a past president of the Canadian Medical Association, readily admits his private clinics are violating the Medicare Protection Act by extra-billing patients. But he said an audit will just delay the constitutional battle he wants heard over whether the law should be tossed out.

“Our whole premise is that the law that prevents people from using their own resources to bypass a wait[ing] list is unconstitutional,” he said.

But to look upon Obama’s new version of healthcare with wishful eyes is a mistake.

What they are getting is a means of control, cost-containment, and otherwise letting a third-party decide if you live or die.

I’ll take a little wait over that idea, thank you very much.

It’s time Dr. Day learned the cold, hard truth.

Out of the bushes pops a head: “I taught I heard concessions again… I did, I did hear concessions again”

Is it the summer of 2009? It must be. I think I just heard the names John Kaites and Jerry Reinsdorf again.

I did, I did hear their names.

According to Kaites, recently (yes, this is recent, check the date):

An alternative plan presented by lobbyist Kaites to state lawmakers hinges on creating special tax districts around sports and other facilities to capture revenue from those zones. Districts could be created around the proposed Cubs spring training facility as well as Westgate City Center and Jobing.com Arena, home to the Coyotes.

Put another way,

"I taught I heard concessions again....I did, I did hear concessions again!"

Thus far, the trio has opposed other funding ideas including some proposed by lobbyist John Kaites, who represents the Chicago White Sox. Kaites has talked about taxes on restaurants, satellite television communications as well as special tax districts. Butler and Mesa lobbyist John MacDonald contend those ideas either won’t raise enough revenue or lack political support.

MLB has talked about special property tax districts around the proposed stadium to capture revenue for various teams, not just the Cubs.

Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon supports similar sales tax districts that could be used in downtown Phoenix. Arizona Rep. Jerry Weiers, R-Glendale, proposed a special tax district bill that could have been used to help the Phoenix Coyotes at Jobing.com Arena, as well as US Airways Center in downtown Phoenix, but that bill has gone nowhere.

Yes, was the Phoenix Mayor also in favour of those CityNorth parking spots at the tune of close to half a million bucks a spot? Yeah, I think so. What’s the rub Mr. Mayor? A little grease to go with that palm? Just asking.

No. I think the timing of more taxes is a little “off” especially with the whole Healthcare Reform scam and all. You know, the folks in the U.S. that will have to now pay in the neighbourhood of $500 bucks per family per month for inferior, government controlled care. The same government that will be stepping in between the doctor and the patient, and forcing many to retire, or head to who knows where to practice.

And, with the banker bailout that was supposed to free up money to free up mortgages of those caught in the housing bubble, it is way more important to loosen credit for a hockey team over a family’s home. Yep, I think I get it now.

Let’s not forget the taxes the folks would pay, for the most part, would be for the hockey team they don’t really want. Talk about fair.

And we thought the tag teaming was finished with Ice Edge. Wow, what a turnaround.

So I suppose Ice Edge just kept the puck cycling in the corner, and like the checking line were there to wear down the opposition and wait for the power line to get back on the ice.

Let’s all wait until Goldwater lets their guard down and try it in a different way I suppose.

So, a special tax district of “tax” revenue in Glendale and this is not Glendale’s revenue? So, if Glendale turned around and handed it to the Reinsdorf /Kaites  contingent that would not be a concession? Really?

Don’t think so boys. Back to the drawing board with ya.

I gotta say when the NHL picks their man they don’t give up do they? Persistent to a fault.

So the White Knight is coming out of the bushes where he and the boys have hid all these months.

Something for nothing. No risk. No, not like Jerry Moyes had to take.

Moyes gets sued by the NHL and Reinsdorf continues to look at all the angles that will guarantee success. Tax revenues turned into concessions, and a better lease deal.

Maybe the financiers in Abu Dhabi are getting tired of being flogged on oil prices, and are looking to recoup some losses.

Whichever way this turns out in the end, it will always stink of favoritism and lack of compassion.

They can have it, lock, stock and barrel.

Don’t worry Tweety, the puddy tat won’t bother trying to get you this time.

Note: Don’t we have to laugh that the automated “possibly related” post below is from Mr. Kaites…..we have come full circle indeed.

