Monthly Archives: July 2010

Glenn Beck: “You know, Bob Bilderberg”

If you still believe Glenn Beck has never heard of the Bilderberg Group, and this is the reason he doesn’t cover them on his “truth” programming, here’s more evidence of the cover-up of the power-broker bosses he is keeping hidden from view. When you think of Beck from this point on, think of a Bilderberg minion, whose job it is to deflect awareness away from his bosses.

On January 7, 2009, published on the Glenn Beck website, the article entitled, ”Where’s the Amero?” is there for us all to read.

The piece, in large part, is an interview with Dr. Michael Lynch who stressed to Beck in a radio interview on September 27, 2007 that Mexico was collapsing, and the Amero and North American Union was not far off. Beck was with CNN in 2007. And, thanks to Glenn, he has provided us with proof via a transcript on the interview with Lynch from his own website.

In an effort to discredit Lynch, Beck sarcastically taunted Lynch about the Amero coming into play (clip from the 2007 interview):

DR. LYNCH: Within a year from today more or less, Mexico will change their currency from the peso to the Amero which will reestablish a new Mexican currency by October –

GLENN: Let’s make it by January 1st of 2009. And if they haven’t changed their currency, if we haven’t changed our currency and we’re on the new Amero.

DR. LYNCH: Right.

GLENN: Here’s what you have to do. On November 1st if I still have a greenback, that is the government-issued tender, you come on this program and you must deny the existence of the Bohemian Grove.

DR. LYNCH: I can’t because assuming people –

GLENN: No, no. No, no, that’s the deal. And if I –

DR. LYNCH: I don’t want to lie on your program, you know.

GLENN: And if you’re wrong, then we’ll do a special on the Bohemian Grove.

That was the clip from the original interview in 2007.

In a follow-up interview in 2009, Beck had Dr. Lynch on the show again to collect on his bet regarding the status of the Amero, and to take another shot to discredit anyone looking into secret societies.

 But hang on, something is just not right here.

 Take a look at this clip aired on CNN in October 2008, where Beck in a panic is warning the public of the drive for a One World Government and One World Currency.

2008 is sandwiched between 2007 and 2009, right?

Beck, in 2007 interviewed Dr. Lynch, critical of his belief that there will be the Amero by 2009 or 2010. Mockingly, Beck makes a bet with Lynch that if the Amero is not in place in 2009 or so Lynch would have to also eat crow on the existence of the Bohemian Grove.

But, in 2008, Beck comes on CNN in a panic that they are going to a One World Government, One World Currency, and the New World Order. This further supports the interview Beck had with Ron Paul on the Texas corridor leading to the NAU and a One World Government. Forget the Amero, I would assume, Beck is saying they are going for the gusto – straight to the New World Order!

In the following 2009 interview with Lynch, Beck discredits the idea of the Amero yet again, denying America is heading to a North American Union. Was there a brain cramp somewhere that we missed? How does Beck go from discussion of turkey lurkey and the sky is falling in 2008 to everything is fine, Dr. Lynch, and by the way, now I am going to make you eat crow on the Bilderberg Group too:

(From the follow-up interview in 2009)

DR. LYNCH: 2010. 2010. With that –

GLENN: Will you deny the existence of a Bilderberg?

DR. LYNCH: No, I can’t.

GLENN: You know, Bob Bilderberg.

DR. LYNCH: Pardon?

GLENN: Of just Bob Bilderberg, not all of the Bilderbergs, just one of the Bilderbergs if you don’t get it right this time?

Deny, discredit, mock, and any other means. From One World Government back to discrediting someone that would even say the Amero is coming. Make sense?

Beck doesn’t stop there in defense of his bosses, oh no. Check out a few moments later in the interview:

GLENN: How did it get — let me ask you this: How did it get into the bottle of champagne or wine? Were the Rothschilds involved?

DR. LYNCH: With a Rothchild?

GLENN: Well, the Rothchild, you know, they helped bring World War II about, you know.

DR. LYNCH: The Rockefellers I would say would be the best people to interview because they have the long-term goal on this.

GLENN: Is it possible that Dan is part of the Bohemian Grove, my in-studio producer?

DR. LYNCH: It’s possible that any journalist can be a part of the Bohemian Grove. I mean, that’s not a –

GLENN: I haven’t received my invitation yet.

Even though  the invitation to the White House dance wasn’t offered to Beck so he would  look like the bad guy against Obama, there is a better chance he’s gotten an invitation from a Bilderberger or two.

There is at least one consistency in Glenn Beck’s message. He is loyal to his masters’ will.

Even if they are hanging him out to dry!

Niall Ferguson: Bilderberg’s History, er wait, Economics Guru

As reported in a previous article, it is important to be reminded of this fact:

As Charles Skelton of the Guardian (UK) reported so well, the agenda of Bilderberg is expected to be implemented. All talk of being a harmless group of concerned citizens flies out the window when people of this magnitude and stature step to the plate to tell us the truth:

….the former Nato secretary general, Willy Claes (Bilderberg 1994), said on Belgian radio that at Bilderberg each participant is given a report and they are “considered to use this report in setting their policies in the environments in which they affect”. This remark is revealing of the Bilderberg dynamic: the flowing of policy out from Bilderberg and into the world, from power towards political implementation. From the steering committee to the guest members.

Let’s be blunt, what is in  the report that Niall Ferguson took from this year’s Bilderberg meetings? Or put another way, knowing that the Bilderbergers are the power brokers pushing for the collapse of societies as we know them, we must cut through the diversions and debates, and get back to the simple agenda they have.

