Think, think team, what can you do to counter the accusations and deflect the spotlight from Rupert, Billy Clinton, Rob Rubin, Marty Feldstein, David Rockefeller, the Rothchilds, and all the other Bilderbergers that are really doing this to the people of the world?
Think, think…..BINGO!
How about take that “Progressive Agenda” argument we have used before we got sidetracked into eliciting violence, and get back the mission at hand. It is Obama and his accomplices in the White House? They would just need to make sure we tie in the idea of “wealth transfer” so everyone gets off track and believes it is a push to “Global Socialism“. It will be perfect! The people might just buy it!
Found in the course, “Saving Glenn Beck 101″ no doubt. But sorry, it is not available at time of print at Princeton U anymore than Rob Rubin’s “Ponzi Scheme 101″. Pity really.
Yes, Glenn will be busy in the next few days attempting to get the spin train back on the rails and diverting information away from his bosses at Bilderberg. Why is this just not “so obvious” to everyone?
It is to many, and he has a big problem. There are many of us that are very leery of his spin on the issues; more every day.
He is also going to have to answer for his latest statement that Obama does not want to “bail out the fat cats on Wall Street”, when many of us have clued in to the fact that he is a product of Wall Street. We know that Wall Street were his largest campaign contributors.
We also know that Beck supported the bank bailout, and Obama is in charge of the latest financial reform that will give the crooks on Wall Street the powers of “consumer protection”. That’s like putting the wolves in charge of protecting the sheep.
Yes, Mr. Beck has decided to save his own bacon, by telling us all that he believes this latest idea with all his heart.
And why not, it’s his last chance. He has no ability to join the Bilderberg expose club that the rest of us have joined.
A drag really, he would have been fun to have on our side.
Red Alert! We are entering a critical time in the info war.
We must, as emphasized by Alex Jones be critical of all things that sound good. They may have hidden agendas attached to fool us, or to make us react in a way that will be detrimental to the cause. As Jones’ analyses includes the very credibility of the latest entries toWikileaks, there are more tricks up Bilderberg’s sleeve to come. That we can be sure!
Let’s ensure we take everything with two grains of salt, not just one. We are reaching critical mass. We are infowarriors sniping the targets of deception. They can’t see us, and they are upset. They need to change the game, to draw us out into the open. We are just too effective and elusive. They must “sell” the new fight. The reason is clear: We are waging an “info” war, and we are winning.
We are now at a critical juncture, as so well contemplated by Alex Jones and his expert guests. The big news – even Rush Limbaugh is in the fight. But, let’s be cautious, Jones would tell us, we cannot trust him. Is Limbaugh for real? Is Beck now “for real” too? Are we just painting the picture that cannot be avoided, that is waking even the most staunch of the neo-cons up, and making them join the info fight?
The timing is this: Obama’s internet kill switch is in the last stages of preparation. His finger will be poised , ready to strike when there are too many of us awake. He will be ready, looking for the excuse to pull the plug on the information that is getting too hot to handle. The information shared between bloggers the world over. And, we know it is not just bloggers – the people in general who don’t blog and are concerned with the goings on in the world will google and look at different perspectives. So, it’s really everyone who has access to a computer and free thinking that is the enemy to the New World Order.
We also know there is a false flag event somewhere on the horizon to serve perhaps a dual role – to save Obama going into the next election, and in order to do so, destroy the resistance to his mission and that of the Bilderbergers. And, the greatest resistance is currently staked out in homes the world over – ah yes, the bloggers!
Bilderberg has a problem. We are virtual. We are invisible. We are a threat without a name and a face. We cannot be brutalized by police as proven at the G20 meetings, year after year. We cannot be humiliated by strip searches, excessively cold temperatures in cruel cells. We are comfortably placed to think freely on our couches, or kitchen tables, or office chairs, cheerfully clicking the keys of information, and they do not like it.
They must draw us out in the open. They must bring the effective information “snipers” to the battlefield. While the true bosses of Bilderberg cower in hiding, they want to fool us into a fight that is simply not necessary. And to do so, they must pull out all the stops; use all the media influence they can. Would it include Rush Limbaugh?
Limbaugh is the most prominent name in radio. While his station and it’s parent have been looking for scraps of food, “Limbaugh’s living large”.
Alex Jones dedicated the better part of an hour of last Sunday’s show in discussion of Limbaugh’s revelation that the “ruling class in America are looking to consolidate power“, a non-partisan power play by the ruling elites in corporate America and offshore. Hold that thought, back to Beck…
On yesterday’s Glenn Beck show on FOX, Beck informed his followers that the enemy of America is not just against Beck, they are against his followers (viewers) - the Beck manipulated Tea Partiers. By ensuring there is little doubt, he has tied himself in with the Tea Party Movement yet again, before making the call for action. Remember, he works for Murdoch, the Bilderberger.
