Monthly Archives: October 2010

Orwell’s 1984 coming to Canadian Universities?: UWO Faculty Strike looming

PLEASE NOTE: DON’T MISS THE SECOND INSTALMENT LOCATED HERE…..

If the experience is good, isn't it attributed to freedom?

 

Is it really about what a Professor can or cannot say?

Who will the students get if University Administrators have their way? Will it be the concerned friend, with mutual admiration, like the professor in the movie sharing a toke and some debate? Or will the discipline of higher learning fall to tyranny and fascist rule? And it would seem it’s not just professors that are concerned with keeping their oath of duty!

Orwell wrote that

indifference to objective truth is encouraged by the sealing off of one part of the world from another, which makes it harder and harder to discover what is actually happening. There can often be doubt about the most enormous events… .The calamities that are constantly being reported — battles, massacres, famines, revolutions — tend to inspire in the average person a feeling of unreality. One has no way of verifying the facts, one is not even fully certain that they have happened, and one is always presented with totally different interpretations from different sources. Probably the truth is undiscoverable but the facts will be so dishonestly set forth in that the ordinary reader can be forgiven either for swallowing lies or for failing to form an opinion … 3

And, as the article continued, it noted how history is tainted, perception clouded, and minds conformed:

The popular perception of history is based on brainwashing by the mass media, indoctrination by the education system, peer group pressure, self-censorship and television “docudramas.”

James Compton, the UWO Faculty Association head pinned the argument this way:

People whose jobs are less secure are less willing to speak out, and that, in turn, weakens a central purpose of a university, Compton said.

Academic freedom isn’t a perk or a privilege. It is a core component of what professors do.”

It might just boil down to a battle of good and evil, as in this psychology assignment related to Orwell’s 1984, suitably given to students at Western University in London, Ontario.

The Professor might be scrutinized to administer that or any other assignment in the future as it may not be in line with a growing trend toward censorship and control by administrators, not peers.

That would be like the budgeting department telling the sales team how to sell, and judging how the sales are coming along. With no clue of the issues and importance of the professor’s task, administration represents an ever-growing  obstacle to ensure the job gets done. And one of the biggest issues to hit the higher echelons of learning – freedoms of speech and expression.

Freedom to challenge is the freedom to learn. Examining the world and being free to discuss things openly without fear of repercussion spawns intelligence and growth. Without it, we are lost as a society and a people, and are subject to fascist rule. The places of higher learning in a dictatorship would be fertile ground to get control of the minds that represent the future. The professors may just see the writing on the wall, and are fighting back!

MacLeans Magazine has written this article with the key point being:

At the same time, what is good for faculty is often good for students in the long run. If faculty win higher salaries at the bargaining table, it may mean recruiting better profs in the future. If they get better rules for academic freedom, it may mean better teaching because instructors are not worried about what they can and cannot say. If they get smaller class sizes, you may get more personal attention in your next course.

In another article, this comment by “Zarko” on 29 September 2010:

One of the proposed demands by the UWO administration includes some rather creepy stuff about invading the personal lives of professors. Imagine if your employer had the right to know who you might work for in a second job, or what charities you volunteer for. Now imagine that your employer, armed with this information, could indiscriminately dismiss you just because they don’t like how you spend your free time. The threat is rather clear: the employer wants to know who else you work for, how many hours you work for that other business, and exactly how much you are paid. No employee should be subject to such scrutiny and privacy invasion. It’s a little too 1984 to passively accept. To those who think UWO is stuffed with “fat cat” tenured faculty with sinecure positions, think again. UWO is leaning more towards “flexible workforce” which means part-time faculty who make very little, who have zero job security, and can easily be turfed at any time for reasons that have nothing to do with being inappropriate.

That comment was posted in this article about the pending strike of faculty at Western University, London, Ontario.

A strike by faculty  at Western could be in order as early as November 3rd at 12:01 AM.

What’s interesting and at the same time refreshing is it is not about money – it’s about freedoms, rights, and ultimately the quality of education.

As one student understands it, it limits the ability for a professor to state their opinion on a given issue, that must fall in line with university policy. The example cited was, say a University had a corporate arrangement with Apple, and the prof wanted to express concern for low wages in China where computers are made – then the university may try to limit the ability to criticize an affiliate of the university. That student is onboard with the rights of the professor.