As no surprise, and as both a further support that Bilderberg is working with the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Ferguson offered this article to the Council, where the summary is described as follows:

Imperial collapse may come much more suddenly than many historians imagine. A combination of fiscal deficits and military overstretch suggests that the United States may be the next empire on the precipice.

One of many comments on the piece can be found here. The suggestion by Ferguson is that when America crumbles, it will crumble quickly. Not if we can help it, that’s for sure. But the Bilderbergers have been gearing up to effect a quick takeover – that would be consistent with their objectives.

One of the key objectives is to twist debate to serve the purpose of stripping wealth.

We have seen the push for the crushing of pensions and unions on the Glenn Beck Show.

Niall Ferguson, a history professor at Harvard, has evolved into an “economics” guru, and seems to be making his way into television studios, and reports everywhere. Again, there is a lot discussed. But can we find the “Bilderberg agenda” in his thoughts and suggestions? He also has (imagine that) been a guest on Glenn Beck. Now ain’t that a coincidence?

Well, in the clip found in this link, while discussing America with Joe Weisenthal, Ferguson discusses the unlikelihood of his visit to the White House at the call of Obama. You will recall Weisenthal contributes to the Keiser Report, and the slip of Obama may have been an inside joke for Weisenthal that may have more background knowledge on Ferguson than Ferguson may know.  Being a Bilderberg attendee as has Obama, perhaps the likelihood of sharing planning (the Bilderberg agenda) may be more on track than we might know. However, amongst other things, the bell went off when Ferguson mentions the cutting back on Public Pension plans.

Cutting Pension Plan payouts and liabilities, Ferguson would argue, would be correct austerity. Not to mention it meets the goal of Bilderberg in stripping wealth. Emphasized we must remember, by Glenn Beck, working for a Bilderberger, Rupert Murdoch.

Common message, two sources, both linked to Bilderberg.

Emphasis cannot be strong enough to suggest there will be a lot of rhetoric mixed in with agenda. Credibility built up to support the speaker, and while asleep, the suggestion to give up your wealth as a nation will be implemented.

As we find ourselves buying in to the message of the Bilderberg influence that has steadily been creeping into media sources everywhere, we need to splash the cold water of reality into our collective faces, and realize the messages have been tainted – sold out to the bigger mission of Bilderberg and their global plan for humanity.

We will continue to cut through the rhetoric and diversionary tactics used, and focus on the people of Bilderberg, and how they are contributing to the cause.

Glenn Beck: “Do we have to go to the Bilderbergers?”

Let’s look at the things out in the open, Gary”, said Glenn Beck in the clip below.

Why look at the Bilderbergers?, Beck asked. Why not look at what “people are saying out in the public” .

“Let’s concentrate on what’s out in the open”, Beck continued to argue.

Sounds like his job, doesn’t it? Working for the man.

Rupert Murdoch, head of Fox, is a Bilderberger. With all eyes pointing to the Bilderberg Clan, could that be Mr. Murdoch telling Glenn to take credit away from the ones that would bring him to the fore?;  to deflect concern by mocking  those that would bring him to suspicion. Is that the reason for that big, fat paycheck?

Just like Beck would tell you on one of his shows related to  9/11, “you are not one of those people are you?”.

If you are, Beck would call you out, you radical. Oops, all it tells me is Murdoch doesn’t want attention to 9/11. And why would that be?

There are cowards that are afraid of being exposed, that would sooner have a trash talker create social unrest, anger, and promote aggression. And Beck is doing that job day in, day out. Creating social division is his mission for the cowards that want Beck to hide them, deflect concern about them, and otherwise discredit anyone that has spent time and energy exposing them. The cowards are the Bilderberg Group. No Glenn, not the “build a bear group” at the mall. But, it does start with a “B”.

When the ‘harmless’, in the dark, Bilderbergers (yes, that’s right they are not out in the open -  no wait, yes they now are, hmm) just get together and their argument is to discuss the issues of the world, Beck would suggest that they are not an issue here.

These power brokers, I suppose Beck would tell us are, indeed  harmless, and not flexing their power at all. They are just the concerned group of Richy Rich types that get together once a year to say, “oh my, oh me, what a lousy world have we”. Not worth a look Glenn? And Glenn Beck has the support of a history book or two to have come to that conclusion? Or, would Rupert Murdoch have told him to get the dogs off him and his buddies - keep us in the dark to the people Glenn, that’s what you are paid to do.

While Beck can bring all the sensationalism of bombs with nails exploding into a grandma’s face, why does he continue to waste time on comparatively meaningless news. Distraction anyone?

So, for those faithful to the Glenn Beck book club, reading all about the world and the United States history is good, and learning about the version of history that paints the banker family dynasties like the Rothchilds and the Rockefellers is bad.

But, wait, here comes the argument from the Beck supporters – “he talked about the Rockefellers just the other night, I heard him”. I must be a silly man, because I got that wrong again – Glenn brings all that stuff up!

Sure he does.

He sure does.

He deflects the true issues. He spins the criticism. He, in a myriad of ways covers up. And, the really sad thing now is he knows that more and more people are on to his game. They just need to know the base. The dark side. That is, they just have to bring light to what Beck wants to keep in the dark – the Murdochs, the Rothchilds, the Rockefellers, and on and on.

