Steven Jones, Ph.D, of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth heads up this April 30th, 2009 lecture on the dusty evidence:
What does thermite, aluminum oxide, and silicon have in common? I don’t know, but does it bring to mind chemtrails, chicken McNuggets, and other nasty things?
Posted in Corruption, US Politics, 9/11, Police State, Bilderberg
Tagged 9/11, Jones, 911/ thermite, aluminum oxide, silicon, Steven, architects, and, engineers, for, truth
Most of us watched the youtube videos of buildings falling into their own footprint and questioned how they could be crushed into dust. The remaining vision of a few hunks of wall from one of the towers almost impossible to digest.
As time went on, the questions of how these things could happen they way they did reared their heads. The Conspiracy Theory of those who questioned the slow but questionable official story as given by the government began to grow.
George W. Bush had to tell the American public not to believe outrageous conspiracy theories. He knew the truth movement would be trouble. He knew the evidence the government wanted suppressed would have to remain suppressed, and as Dick Cheney explained, any further investigations would have to be contained, kept secret and dealt with in private.
The question has remained, how much should remain secret, withheld from the citizens of America, and the people of the world.
As a result of 9/11, we have had the Patriot Act, gropings and acts of sexual assault at airports from the TSA, and telescreens being installed at Wal Mart and other stores to, in effect spy on your neighbour who could be suspect.
After all I suppose, the American public might as well police itself, because in the movie you are about to see, the incompetence of those responsible for your security in the United States dropped the ball on 9/11, and were never fired. In many cases those not knowing what to do on 9/11 were eventually promoted to higher ranks.
And that lends itself to the question most “Conspiracy Theorists” might have: Was incompetence what they were looking for to put in place if there was an agenda that needed to be fulfilled?
Sir, the plane is now 2 miles out, does the order still stand?
Of course the order still stands (you incompetent poop)
Those that questioned the official story like Sibel Edmonds were quickly gotten rid of as a threat. But, other threats of higher office might be too risky to let go. The old saying keep your friends close and enemies closer may apply. What would an insider with a lot of questions do if they left office? How might they hurt the official story by giving personal accounts of further incompetence, perhaps cover-ups? No, they needed to stay put, perhaps moving up the ranks in the process to further get them in the fold, and to keep them contained.
It reminds one of the reasoning they must have had at the World Wilderness Congress when they realized George Washington Hunt could pose a problem. He caught on pretty quick to the problems of the One World Bank, and they likely knew not how to get to him. That is, unless the illness of choice of the “world order” was to have taken him out.
But let’s get somber here for a moment. I mentioned most of us watched the buildings collapse and questioned the story.
The victims’ families investigated this perhaps from a different angle.
Why did the second tower have to get hit? Why didn’t they intercept the plane? Why did my husband have to die? Why didn’t you do your job?
Perhaps an angle you never considered as an outsider looking in.
Perhaps it’s time to change your perception, and hear what the family members had to say. Note, they are not conspiracy theorists, and their questioning isn’t about an “inside job”, but rather how do you not discipline the incompetence of the actions of so many?
Posted in 9/11
In this multi-part report, Tony Gossling discusses with his colleague the events of 7.7 and 9.11, and the name of the show says it best: “Now that’s weird”.
The facts surely are weird.
Gladio, is now the new term to describe an operation to effect an agenda, used by government to further their objectives, whatever they may be. False flag events can be classified as events of “gladio-proportion”.
Can we tie in the key points with the goal for new wars of occupation to take over the resources of the world as the US economy tanks?
Is Janet Napolitano’s “see something, say something” campaign suddenly taking on an ah ha meaning now that we see the evidence from Norway suggesting the blond haired, blue eyed guy next door is the new Al Qaida? Anders Breivik was the guy next door who bought a farm to get the fertilizer, to build a bomb, to go along with his two-gun purchase to terrorize Norway. Breath, breath breath……whooo. And he made sure he put it all in a manifest of suspect proportions. Like who does that?
Why is it there always seems to be evidence beforehand to warn those awake that something is coming.
While the Obama administration commented that they need a new “Oklahoma City” to further Obama’s approval rating, the warnings have always been there that governments throughout history have used what are called “false flag” events to further their goals.
This interview gives the points once again worth thought. And, you have been warned, once you start to think on your own, critically, you might become the new terrorist – - those who question and think, and ponder. Remember, you have been warned. Once transformed, according to a BBC reporter, you will not likely be able to return to your old life of trust, and you will be demonized.
The new terrorist is the guy next door!
Posted in 9/11, Bilderberg, Corruption, Politics, Spirituality, US Politics
Go away conspiracy theorist!
