Monthly Archives: May 2011

Choose a side, scum!

Oh, suck it up slave! We don’t want to listen to your “middle class” sniveling.

Violated? You ain’t seen nothing yet anarchist!

But thanks for showing up to the “show” because without you, we’d have looked pretty stupid.

Bob, did you get me throwing that scum in the back of the van? Do you think lots of people filmed it? Yeah, do you think it will end up all over you tube? Go viral? Awesome! Yeah, I pounded that slave, that conspiracy whackjob! Whoohoo!

Yeah, but Phil, did you catch how I hit the gas and sped away. Too bad that van didn’t have more power or I could have left some tread on the street. That would have looked cooler.

Canada, you have a choice. You can decide that you are okay, the rest are not, or you could decide you are no better than the rest of those losing wealth, with too much time on their hands.

“Those people” tend to drift to the internet to see what the heck happened. And with all that investigation, they get their minds all filled with knowledge and facts, and other nasty things. Then, they form an opinion, perhaps have waves of what they call “revelation”, and then they get a glazed look in their eyes.

Kind of like the Return of the Living Dead movies.

The Black Bloc in a show where the phone rings in the ambulance and the zombie says, “Send more Paramedics”. Yep, they’ve gone mad. Gotta stop ‘em zombie conspiracy dudes. More jails to contain these ‘problems’.

So choose Canada. Support the filling of the new jails that are to be built by our P.M. and his new majority or don’t.

And hang in there if your neighbor turns conspiracy zombie too. Don’t let it get to you. Hang on as long as you can.

This is a game, and whether you like it or not you are a player. But they need you to keep turning a blind eye to those that become whacky, and remember, they deserve what they get.

Harper wants to build more jails: Whoopie!

If you build it, they will come. If you build it, you will make sure you fill it. And, unfortunately, there is a new revelation that crime will be on the rise. The question is, what kind of crime? Is it time to make thought the new taboo worth being locked up for?

Go away conspiracy theorist!

Sure, you might have read the recent article in the May 23rd, 2011 edition of Maclean’s Magazine, on bin Laden and the ‘Culture of Conspiracy’. Ewwwww… which side are you on “Conspiracy Theorist“?

They’ll scrap the long-gun registry, and sign on for 65 F-35 fighter jets, and build a lot more jails.

Don’t question that move Canadian, unless you want to be a conspiracy theorist. Our leader has his majority now, so accept it, do not question, and hope all is good for a long, long time.

Obvious which side Maclean’s is on. But don’t let me tell you what to believe you conspiracy theorist, you dirtbag. You  who has lost your mind, perhaps your marriage, and is living now on donations! Don’t let me tell you what is politically correct, and what the majority is thinking; and if you think that way you must be becoming paranoid. No, don’t let me sway your decision to have a right to look into evidence and form an opinion.

Just know one thing conspiracy theorist – -what we want you to know — the moment, yes the very moment you start to pay attention to things around here that challenge the government or the governments of the world, and the very second you think for a milisec that the government may not tell you 100% truth, you are, dare I say, a full-fledged, whackjob conspiracy theorist! Okay?

Don’t pay attention to the fact that Anwar al_Awlaki dined at the Pentagon shortly after 9/11. Forget that, conspiracy theorist, and just tune-in to when the media says he is a huge threat, and Canadians are a threat too if they have any business with him. The Pentagon? Forget it, they are okay because they are the Pentagon. They are allowed to give the guy a dinner. If you did it – -  terrorist!

Don’t for God’s sake, look into the idea that al-Qaeda is a CIA creation. That would lead to more thought. And thought, well, that gets you into trouble my friend.

The key to staying in good stead is to not pay attention to anything except the official stories the governments tell you. Then you will be politically correct, stay off the watch lists, and not be a conspiracy theorist.