Yes, sure he sacrificed Al Gore and his climate duping, and yes he threw George Soros and Maury Strong under the same New World Express, but where is the continuation of those important arguments? Used to bolster some credibility and to be put on the shelf because they served the purpose of bringing in some viewers?

We have Crime Inc, a Beck design, that is now where exactly?

Oh, I hear the Beck supporters again. “He will get back to that again really soon, don’t you worry. He just has to trash the Black Panthers, Mel Gibson, and tell us all about the nails entering grandmas face”. Yes, those are just as important as the bigger picture of Soros and Strong duping the nation.

Yes, those are the same Soros and Strong fellows that are in the same Bilderberg company as Rupert Murdoch.

Olly, olly oxen free boys – it’s time to continue to call you out, and bring the flashlight to your dark little party.

Glenn is going to have his hands full from this point on, deflecting and pulling the covers over your little escapades.

And sadly, Glenn is feeling the heat. Beck recently said he is not sure what will become of him.

Does Glenn think he is in on the party?  Does he think that Murdoch will have much for him to do once he has served his purpose?

Time will tell.

On behalf of bloggers in basements the world over, chalk one up for those of us that don’t get paid to bring the truth.

That is why we have no issue with shining a light  in the deepest, darkest places.

Those in the Bilderberg Group should know the party is over. The game of hide and seek is done.

Stay tuned, Glenn has a show today that you do not want to miss. And, he is going to tell us about “someone else”. Boy, I can hardly wait to see who else he discredits, or, who he throws under the New World Express.

A response to a Beck supporter unhappy with our latest article, “Murdoch’s mouthpiece”

Beck offers the same strategy on his show that is used by the globalists – Problem, Reaction, Solution!

A response to a comment

We can learn a lot from criticism.

Sometimes we learn what we did wrong, and other times we find opportunity to offer someone else an alternative viewpoint.

Please take this comment, made in support of Glenn Beck, from our last post:

This is one of the dumbest smears against Glenn I’ve ever seen. How stupid do you have to be to believe that Rupert Murdoch sits around with Glenn Beck, strategizing his content?

How stupid do you have to be to believe that the dreaded Bilderbergs would spend there time exposing Communists in this government? Wouldn’t that be counter productive…since one world Communist rule is their goal?

But then I remember that this is from the same paranoid delusional who believe that Popular Mechanics is in league with the CIA…and it all makes sense.

It’s really too bad that either you’re all in with each and every Infowars conspiracy…or you’re all in with the Owl Worshippers. I’m sorry, did I mix my IW conspiracy metaphors there? Or are Bilderbergers and Bohemian Grovers one and the same?

I realize there’s only ONE high profile person who rates with your nutty little group…but since you’re all in or all out…why not ask Ron Paul to embrace the 9-11 Truther tale on air sometime…and see how he responds? Surely he wouldn’t deny it…that would make him a neo-con, Trilateral Commissioner of the Bilderberger CFR Grovers, wouldn’t it?

Here was the response:

Pat, thank you for your comments! It explains a lot.

This is not a battle of whose kool-aid we choose to drink. But, there does seem to be a Jones vs. Beck undercurrent that has developed. And, I was like you – Beck is a guy you would like to believe.

Even Jones found himself wanting to like Beck, as Beck turned up the discussion a notch. But what must be understood is the “agenda” behind it.

You must admit that if Murdoch is a Bilderberger, he would be crazy to “expose” his own agenda, right?

My argument is Beck serves his employer’s agenda. He has “followed” Jones and offers an alternative to the “conspiracy theories”, because, as you will recall, “you do not need a conspiracy theory to explain this”. In other words, Beck by this statement could have just as easily said, “you might as well listen to me and not Jones, and you don’t need the conspiracy theory Jones outlines”. Beck in doing so, is providing an alternative direction. Wherever Jones goes, Beck follows with a “spin” on the issues at hand. The “spin”, if I am correct, will always take the viewer away from the Bilderbergers, OR, and this is important, explain an uncovered truth in an alternate way, deflecting away from the bigger issue of the banking cartel families (the Bilderbergers).

Psychologically, the attack and strategy has been clever. As Beck has shown, the communist regime leads to people jumping into pits to be mass murdered. So, Beck has provided the “problem” of where the country will be heading, and he has left his viewers/followers looking for direction to avoid this terrible fate. By doing so, it is like a false flag event  - problem (we will be exterminated), reaction (help us Glenn!), solution (follow me and we can take our country back).

Well, hold on, who is Beck working for again? Murdoch, the Bilderberger, that would prefer you believe it is those nasty Progressives leading the country to Communism as a DIVERSION from the group that is really in charge – the Bilderberg, CFR, Trilateral Commission, the Royal Families, etc., etc.

I have written several articles on some of these elements.

Interestingly, I came across Aaron Russo’s documentary, From Freedom to Fascism, that you can view on YouTube. It was interesting to see that Woodrow Wilson was humbled in 1919, and admitted that allowing the Federal Reserve and the private bankers to issue the currency, at interest to the people of the United States, as a HUGE mistake.

Isn’t it Glenn who claims he “hates that guy”?

Another piece fits.

In closing, we all need to seek the truth. It isn’t just one man’s opinion and direction that is important – we need to look at many sources.

Once you look to discern Glenn’s content and message in this way, you will pick up the reasoning and the pattern, and understand there is reason he “handles” the truth in the way he does.

And the simplest of all is to ask, who butters the prophet’s bread?