Another student agrees:

Lippay is concerned that a condensed semester would sacrifice the quality of education that she will receive. However, she also sympathizes with the faculty’s issues around academic freedom.

“Most of the professors I’ve had are very passionate about what they talk about. They talk very freely about what’s concerning them, and they make an effort for students to get involved in the discussion,” said Lippay.

Lippay believes that a lack of academic freedom could make classes boring and take away from the quality of the educational experience.

Goodbye freedom of speech and expression?

If Western University is one of the best for “student experience”, it can largely be attributed to the faculty of dedicated professors.

Let’s face it – people work, thrive, and live best when free. If there is a power grab from one side that seems unreasonable, then this will undoubtedly be felt in the level of education the students get. The university explains it this way:

Outstanding issues at the table include: a series of linked articles that would institute “performance management” techniques governing Academic Responsibilities, Conflict of Interest and Conflict of Commitment, Annual Performance Evaluation, Sabbatical Leave, and Discipline. Compensation also remains unresolved.

 

If the “agenda” was censorship and control, the above guidelines could be used to manipulate and control, and subjectivity is more likely than objectivity.
Performance management? Who should judge that – administrators or the students the professors serve?
Conflicts of interest? Would this be monitoring and judging extra-curricular activities, interests and group participation that would be subject to approval of the administration of the university? Don’t believe what we want you to believe and it affects your employment?
Need we look at conflict of commitment and discipline? God knows where that could and would lead.

Remember, we are talking about tenured professors that are some of the best in the world. They are used to having freedom to do what needs to be done from a variety of angles. Are we to believe that “moonlighting” at another employer will affect the dedication the prof will have to his responsibilities at Western U?
At York University not long ago, free speech was under fire:

York University President Lorna Marsden is under fire from all directions for her decision to banish student activist and journalist Daniel Freeman-Maloy from campus for three years. Freeman-Maloy’s expulsion was meant to send a message: challenge my administration’s authority, and you will suffer the consequences. Instead, it is demonstrating that crude repression of student activism will always backlash.

Freedom of belief, freedom of assembly, and freedom of association are rights that must be maintained in every society, under every circumstance, and in every setting.
The professors of Western University have a right to maintain the ability to state their opinions in a quest for higher knowledge, and if they succumb to the barrage of pressure to toe the political line and give up rights and freedoms, we are one step closer to having our children “processed” not “growing intellectually”.
Dalton McGuinty was looking for all day kindergarten for children as young as three, because he claimed they would be learning better at older ages as a result. We could easily challenge that and counter that it would be a means of controlling the mind when very young. Agendas that might not be good for the family but the State, and in the wrong hands, could be devastating to the rights and freedoms of mankind.
In the U.S., we are seeing freedom of expression and association under Nazi-style pressure to dissuade those looking to join a group sworn to uphold rights and freedoms:


The issues at Western University may seem small at first glance. But it is part of a bigger picture that is designed to strip people of their rights.

Now take a look again at the comments at the top of this article.  Compare that to the experience of those affiliated with  Oathkeepers . Two examples, but similar theme.

What if a professor was a political activist supporting a cause? If the university had the right to discriminate in this way, they could effectively censor and control the content of higher learning.

Our minds and those around us are meant to be free. Free to learn and free to challenge.

Trying to put us in a box must be met with resistance, and the professors of Western  & Carleton Universities are on the front lines. They see the issues. They deserve our support.

Eloquently put, there is a war on for your mind and the minds of our children, Because if we ever figure it out, they are in trouble.

Let’s not go the way of Harvard! (see the next in the series!)

Where does the Western Faculty Strike stand? Here is a chronological listing.

Tax lien certificates are a license to steal money: Tapping into the municipality that used hockey for infrastructure and tax-base growth

We had reported on the foreclosures in Arizona, and mentioned the fact that municipalities have plenty of reasons to link up with firms that can aid in tax collection. There is an unpleasant but lucrative business opportunity related to unpaid property taxes. Buying for back taxes and selling for more is one way, but beware, without proper title and the derivative, mortgage backed-securites being in question, this could be risky. You might not end up owning what you think you paid for. But that is not for this discussion.

