The Controlled Opposition Fronts have played truthers like a fiddle

I think we can all agree: the world is full of deception, greed, and the seeds of evil.

The truth movement has been led by some leaders, the greatest of these perhaps is Alex Jones and Infowars.com. He would probably like to think of himself as the tip of the spear as he often uses to describe his operation.

At the root of the beliefs of the truth movement is the John Birch Society, founded in the ’50′s, and exposing the globalist agenda ever since.

One might say that if the John Birch Society has exposed the truth for so long, how come they have not been able to wake up enough people over the years to agree with them? And, if they truly were followed, would this result in the destruction of the political process and the government as we know it?

What would really happen if everyone believed that their vote did not count; that their government officials were all crooked, self-serving sellouts; that there is no hope whatsoever for a free and democratic society, as verbed by John F. Kennedy?

Would the secret societies be able to pull off the mission of global enslavement by themselves, or would they have to have the masses wish for their own enslavement? Would it be easier to cull millions, if not billions of people by a few, or would it make more sense to use the very people, the citizens, to wish for the very change that the globalists wanted to effect?

I think that answer is clear.

Although Alex Jones would talk on several occasions to the metaphor in the movie Ants, that if the little ants knew they outnumbered the big ants by a sizeable margin, they could easily have victory over them. So, the drive is to make the little ants believe they have power, but more importantly, to pose as the little ants’ friend, and like a little voice in their ear, tell them exactly what it is they want.

For it would not be enough to control the little ants’ desires to take back control, you also would need to tell them how. And, this is the criticism that Alex Jones has been under for years, as his listeners start to question why he doesn’t elaborate on some political factions such as Zionism. Or, why he doesn’t talk about religious powerhouses that have been linked to the Nazis like the Vatican, Pope, and the Jesuits, SMOM, etc, etc. Why is it he downplays groups like the John Birch Society; play dumb with guests like Charlotte Iserbyt when she tries to tell him about the perilous Council for National Policy (CNP)? Why does Jones first say he has only a little knowledge when extracting his guest’s information, and then later come back with the notion that he has indeed researched these groups?

Why does Jones refute the arguments of Webster Tarpley when criticizing Ron Paul and his clan, refusing to dig deeper on the Freemasonic link; or dig on the campaign contribution of Peter Thiel to Paul, just before Paul goes into hiding while the dust clears on his son Rand’s endorsement of Romney?

And, why does Jones try to paint Webster Tarpley as a communist sympathizing friend who, he has tried to like, but come on Tarpley, you are making it tough to call you friend with your current aggressiveness. And, of course we have the support of the Koch Brothers, that suddenly in Jones pronunciation sounds like “coch” not “coke”, as if that is supposed to fool many.

So many questions, so little answers for those that are starting to question.

Over the years, there are many that have criticized the, let’s call them mainstream alternative media. Because, to make a comparison, the mainstream alternatives have a growing desire to grow their operations to get the word out better, and clearer. That would, my friends, include buying better microphones, backdrops, perhaps TV’s with videos playing in the background, and hiring staff, creating blog entries at rapid pace to keep up with the barrage of world events needing clarification, and on and on.

The other alternative media, have maybe a Youtube account, a handful of like-minded subcribers, and no intention of going mainstream. But the little guy is also much more likely to be critical of the mainstream alternative media like the Infowars, tip of the spear operation.

I like to call the official story of truthers the Jones-bourne truthers, because it is a game of follow the leader. The leader speaks, and the group all go back to write their own articles, Youtube videos, etc, all based on the talking points of the leader of the pack.

In this way, you can see a lot of the same argument. And we all know what happens when we see the same argument over and over again, right? Well, it must be true.

Where you get your news is important I guess. It is important to be completely turned off the the mainstream, mainstream, but it is okay to be tuned into the mainstream alternative, and if you are daring and rebellious, you might go outside the norm and become a rebellious alternative only type truther.

The man who would question the “Man who woke him up” must be a rebel, turncoat, and would need to be shunned as a bit of a whacko no doubt.

The man who woke up not once, but twice, the second time to the deception of the group that claims to have woken him up the first time.

What I am getting at is both complex and yet surprisingly simple. The opposition to that nasty untrustworthy government may actually not be against the global elite at all – - they may actually be working with them.

When you awake for the first time you are told that the political process is a fake. It’s called the left-right paradigm. When you awake the second time you realize that the truth movement has been equally hijacked, and the opposition to the status quo is a fake opposition – - a false paradigm of it’s own. But, funny enough, you wouldn’t expect that now would you?

If politics is to give you a sense of having choice that you can relate to a political party, but in reality both parties are driving to a similar agenda, the false opposition group would want to lead you to believe you can put up resistance to the globalists even though they are fooling you, and perhaps using you to effect what they desire. Is it really that much of a stretch to think the globalists would think that far into the future, as to plan that too?

I mean, seeing the tip of the spear standing with bullhorn in hand at Bilderberg, a mere fence away from the world leaders then becomes a laughable image when you realize it is a scam designed to suck you in, make you shout with glee, but in reality do nothing.