Murdoch’s mouthpiece: It’s not what Beck exposes, it’s the issues he deflects and who he discredits that counts

If you are a businessman and need to hire a potential employee, what is standard procedure when “checking out” your prospective employee?

Well, one prudent thing to do would be to contact the previous employer.

Can you imagine FOX News, as it called CNN to get a character reference for Glenn Beck? What do you suppose CNN would report?

Well, they would likely tell FOX that Glenn was good at following orders, toeing the “station line” and reporting what he was asked to do. For CNN, that would be the “liberal line”. Did he do a good job? Would CNN tell FOX he was great for CNN? Or, would they say, well Glenn became too “Republican” for our liking, and so we realized he had to go. Kind of like Lou Dobbs?

Well, Dobbs would have been a bit of a different issue we might all agree. Dobbs was looking at the North American Union and was disgusted by what he saw. He could not contain his disgust, and his position made his staying at CNN impossible. His position made going to FOX impossible too.

How about MSNBC? No good either, sorry Lou!

Dobbs had nowhere to go because exposing the dark side about the North American Union was faux pas broadcasting. It didn’t matter if it were on FOX (conservative) or CNN (liberal), the issue of exposing the NAU was off-limits. Any news anchor that voiced his own opinion on the subject was undesirable. And, why is that? Most of us know the answer, but there remains many of us that need to learn.

As mentioned over and over, it is significant that Beck, for CNN interviewed Ron Paul on the Presidential campaign trail in 2008. It is significant that Beck mentioned his own understanding that the NAU would lead to a World Government, and he asked Paul if he agreed. Of course Ron Paul did. Was it Beck’s personal opinion and concern as it was for Lou Dobbs?

While Dobbs put his career on the line to stand up for principle, the comparison to Beck is important. To my knowledge, like water off the backside of a duck, Beck shelved the thought and discussion because it no longer served the purpose his employer required. It looked more like a “call out” of Paul to make him look radical than a pure seeking of truth and concern for the ravages of what the North American Union would do to the United States, Mexico, and Canada. Dobbs knew what it meant, and he stood up to it. Beck? He was likely doing what he was told to fulfill the political agenda his employer needed him to carry out.

So, when FOX checked Beck’s employment history, did CNN tell FOX he does what he is asked to do? Does Beck toe the station line?

The nature of the show and FOX itself would have us believe they are the counter to all crappy news sources. Nobody tells you the “truth” like FOX!

Now, onto the point.

Who owns Fox News? Rupert Murdoch.

Not long ago, when Beck was explaining his wonderful ability to bring the truth, he mentioned Rupert Murdoch as the man that allowed him to tell us all what is going on.

It’s interesting that Beck bashes communism so freely. Interesting because his boss has long strived to get his news into China:

Mr. Murdoch has flattered Communist Party leaders and done business with their children. His Fox News network helped China’s leading state broadcaster develop a news Web site. He joined hands with the Communist Youth League, a power base in the ruling party, in a risky television venture, his China managers and advisers say.

Okay, forget Murdoch’s ties to communist China, how about Bilderberg.

Not long ago, you might recall Beck defended the Bilderberg Group. You don’t need the Bilderberg Group to explain anything Beck told us. Why would he deflect concern or investigation from the Bilderbergers? Could it be because (and I know this is not a shock to most of us) Rupert Murdoch is a Bilderberger too?

Glenn Beck is the mouthpiece for Rupert Murdoch and it is not likely he is doing anything any different from what he did for CNN – he is following the station’s agenda, and Murdoch’s will.

So, if Murdoch is a Bilderberger, is it a surprise Beck would deflect concern about Bilderberg?

And, check out Murdoch himself admit that the news is used to “further the agenda”, and “disclosing certain things can shape the agenda in a limited way”. What agenda? The Bilderberg agenda no doubt. And, Beck is his means to “disclose” only certain information in a “limited way”. Sure fits the Glenn Beck persona and show. Here is Murdoch admitting manipulation of the news:

And, this brings us to the final point.

We do not need to address the issues of Bilderberg. They are the big picture Beck refuses to address.

Bilderberg would lead to 9/11 truth, which is also taboo. Attacking the Democratic President is not taboo, as it fits the agenda of false left-right politics.

But there is a way to watch Beck that will help you understand the pattern.

It is not what Beck exposes that is most significant under these “manipulations”. It is who he discredits, and what he tells you to ignore or brush off as crazy.

Recently, he has attacked Russia Today (RT).

We all know that RT has some very insightful programs and interviews, including Max Keiser (Keiser Report), and interviews with Tarpley and Alex Jones on a regular basis. We know they pose a significant threat to bringing out the truth, and exposing Bilderberg.

And expose Bilderberg they do:

Deflect and discredit Glenn, hurry!

Murdoch wouldn’t like that.

Is it a coincidence Beck is attacking RT?

As you watch Beck, and you still think he holds merit of the truth, keep in mind who butters his bread, and who his new master is. Know that he works for Murdoch, a Bilderberger, who admittedly tampers with the news to fulfill an agenda.

In this case, it is the Bilderberg agenda. It is the globalist agenda.

Beck will continue to do his part to further it, whether it is to create division among races, social groups, unions vs. non-unions, and attack anyone that fulfills the mission of his new master. At this stage in the “game”, the Bilderbergers need to create a social divide, create violence and civil unrest, and deflect away the truth. That is the new agenda. Just watch it come to life on the Glenn Beck show.