So go ahead, read the article in Macleans magazine  on the Culture of Conspiracy  (sorry, not yet available online!), and if you are smart, you will snub your nose at those that have gone from father, mother, architect, military official, doctor, and all other walks of “normal” life to the dark side. Yes, that’s what we’re talking about, the dark side of becoming a conspiracy theorist, because that explains the state of crazy mind of anyone that doesn’t believe that the government is good, and caring, and looking out for you. Remember the words of Glenn Beck, you are not one of those are you?

They are so caring that the Harper government is going to build more jails as a primary initiative now that most Canadians were trusting enough to vote for him, and give him the control he needs to implement that decision.

But when you starve the education system and the kinds of supports that build healthy families (definitely the first things chopped under conservative or right-wing governments) you’re going to get more social problems.

And while Dalton McGuinty has washed his hands of guilt for the injustice to Canadians rallying in protest to the banking system at the G20 meeting, McGuinty was quick to point to Harper. Hmm, the very same Harper that wants to build more jails. Hmmm, well what about more funding for student loans, healthcare, other things good for the Canadians that trust him? No, sorry folks, more jails is the priority.

And how did I know he wants to build more jails for the nasties in Canada?

Well, that’s easy, I read that article in Maclean’s before reading why a conspiracy theorist has lost his mind.

I just have one question and one worry. If I say Harper wants to build more jails, does that make me a conspiracy theorist?

And, I don’t know if this makes me a conspiracy theorist, but I do agree with the words eloquently pointed out:

So you need to build more jails. And if you build more jails, you need to find some way to fill them. Did you know the US spends more on jails than it does on education? That the state of California in the last decade laid off 10,000 teachers but hired 10,000 more prison guards?

Golly, and as I try not to think the way of the nasty conspiracy theorist, I can’t help but drift back into thinking that the article telling us it is dangerous politics to challenge a government, your government; that there is a chance that the new criminal may be a criminal of the mind — a thought criminal.

And, those thought criminals would not be cold blooded, maximum security types, but they could be the types that would have protested the “new world” as Harper has told us, that Canada has to give up it’s sovereignty because that’s just the way the world is now. What was that again? A global reality? Something like that.

Well, I can certainly see where a media source like Maclean’s would have to paint a picture of the new, low risk criminal worthy of jail space.

Those conspiracy theorists that pose a threat to government, who challenge the leaders whether they are truthful or not.

And remember, Maclean’s would like you to believe they are as “fair and balanced” as Fox News in the U.S.. Yep, they have not reported with a negative spin on conspiracy theorists before, nope, not a chance. Nope, they make sure they give you the facts without trying to shape your opinion with various hit pieces over time. Because, if they did that, they would be challenged on their motives, and might be questioned on who they serve.

Those nasty conspiracy theorists might form a group called people for media truth or some such thing.

Don’t question media Canada, no more so than questioning government. Take both as 100% gospel truth. And, those jails you will simply drive by, not occupy.

And that would go double for journalists turned conspiracy theorists that don’t buy everything the government tells them too. Too bad, they could have been a contenda!

I wonder if some reporters for Maclean’s were treated poorly at the G20 too. Just wondering, because they may be creating a nightmare for themselves too. Just a thought.

Bad Television!: Hold on Fox, while I stick my finger down my throat

I cannot say which is worse: The realization that false flag events are a reality, or watching media propaganda so flagrantly flop in the wind, and blow whichever way they are directed. Unbelievable….nobody is buying this fantasy on bin Laden’s death, but they keep churning out the lies, and spinning perception to where they need it to go.

It’s not a question of what to say, it’s a question of how to say it. Where do you start on the realization that seeing the agenda unfold on Fox News and other sources is so blatant and obvious, that it blows the mind that people might actually still hold hope that Fox is the “official opposition” to the current Obama Administration, and the mouthpiece of the Republican Party. The game is so obvious and contrived, it really gives me a sick feeling in the pit of my stomach.

Let’s start here.