Remembering that the Phoenix Coyotes hockey team was more about land development and not hockey, we have continued to look for connections surrounding business people who have been partnering with Glendale to solve the hockey issue. The question about being a “business reason” to own the Coyotes, where there would be sources of revenue outside of hockey stays prominent in focus.

The Ice Edge boys all gave some interesting tidbits. Daryl Jones said it was a “business reason” to own the Coyotes. Keith McCullough asked ‘who wants to go to a game in Phoenix anyways’. Hence the reasoning to shuffle off a few games to Saskatoon.

Strange for a team looking for a dedicated owner(s). And Anthony LeBlanc had tipped us off that Canadians were snapping up real estate in Arizona. Foreclosures were ripe for the pickins.

The above paints a vague picture that might suggest the business opportunity is related to properties, because, who the heck is really interested in hockey in 105 degree heat? Hmm…

Of course, we now have McCullough who supported the policies of Ben Bernanke in the past supporting the new friend, Hulsizer, who happens to be in a similar business, and would want to keep the Ice Edge boys in action in Glendale with the team. Who wants it? It doesn’t seem to matter. Swallowing pride (gulp), McCullough tells it this way:

Ice Edge chairman Keith McCullough told the Thunder Bay Chronicle-Journal earlier this week that his group had found a partner to help buy the Coyotes.

“Ice Edge would be a minority owner and an adviser,” McCullough said. “That investor is a friend of ours.”

Our last article pointed out that Hulsizer’s firm, Peak6 Investments as supportive of the Feds quantitative easing policy as if it were a good thing. The flavor is the same. No wonder it doesn’t matter who technically takes the team. There is a picture forming.

And, because everybody and his brother is looking at Mubadala today, let’s not forget they could be involved as they were with CityNorth. They could be the bondholders for the Jobing.com arena. But, will we ever know?

Where are the opportunities in Glendale that would make the Coyotes a viable loss-leader?

What if a City didn’t really care as much about hockey as it did collecting taxes? What if there were a whole bunch of homes that were vacant, and owed taxes for, and mean a double edged sword – no collection, and no future tax prospects.

Food for thought continues:

It seems to be Wall Street vs. everyone else.

Unless the U.S. economy experiences a dramatic turnaround, we are going to continue to see large numbers of Americans get behind on their property taxes, and the big banks will continue to be there to scoop up the tax liens.

Large numbers of poor and elderly Americans that don’t even have a mortgage will lose their homes and it will all be perfectly legal.  Executives at the big banks will be having a good laugh about their huge bonus checks as thousands upon thousands of our most vulnerable citizens are dumped out into the street.

And, we must pay close attention to the supporters of policy that support Wall Street. Any players entering the game to bail out the Coyotes must be scrutinized from this important perspective.

Remember, we have a municipality that might just be feeling the pinch from being strapped to a usury bond in Jobing.com arena, on top of a shrinking tax base.

Remembering the first thing the U.S. government might do with quantitative easing is to buy up toxic mortgage debt and pile it onto the taxpayers, there is also the issue of credit default swaps and the nasty business surrounding houses being worth more foreclosed than staying with homeowners.

If JP Morgan is involved with tax lien certificates via newly formed entities to stay off the radar, they might have lots of work for investors looking to tap into the lucrative tax/foreclosure game. After all, they are no strangers to checking things of this nature out:

16 Jul 17:06:17 Firefox 3.6 WinXP unknown United States New York,
United States
Jpmorgan Chase & Co. (IP removed)[Label IP Address]
makeiteighteh.com/2010/07/16/martin-feldstein-bilderbergs-promoter-of-adjustable-rate-mortgages-and-the-subprime-mortgage-crisis/
No referring link

Hyperinflation coupled with a falling dollar will mean greenbacks are not as valuable as the collateral that was taken to secure the debt. No wonder the banks want to foreclose:

The horror show playing out before our eyes in the foreclosure markets, is the continuing collapse of perhaps the greatest financial swindle in the history of mankind: the derivatives markets. The story revolves around the way that derivatives were used to create a giant pool of fictitious capital, nominally based on home mortgages, and the way that the banks are now attempting to seize the homes to turn their funny money into hard assets.