Will McGuinty or Campbell become our Obama?

I don’t like what I see. And I haven’t liked the developments in Canada over the past while. The news has painted a picture to suggest we could be heading down the great Liberal divide, in parallel to the change we saw in the U.S..

George W. Bush left office as a Republican to be replaced by the great, messianic Democrat, Barack H. Obama.

There is plenty of fact to support that Barack Obama is really a man named Barry Soetoro. According to Phil Berg, a lawyer who is legally challenging Obama’s regime, “The crucial issues regarding Obama, the “IMPOSTOR”, continue to grow.  However, the most important issue is Obama not being Constitutionally eligible to be President: 1) not being “natural born” being born in Mombasa, Kenya; and 2) even more important the fact that Obama was “adopted” or “acknowledged” by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro, and his school record in Indonesia indicates the “Impostor’s” name as “Barry Soetoro” and his nationality being “Indonesia”.  Obama, the Impostor’s legal name is “Barry Soetoro”.  Obama must be stopped ! ”

The argument is Obama is an imposter brought in by the globalist push for World Government. Obama has stomped on the U.S. Constitution and the result has been devastating to the United States, so much so, that many States are joining Arizona in fighting to impose the laws that the Feds should be upholding. Obama has defied Arizona to such a degree, that he actually handed a National Park over to the Mexico, and travelling the highways in the area are becoming risky, in fact dangerous. Obama, while making life dangerous for Arizonans, had the nerve to suggest their upholding  of the laws were “misdirected”. 

We could go on and on about Obama and his trampling of the Constitution, including his handling of the Gulf Oil Crisis, gun confiscation violations, the Healthcare Bill, the banker bailout and his ties to Goldman Sachs, the address he made to the United Nations as the World Leader (holding two offices), secret meetings including the 2008 dodge of reporters to visit the Bilderberg meetings in Virginia, and on and on. Just about everything the man has touched has been a violation or mockery of the U.S. Constitution and the rights of its citizens.

And, the game appears to be revving up here in Canada.

The recent G20 meetings in Toronto late June could just be the back-breaker of Stephen Harper. While there is plenty to suggest that the McGuinty government had their hand in the propulsion of the “public works law” that saw 1000 arrests and abuse of police power, he now refuses a public enquiry, and the explanation at best is described as a “confusion over expanded police powers”.

Arrogantly, McGuinty appears ready to challenge his Federal counterpart, and become the people’s choice – the counter-Harper as the defender of human rights for those Canadians traumatized by the invasion on our liberties.

Sounding like Obama?

 Brownie points to Mr. McGuinty. After all, it’s all about providing the alternative political choice when one party “screws up”. Sounds like a future campaign, selling feature does it not?

McGuinty has also recently hit the world stage, and if that does not seem strange unto itself, we must remember he supports more globalist strategy, when he attempted to bring in the all day kindergarten for three-year olds. That’s right, you read that correctly, because according to McGuinty, the influence of the state (schools) on your young is more important than the bonding time with mom and dad, and I’d like to know where the study is to support his claim that the children will progress better in school as a result. It wouldn’t have anything to do with “shaping” children to accept the New World way of change, as alluded to in Obama’s famous, but now sick, twisted campaign promise of Hope and Change. I think we can see where there is no Hope, and can only imagine how far from the family dynamic the change aspect will destroy.

And, then, we had rumour of McGuinty entertaining the possibility of selling water supply rightsand privatizing public corporations to foreign interests, displacing more university spots to foreign students who pay more, and significantly, tripping over himself to pamper the globalist supporting Queen of England. Could that be Mr. McGuinty drooling at the Queen, and saying “pick me, pick me?!”.

So, the summary on McGuinty: global visits as an “Ontario” politician, privatization of industry that was province owned, changing the family dynamic by getting to the kids really young, appearing to be taking on the Federal government as far as human rights violations during the G20, and sucking up to the Queen who has to okay everything this country does. And where was Mr. Harper – behind McGuinty in queenly posture? I’d a kicked Mr. McGuinty to “his place” if I was Mr. Harper.

Now, for our British Columbia, Liberal Premier, Mr. Campbell. He attended this year’s Bilderberg meeting. Need we say more?

So, with the butt-kissing of McGuinty, perhaps he is trying to oust his west-coast rival. The only problem is, he wasn’t in on the new, world agenda as Campbell was.

The false left-right paradigm is ready to bring in the Liberals as the fake choice we Canadians will need to think we have a say. Maybe they need to destroy Harper a little more first. I just hope Harper is true to Harper for his own sake.

Perhaps Harper is resistant to the New World Order agenda, and is resisting. God knows only he can answer if his government’s Christian influence is real or a show.

 

Is the Queen making peace with God?

It’s never too late to repent. Let that absorb for  a moment won’t you?

No matter what one has done in one’s lifetime, it is never too late to ask forgiveness from God the Father in Heaven. And, please take another moment for that to absorb.

That is what makes God, God.

I’m no preacher but that much I know. I’m not big on organized religion, but  do communicate with God on a fairly regular basis - and he has been communicating a whole lot lately. How about  you? Is it politically correct to talk about this? Probably as correct as handing out the Gospel of John on the streets and getting arrested. Sick (and not in the way some teenagers view the word “sick” as meaning cool or gnarly).