For months, every member of Fox News was bashing President Obama on all issues. Glenn Beck was perhaps the greatest attacker amongst the pack of news/ commentator jockies, but not long after he learned of his walking papers from Fox, his loyalty to them remains intact regardless. Yes, you will not find the security guard waiting to watch Beck pack up his office in a banker’s box, and escorting him to the door, and by the way Mr. Beck, your keys please. Not a chance. Beck has said it himself, he believes there will be a place for him at Fox.

More like, a new assignment to continue to further the propaganda cause.

Whether Beck believes he is doing tremendous good, in retrospect is not the issue. What seems more important is his being part of the bigger agenda to build up Fox’s credibility as the official police of the White House and Obama, so that when they decide to say Obama did a good thing in killing Osama bin Laden, we are all supposed to say, “even Fox agrees so it must be true”.

Obama has done a great job, and he “really did” have Osama killed. So, there is no true “we got to get rid of Beck because even we can’t take the level of ‘truth’ he brings”, no!

He’s done his job, and the proof is the fact that he is still on the air. If he knew he was on the way out and could then say whatever he wanted to say in a “see if I care and let them stop me” attitude, and was a true Patriot, he wouldn’t be furthering the false war on terror, and bringing in the marching band when discussing the alleged death of bin Laden.

It get’s better as we all know. Well, check that. It gets better for those that have paid attention. Because all the people who simply do not trust the media have one thing in common – - they have paid attention. It’s that simple.

As Gerald Celente chatted with Paul Watson the other day, Celente pointed out that “Americans only hear the first lie, and then they tune out”. That would be a known fact for mainstream media. They know they can’t get to those that truly have paid attention, but the ones that tune out and “trust them”, well there’s the audience they truly serve.

Yes, they are “press-titutes” Celente went on, the only difference is “you pay for it with no happy ending”. Oh Gerald, you are still in fine form sir.

We should move on to Snidely Whiplash, aka Geraldo Rivera. He reminds me of the “medicine show” in old western movies. You know, the guy that sells snake oil, and whenever anyone challenges him on the effectiveness, or what he said before he changes his story. Smiles all around Geraldo! Osama is dead after all. Make sure you have a special complete with credible, ex-navy seals to further support the ever-changing official story.

Forget Mr. Rivera, that you were on the verge of agreeing with the victims’ families of 9/11 on the Building What campaign to get an explanation as to why the buildings, in your own words, seemed to fall as if in controlled demolition. No, remember now the new excitement du jour, the fact that the man who was 100% responsible has been killed, and don’t bother to figure out if he could have rigged the buildings to collapse. Simply go back to plan A, where it is so much easier, and the fact is, that’s what you get paid to do – - toe the party line.

And those people who don’t pay attention out in the public can flap in the wind along with Fox News – - both of them in a love in of joy at the death of bin Laden. Oh what a great day! America is strong and good!

Suddenly and not even begrudgingly, Fox is leading the pack as the (used to be) official pain in the White House’s rump (remember that?), to now effectively serving its ultimate purpose.

Fox has been playing the bad cop role for what has come full circle. A psy-op (psychological operation) to fool the public into believing that Osama bin Laden was actually, without question and full “right-wing” support, the only bad guy, and that it is irrefutable that Obama got the job done. Gotta hand it to him do you Beck?

Geraldo Rivera can slip in the counter-call  to the criticism that the man in the photos looked young, and advise us all that bin Laden liked to dye his beard black. Oh really? Couldn’t locate him for ten years, but the intel knew he used hair dye?

Well, here ‘s a humorous clip to add levity to that faux- up!

So…..

Wife used as “human shield” or not? Buried at Sea for what reason exactly? Situation Room had the T.V. on or off? Which is it Fox? I am sure you will put aside your despising of the White House for a moment to cover up for them right?

Hillary Clinton and Obama should have gone to acting school before the “situation room drama scene”. Hokey! But, now that I hear Hillary explain it was her allergies I totally get it, having them myself. Yep, in the words of that T.V. game show, good answer!