It might make a “tax district” seem like a nice diversion from the real tax-related money of unpaid taxes on properties. As Glendale becomes more desperate for relief, the more accomodating they might become.

Hockey might be the least of Glendale’s worries, but might attract help looking to cash in on peripheral opportunities, or to aid and abet the Bilderberg agenda,  and the derivative housing scam’s effectiveness. We just need to look at the big picture, follow the money, and put the pieces together.

The Coyotes, the Federal Reserve, Inflation, and tapping you dry (and will somebody give Bettman his money already?!)

….from those who brought us the military industrial complex, we now have……

The Sports Industrial Complex Racket!”

Show me the money!

Reportedly, Gary Bettman does not want to sell short the value of the Phoenix Coyotes. It’s $165  million if you want to make a deal with the NHL, Mr. Hulsizer – certified cheque or money order please.

And according to the newly thrashed David Shoalts (who really just tells it like it is and apparently is not admired for it):

Matthew Hulsizer’s bid to buy the Phoenix Coyotes from the NHL has stalled because the Chicago businessman wants a big discount on the $165-million (all currency U.S.) the league wants for the team, two sources say. This, the sources add, is despite the fact Hulsizer, 40, has an agreement in principle with the city of Glendale, Ariz., on a multiyear arena lease that could pay him $100-million toward the Coyotes’ annual losses through parking charges, taxes and property levies from a community-facilities district created around Jobing.com arena.

As Dave Zirin, from EdgeofSports.com discussed with Max Keiser, it’s all about subsidies – the rich guys taking all they can from the taxpayers of municipalities who, in Glendale’s case, cannot afford it.

Let’s do a quick recap shall we?

Who in their right mind would buy the Phoenix Coyotes for the realization that on its own it would make money? Hands anyone? Anyone?

Right!

So, how is Hulsizer and the Ice Edge Group going to make it? That is the question. The hints begin with what the “unpopular” Shoalts points out – taxes, charges, and levies – the taxpayers, and business owners are going to subsidize the team. No different really than the current focus in America as a whole.

The Federal Reserve, a private central bank produces money out of thin air, lending it to the U.S. government, and the interest on the escalating debt is paid for by, yes, that’s right, the taxpayers of the United States. In the U.S. about 60% plus of each tax dollar goes to paying interest on the debt – forget everything else. Ellen Brown tells it best:

Our money system is not what we have been led to believe. The creation of money has been “privatized,” or taken over by private money lenders. Thomas Jefferson called them “bold and bankrupt adventurers just pretending to have money.” Except for coins, allof our money is now created as loans advanced by private banking institutions — including the privately-owned Federal Reserve. Banks create the principal but not the interest to service their loans. To find the interest, new loans must continually be taken out, expanding the money supply, inflating prices — and robbing you of the value of your money.

Not only is virtually the entire money supply created privately by banks, but a mere handful of very big banks is responsible for a massive investment scheme known as “derivatives,” which now tallies in at hundreds of trillions of dollars. The banking system has been contrived so that these big banks always get bailed out by the taxpayers from their risky ventures, but the scheme has reached its mathematical limits. There isn’t enough money in the entire global economy to bail out the banks from a massive derivatives default today.

The debt is spiralling out of control and citizens of the United States are buying guns because reportedly over 80% do not trust their government!

So, with a nation already on the brink of wondering where the next meal will come from, or if they will be able to keep their home/roof over their head, because of the luxury of saying they have a hockey team, the City of Glendale is going to push the taxpayers and businesses further to support higher taxes?

How about rising prices to boot? Inflation!

In this video clip, Peak6 Investments, Jud Pyle (from Hulsizer’s firm)  says that the Government will implement quantitative easing:

Pyle tells us in the above clip that they are “waiting” for the quantitative easing, as if it was a good thing….interesting.