In the latest plea, Beck claims it’s time to take the fight to the streets in protest; it’s time to put a face to your protest. You must be drawn out.
While Bilderberg continues to hide, they are calling us out. Who are those that dare challenge Bilderberg?
This is not the first time Beck has asked his viewers to identify themselves.
Not long ago, he asked us to fill out the Nolan Chart with radio buttons and easily traceable IP addresses. Bilderberg wants to know who the resistance is. They need to put a face to the keystrokes.
Beck explained on his program, that the method to be used was developed by the late Bill Moyer. You must remain involved is the argument, but how? He has posted the plan on his website to ensure his viewers can study the plan called “MAP”: Movement Action Plan. It’s ironic that this MAP would be the chosen battle plan, considering it is a “progressive movement” plan for change.
While the notion of protest would seem on the surface noble, we must remember the recent past. What is the new dynamic in those protesting the New World Order? What happened at the G20 in Toronto to Charlie Veitch and others that were peaceful? The short answer – the game has changed. The peaceful are being demonized. They are being used as examples for others to see. They are being filmed on camera and humiliated. Protest, in short, is the arena for Bilderberg to flex their evil muscle. It does not support our cause or effectiveness.
What’s most significant now, is it is apparent the odd G20 meeting has not been the effective means of fighting.
Jones’ films, shared amongst small gatherings in homes works.
Blogging, and the sharing of information not in the atmosphere of threat, but in the arena of calm reflection works.
True peaceful sharing of information works. It doesn’t have to be radical, it needs to be peaceful.
It never needed a protest that can be used by the globalists to impose turmoil, it can be done one on one, or in small groups hidden from Bilderberg view.
The truth does not need a group to seep into the minds of men.
So the question, how would Limbaugh fit? Can we trust him? More importantly, should we trust him?
At this critical time, with continued stealth victory, Bilderberg and the New World Order is losing. By bringing in Limbaugh, would they have a strong and trusted voice to add fuel to the fire that Beck is fanning?
Would they be trying to bring the people to the streets so they can be identified?
And more importantly, would they be setting up a false flag event to demonize the Tea Party Movement and give justification to Obama flipping the switch on free internet speech?
Human nature is interesting. We tend to leave what is working.
Alex Jones knows that the sharing of information in a non-violent way is the best way to beat the globalists. Peaceful sharing of the truth cannot easily be monitored, and therefore cannot be demonized. The globalists are looking for a reason to justify stopping us from sharing the truth.
The globalists will pull out all the stops, and use all means and resources necessary.
So, when it comes to Rush Limbaugh – is he for real, or merely a fellow neo-con ally in the game to support Glenn Beck?
They are two men with large paychecks. One works for a man with ties to Bilderberg, the other not so clear.
The question may not be can trust them but rather do we really need to?
Hidden from view we can effectively destroy Bilderberg and the global elite. If we focus on sharing the truth, and avoiding the violence they provoke, we can beat them.
The truth is all we need. And, the truth will set us free!
First watch this interview of Feldstein with Charlie Rose, and see if you can pick off the agenda of Bilderberg – that is, the goal of wealth transfer from the people to the banksters:
At the 4:30 mark, Feldstein talks about mortgage replacement loans – great for the banks to maximize the bubble and keep the poor on the hook. The market should be allowed to correct to pre-bubble prices, because that was the true market value in the first place. Artificially keeping prices inflated from the derivative/housing scandal that his buddies at Bilderberg caused in the first place (beginning with the derivative market deregulation from Clinton, on through):
Here is part II:
Please make comments on all the “wealth tapping” points that Feldstein is selling in this interview.
Economics is a social science, subject to interpretation. And, he is a sales agent to give credibility to the process of reducing the wealth of Americans in favor of the banks. This is one piece of the puzzle of how the derivative Ponzi scheme was set up from Clinton on through to today, and is still underway.
To make a very long story short, we need to team up and do some digging -0n YouTube, google, etc. The really neat thing about that is that google and YouTube may be Bilderberg-controlled, so we can use the very tools they use against them. Ah, poetic justice.
Some of you may have no clue as to what I just was getting at, but others who have clued in to the NWO (New World Order) as “derived” from Bilderberg and other control groups, you know exactly what I am talking about.
So here is the challenge. Can we use this blog by sending comments to expand upon the Bilderberg Group members responsible for the instigation of the Derivatives Scam?
Let’s start with this overview.
Bill Clinton was convinced by Robert Rubin and others to allow Derivatives without regulation. Clinton claims that the argument was that they were “too complicated” and that only the rich investors would buy them so “the big bucks” would be reason for these investors to get the details. We all know now that was a lie, and an excuse. In fact, the local law authorities in Virginia are likely looking into this right now, so the more we give them the better.