Sure, you might have read the recent article in the May 23rd, 2011 edition of Maclean’s Magazine, on bin Laden and the ‘Culture of Conspiracy’. Ewwwww… which side are you on “Conspiracy Theorist“?
They’ll scrap the long-gun registry, and sign on for 65 F-35 fighter jets, and build a lot more jails.
Don’t question that move Canadian, unless you want to be a conspiracy theorist. Our leader has his majority now, so accept it, do not question, and hope all is good for a long, long time.
Obvious which side Maclean’s is on. But don’t let me tell you what to believe you conspiracy theorist, you dirtbag. You who has lost your mind, perhaps your marriage, and is living now on donations! Don’t let me tell you what is politically correct, and what the majority is thinking; and if you think that way you must be becoming paranoid. No, don’t let me sway your decision to have a right to look into evidence and form an opinion.
Just know one thing conspiracy theorist – -what we want you to know — the moment, yes the very moment you start to pay attention to things around here that challenge the government or the governments of the world, and the very second you think for a milisec that the government may not tell you 100% truth, you are, dare I say, a full-fledged, whackjob conspiracy theorist! Okay?
Don’t pay attention to the fact that Anwar al_Awlaki dined at the Pentagon shortly after 9/11. Forget that, conspiracy theorist, and just tune-in to when the media says he is a huge threat, and Canadians are a threat too if they have any business with him. The Pentagon? Forget it, they are okay because they are the Pentagon. They are allowed to give the guy a dinner. If you did it – - terrorist!
Don’t for God’s sake, look into the idea that al-Qaeda is a CIA creation. That would lead to more thought. And thought, well, that gets you into trouble my friend.
The key to staying in good stead is to not pay attention to anything except the official stories the governments tell you. Then you will be politically correct, stay off the watch lists, and not be a conspiracy theorist.
So go ahead, read the article in Macleans magazine on the Culture of Conspiracy (sorry, not yet available online!), and if you are smart, you will snub your nose at those that have gone from father, mother, architect, military official, doctor, and all other walks of “normal” life to the dark side. Yes, that’s what we’re talking about, the dark side of becoming a conspiracy theorist, because that explains the state of crazy mind of anyone that doesn’t believe that the government is good, and caring, and looking out for you. Remember the words of Glenn Beck, you are not one of those are you?
They are so caring that the Harper government is going to build more jails as a primary initiative now that most Canadians were trusting enough to vote for him, and give him the control he needs to implement that decision.
But when you starve the education system and the kinds of supports that build healthy families (definitely the first things chopped under conservative or right-wing governments) you’re going to get more social problems.
And while Dalton McGuinty has washed his hands of guilt for the injustice to Canadians rallying in protest to the banking system at the G20 meeting, McGuinty was quick to point to Harper. Hmm, the very same Harper that wants to build more jails. Hmmm, well what about more funding for student loans, healthcare, other things good for the Canadians that trust him? No, sorry folks, more jails is the priority.
And how did I know he wants to build more jails for the nasties in Canada?
Well, that’s easy, I read that article in Maclean’s before reading why a conspiracy theorist has lost his mind.
I just have one question and one worry. If I say Harper wants to build more jails, does that make me a conspiracy theorist?
And, I don’t know if this makes me a conspiracy theorist, but I do agree with the words eloquently pointed out:
So you need to build more jails. And if you build more jails, you need to find some way to fill them. Did you know the US spends more on jails than it does on education? That the state of California in the last decade laid off 10,000 teachers but hired 10,000 more prison guards?
Golly, and as I try not to think the way of the nasty conspiracy theorist, I can’t help but drift back into thinking that the article telling us it is dangerous politics to challenge a government, your government; that there is a chance that the new criminal may be a criminal of the mind — a thought criminal.
And, those thought criminals would not be cold blooded, maximum security types, but they could be the types that would have protested the “new world” as Harper has told us, that Canada has to give up it’s sovereignty because that’s just the way the world is now. What was that again? A global reality? Something like that.
Well, I can certainly see where a media source like Maclean’s would have to paint a picture of the new, low risk criminal worthy of jail space.
Those conspiracy theorists that pose a threat to government, who challenge the leaders whether they are truthful or not.
And remember, Maclean’s would like you to believe they are as “fair and balanced” as Fox News in the U.S.. Yep, they have not reported with a negative spin on conspiracy theorists before, nope, not a chance. Nope, they make sure they give you the facts without trying to shape your opinion with various hit pieces over time. Because, if they did that, they would be challenged on their motives, and might be questioned on who they serve.
Those nasty conspiracy theorists might form a group called people for media truth or some such thing.
Don’t question media Canada, no more so than questioning government. Take both as 100% gospel truth. And, those jails you will simply drive by, not occupy.
And that would go double for journalists turned conspiracy theorists that don’t buy everything the government tells them too. Too bad, they could have been a contenda!