You see, one lesson that was learned during the last round of bank bailouts was that the American people really, really do not like it when the U.S. Congress votes to give money to the big banks.  So this time, the financial “powers that be” have figured out a way around that.  Instead of going through the massive headache of dealing with the U.S. Congress, the Federal Reserve is simply going to print money and give it directly to the banks.  To be more precise, the Federal Reserve is going to use a procedure known as “quantitative easing” to print money out of thin air in order to purchase large quantities of “troubled assets” (such as mortgage-backed securities) from the biggest U.S. banks at well above market price.

In the end, all of the inflation that this new round of quantitative easing is going to cause is going to be a “hidden tax” on all of us.

These new backdoor bailouts are going to work something like this….

1) The big U.S. banks have massive quantities of junk mortgage-backed securities that are worth little to nothing that they desperately want to get rid of.

2) They convince the Federal Reserve (which the big banks are part-owners of) to buy up these “toxic assets” at way above market price.

3) The Federal Reserve creates massive amounts of money out of thin air to buy up all of these troubled assets.  The public is told that all of this “quantitative easing” is necessary to stimulate the U.S. economy.

4) The big banks are re-capitalized and have gotten massive amounts of bad mortgage securities off their hands, the Federal Reserve has found a way to pump hundreds of billions (if not trillions) of dollars into the economy, and most of the American people are none the wiser.

Some like to call it “printing money”, as does Peter Schiff in this clip with Max Keiser. This was taken in 2009, and note the flavour of the conversation. Where will the U.S. economy be heading with lowering jobs, lowering wages, and “inflation” by the promotion of more borrowing at the price of “savings”?:

Sniff, sniff…

Couple quantitative easing with the other Obama goal of allowing banks to start the foreclosure racket again, and we can smell the pro Wall Street stance. And, let’s not forget that the foreclosures of homes were the result of the derivative scandal attached to the toxic mortgage debt. In some cases, we had two banks competing to foreclose on the same property that was according to the homeowner paid off years prior. Oh well, who cares – let the foreclosure games begin (again)!

How long can people continue to pay the rent on their own homes?

Really makes one wonder if the push to higher inflation is like taking the plug out of the bathtub in hopes the waters of wealth drain faster. As  the economy tanks, and taxes rise, who will have enough money to go to a game anyhow?

Shifting gears, it’s interesting to note the allegiance shift in campaign contributions over time, of the new  potential Coyotes owner.

With Obama selling his country down the river to Wall Street interests, it is interesting to see who supports the monetary policies and why.

Forget about pulling the plug on grandma….just pull the plug on needlessly tapping the good people of the United States with taxes for a game that will be the least of their worries.

The bottom line is wealth transfer. The rich get richer whether it is the privately owned Federal Reserve and their banker buddies, or the peripheral support of those looking to further the cause. Who pays? – we do. And they are tapping us more and more whether we like it or not.

There is something about quantitative easing and the new breed of real estate scam know as foreclosuregate.

When instututional lenders who bought up to 30 times the value of homes incredit default swaps come a knockin’ to foreclose on property, it is no wonder the foreclosure racket is the new tool to bilk the taxpayer.  The bet against the borrower has incentive to fail. The lenders bet against who they lent to. Conflict of interests abound. And Arizona is ripe for the foreclosure picking it would seem. Hmmm….

Your $300,000 home could be worth more foreclosed than not. $300,000 or 30 times that. Where is the incentive to keep you in your home?Sorry, about hockey….

It would lead us to believe the sports industrial complex may be put in place as a substitution for the fact that they might have us all living in State-run housing projects, on state-funded food stamps from J.P. Morgan, and watching state subsidized sports.

But, at least the President of the United States has promised he will be fixing up the roads – even leading  to the Coyotes games, with fresh, fully funded asphalt.

Infrastructure growth in America will increase jobs, wages, and the like. Of course, it will also put more people dependent on the public payroll (not to be confused with being paid for by taxpayers though – get that straight will you?).

Certainly, there is a shape forming.

Can you see it? The State becoming the major employer in the U.S. ?

Well, at least the new Coyotes suitor is honest – the Coyotes staying in Glendale will cost the taxpayers; they have come right out and said it – no bones about it.

Fox has already lost Beck: What will the Lord have him do?