But wait, it get’s better, Bill Clinton goes on several, cleansing the conscience talk shows and gets an artificial sense of relief. I wonder if he actually believes the stuff that comes out of his mouth? I heard people who perpetually bend the truth tend to make that a habit.
Here is Clinton on the View (2008):
Worth thinking about over and over, Rubin convinces Clinton to allow derivatives, and by the above video, Cllinton justifies the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, with the argument that there will be regulations now for the very derivatives that he admits he should not have allowed in the first place. Oops Bill Clinton, you are sounding like a true Bilderberger now – create a problem (allowing derivatives), then watch the pain that ensues – then bring in the solution (the Graham-Leach-Bliley Act (Nov 99) – otherwise known, and perhaps a sick joke (Bilderbergers love those), cheap shot, the Financial Modernization Act of 1999. Phewie!) .
Problem-reaction-solution, of course! Way to go Bill!
Here are a couple of videos to tell you some more on Glass-Steagall:
I can’t help but keep thinking of the very loaded with evidence YouTube clip above. He tells us that in his Administration, the economy was good (applause). Great, but when he allowed derivatives and later repealed the G-S Act, he ensured that his departure would pave the way for the destruction of the economy. Think – is that how it works? An entire Act is killed with a conversation between two people? Like saying, “They told me the big money would ensure the derivative risk becomes known?” Is Billy Clinton kidding us? Does he think we will buy the bunk? Silly us – we didn’t need to bother with a silly Act like Glass-Steagal, Bill makes it all so simple! Reminds me of George W. Bush telling his audience that obviously the television was on when he watched the plane flying into the first building on 9/11. Yes, make sure the people know the T.V. was on George, that will give your story credibility! Did he know about 9/11 in advance? Might explain why he sat with the kiddies in that classroom practicing that look of concern. Problem: no television footage was available for the “first” plane. Oops!
The derivative scandal was a true tag-team play between Clinton and Bush (two Bilderberg boys), furthering the goal of their true bosses. While the move would be responsible for the collapse of the economy, the American people would see it as a mistake. For the Bilderberg Group (the true masters of both Clinton and Bush), it was a victory.
So, here’s the deal. Bill goes on to explain that those poor homeowners will have to have their mortgages helped out and renegotiated. Sounds great, does it not?
Don’t get excited. We must remember that according to another of the Bilderberg tag team, Marty Feldstein, there would be a way to ensure the mortgages stayed with the homeowners.
The kicker is, it wasn’t for the homeowners at all – it was for the bankers looking to squeeze every last drop out of the derivative/housing scam.
Let’s take a closer look.
The housing boom that was derivative-based drove up the prices of homes artificially. Then, the crisis hit, and Marty Feldstein would be the first to tell you “deflation bad” – we must not allow the house prices (that were artificially blown skyward) to drop. That, according to Marty (and as we can learn above, ‘ol Bill) would be bad for the economy.
Feldstein gives himself away though, he told us that people would walk away from their homes, and come back and buy at a lower price. And what would be wrong with that Marty? The market will have corrected itself from the scam imposed by you and the other Bilder-bums!
Marty Feldstein can be found on YouTube everywhere explaining his latest scheme. And, no doubt Billy Clinton approved.
It goes like this.
A portion of the mortgage would be carved out, and both the mortgage and the new loan would bind the borrower to both obligations. This, Feldstein would tell us is good – because the borrower keeps his home.
Well, looked at another way, it’s bad, because it guarantees payment of the inflated house price further squeezing the homeowner. It would be better to have rented and come back later. Walk away, declare bankruptcy, and effectively “just say no” to corruption, greed, and the banksters scam.
The example Feldstein cited, was for a mortgage of $400,000, where the carve-out loan is for 20%.
So, now we would have a house that has a mortgage of $320,000 so it is closer to being onside with the prices of houses in the market, but the homeowner is on the hook for both the $80,000 carve-out loan and the $320,000 mortgage loan.
Can we see how they with this scam would maximize what’s good for the banksters? Where is the deal for the homeowner again Mr. Feldstein, I seemed to have missed that part.
Bottom line – help me put more pieces together. Leave a comment below.
We can tie in the conspiracy fact that this was a staged terror attack on the financial system by the banksters in government and Wall Street. Let’s put the Bilderberg faces to the accusations some more.
Oh yeah, we are still just getting warmed up.
How’s the heart Bill? Oh, and send a message to Larry Summers too, won’t you? He seems a little fishy on the exit of Peter Orszag, with that whole let’s keep spending the country down the hole thing and all!
We don’t need to point out that Summers is also a Bilderberger do we?
Was Peter Orszag just not cut out to be a Bilderberger? While he was on the list for the Bilderberg meeting in Spain this year, would he have been looking forward to the trip? Apparently, his thought of resignation from his Budget post was in the works for months.