Remember, Alex Jones’ recent comment that the photos were perhaps of a patsy used and killed to look “sort of” like bin Laden, but it was cartoonish because the man in the photos was obviously much younger, with a dark, youthful beard. Dang that photoshop program can show the birth certificate was layered, and reproduce the alleged death photo.  

What’s that? The kid got lucky you say? Well, how about this one? Luck too?

Oops, training session this was not! No more so than the underwear bomber, and what snowjob was sold him to  get onto the plane, assisted by the sharp-dressed operative.

But the creme de la creme has got to be the new drive for the Fox News Network to try to put the counter-Paul in the Republican seat. The mission now is to support the unknown, non-experienced Herman Cain.

Who is that you say? Herman Cain? Exactly. Let’s have an after -party won’t we Fox, with 29 supporters in an unprecidented display that support Cain. Wow, this is unprecedented the announcer came back with. Please people, really?

He “hit a home run” as one of the 29 on the panel suggested with his comment that when asked how the current politicians are doing. Cain was eluding to the fact that it is good that he has no experience in politics, because after all, with the guys in charge now, “How’s it working for you?”. Wait for the applause to end folks before volunteering to be one of the 29 that mirror exactly what the American Republican Party would want for the counter to the newly bolstered Obama.

‘Cause the Cain Train will roll over Obama! R-i-g-h-t.

Now, let’s also not forget the Hannity show after the debate, who ensured he mentioned that Ron Paul was not going to stick around, instead he was going to that crazy Tea Party event. Pshhhh…. missed the boat did he Hannity?

Seems Hannity got the memo on the looks and gestures that are a prerequisite to any news or comment that Ron Paul would make. If the audience applauds Paul, make sure you roll your eyes guys, and remind them to hold their applause. Good job! You are true lackies!

Contrived alert, contrived alert…..paying attention or still sleeping?

As Paul Watson of PrisonPlanet.com recently pointed out when discussing this debate in South Carolina, the only credible threat to Obama at this point is Ron Paul.

The boys at Fox should have been on their hands and knees asking Ron how he likes the buff on his shoes.

Instead, the game has shifted. Support the unknown to ensure the GOP has no chance in beating Obama.

And, what scares the Hell out of me is the revelation that the Book of Revelation tells us that the man would almost be killed (politically), but would bounce back.

Could this be it? Could the patsies be helping to fulfill what was destined to come all along? It might be worth paying attention if you aren’t already. What do you think?

Harper’s new BLOC

Seemed crazy it did that the Bloc Québécois wanted to get elected in the national elections in order to separate Quebec from Canada. Ridiculous you might say. Of course, they never got their way, largely because they made no bones about their agenda. Their mandate never seemed to make any sense. But don’t let their confused honesty fool you. The world of politics in Canada is far from what most believe.

We all knew using a national election for provincial needs was ludicrous. But what about using a national election to further the cause of globalization and complete lack of democracy? Would that be any nuttier?

Harper used the promise of sovereignty to win a majority in this election. The problem is, he has repeatedly told Canada we have no real sovereignty.

But, the only way he was to ensure a majority and  win the national election in Canada was to appear patriotic. Wave the flag, even though your past actions have suggested Canada should be patriotic, at the same time as telling Canada that there is a new reality; that Canada is part of a global economy; a reality that means we have to give up our sovereignty.

Now, had Stephen Harper been as brazen as the Bloc in Quebec, he might have come out and said that he wants Canada to give up it’s sovereignty and join a North American Union, leading to the new global government model when enough pain has been dished out. And that would be a bottom line of losing our political process, to go the way of the European Union, where democracy has been replaced by a “corporate-like” autocracy.

There are no true democratic elections to decide the leaders in Europe, it is simply a board of directors appointing their lackies to follow the bigger agenda, regardless if the people want it or not.

Would Harper have gone by way of Iggy and the Liberals if presented his platform that way?

Now, let’s look at a film that is well done, and well worth the two hours it will take to watch. It’s called the Global Hostile Takeover, and it paints a picture based on fact that irrefutably brings home the mission that has transcended party lines, countries, and perceived differences.