The U.S. Government could self insure to a point and buy catastrophic coverage as a backup plan: The Healthcare model should act like a “health spending account” and not waste unused premiums to insurer profits

In Canada, the group insurance market is wrought with escalating premiums as claims rise. Large groups are a better “deal” for the employees as the cost sharing arrangement usually leaves the employees paying only a portion of the overall cost. The group, if really large, will have bargaining ability with the insurer with the goal of containing cost increases. The insurer will want to keep premiums low in order to not lose the client.

But, when groups are smaller, there is a direct correlation between increasing claim numbers and premium increases.

The 60% rule applies – if you use 60% of the premium in claims, then expect a rate increase for your group in the coming annual renewal. The claim “experience” can be spread over three years often, but if there is an upward trend in claims, this “spreading out” of claim experience will not have much if any bearing on future premium increases.

President Obama has mentioned that the government being large, will be able to have an effect on the insurance industry cost for coverage, but the program is designed more like an individual policy than a large group. With limits low, there is no guarantee that those that need the coverage most – with chronic or terminal illness – will get adequate coverage and high enough insurance compensation.

If it holds that there will only be eight doctor visits per year and a hospital limit of $10,000 annually, this does sound more like “off the street” pricing with very little pull for being a supposed “large group”.

Inherent in the “premium” method of funding health care, there is a use it or lose it aspect that is critical in this analysis.

When someone pays a premium, if they are healthy and do not use the coverage, the premiums are forfeited to the insurance company. The money that might otherwise be available to be used by the government to cover increasing costs for those individuals in need is not available, but lost to the insurers looking to profit.

Would the government really need to fund healthcare in this way? Likely not. They could actually use a system known as the “health spending model” of self insuring, and only buy stop loss coverage from the insurers to fund claims that go over a given threshold – in this case, say $10,000 per enrollee.

I will assume for purposes here that less than 20% of the population will develop serious or chronic illness and require treatment beyond the $10,000 threshold. The cost saving should be significant.

If the U.S. government were to save premium dollars on the healthy, and pay the insurers only for catastrophic illness, the amount of premiums that would be outlayed would be far less than that proposed in the Bill.

I am under the impression that the U.S., like Canada, makes provision in the Income Tax act to cover tax saving for people who have Health Spending Accounts.

The model I propose would put a savings element into the equation that is sorely missing. It would also ensure the annual, low limits for those needing significant health coverage would not be a factor. And, it would ensure that pre-existing conditions could also be funded.

The above model relates to all expenses, and buying catastrophic coverage is like saying,

“We will self insure our citizens individually to a point, but when they need a great deal more coverage, we will share that risk with the insurance company, containing our cost.”

Therefore, the only true premium that needs to be paid is for the catastrophic component. The cost savings can ensure the viability of cost-containment moving forward.

Below: information on catastrophic “drug” coverage in Canada.

In Canada, here is an interesting document on Catastrophic Drug coverage in Canada.

  • In 2002, one study estimated that approximately 11% of Canadians faced the risk of experiencing high prescription drug costs because they either lacked or had insufficient drug coverage
  • Unlike most countries that are members of the Organisation for Economic Co operation and Development (OECD), Canada does not have a national catastrophic drug coverage system, nor does it have a national universal prescription drug coverage plan.
  • Though the Canada Health Act provides for public coverage of physician services and hospital care, the only pharmaceuticals it covers are those used while in the hospital.(17) Out-of-hospital prescription drugs were left beyond the purview of the Canada Health Act, because historically they had played a limited role in the provision of health care, and their costs were not considered a significant financial burden to Canadians
  • It also meant that prescription drug coverage was not considered medically necessary, but rather a fringe benefit offered by employers in the private sector.

However, this situation began to change as early as the 1970s, when provincial governments started to recognize that the rising costs of prescription drugs could constitute an increasing financial burden on those with low or fixed incomes.