Would the trip to Bilderberg become the icing on the cake and final confirmation that led to his resignation and departure from the Obama Administration and perhaps politics altogether?
The following observations will outline a picture of a likeable man. A man who seemed to have genuine interest in his field, a very learned man.
Orszag attended undergraduate school at Princeton and in 1991 he earned his Economics degree “….graduating summa cum laude. He then traveled to study at the London School of Economics as a Marshall Scholar, obtaining a master’s and a Ph.D by 1997″.
He, in short must have developed a passion for economics. His presentations support that claim. A dynamic presenter, when he is”on” he is convincing. He is no doubt proud of his knowledge, and it was obvious he was eager to put it to work. There did not seem to be a “hidden agenda”. Orszag comes across as someone truly concerned with doing an honest job. And this is an important distinction from the norm of double-speak, the Bilderberg agenda disguised as something good. We have seen this in our analyses of Niall Ferguson, Martin Feldstein, Robert Rubin, the team of war “sellers“, and others. So, Peter Orszag is refreshing in comparison.
Aparently Orszag had a few mentors, and Robert Rubin his last. Would Rubin be assigned to shape Orszag, and turn him into a true Bilderberg minion?
Orszag’s political journey is interesting because he served first under the Bush Administration as “Head of the Congressional Budget Office (Jan. 2007 to Nov. 2008)”, and then later under Obama. He, no doubt a Democrat, earned his appointment as “Director of the Office of Management and Budget ” , and it must have made the appointment all the sweeter.
Orszag without much doubt wears his personality close to his sleeve - his emotions clear, and when uncomfortable, it is obvious. In Washington he must be well liked, and would offer a unique credibility to the political process. His knowledge and passion an asset,with little doubt.
Doing a little digging, it becomes clear that the reason for Peter Orszag’s resignation is disappointment, frustration and disillusionment. Economics in practice not matching theory. He may not have known the reason for this. He was serving Bilderberg, not Democrats and Republicans. Perhaps he was to learn the true Bilderberg influence.
Our series of videos may help paint a picture – a progression of passion lost, regained, and lost again.
Under Bush, the biggest frustration without doubt would have been the ever-increasing pressure from mounting Iraq War tension. As the country suffered financially, Orszag was put in a position to explain this to American people:
Orszag was the scapegoat while President Bush concentrated on eloquent speeches complete with vague sound bytes to support the troops and the “war on terror“. The Bilderberg mission was to occupy the areas surrounding those countries not convinced that world government was a good idea. Was Orszag aware of what he was budgeting?
One thing is clear, he did not seem to argue on the point of flagrant spending. There was no defense of the war budget. That in itself spoke volumes. If Orszag was oblivious to Bilderberg he would have grown increasingly weary of the attack from all fronts on spending gone wild. And, it was not about to change anytime soon.
When Obama was elected in November 2008, Orszag, no doubt would have welcomed the promise to pull out of Iraq – the troops, Obama would claim, would be withdrawn. We all know this did not happen, and the war went on. The Democrat new boss was the same as the old boss. Was Orszag catching on, realizing the transition from Republican to Democrat in the White House was meaning little. Did he suspect it was Bilderberg he was working for and not simply a “Democrat”?
Perhaps in an effort to effect true change, Orzsag had reason for hope with his appointment as Director of the Budget Office.
Visibly enthusiastic, Orszag showed he was just an average guy in this clip:
Unfortunately for us all, Orszag’s passion for sharing information via the internet isn’t shared by the controllers in the White House weary of those waking up.
Even more tragic and directly affecting his post, it is fairly apparent Orszag was misled to believe his boss would welcome fiscal responsibility and commit to tackle the budget deficit. That was the campaign promise. It was the promise entering the Presidency. What changed?
John King was the first of many to perpetuate the exposure of a losing cause. There was no solution, there would be no newfound respect for his talent with the Democrats either:
In defense of the new boss, the important observation is to note the level of belief Orszag had, that things would be different. It is not the demeanor of a man who is setting in for a long-haul of explaining away lies. It is clear he was passionate in defense that things would change, and be different.
He along with much of American bought into Obama’s Hope and Change . He would be deceived.
Other members of Mr Obama’s economic team, notably Lawrence Summers, the head of the National Economic Council, have placed more emphasis on the need for continued short-term spending increases to counteract what increasingly looks like an anaemic economic recovery in the US.
Summers, a Bilderberg member, along with Rahm Emanuel were effectively tying Orszag’s hands and his ability to do his job. The mission of Bilderberg was to effectively spend the country into oblivion, and if Orszag has the integrity he seems to have, it would no doubt have played a role in his decision to resign.
