If you are an American, you might want to vote for Newt Gingerich because he likes American Idol. Can you relate?
If you are a Constitutionalist and believe that the rights and freedoms of Americans are under attack, then you might want to vote for Ron Paul. But don’t expect for the establishment to share your sentiment.
And, for the other GOP candidates, who among them would stand with Ron Paul? Who would want to reduce the war effort to near zero, attack the privately run Federal Reserve, go after Obamacare and go to a fully private system, reduce government interference in the free market to zero? Who would dare stand with Ron Paul?
In the clips below, let’s start with RT and Gerald Celente, and then move to the close, the GOP debate broadcast on CNN.
The best question John King asked the other night was who would Ron Paul have run with him? Paul was quick-witted and understanding enough to leave that to them.
After all, would the candidate look at the honor with pride or the kiss of political death? Who would dare take the real stand to address the issues that are wrong in the United States?
Funny thing about conspiracy theorists, they tend to never go back to their old life. We’ve heard that type of situation before. Those that are born again Christians tend to never go back to their old selves. Don’t get me wrong, they still sin, and are tempted to sin.
But let’s get back on point. The conspiracy people who don’t tend to go back to their old level of belief.
Interesting, that this is the belief of a BBC reporter, David Aaronovitch, that conspiracy theorists once “transformed” cannot be returned to their former selves. Effort therefore, must be put in to stopping them from crossing over to the other side, so to speak. And thus, the push to not discuss conspiracy theories like 9/11 and Bilderberg. Okay, now we get it.
I guess this kind of flies in the face of the hungry news hounds of old looking for the next great scoop. Now instead, the job is to explain away with some knowledge that it is no big deal, go away and don’t listen to conspiracy theory. It’s the new way to be a journalist.
It is interesting that these “reporters” have a certain level of knowledge when discussing the insignificance of these topics.
Let’s have a look at this first clip, on US Broadcaster, Fox News. Here, you will get the party line, but no explanation how the information was obtained. It was provided to these people no doubt by the network, and they are simply conveying it. How else would they be able to form an opinion unless they either a) actually did an investigative journalist job, or b) were handed over some info to convey as if they themselves figured this out on their own:
Laugh it up, the Bilderwindbags, as explained by one of the guests, go to these meetings out of an ego boost. Wow, you want to invite me to this expensive event, then I’m coming!
They are former this and former that? Worried about agreements they enter into?
We just need to give them less influence, says the lady on Fox. Right, but the point is they have influence. Easier said than done.
The ideas, once put on the floor of the House of Representatives will be shot down another guest claims. Checks and balances are in place? That’s it?
And on what information did you folks get the content for the discussion if it wasn’t important enough to investigate?
I wonder if they had a red flashing light in studio for the guests, “Laugh, laugh, laugh”. And on queue they all laughed. A little too much for credibility.
Now, an even more telling clip from BBC to downplay Bilderberg. But this one has the interesting point that ties the fact that conspiracy theorists are goners once they get these “false beliefs”.
Well, let’s think about this for a moment.
To become a conspiracy theorist you have to first, sheepishly go “into the closet” to study the evidence, and decide for yourself if the picture forming supports the “nutbags” or the media. Then, to come out of the closet and admit you are a conspiracy theorist would require you to have enough evidence to see a picture worth defending. And, then the realization that the only defense the media has against your belief is to try to make others see you as a nutbar, gone over the edge mentally unstable fellow (or gal).
So, the pattern would support that there must be a whole lot of evidence that the media would sooner not show.
It would seem that on slow newsdays, they would sooner report on shark attacks than why the most powerful and influential meet in private. They would sooner label those that look at things seriously with terms like “truthers”, “birthers” and the like. Did they think of a name for those that study the Bilderberg group yet? How about Bilderbergers? No, I guess that wouldn’t work.
Good analysis on this loaded clip from the BBC.
I suppose they would have us laugh it off, and not pay attention or wonder why Henry Kissinger would chance arrest for war crimes, to attend the “pipe smoking” good boys club. Insignificant to a point that is worth risking incarceration? Not really seeing that sorry media.
Nor am I seeing it when a prominent Swiss Politician, Dominic Baettig is concerned about Bilderberg and their policies. He can’t understand why his government would allow the Group to enter his country to discuss such things as abuse of the people of the world.
There are those who don’t like to admit they are on the official guest list who have deadly agendas. Like Bill Gates. He was spotted and photographed at Bilderberg 2011, but apparently was not on the list. Unlike the coming out Conspiracy theorist, who sees the information worth risking his reputation for, certain individuals would prefer to remain anonymous as they carry on their deadly agenda. Hate to spoil it for you, but the number that Gates says has to get close to zero is carbon. That would mean people must be reduced:
The above pic is from a German newspaper. It shows some of the attendees at this year’s Bilderberg meeting. Henry Kissinger is a regular attendee, and is wanted on charges of war crimes in Switzerland.
Earlier in the weekend, an emergency on an airplane was reported, where an ambulance showed up, but not before a red carpet was laid from the plane. The ambulance was later reported to be pulling into the hotel where the Bilderberg meeting was to take place. Could it have been a diversion for Kissinger to avoid Swiss authorities?
Some of the controlled-media headlines included such blatant opposites to reality as “May the Holy Spirit be with them”. Something tells me the Holy Spirit may be monitoring them, but certainly not with them.
Fox News in the U.S. are reportedly telling viewers and listeners that it is no big deal that over 130 of the most powerful in the world are meeting in secret. And the little coverage they did have was meant to pacify those Fox-believers – - that have not taken a serious look at the issues, and who choose to believe what mainstream media feeds them.
Today, at 12 PM Swiss time, there is an international protest rally scheduled, that you may be able to catch live at this JustinTV feed or this one.
This year’s Bilderberg meeting should prove to be the most controversial ever, as the world is catching on to the agenda, in direct contrast to the media’s feeble attempt to downplay the importance of the decisions made in secret, that control the goings on in our world.