  • Private Plans: Private plans offered by employers, unions and professional associations are a significant source of drug coverage in Canada, providing approximately 60% of Canadians with some degree of protection from catastrophic drug costs.(22) Of those enrolled in private sector programs, 55% have plans that protect against catastrophic drug costs, either through the provision of a cap on overall drug expenses, or through their coverage of 100% of total drug costs. The remaining 45% have plans that provide substantial but incomplete coverage, commonly reimbursing 80% of drug costs, once a deductible is reached.
  • Federal Government Plans: The federal government administers prescription drug coverage plans for specific population groups that do not otherwise have access to private drug plans, or plans offered by provincial or territorial governments. These programs are managed by the following departments: Health Canada for First Nations and Inuit; Veterans Affairs Canada for veterans and regular and retired members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police; Correctional Service of Canada for federal offenders; Citizenship and Immigration Canada for refugee claimants, Convention refugees, and persons detained by the department for immigration purposes;(25) and the Department of National Defence for members of the Canadian Forces. Altogether, these federal plans cover approximately 1 million eligible clients at a cost totalling $594 million in 2007–2008.
  • Why does the U.S. Healthcare Bill remind me of Logan’s Run?

    Don’t be fooled…the U.S. healthcare bill, if made law will end up killing more people than it will save.

    It won’t matter if pre-exisiting conditions are covered when the limits are so low, the sick will be dead long before they become a burden on the system…..the only “pro choice” inclusion is the ability to choose death (by abortion).

    It’s 1976 -  are you old enough to remember seeing the movie, Logan’s Run?

    "Carousel", the life ending ceremony in Logan's Run

    It was a long time ago, but it was enough of a memorable movie to have impacted enough of us. So much so, that a modern remake is in the works (Logan’s Run 2012). A twist of fate that the year of the remake is 2012? The limits on care remind me of the movie, where you are given only a small window to life.

    The proposed U.S.  Healthcare Bill apparently slashes $500 Billion from Medicare for the elderly. It also increases taxes by $500 Billion. Apparently it adds 32 million individual health care recipients to the numbers.

    While President Obama stresses what should be a good point – that people who were refused care because of pre-existing conditions before, cannot be denied coverage now –  the overall picture does not add up. Those in need will not be given extra consideration for the much greater annual costs of treatment. It is therefore a dummy benefit. Sounds good, but the reality will be far different.

    I have been a life and benefits insurance broker, in Canada for the past 22 years. I analyze need and match product for a living. The long and the short of it is the insurance industry in Canada is guilty of “product pushing” at the expense of what sometimes makes sense.

    Where this becomes most evident is in medical and dental coverage that is sold individually. While hospital and doctor visits are covered by the government, medical  (drugs) and dental are not.

    Often, people without coverage will go looking for private coverage not heeding the economics of it, or if it is truly going to benefit them if a costly medical tragedy should strike.

    The premiums are high relative to the risk to the insurer. The result –  high insurer profits and low insurer risk. Statistically speaking, only a small percentage of the people will need coverage, and the limits are low enough to not make an impact on the health or finances of the insured!

    And, in Ontario, for drug coverage, we have a form of welfare drug coverage known as the Trillium Drug Program. In short, if you develop a medical condition that would financially cripple you, the government would step in, and you would only have to pay a small portion of cost geared to income.

    It’s interesting that Obama mentions the Canadian Healthcare System as he discusses the “process” that the U.S. healthcare system will undergo, in stages to get to the type of system we have in Canada.

    I would argue Canada is getting a bad rap in some media – our program makes a lot more sense than the “startup” plan the U.S. is trying to ram through Congress and the Senate. Rightly so, no Republican in their right mind would vote for this plan.

    The reason is simple in my mind. Insurance is the same no matter what the type. It is designed to cover the few that are left with a huge problem. The U.S. plan is not meeting that basic insurance need. Let me explain.

    High premiums and taxes; low risk and per patient benefit….Catastrophic insurance protection is missing!

    The Medicare system will be hit with cutbacks. The seniors are the group that will be hardest hit because they are the ones in the greatest risk of health issues.

    The inclusion of  “death panels” that will effectively decide a patient’s health funding are an excuse to literally pull the plug on grandma. Is it suggesting older people are not worth it? Have they outlived their usefulness as might have been described by Bernard Shaw? Didn’t he say if you cannot work, you cannot be of much use? What happened to honouring those that have paid their dues? No, it would seem the greatest savings to the healthcare system and the insurance companies come in the form of stripping those in need from the coverage.