Obama, the ultimate Bilderberg puppet used Orszag as did Bush. The legitimate nice guy would have been a nice addition to the Bilderberg minion count – a wholesome “sell”, and welcome change of face for Bilderberg. After all, who wouldn’t believe Peter?
Showing true lack of character, Obama admitted it wasn’t necessarily his credentials that were of interest, as he dubbed him “…..a “propeller-head” because of his brilliant facility with projections and spreadsheets“. Forget the more important reasons of integrity, morality, competence, and a sense what’s right, Obama would have no need for those qualities.
In short, Peter Orszag would have to lose himself and his integrity to stay at his job. For a man as dedicated as he , a crying shame.
Macro Economics in Washington is beoynd tainted – it’s criminal. And thus, they did not deserve to abuse a fellow like Orszag.
Peter Orszag without doubt came to realize that something was very wrong in Washington? Did the trip to Sitges, Spain make it crystal clear?
Peter Orszag the self-professed “super-nerd” was a misfit – a square peg in a round hole, but a Bilderberg lacky he was not to be. He was a clean spirit in a pile of dead, political debris.
And, as there is no honor among thieves, nor should there be the honorable amongst the corrupt.
So, we will see more fallout moving forward. There will be more resignations as corruption and greed magnifies. There will be more Bilderberg regulars not wanting to be seen, and some will refuse to remain a part of the clan.
As Glenn Beck admitted on his last show, “we have a tale to tell, but not today”.
There is a story that underlies all the smoke and mirrors. A story that perhaps some are not at liberty to disclose because of their background. Perhaps because of fear, or allegiances, or past or present employment. The truth is here somewhere.
And for Peter Orszag, after enduring much slime in Washington, he may someday have a tale to tell too.
But for now he will move on, hopefully hug his family and gain a new appreciation for life.
Perhaps he has seen the dark side that so many of us are waking up to. It is the Bilderberg Group – make no mistake.
In October of 2005, in one of many speeches, Robert Rubin addressed a group of students at Princeton University. When he was done, a round of applause was offered from the audience. After all, Rubin had taken time out from his busy schedule to address concerns of the future bright young hope of the United States – the students – the next generation that would take the reins moving forward.
He told the students of Princeton that day, that there might be a chance that the economy was going to take a nosedive. Like pulling out a fry pan and a couple of eggs, it would be easy to predict that the eggs will be cooked, especially since you intend to cook them. We should give the intelligent youth in the lecture hall that day some credit – they probably knew it wasn’t eggs on the fry pan, it was more like a few gooses – as in, our goose is cooked!
Some of the excited group at Princeton probably didn’t know Robert Rubin was working with the power elite of the world. Their educations, and more, their dreams would become futile in a world where freedoms were being stripped, educations would be slated to become mere tools for slavery, heck, one’s very existence would be in question. The group responsible for the world’s change to bondage – The Bilderberg Group.
Rubin, as former Secretary of Treasury, worked his post in the mid to late ’90 ‘s under Bill Clinton (wait for it – a fellow Bilderberger). Clinton’s wife Hillary, we all know today as a regular Bilderberg contributor. Don’t be alarmed if she was missing from this year’s list of delegates . It means little.
In 2008, Clinton slipped into the now infamous Bilderberg conference in Washington, accompanied by the next President of the United States. Little chance she was on the official, secret list then either,so don’t be confused – her loyalty was not in question.
Breaking a few rules to get things done, I’m sure could easily be argued by the Bilderbergers, when important decisions need to be made. On that evening in 2008, the group of the most powerful in the world would decide whether Clinton would step aside leaving Obama to assume the American Presidency. Reporters to this day are no doubt still scratching their heads in wonder why Obama never got on the flight to Chicago that evening. That’s easy – the press weren’t invited to witness real news.
This June, in Sitges, Spain, Robert Rubin was in attendance, and was there listed as the Co-Chairman for the Council on Foreign Relations. Let that absorb a moment.
The CFR “….is a very old and very prestigious group of Americans actively engaged in shaping U.S. foreign policy at a professional and/or academic level. The membership includes almost every prominent name in U.S. foreign policy including most presidents and secretaries of state over the last 75 years.” I suppose it even includes those accused of Ponzi schemes. I suppose if Bernie Madoff was in the U.S. government, he would be eligible to maintain membership in the “prestigious group”. The self-acclaimed, ” prestigious group”.
Rubin, among others, was at the meeting illegally, as outlined under the the Logan Act which clearly defines that it is against the law for federal officials to attend secret meetings with private citizens to develop public policies”. But, like other things worth repeating, we already know that, don’t we? We know that laws in America, as Gerald Celente would tell us are ” just for us” – his explanation to describe the current state of law and justice (pron. “just-us”). That would explain how Bilderberg has now drafted up their own website as if to mock the world.