The world is getting rough. There have been terrible tragedies occurring, and it seems of late, there has been an acceleration of events to make the world a visibly shaken place to be. People the world over know something is not right, but are finding it hard to put a finger on the feeling in the pit of their stomachs. And what of those directly involved in the scandals? How are they coping with their responsibilities and involvement?

Why is it that if you watch the news, it is as if there is a cover up of how bad “everything is”? It’s almost as if there is a stall tactic being employed while a deep, dark agenda is unfolding beneath the surface. You can feel it, can’t you?

The Gulf oil spill’s latest victim is the conveyance of truth, as reporting and filming the region is now a crime.  It is the nation’s largest environmental disaster that the people are forbidden from seeing for themselves. The people don’t count or matter.  Stories are leaking from those in Louisiana  and Florida to suggest it is far worse than anything that is even close to being reported. Is it any wonder, when reporting is not allowed? Is there an agenda? And the Gulf situation is part of a very real pattern of cover ups, lies, and supports the the bigger fear – the hidden agenda to which  the world’s top leaders are incredibly involved. And if the big picture is as incredible as it is shaping up to support, there will be guilt and souls seeking forgiveness.

For the riot police acting unethically at the G20 in Toronto -are there some that might feel remorse?  Are they fully proud of their involvement, with  clear conscience? Is there any remorse felt for actions taken that were less than ethical, or for partaking in crowd control that took several steps beyond humanity by all accounts – complete with reports of torture, humiliation,  even rape ?  The makeshift detention zone cleverly compared to it’s long unknown Cuban cousin, appropriately described as Torontonomo BaySurely there must be some remorse. Are there police officers seeking repentance  in the aftermath? Did our Queen mention the mark it left on our Country’s image?

Simply, twisted and sick is the only way to describe the goings on in the world – sick and twisted.

And of course we have the symptoms of the stages of awareness and acceptance in full play. Apparently, the new Canadian way of coping with the world’s trouble is to put it in perspective. “We are good and strong. Thank God our country isn’t in debt like the rest of the world. We are strong, and will remain strong. Yeah Canada!”

And as the world looks to make sense of it all, and people hunger to get some semblance of normalcy in their view of the world, the Queen of England appears as she has in the past. At 84 years old, there must be a lot of wisdom in her yet. She doesn’t look too bad for someone 84, complete with busy agenda. She must be eating well.

 ”Hello Queen! We are ready to celebrate your “coming home”, now more than ever! We are proud Canadians. Thanks for being harmless and insignificant even if the Governor General tells you everything major we want, and you have to okay it. You are insignificant, but a welcome, mysterious charm of our country’s heritage.”

 Meanwhile, we conveniently have overlooked that our Queen of Canada is also the Queen of England, and they don’t have it so good. But, don’t tell the Brits because it might spoil their memory of dancing and mocking Americans on the streets of England on the fourth of July. They can mock because they are better off. It’s kind of like the hospital patient’s rationale - ” At least I don’t have cancer like that guy!” Oh yeah you do, they just haven’t told you yet.

Not long ago we Canadians didn’t have an identity, and the talk on the street was that we were the subsidiary of the U.S. economy, complete with McDonalds, Home Depot, Lowes, Wal-Mart, and ” look, “we have a Starbuck’s now!” Time to put away the denial and realize we have all been railroaded down the same track. But that’s okay, the Queen has visited, and she says Canada is like coming home. Just like England, and just like the U.S .. And, could that be why she made a five-hour visit to New York to pay homage to the 9/11 victims? Or was she more concerned perhaps with checking out the damage of the Royal Family controlled BP Oil company? And interest she does have, the harmless 84-year-old Queen of ours:

“The British Crown is franchisor of all corporate entities operating under or out of Britain and The Commonwealth. Legal title to said corporations is held by The Crown with equity operating position of corporations held by agents under corporate charter whose management and stockholders are subject to Crown authorities.

“Thereby all acts or omissions of said corporations are attached to The Crown through license and provably so by taxes collected on operation of said corporations.

“The Crown holds ownership position in BRITISH PETROLEUM in conjunction with partners through interlocking directorates, disclosed and undisclosed.”

The Conspiracy Theorists, who are really just investigators and thinkers,  are quick to realize that Globalists tend to support each other. If they are short on praise, they get support from other Globalists to bolster their image and give more creedence to their message. That would explain  the lead in by Ban Ki-Moon, Secretary-General of the U.N. when he introduced our Queen to the assembly with, “In a changing and churning world, you are an anchor for our age.” Of course the Queen supports the taxation of the world for the very iffy austerity that will accompany Global Warming.

With all the talk of World Government, World Governance, Global Taxation, and a new Global Currency (Special Drawing Rights) coming to the forefront, there is concern that what was once dismissed as conspiracy theory, is now mainstream admission and fact.  Which makes this sick feeling beg the bigger question - how much more of what the conspiracy theories have foretold are also true? Dare we go there? Dare we face what has been staring at us all along? Is the Queen really “insignificant” and will a global government make her “insignificant” yet again? Or will she emerge a player, with more power than we were led to believe she ever had?

As conspiracy theory is rapidly being proven to be fact, what other strange evils will become known? Should we ‘go there’ on the supposed harmlessness of our beloved Queen?

In a couple of paragraphs, the Queen mother proved she has more influence than the little old lady, waving her hand to the masses. She has kept abreast, perhaps in there like a dirty shirt, when she justified world events by saying you asked for it, you got it, and like war being waged, peace will come at a price:

“Many of these sweeping advances have come about not because of governments, committee resolutions or central directives — although all these have played a part — but instead because millions of people around the world wanted them,” she said.