It would certainly explain why the big guy could ask a guest if they are suicidal, to suggest the information that is being leaked on air was not carefully screened for effect moreso than content. How it will affect the psyche of those listening is more important than the material it covers. Getting you to defend the grand poobah the goal. Getting you to see your hero the ultimate mission. Are you there? Are you getting mad enough to defend the man that woke you up, and how dare I tell you it has been a scam? Is that where you are at right now?

Ron Paul once said on the Alex Jones show, that the globalists are very patient. They have effected their plan over a long period of time.

But on the topic of 9/11 at the GOP debates, Paul would adamantly deny the truthers’ belief that he supports them on the theory that 9/11 was as inside job. Paul was quick to distance himself from the fundamental root that makes a truther a truther – - that if the powers that be would pull off 9/11, they would do anything. The same patient globalists that Paul would describe are either secretly believed to be responsible for 9/11 by him, or he truly believes they are not. But where does that leave the truther looking to latch onto the Ron Paul train? Can they truly trust the aloof man that watched his son endorse the other guy, walking away from his old man? Where is the allegiance really of the Paul clan? A mystery worth investigating, wouldn’t you at least agree to that?

And so, we come back to the notion that the globalists thought far enough ahead to be patient yes, but also to be patient building their opposition that will give a support group as the world wakes up to them. They had to create the same false paradigm, giving those that woke up a place to go. They had to patiently create the tip of the spear, who would in turn create the ripple effect of support to build on an idea whose time has come, so to speak.

Liberty and the Constitution would become the ideals of the movement. Sound currency based on gold would have to be the basis of world economies. If the globalists snatched all the gold while the scam was underway, yes they would become filthy rich controllers, but you were not supposed to realize that. Just buy as much as you can little serf, and laugh at those that aren’t awake yet.

I can say this with conviction because what I experienced so far in this cesspool of contaminated truth is the same you have experienced. I too was a Ron Paul, go get him grandpa, supporter. But, like the saying goes, you can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all the people all the time. And, that’s true.

If the real truth is what I now believe it to be, the globalists will be using the first time wake uppers to destroy their own government. Did you hear that? Destroy your own government leaving no choice but World Government. The ants will have been herded to take the action desired by the few controllers.  They will have them listening to grandpa Paul as he tells them to go ahead, secede from the union, and divide yourselves little children. Because when you do, you will be helpless to the global empire.

Funny, Ron Paul is a libertarian right? He should be thinking united we stand, divided we fall you would suspect. But divided it is in his mind now. Reminds me of his stand on 9/11. Who the hell really knows what he is thinking? A little slippery I would say. No, check that – - a lot slippery.

The John Birch Society has many supporters that lo and behold have appeared without interruption on the Alex Jones Show. The Society was founded by a high level Freemason, and funded by a globalist.

Ron Paul is a supporter of the Society, as is Alex Jones, and Jones’ father was a member.

If you google Barbara Aho, controlled opposition fronts right now, and give it the justice it deserves, I am willing to wager you too will get that sick feeling in the pit of your stomach like I did not too long ago.

5 responses to “The Controlled Opposition Fronts have played truthers like a fiddle

  1. alex jones is a nut case

  2. I liked your article up until the talk about Ron Paul. Rand endorsed Mitt as a political move. Nothing more. If Rand is going to continue to seek it’s party’s nomination in 2016, he would of had to get his name in the party’s recognition. In the past, Ron had made some political move endorsement’s as well, such as john boehner for example, just to move a long with the party and keep it together.
    I understand everything else you’re talking about, Alex Jones being the tip of the spear, basically creating a false paradigm that the new world order is out to get us. Alex Jones is a character alright, how is he still a christian fundamentalist yet he still makes up his conspiracy theories about everything else. You would think he would have looked into Christianity and the scam that it is before saying that all NWO are satanic syphilitic minded baby-raping child-groping devil worshippers.

  3. You do awaken more than one time. It’s a continuous learning process. Then one day we will awaken to a New Golden Age, that’s inevitable, as we had once upon a time.

  4. good article. I did a documentary on alex jones. please watch.

  5. benefitsontario

    You can’t have the dog without the pony in the Dog and Pony show. In other words, if Jones is controlled opp, then his support of Ron Paul, and his excuse-making for whatever they do implies they are on the same team.

    Something to think about: You would think that the father and son who shared ideals of liberty (of course I am speaking of Ron and Rand Paul) would be looked upon by A Jones with the thought that they would be similar politically. Wasn’t it a bit odd, that Jones foresaw the future in the Rand Paul flip flop on his father’s ideals by endorsing Romney? Jones would go on about how good Ron was, and wasn’t so sure about Rand’s allegiances. You would not think that would be the case. It’s kind of lie succession – - with the family business – - you would think dear ol dad would teach sonny boy how to view the world, and make the son want to pick up where dad left, but in this case, Jones seemed to know in advance that something was coming with Rand that would distance in the mind of Jones that Rand was similar in political position than his own father. Strange stuff, unless they are in on the game together, and Jones is privy to the maneuvers and moves. That would then tie both agendas together.

    To summarize under these conditions: If Jones bad, so are the Paul clan.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s