Let’s face it….’ Logan shmogan’, the law does not apply to the elite, so what are you gonna do about it? It would be like telling the mafia they just committed a crime. Yeah, so?
Worth taking note. We are not talking about government officials taking liberties. We are talking about crooks taking government positions and using that influence, power and control to effect the goals of the relatively few that want to take over everything and everyone. The good news is, it is not the government in control – it is the Bilderbergers in government that have sabotaged the Constitution, who are conspicuous by their actions – stomping on our rights. We can identify the crooks – we have a list! And, even if they can prove they are “innocent”, they are, individually and collectively “suspect”. With full certainty, we have our suspect list. It’s time to get busy. It’s time to expose the criminality stressing and shining a light on how each has contributed.
What precious time we have needs to be spent, not on the Black Panthers, not on the Unions of America, or the ethnic group of the week, not on Democrats vs. Republicans, or the for Glenn Beck people vs. the ones that are not so happy with him. No, we need to continue to expose the criminals and the criminality that is right in front of us. Forget the distractions. Forget the media controlled by Bilderberg telling us to attack each other, and let’s crumble the cookie.
As Rubin would argue on the collapse of the economy, it was Americans not living within their means. Your own fault America!
It would have nothing to do with Rubin, supposedly “convincing” Bill Clinton that derivative deregulation is good.
“On derivatives, yeah I think they were wrong and I think I was wrong to take [their advice] because the argument on derivatives was that these things are expensive and sophisticated and only a handful of investors will buy them and they don’t need any extra protection, and any extra transparency. The money they’re putting up guarantees them transparency,”
I suppose when you have to clarify what “is” is, anything this complicated would be a stretch.
That last little bit about transparency is in the course, Ponzi Scheme 101. Unfortunately, not available at time of print at Princeton U.
For, it is all about consumer and economic confidence.
Again, the Bilderberg talking heads, whether it is Feldstein, Rubin, or take your pick, will discuss the economy in terms of “confidence”. Confidence in the markets, known as investor confidence. We can translate that into Ponzi terms to be read, confidence in the government, in the Bilderbergers, in the Ponzi schemers, and in the derivative selling clowns on Wall Street. Put another way, are you still buying their stories and promises that if you keep investing, you will eventually get rich?
As long as the market “confidence” is there, the crooks know the suckers are still on the hook, still ready to hand over their wealth to the banksters.
The Bilderbergers benchmark to monitor progress is in consumer/investor confidence. It means they can open for business and off the radar of suspicion. They can carry on their looting. The people have not caught on to the scheme yet.
But, as the economy continues to sour, there is a good chance more and more people will stop listening to the rhetoric. They will stop buying the lies. If America riots, Bilderberg wins.
They will have won because they will have fooled enough Americans long enough to effect their plan.
The street riots, the police brutality, the armies in the streets will all be signs they avoided true justice.
We have a choice. We can take the list of suspects (the Bilderberg list), and hold them accountable for their actions. We can press them for roles in effecting world government not represented by the people.
We can use the muckety map of Robert Rubin and investigate every crevice of relationships. They are all intertwined. As the cliches go: “the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree“, “birds of a feather flock together”, “be careful of the company you keep”. All good cliches that have stood the test of time and hold wisdom.
We are just getting warmed up. The exposure is just starting. If the U.S. courts won’t expose these criminals, then it is up to us, as citizens of the world to do it.
Robert Rubin is a symptom of the greater darkness that plagues our countries. He is a player in the Bilderberg gang of criminality. We could say more for now, including the lack of reporting in media that few would touch regarding his role in the Citi fiasco, but more important is the question how he got away with it. How, if Bilderberg is argued to be diplomats would they want such types in their group?
We know the answer. They are all the same. They cover for each other. There is more to be uncovered.
We don’t have much time. We must turn our attention to Bilderberg, and how they all fit together.
We must join the pieces of the puzzle and expose their game of world enslavement.
They must and will be stopped.
In the clip below, please forgive the mechanical voice that was used. We should ask ourselves what we have to be afraid of. Why wouldn’t a real voice have been used? Does it reflect our fear in getting involved? Shouldn’t we be forthright in bringing truth?
Pretend for a moment that you are the Bilderberg Group. You want to dominate the world. You need to get at China and the economy that is growing by leaps and bounds. How are you going to do it? How are you going to crack the shell, and get the Chinese hooked on America and the western world? And why?
“Why” is easy to explain.
The Bilderbergers were quite successful at lulling Americans into a slumber, found for the most part fat and happy in front of their television sets. With promise of less work, more pay, and more “toys” to play with, America and the western world developed a false sense of entitlement. They lost the basic survival skills. If the stock market returns and easy credit were going to keep us decadent, then why not ride the wealth wave. Why pay attention to what the government is doing? Why not trust that freedoms need to be stripped to avoid the boogie men from the Middle East? Who cares if body scanners cause cancer, troops and police beat up civilians, and the borders are collapsing around Mexico? We got iPads, iPods, cell phones, televisions and comfy couches – at least some of us still do.