Acknowledging that the body faced important new challenges like terrorism and climate change, she said, “It has perhaps always been the case that the waging of peace is the hardest form of leadership of all.”

“The waging of peace”? The last time we heard the expression, the “waging of…” usually was followed by the term “war” not peace. But, in this sick, twisted new version of the world, where everything good is spun to have the opposite affect on the world, it is not surprising to hear the words “waging of peace”. It just seems to fit the way the rest of the world is going. It is no stranger than President Obama saying grandma will be fine, only to learn the death panels in the Healthcare Bill  are real. No conspiracy theory, just fact.  So, waging peace it is then. Why not?!

As the press suppresses and covers up the festering truth, we must ask if the Queen spoke of the events of the world from a point of regret, or as a mission that must be endured. Was she in pain with the rest of us, or was she justifying the events around us? Was she more like Michelle Obama telling the children of the U.S. that hard changes must be endured, or was she trying to preserve the world as she has in the past led us to be comfortable with?

Is the Queen acting like a supporter of those effecting global government and austerity, or as one saddened by its invasion?

She told the world we asked for it. It wasn’t the governments of the world that decided it – we asked for it. I don’t recall asking, do you?

On the question of why an 84-year-old Queen visited the site of 9/11, does she have reason for regret or remorse? She is the only one that can answer that question.

As more and more consiracy theory becomes fact, there will be plenty of opportunity for those guilty to seek forgiveness and redemption.

After 84 years, does the Queen have anything to say to God?

The giant sucking sound of wealth being stolen, and the girgling of bloated, starving bellies

The words, “you all are making me sick” come to mind and to mouth sometimes when we think of the people who choose not to check out the fraud in the corrupt as all get out Wall Street zombie banks.

The above sentence is a combination of terminology used by three very savvy, in the know people of change and whistle-blowing – Alex Jones, Webster Tarpley, and Max Keiser. Those of us that listen to their words of wisdom will be able to pick off who uses what jargon to explain what can only be described as infuriating.

There are many more financial and world-knowledge gurus that have been out there all along, but to many of us, are only becoming known now.

There is a growing number of disgruntled financial experts  flowing from Wall Street and mainstream press to the airwaves and print/blogs that are not readily viewable on North American press/television.

And that’s a drag, because these people are interesting, addictive, and refreshing. They speak the truth, because their predictions of future financial fallout jives with things past and things to come. They are like a magnifying glass on paper to burn the truth, like sunlight on the hidden truth in mainstream articles.

Ask yourself if you’ve heard of some of these people: Alex Jones, Max Keiser, Gerald Celente, Webster Tarpley, Michael Hudson, Keiser with Hudson, Bob Chapman, Peter Schiff, Keiser with Schiff, Joe Weisenthal, Keiser with Weisenthal, (don’t miss it Max goes ‘bananas’!), Wayne Madsen, and many more.

Yes, likely the White House masters, Goldman Sachs would tell you these guys and girls, and the growing numbers that can’t take it any more are disgruntled dissidents that should not be trusted. And at this stage we want to trust a bank or a politician because of what exactly?

Well, let’s take a really easy look at what these folks talk about day in and day out. It is really complicated, but not really. It all involves the gambling of financiers on the failure of investments, countries’ bonds, etc.

Simply put, guys like Goldman Sachs will control the financial markets electronically with high volume trading software, that they can simply choose the price they want a stock to be at, hit a button, and trade whichever way they want to effect the stock price they want. If they want the price to go down or up, will depend on their bet.

Bets have many names, and one very popular one is called a credit default swap (CDS). CDS’s are used to “insure” against the failure of a stock or bond (oh yeah, like the borrowing of bonds of Greece? You got it!).

Well, again simply put, Goldman Sachs using market manipulation with high volume trading, can ensure stocks fail, by creating fear in the markets with high volume trades that might drive down a stock’s  (or bond’s) price. As the day traders with home-based, low fee, computer-powered devices are able to react to the markets movements, fear amongst them and other investors will effectively react to the triggers that Sachs and other market manipulators put into effect. The puppet master, Goldman, can ensure the market reacts the way they need them to, by giving a nudge to the market forces to drive prices down.

The big boy investment houses can buy CDS’s from sacrificed firms like AIG, and make all kinds of profit on betting that things will go bad, and making sure they effect it. It’s like being able to see one day in the future before going out to etch the numbers on the lottery ticket like 6/49 here in Canada. Yes, they have worked hard at ensuring there is no way they can lose.

Fast forward to Greece, and other failing countries (all of us), and you will find ex Goldman Sachs influence everywhere.

Now you know why Max Keiser is sitting back and making a joke of the ridiculousness of the situation. The next time an investment suggestion is made to you, nail your advisor with a quiz on what you know, and see if he or she has a clue. If they did, they might be suggesting gold, if not, who’s their daddy?

Keiser is quick to point out that Hollywood is a sure, coming target of the system. At $10 billion a year in revenues, that can be parlayed into a $300 billion derivatives bubble that Goldman will have the pin in hand ready to burst once they have tapped out more wealth.

Makes me feel warm and fuzzy. Reminds me of Bill Gates asking for half the wealth of his rich friends under some good cause guise I can’t even recall. The names change, but the theme is the same. It’s called “calling in all wealth, everywhere, so we can get you at our mercy”.

And finally, how low can Goldman Sachs go? What drove me to write this article?