“That which you gaze upon you become“, said Beck as he opened his monologue on October 11th, on his popular show. His nervousness was palatable, suggestive of a man trying to reinvent his role in an atmosphere all too familiar. He, no doubt explaining his own admission of guilt for his role in presenting propaganda over the years.

Before that revelation, he mentioned he feels that he has been poisoned (metaphorically) over the last four years. On a previous show, Beck apologized for being coarse; being part of the problem.

I think I have seen enough signs to know that Glenn Beck has changed. He may no longer be of this world. He is in the world, but perhaps no longer of it. In short, Beck may have found his purpose. As he would call it, he found his “stick”. The stick that Moses used to part the Red Sea, as a metaphor for God’s purpose.

Thinking back now on  past episodes it becomes clear where the Glenn Beck trying to break- free of the poison is in stark contrast to the Beck that reads the propaganda on the teleprompter. It must be harder to get Beck to read, and focus on the script. He may be reading from a new playbook; taking direction from a new source.

Beck may be starting a new chapter, turning over a new leaf.

He may be on a journey of understanding  - a process – that if experienced too fast it would make one’s head explode –    like the kids in the global warming,” of the world “advertisement which the globalists cannot understand is in extremely poor taste.

There are YouTube videos where Beck breaks down, telling his audience that he might have macular dystrophy. But I saw a different type of weeping. I saw the weeping of a soul crying out in realization of the magnitude of the “wrong” that we can only understand ourselves. The cry of realization of the magnitude of remorse. Part of a process as the realization of wrongdoing becomes overwhelming, as God takes us by the hand and marches us to the cross.

While Beck continues on at Fox, for whatever period, we should be able to pick up on the double message. There will be one for those that “get it” hidden behind the propaganda that must be mouthed to fulfill the contract.

For those that have been changed and given a new purpose not of this world, but to be delivered to this world. If you look you can see them. They were lost and now they are found; blind, but now they see.

And to get there, sometimes we need to experience enough evil to scare us.

It is often easiest to see the light when shown true darkness. Beck may be trying to tell us all he is tired of being part of what he describes as a poison. He emphasized quite effectively that he had seen  enough poison that he was pushed to see the light. He admitted to his own role in the process.

And the jelly bean jar shook to show there was no turning back. Amen!

I am happy for Beck. Despite his job of eliciting propaganda he has made a decision that can best be described by him on where he would be in his life: “This isn’t what I planned”.

The jelly bean jar Beck shook was to show how once changed it is impossible to go back. Reflective of the devastation on the globe due to the globalist push to eugenics in disguise of climate change, it is also reflective of spiritual change. Once God saves you, you are forever a different creature.

When the biggest persecutor of Christians of his day travelled down the Road to Damascus, and was visited by Jesus, he dropped to his knees and in an instant knew who was before him. “What will you have me do Lord?”

Whoever knew Saul of Tarsus before his visit they would not have recognized him after – instant transformation from sinner to saint. But there was a process.

It likely involved much weeping as the veil was lifted from Saul’s eyes – as God pointed out the poison he suffered under. The process of redemption was underway. God took Saul by the hand and marched him to the cross.

We know him now as the Apostle Paul. He was to be a strong ally of good. He was to point out that which was evil. And if anyone would have asked him where he would have seen his life going four years prior, he would no doubt have never seen that coming.

To tell a half truth is to be silent on the realization of the entire evil. Beck asked his audience, “Can we call it good and evil?”

And, as Beck pointed out, Silence in the face of evil is evil”.

“There is a God. He holds us accountable”.

There are signs to suggest it may become increasingly difficult for Beck to continue to read from the teleprompter that represents the poison of a life past.

Fox may be wondering if they have already lost Glenn Beck. They may be at odds to understand why he resists doing what used to come easy.

I could be wrong, but I don’t think so.

There really is something to be said for dropping to one’s knees.

Beck may be “getting it” a little too well

Let’s not forget what has been mentioned many times before. Sorry, but worth repeating here again. Glenn Beck works for Rupert Murdoch, a Bilderberger.

We thought there could be remorse on the part of Murdoch. Perhaps he is acting against the Bilderberg machine. Or, maybe not.

Rumor has it that Beck is becoming less popular at Fox, as he becomes more popular in the world that “gets it” around his research.