The bankers on Wall Street, while America was sleeping were busy putting the finishing touches on their master plan to collapse America and other decadent societies. But, we already know this story, don’t we? The banksters as they are so well described had a mission of wealth transfer from the people to the globalists, and we are experiencing the beginnings of the end of life as we know it.
But let’s not forget, there is more wealth to strip, jobs to be replaced, and wages to be dropped in America. After all, if all the auto makers were left to die on the table, there would have been a huge human toll on standard of life. It would be so much wiser to, in the words Max Keiser would use, to ”keep the corpse alive so you can flog it again tomorrow”.
Enter Roger Altman - Bilderberg’s man of mergers, acquisitions, and supporter of Globalization. And, not to mention Chinese investment in the failing U.S. economy.
We should seemingly overlook his pro Wall Street stance, even though he is a Democrat who “fought” for the workers of G.M. as he assisted with the government takeover. We should not be surprised about his remark when asked about AIG’s 100 cents on the dollar, that the ”honoring of contracts” is a way to look at the bonuses paid - for merit (not to be confused with undue “risk”) To Altman, AIG payments were history – no sense bringing that up now, it’s over.
We shouldn’t bat an eye when reminded of his support of Senator Obama as presidential candidate that he had no doubt would win the presidency.
And should we ask whether he supported the banker bailout, Hank Paulson’s job, the integrity of the “cautious” Goldman Sachs - please, really? – Do we need go there?
The important thing to know is that Roger Altman is a Bilderberger. He attended 2010 in Spain as Chairman of his “boutique bank”, Evercore. His specialty – mergers, acquisitions, advising on public pension plans, and he has a real interest as a company in attracting chinese investment in the mature economies. Yes, that would be America and the fire sale that would make it a great buy for chinese sovereign funds looking for a good bet.
Can you see the danger when a Bilderberger is trusted with advising on public pension funds?
Bilderberg might be very interested in having China get hooked on investment in American companies failing for a variety of reasons. An important one, is it would assist in the goal to drive wages down, chinese- style. It would also open up China’s trust to the western world. Perhaps the banksters could work their magic on the hardworking and underpaid in China, and turn them into the lazy, and more decadent society we have come to live in. Perhaps then, when the Chinese are not on guard, the bankers could work their plan of domination and control. They certainly need to crack the shell, and get a foot in the door.
Almost brings one to remember Rupert Murdoch’s desire to push for his news empire’s influence in China. What they see is what they want. And what they are told is what becomes “truth”. Glenn Beck would tell us – Fox brings the truth.
In the second clip, pay careful attention to the interview with his Evercore CEO, Ralph Schlosstein explain how China should be looking to invest in the mature economies of the world.
And if they come, they will bring their version of lifestyle, wages, standard of living. And, at that point, we may actually wake up.
Chinese investors wanted to buy ‘Hummer’. What if they took over G.M. in America? What would happen to the workers, their union, and their wages then?
Bilderberg’s mission to reduce the middle class to rubble would be well served with the selling off of America.
Roger Altman seems to be loyal to Bilderberg. There’s a good chance he wasn’t at Bilderberg in Spain this year for the golf.
At 84, it seemed odd that Queen Elizabeth II made a special trip to New York to pay respect to the 9/11 victims, and in addressing the U.N. assembly claimed, “the waging of peace is the hardest form of leadership of all.” We don’t usually hear the term, “waging of” followed by anything other than “war”. So, in this case, it was indeed an odd twist.
But, the comment is actually in keeping with the intent of the globalist leaders that, according to Queen Elizabeth II, must wage peace to address the issues of “terrorism” and “climate change”. The Bilderberg Group must have been comforted to get the support of the Queen of England. And, it would seem, the Bilderberg influence has shaped U.S. military efforts over the past while as well. The “waging of peace” has support by those responsible to sell the concept to the American people and the world.
We could look at the “waging of peace” as the military strategy for Iraq. The trickle in strategy of U.S. troops would suggest a war of occupation not with intent of “victory”.
The Bilderbergers, looking for world domination, would have no reason to win and leave the Middle East – not if they were intending on controlling the world. They would need to spin the occupation as a war of peace; the selling feature would have to be to sell the need to build the democratic infrastructure of government, and eventually do the same for Afghanistan. In 2007 and beyond, The Bilderberg Group would need a marketing plan to sell the occupation war. They would require a team of marketers with credibility, stature and title.