The fact that they have bet against food itself as the last bastion of taste and proof they are the scum of the financial earth. Don’t leave here without ‘digesting this truth’.

“Doing what’s right with zero Compromise” – Charlie Veitch

Charlie Veitch is the unofficial adopted son of Canadian Liberty. He took one for the team over the G20 protests on the weekend of June 26, 2010. Sacrificed he was, not once but twice.

(Oh why, as I watch my fingers typing do I want to label myself one of the types that must have been present during the wars, as the realization of secret police and arrest haunted the people of the day?)

The question is less becoming are we entering a police state, but more, why and how fast?

If this is what it is, and believe us, it is, then we as a people and society, and a world are heading headlong into the same economic, social, and spiritual abyss.

If you are one of those that is trying to lead by some semblance of example, you may notice yourself evermore slipping away from the things that you used to amuse yourself with, and more into seeking what you know as the truth; as the people around you resent the reminder, and justify your thinking as crazy. Yet, you may too, find yourself taking opportunity to explain things, as you see them hungering to learn amidst their fear, so you break it to them gently in a way that will meet the least resistance and objection –  with the intent of slowly bringing those to your thinking –  You hope.

 Believe me, they already  know what you are all about, and what you represent, whether you speak or not. Your interests have given you away. After all, everyone is trying to sell his neighbour something these days, aren’t they?

So, the dance  continues….

Charlie Veitch is one of those people who is a hero to the cause of exposing the reality of his day. Taking his humourous bullhorn to the streets, greeted with laughs from some, while jeers may come from others. Who is this wacko jaunting behind us? Another big city activist.

YouTube videos will pan the crowd, and you can see the celebrity of Veitch on the faces of those taking his picture or a video. He is famous after all. He is challenging the status quo. Thinking the Beatles? How about Rush, for our Canadian friends, as the song goes…”conform or be cast out”.

The trauma is visible on Veitch’s face – a far cry from the more human treatment he has had in his home town, and interaction with police there. Hugs for everyone!

 InVeitch’s humour, one cannot help but be reminded that there is an underlying truth that tickles the psyche, making fun of what must, according to the powers of the world, be taken seriously – like breathing out nasty C02, terrorism from cave dwellers half a world away, television, spending on junk, and ensuring we listen to all accounts of reality from the power-broker controlled media. After all, if it’s in the paper, we have been conditioned, it must be reality. I never thought I’d hear myself say, welcome to the matrix.

Many of us learned of this mystery man, Charlie Veitch, for the first time this past weekend. Some of us had seen him before on YouTube or elsewhere. He’s a man who took a trip from London to help the cause of awareness in Canada. And this Charlie is not to be confused with another Charlie, who has the surname Skelton (Charlie Skelton), who will continue to be admired for his bravery enduring perhaps a less harsher arrest in Spain during the Bilderberg meetings. The police there, like England have had a better experience with the fallout of the police state than our rookies here in Canada. In Canada, the consequences of police action have not yet been felt in the laying off of buddies. Nor, have the pension plans been reduced or removed as they have elsewhere. Here in Canada, the petty power is new, and fresh, and exciting.

Charlie Veitch is no doubt realizing what he meant on May 20th, as he was interviewed by Alex Jones, when he said he was “doing what’s right with zero compromise”. What Charlie no doubt experienced this past weekend was a taste of the cost of what that meant.

But, what’s more important for us to understand is what Charlie did wrong.

He came from London to protest his view of the world. This view is shared by a growing number of people, and it would appear it represents a threat to the establishment. It is a threat, no doubt because it is real, it is bang-on, and it cannot be challenged successfully.

Imagine yourself having something to hide. Would you want an open debate on issues that expose your own corruption? Did Al Gore welcome debate with Lord Christopher Monkton on Climate Change? Did Glenn Beck want to have a go with Governor Jesse Ventura? Did the Queen of England come to Canada and tell us all how horrible the injustice was to those who suffered false arrest, imprisonment, rape and torture in Toronto?  For that, a national day of mourning, lest we forget is in order I would say.

I suppose I am becoming a political dissident.

You, like some of us, as we choose to speak our minds might be realizing that it is a road that has no U-turn-ability. We are heading down a path that we might as well head down full steam. There is no turning back. There is no compromise.

Keep typing. Keep talking. And when they come to get us, then those around us, who know us can wonder what exactly we did wrong. And it might help them to realize this is really happening.

Have you noticed? We voicing our views of the world are the new terrorists. We are worthy of arrest, detention, and torture – anything to suppress the truth from becoming known before it’s time. Theirs is an agenda that has been in the works for a long time.

The bottom line is we can see what Veitch did wrong – nothing! Stating a political point of view is not a crime, but it is becoming one to the world. The big question is why?

Get to know Charlie Veitch a bit better:

Parts: 2, 3, 4, 5

Canada Day can officially be now known as HST’s Birthday! Happy Taxes to all!

And, since we have no money left to buy anything, we thought we should show you why. Thanks to the creator of this very informative documentary from ohcanadamovie.com.

I care not who controls government, just the money supply, er something like that, wasn’t it Monsieur de Rothchild?

Part 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Again, thanks to the filmmaker, for making us laugh, cry, fume, and wish we could run out today to buy a really good printer! Please support this movie by visiting the website, buy copies, and pass them out.

We’d also like to thank Mr. Martin for hiring so many hardworking Canadians on coffee cup duty.

Happy HST Day everyone!