It shows a mission that may make you have that ah ha moment when you realize they are taking away our prosperity, and shaking the foundation of our security with the resurrection of the Al-Qaeda threat.

All part of creating the two problems before they roll out the solution. The first, your prosperity and financial wealth is under attack. Second, your safety will be challenged with the promise of more terror attacks. Goodbye security.

Hence, the Security and Prosperity Partnership rolled out in Canada first by Paul Martin, and then furthered by Harper with Bush’s support, not to mention Mexico, was designed as the solution to the created problems that we are witnessing today. Boy, they sure knew what was coming, didn’t they?

It may leave you wondering if those conspiracy people had a point after all. When they told you of the problem-reaction-solution nature of the globalists ploy to create problems, watch the people squirm, and then come in as the heroes, you might realize that the events that have taken place the world over are absolutely no random acts – - oh the contraire — this has all been planned a long time ago, and is just being unraveled as we watch the horror of the globalists’ current panic.

The bin Laden hoax has had many lies and inconsistencies and backtracking to cover lies. It is horrifying not so much because it is a government caught in a lie, but what it represents and clarifies.

The Bush Administration working with the current Obama Administration, working with leaders the world over to support a lie, to further wars and occupations; to give excuse to get at Pakistan, and one step closer to disaster.

The bin Laden “going for broke” announcement is the globalists playing the joker card, and proving there is no turning back now. The Jeannie is out of the bottle, the full circle effect of 9/11 is going to give some more people the realization that the globalists pulled off 9/11, the ensuing Patriot Act, and are part of something purely sinister.

But if you haven’t got the big picture yet, here’s a great place to start:

A learned man who studied first, and has been “winning” ever since

Preparing "20 minutes" : the result of much research and thought

I want to throw this out there because rumor has it there are many that know Charlie Sheen’s famous phrase, “Winning, duh!”, but don’t know where it came from.

Fair enough, you too can say “really” when you realize that his problems and the vilification of the mainstream media and entertainment industry all started when he questioned 9/11. No, check that, when Sheen started to flex his knowledge muscle on 9/11 let’s say it that way instead.

Take a look at this man that spent loads of time in study of the planes, the day, the evidence. Ask yourself if you did similar homework. Ask yourself too, if you could put together the questions you would ask Obama if you were allowed 20 minutes.

Mr. Sheen is a brave man that knew vilification would come. But, he is a Sheen after all. Damn the torpedoes attitude. Nothing to prove has he. No reason to care if anyone likes him, hates him, or is indifferent.

I asked a family member who knew someone that went to the recent Charlie Sheen torpedo of truth event.

I asked what Charlie talked about. When she didn’t know I realized that more people need to know the reason Charlie has been placed under the popularity heat lamp is because he did ask for an investigation into the events of 9/11.

I wonder what he thinks of the ninth time Osama bin Laden, the CIA asset has been used as a scapegoat and killed. Interestingly, he likely died of a weird disease in 2002, not related to the kidney disease he had, but more deadly.

They had to use his death as a means to concoct the villian of 9/11.

With no body, no pictures, and inconsistent stories, the full circle lie is coming around to rear it’s true ugliness.

We need more Sheens to bring it to the surface. Damn that torpedo of truth is a good idea!

Pulling out all the stops: Mainstream media bring in points of contention to resurrect the leadership and patriotism of America

Yesterday, the silver market took a tremendous hit as silver prices plunged up to 11%. Some claim the brief collapse of silver prices were to drive confidence out of the market and to support the idea that silver is indeed in a bubble, and you’d better get out.

Of course, that would be in direct contradiction to those experts that predict soaring gold and silver as the dollar continues to deflate with quantitative easing.

Have they shaken your tree yet? Are you feeling that what evidence you have witnessed of late that supports a picture of corruption has suddenly tainted and perhaps been wrong? Well, hold on, there’s more they want to show you. And, it all ties in to the war on terror and the fact that the wicked old man is dead. Osama (Usama) bin Laden is no more.