    I humbly suggest that the primary purpose of this system change is to cut cost by imposing life and death decisions that families will no longer have at their discretion. This is not the case in Canada. You are given healthcare for as long as you want – there is no death panel nor should there be.

    In Logan’s Run, you were allowed to live it up until the ripe age of 30, and then had to be blown up in a ceremony of life called “Carousel”.  You see, there were not enough jobs to sustain the economy and the people. Similar to eugenics that protect the earth, suggesting there are about 2 billion people too many now, this is eerily similar to the global mission of today. How is that job growth working in the European Union and the U.S. these days?

    In Logan’s Run, those that did not want to accept their fate were known as “runners”.  Today, I think they are known as Patriots or Tea Partiers.

    The U.S. healthcare reform reminds me of this scenario – there is a proposed lack of choice. The people have lesser and lesser rights. And what do you suppose will happen to grandma if and when the health spending budget gets tight and funds get shorter? How will the aged and the sick fair? Not well I would assume. And the insurance companies profit margins will grow at the expense of life and the people. For shame indeed.

    People will also not be given a choice who their physician will be, and be limited to 8 doctor visits a year. And, they would be limited to $10, 000 in hospital treatment a year. If premiums are based  on this model, the insurance companies will do very well indeed – most people will never need the $10,000, but the premiums will still be collected, won’t they? But, the people who truly need the coverage will suffer tremendously once the limit is reached. And, from what I understand, $10,000 does not go far in U.S. hospitals.  Here is a report from Tenessee, where the $10,000 state cap will stay unchanged:

    Remaining, for now, however, is the most controversial measure: a $10,000 annual cap on hospital stay per enrollee – although the state is now proposing both an exception for transplant patients and a cap on the number of days rather than dollars that state officials say will likely stand at seven.

    Again, the government will add a tax disguised in the health premium, and the government and the insurers will be the winners. The at risk per patient amount is controllable as the government will establish health panels to decide if chronic and terminal health issues are “worth” funding. Is it a wonder the insurance companies stock prices soared?

    So what if Obama says there is no lifetime maximum – it is a bastardized, empty promise. At the rate the system will be denying coverage, people will die much before they would otherwise collect on their “so-called lifetime maximum”. Welcome to “Carousel” indeed.

    Who stands to gain? When this bill was introduced the insurance companies stocks all rose. It is them that will gain. The losers will be those that need it – the sick and the elderly.

    To compare the U.S. thrust to “universal healthcare” should not be confused by the Canadian model.

    In Canada, at least currently, we do not tell people who their doctor can be, and we do not limit care.

    The elderly still have value, and it had better not change any time soon.

    If you live in the U.S., fight this will every ounce of your being.

    Incidentally, those in Logan’s Run who were “Runners” were looking to break out of the dome and find a place called “Sanctuary” ( the place untouched by government control and corruption). Can we think of  ”Sanctuary” as any State that will stand up and not succumb to the imposing powers of the Federal Government? And, can we assume too that those “Runners” who are caught may end up in a FEMA camp of sorts?

    We must all stand up for the right to our own sanctuary, wouldn’t you agree? Freedom to make choices.

    And finally, it is odd that President Obama would be “pro choice”only when it results in more death; namely babies by abortion. Food for thought indeed.

    Second installment: The U.S. should self-insure, and only buy catastrophic coverage from the insurance industry

    Truly “free” utilities for your system that you can justify!

    This is the first time I have promoted products on this site, but I am tired of ads for free software to speed up our systems from spyware and malware.

    So, as one friend to another here are two programs you should not live without.

    Recently, I watched a show that suggested that even the antivirus software that is well known and can run $40 to $75 per year to renew, these solutions, in combination are absolutely all you need:

    1) Antivir virus solution download page

    2) Advanced System Care download (utility that does everything else – registry, spyware, frees space, etc).

    Of course they will ask you to upgrade, but that is up to you.

    If you feel grateful for what they do for free, that might make your decision that much easier.

    In our quest to share what`s important, and in our quest to end corruption, we need to work together.

    So go buy an upgraded hardware solution with all the money you save! :)