They had their team – Retired General John (Jack) Keane and Jessica T. Mathews, President of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Both long-term Bilderberg attendees – especially at critical times leading in to 2007. Both attending the 2006 Bilderberg meeting in Ottawa, and the 2007 meeting in Turkey. And yes, of course they were attendees in Spain this year.
In January 2007, John Keane and Fred Kagan (no relation to Elena Kagan) wrote “Choosing Victory: A Plan for Success in Iraq” which supported the implementation of 30,000 more troops into Iraq, because , “Kagan emphasized that it was critical to reduce the levels of violence before attempting any political solution”. The trickle in strategy was underway, and the strategy to occupy was being sold to the U.S. citizens.
2008 was the election year in the U.S., and with November fast approaching, Obama was poised to suggest a troop withdrawal as a selling feature of his candidacy. As we all know, whether a Democrat or Republican, the voters of America were getting a Bilderberg rep, whose job it would be to continue the agenda of world domination, occupation and control.
In June 2008, an article came out by the Independent in the UK entitled, “Revealed: Secret plan to keep Iraq under U.S. control”. Secret or not, it would affect Obama’s promise to the people who promised the troops could start to withdraw. Bilderberg had their way again.
In the video below, Jessica Mathews, in the Iraq Debate in 2007, sells the war to suggest it necessary as a means of peace – a ” political ” battle.
According to Mathews, there was only a “political solution”, suggesting there was no sense to pull out or to push to “win” the war by deploying the number of troops that later would be proven the argument as well for Afghanistan.
Recently, General McChrystal sought the means to “win” by a surgence of troops (80,000). Obama, the puppet of the Bilderbergers had to counter-argue and replaced McChrystal with Petraeus, citing, among other things that they had to make ” …. sure we’re doing a good job in building capacity on the civilian side.”
McChrystal, frustrated with the lack of military force in Afghanistan, was critical of Richard C. Holbrooke, a Bilderberger on the inside, holding title of Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan. Did he realize the Bilderberg Group never intended on leaving the region or winning? And, wasn’t it fitting that John Keane’s good friend taking over the Afghan mission, Gen. Petraeus, said he is in it to win it. Good luck general!
David Frost, looking much older than in his historic interviews with President Nixon during the Watergate Scandal, allowed John Keane to summarize for us the sales points of the wars that were sold as political structure building in countries far removed from the United States. Ironic, isn’t it, that the Bilderberg Group is currently destroying the free world, and Keane explains how America is “freeing” the Middle East?
Are we to believe that the enemies were CIA groomed operatives by the names of Bin Laden and Hussein? Or would the Bilderberg Group have used the “boogie men” to create the reason to occupy the Middle East, to surround Iran, and effect their plan for world government and world domination? And as importantly, were Bilderberg members Jessica Mathews and John Keane the sales agents to sell the continuation of the wars in the region?
Please note: It has come to our attention that with great sadness, Joan Veon has passed away in October 2010, from cancer. Our sympathies go out to all who knew her. She was a tireless worker to bring the truth. She will be deeply missed.
Feldstein, a Professor of Economics at Harvard University, served as chief of the National Bureau of Economic Research from 1967 to 2008. He also served under Ronald Reagan.
But, what is most sinister will not likely appear on his resume – his ongoing Bilderberg presence. He was an attendee for 2010 in Spain, and perhaps most significant, in 2007 (Turkey).
In the video below, we can observe Feldstein selling the Bilderberg agenda to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) later in 2007.
Did his view of fiscal policy support what was about to come? Was it his view or the agenda imposed by Bilderberg?
According to Feldstein, in order to further stimulate the economy, he stressed the Fed should lower the Fed Fund Rate to help ease pressure on adjustable rate mortgages, allowing homeowners’ to be “able to access more funds”, to spend more. His reasoning – the U.S. economy is dependent on consumption, representing 70% of the U.S. GDP (Gross Domestic Product).
Translation – savings bad!
Feldstein would have no doubt stood behind the value of adjustable-rate mortgages as a means to effect consumption, but when the collapse hit, Americans were put in a far worse financial position. And since savings were not promoted (with low interest rates), there was little security to fall back on. Can we see this as the plan of the elites?
Moving in to 2008, with the problems for Americans with adjustable rate mortgages already taking a toll on their wealth, Feldstein was promoting the further tapping of wealth in favor of consumption.
The sub-prime mortgage scandal reduced wealth for Americans and was devastating. The Bilderberg agenda is to effect further waves of wealth transfer from citizens to the banks, and Feldstein seems to suggest this strategy in his address to the CFR.
When listening to economists speak, it is easy to get lost in the rhetoric. As mentioned in the Niall Ferguson piece of the other day, we need to focus on the roles each Bilderberger has brought to the table to effect the Bilderberg Agenda. We must continue to cut through the rhetoric, and expose the implementation of the plan. We must examine the players in the Bilderberg empire, and the damage they have promoted.