Beck could be suffering from what can best be described as knowing too much. He may have delved so deep into the research he and his staff are doing that he is finding a reality that he cannot ignore. He is no doubt getting his information from sources surrounding Alex Jones – like Alan Watt, David Icke, Mark Dice, and others. Like you, a fellow blogger. According to Beck a while back, bloggers have something to offer. We get to send a message to the world, Beck alluded to on a past episode. That is great, he went on. His criticism of bloggers dissipated over the last while. Have you noticed?

Alex Jones has spoken directly to Beck in recent days after noticing a change in reporting. Bang on with the Fabian Society Beck, bang on. We don’t need to look further that Michael Tsarion to back up the fact that bringing up the Fabian Society may be pushing Beck’s envelope of what he is “allowed” to bring up.

Tsarion explains in the clip above, that “through television” they play with the psyche. Interesting. But what may be more interesting, is what might best be described as countering that game. Beck may be operating within media to bring a message of desperation. He may be pushing the envelope of his own broadcasting freedom. He may be under suspicion and watch of the network to not overstep his bounds.

Something hit me watching the show yesterday.

Take a look at this clip of yesterday’s show.

At the 6:00 minute mark of the show, Beck says this:

“I know you get this.

But I am trying my best to give you information to help__________”

At that point Beck suddenly stops, his eyes diverted to what appears to be instructions on set, and then he returns to finish the point….

“….you wake your neighbors up. I don’t know what else I can do”.

Perhaps I am reading too much into this. Take a look for yourself:

Could Beck be seeing that there is more to this than he initially was led to believe? Is his research leading him where it has led the rest of us – to the realization that it is all too real? When Beck says “I know you get this”, is he telling those of us that might see the new Glenn, that he has been led down a path that he too now realizes is wrong?

He may have found an outlet to get others to go the distance on research, so he can bypass the roadblocks Fox News inherently presents: ” Don’t take my word for it. Do your own homework. Find out if these things are true.” Beck can lead where he is not allowed to follow. He is able to ease his mind and hope his viewers take it to the next level.

While giving credit to Jones may be out, he probably realizes “research” leads to Jones and others, and the bigger truth he cannot bring. He has good reason to go beyond his employer’s wishes. He has said it himself, and if this is indeed where he is going, we all need to give him credit for bravery.

The God Complex. “They don’t believe in the Creator”, Beck explained. And that “is wrong”.

Splattergate replaces Climategate as the biggest slip up of the eco-fascists

Remember Bill Gates slipped into Bilderberg this year under the guise of going to a “different” meeting. The “meeting” didn’t exist. Gates was in Sitges, Spain this year to be there to explain how vaccines can “reduce” the population.

Some call it “soft kill” weapons, and vaccines in the hands of eugenicists like Gates should impact you…..but you may not believe it.

You might want to ask yourself how Hitler was allowed to carry on in his reign of terror. Hitler was also concerned with the environment, and people were not willing to admit he looked like a madman. The belief was that he was a little off but there was no way he could be as insane as he later proved to be.

Are we giving the proponents of Global Warming the same shrug of the shoulder? They are not “that bad” are they?

James Delingpole, in this article paints a different picture. Warning, the video you will see will shock and anger you. Small children should not be allowed to watch this clip. Incidentally, it is the same small children that schools might be “selling” the global warming scare to.

http://www.youtube.com/v/AmBnVjy4vag?fs=1&hl=en_US

Don’t worry, the final cut of the commercials that made it to television are so much more controlled. The eco-fascists were “toned down a notch” after likely being reminded that the world just isn’t ready to learn the true reason for climate change taxation…..you know, to strip us all of all our wealth, then rights, then put us into bondage, and then…..
http://www.youtube.com/v/rAz7jyG0qfw?fs=1&hl=en_US

Here is James Delingpole discussing this with Alex Jones. I hope you are as mad as I was when learning of the globalists’ gall to look at us all like “cannon fodder with bloated bellies”, as George Washington Hunt has explained.

It might change the way we think of our childrens’ safety, and might remind us of the announcer on T.V. years ago. This time the announcement might be, “It’s 10 AM, do you know what propaganda your children are enduring?”