Last night, CNN poured it on and while reporting the death of bin Laden, they strategically slipped in the notion that the Pakistani government will have a lot of explaining to do. After all, bin Laden was found in a region of the country that they should have known he was there. Will this be the start of more propaganda to support further occupations of the Middle East?

This morning on Fox News, the further suggestion that information was obtained from interrogation at Guantanamo Bay countered the criticism that Obama dropped the ball on promises to close Gitmo, as one of his key election platforms.

And while it seems assemblies in the U.S. that protest the government are becoming a risky proposition, the show of youth at the White House last night at midnight was telecast as a great show of patriotism. No police in sight! It’s okay to support what they want supported, just don’t assemble in protest.

“We are at war with radical Islam” was echoed on Fox News this morning before 8:30 AM EST.

Yes, it’s time to bring it all home with news of a man blamed for terrorism.

It is also time to kill criticism of the American government in the process.

They are rolling out reactions from George Bush, Dick Cheney, even Geraldo Rivera. And interesting that the latter would show his joy, as he famously not long ago was agreeing with some of the victims families on their “Building What” Campaign to bring further awareness that Building 7 came down in it’s own fottprint at freefall speed. This of course, dispelled the myth that the families of 9/11 wanted closure and the stoppage of the 9/11 truth movement, which included archtects and engineers for 9/11 truth.

Rivera may loath conspiracy theory but agrees Building 7 came down in a way that is “reminiscent of a controlled demolition”.

For those of us skeptical to the ploy of mainstream media as a tool of globalist propaganda, we would have noticed the “talking points” and the way they have been used to create doubt in the minds of those yet undecided. Some of these include:

  • bin Laden “buried at sea” as a convenient excuse not to produce the body, as there exists evidence to support the fact that he died several years ago would counter their “announcement”,
  • bolster the political process as valid, tying in both the Republican (Bush) administration of the past, with the Obama administration, and “what were you thinking” if you doubted them on their mission against terror,
  • open up the war on terror as a focal point, and to warn that there will likely be retaliation by Al Qaeda and it’s supporters,
  • to further the reason for Guantanamo Bay to remain a viable resource for counter-terrorism,
  • to support the Patriot Act, and the right-stripping powers of the Federal Government to detain without reason (You can disappear and they do not have to account for you),
  • to bolster Obama’s image as a leader going into the next election,
  • to create division amongst the American people as true Patriots will be pitted against those that believe the mainstream media’s current account of 9/11 and bin Laden’s role,
  • to further take blame for 9/11 away from being an inside job to put it back on the shoulders of bin Laden and Al Qaeda,
  • to create confusion in the minds of those that didn’t believe the official story of 9/11, and those that were questioning their government(s),
  • a psy-op (psychological operation) to confuse and separate the power of the people who are “awakening” to a different reality than that presented and supported by the mainstream press,
  • to take the minds of the American people off the collapsing of the economy and onto “patriotism” despite their economic woes,
  • to further funding at the expense of the economy to the military industrial complex, and the war on terror

The fact that this opens the door for more globalist (U.N. directed) occupation of the Middle East is of grave concern. Enemies will be everywhere in the eyes of the governments and will be reflected in mainstream media.

There is a war ongoing – - the war of perception designed to confuse and pit man against man – within countries and abroad.

“We got the guy” Fox News reported this morning. I suppose it’s that simple. It’s us against them.

For those of us that have looked at the evidence, this is simply another sign that there is a growing campaign to stop people from defending themselves, create confusion, and panic in all things that would otherwise lead to freedom and independence.

Whether it would be by buying hard assets like gold and silver to protect our wealth, to trying to wake up our friends and neighbours to the evidence that cannot be refuted.

What may have shocked some of us is the reaction of those that would choose to listed to mainstream media and not their own family. But don’t take it personally. It is more a reflection of denial and fear, and wanting to believe the world is not what it might be. Hopefully, we can still save some from the fate of the system we have all been subjected to from cradle to grave.