Second half of Keiser Report 81 has an interesting guest and perspective on modern, professional sport

Earlier today, the City of Glendale, AZ came to see what was new with the reporting from us on the Phoenix Coyotes. I wish they had waited till this clip came out. Because, the second half of the show (below) will discuss how municiplaities are being sucked dry by professional sports teams. Seems to fit here. The promise of revenues is not as real as the fact that the taxpayers will fund the private teams’ profits – that do not need to be reported.

The owners of old that actually cared about the community as discussed in the Keiser Report can, in my opinion, remind us all of some of the comments of Jerry Moyes. He operated on passion and to help the community with the team. He was heartbroken when it failed, and he could be remembered in court like a father trying to tell the City that it was not going to happen for Glendale. They didn’t listen.

The truth is, it is big business, funded by taxpayers. Period. Note also similarity in some of the rumor that the “luxury boxes” that were to be available in Vegas would have abounded. Was this team destined to find it’s place where money flows like casino chips? We may never know.

When we are at the highest point of despair

Is it a coincidence that the older you get, the more you realize you know very little, and the admission that you are not in control of much if anything becomes clearer and clearer. What’s it all about? That’s what we may think. What am I to do? And, for the Christian element, “What would you have me do Lord”?

It is easy, in the throes of revelation to think we can make a difference on our own, and be a leader of a group that at best, we were entrusted with for a minute purpose – one element at work no more – with the overall complexity of intertwined events playing into a concept impossible as mere humans to imagine.

And, in the moment we realize we have at best been a cog in the greater machine is there a moment for deflation – the feeling of worthlessness. Why am I doing this?

I can relate to Glenn Beck’s demeanor over the last two shows. I have thrashed the message but do not intend on thrashing the man. Let’s face it, despite his mission and direction, he is working within the confines of the machine around him. He may want to tell us more.

If we can think back on several episodes prior, Beck had told us there “is a story to tell, just not today”. What could he mean?

We could speculate, and feel the frustration of a man who has an opportunity to do real good if it weren’t for the agenda of the station. Would he team up with a different message and overall picture? By his own admission on yesterday’s show, he is not sure whether he is doing more good than harm. Was there an attempt to explain why the show has become disjointed, and in order to sleep at night, Beck is telling his audience that at least he tells some facts, despite the fact that they are disjointed.

Perhaps this is why he has told his audience to not take his word for it, and go seek the truth themselves.

Subtleties abound in mannerism. The monologue at the beginning of some shows is like a cry for help. It’s as if there is a man locked in a machine that he no longer admires, and can’t seem to break free of.

Imagine the kindergarten class, it’s the first day of school, and there is a little boy sitting on a chair, frumped over with pouting lips. He has his jacket on, and his mother is trying to convince him he will have fun, and to come on, take of your jacket and go play with the other kids.

But the boy may not trust them. He is not comfortable. What will they think of him?

With all the criticism Glenn Beck has taken for being the beacon of mixed and confusing messages without tying in how it all fits, there must be a feeling like the little boy – “What will they think of me”?

Glenn Beck was told by his producer to put on his suit. He didn’t want to. It just brings back memories and paints a picture.

On yesterday’s show, in the monologue came the bigger admission – he wants to run away and hide, but there is nowhere to go. Beck hopes that some of the facts he has brought to the table have made a difference. He likely knows that it is getting hard to carry on when some issues of importance must be diverted from. Big issues that must be painted as untrue.

It is hard to continue to bring a message even slightly tainted. Eventually God will catch up to us, and point it out, making it hard to get into uniform, into the suit that says I am a part of this, and I really endorse it.

This is not just Glenn Beck’s issue. It is an issue for every one of us.

We may go through the feeling of not being a big part, or having much control.

And, we are being used, and used for God’s purpose whether we see it or not.

To Glenn Beck I would say there may be another chapter coming, and you might have your chance to bring it all to the table some day. The day you alluded to many nights before.

There is a story to tell, it’s true.

The biggest one is the realization that in our highest point of despair, God reaches out and is finally able to take us under his arm.

We will have realized we are nothing, if not for him. We are being deployed to bring some good, even if we cannot see it, or understand how it serves the bigger purposes of God.