I wonder if some reporters for Maclean’s were treated poorly at the G20 too. Just wondering, because they may be creating a nightmare for themselves too. Just a thought.
Posted in 9/11, Banking System, Bilderberg, Canada, Canadian Politics, Corruption, education, Fake News, Money, Police State, Politics
Tagged Harper, more jails in Canada, Stephen Harper
It’s not a question of what to say, it’s a question of how to say it. Where do you start on the realization that seeing the agenda unfold on Fox News and other sources is so blatant and obvious, that it blows the mind that people might actually still hold hope that Fox is the “official opposition” to the current Obama Administration, and the mouthpiece of the Republican Party. The game is so obvious and contrived, it really gives me a sick feeling in the pit of my stomach.
Let’s start here.
For months, every member of Fox News was bashing President Obama on all issues. Glenn Beck was perhaps the greatest attacker amongst the pack of news/ commentator jockies, but not long after he learned of his walking papers from Fox, his loyalty to them remains intact regardless. Yes, you will not find the security guard waiting to watch Beck pack up his office in a banker’s box, and escorting him to the door, and by the way Mr. Beck, your keys please. Not a chance. Beck has said it himself, he believes there will be a place for him at Fox.
More like, a new assignment to continue to further the propaganda cause.
Whether Beck believes he is doing tremendous good, in retrospect is not the issue. What seems more important is his being part of the bigger agenda to build up Fox’s credibility as the official police of the White House and Obama, so that when they decide to say Obama did a good thing in killing Osama bin Laden, we are all supposed to say, “even Fox agrees so it must be true”.
Obama has done a great job, and he “really did” have Osama killed. So, there is no true “we got to get rid of Beck because even we can’t take the level of ‘truth’ he brings”, no!
He’s done his job, and the proof is the fact that he is still on the air. If he knew he was on the way out and could then say whatever he wanted to say in a “see if I care and let them stop me” attitude, and was a true Patriot, he wouldn’t be furthering the false war on terror, and bringing in the marching band when discussing the alleged death of bin Laden.
It get’s better as we all know. Well, check that. It gets better for those that have paid attention. Because all the people who simply do not trust the media have one thing in common – - they have paid attention. It’s that simple.
As Gerald Celente chatted with Paul Watson the other day, Celente pointed out that “Americans only hear the first lie, and then they tune out”. That would be a known fact for mainstream media. They know they can’t get to those that truly have paid attention, but the ones that tune out and “trust them”, well there’s the audience they truly serve.
Yes, they are “press-titutes” Celente went on, the only difference is “you pay for it with no happy ending”. Oh Gerald, you are still in fine form sir.
We should move on to Snidely Whiplash, aka Geraldo Rivera. He reminds me of the “medicine show” in old western movies. You know, the guy that sells snake oil, and whenever anyone challenges him on the effectiveness, or what he said before he changes his story. Smiles all around Geraldo! Osama is dead after all. Make sure you have a special complete with credible, ex-navy seals to further support the ever-changing official story.
Forget Mr. Rivera, that you were on the verge of agreeing with the victims’ families of 9/11 on the Building What campaign to get an explanation as to why the buildings, in your own words, seemed to fall as if in controlled demolition. No, remember now the new excitement du jour, the fact that the man who was 100% responsible has been killed, and don’t bother to figure out if he could have rigged the buildings to collapse. Simply go back to plan A, where it is so much easier, and the fact is, that’s what you get paid to do – - toe the party line.
And those people who don’t pay attention out in the public can flap in the wind along with Fox News – - both of them in a love in of joy at the death of bin Laden. Oh what a great day! America is strong and good!
Suddenly and not even begrudgingly, Fox is leading the pack as the (used to be) official pain in the White House’s rump (remember that?), to now effectively serving its ultimate purpose.
Fox has been playing the bad cop role for what has come full circle. A psy-op (psychological operation) to fool the public into believing that Osama bin Laden was actually, without question and full “right-wing” support, the only bad guy, and that it is irrefutable that Obama got the job done. Gotta hand it to him do you Beck?
Geraldo Rivera can slip in the counter-call to the criticism that the man in the photos looked young, and advise us all that bin Laden liked to dye his beard black. Oh really? Couldn’t locate him for ten years, but the intel knew he used hair dye?
Well, here ‘s a humorous clip to add levity to that faux- up!
So…..
Wife used as “human shield” or not? Buried at Sea for what reason exactly? Situation Room had the T.V. on or off? Which is it Fox? I am sure you will put aside your despising of the White House for a moment to cover up for them right?
Hillary Clinton and Obama should have gone to acting school before the “situation room drama scene”. Hokey! But, now that I hear Hillary explain it was her allergies I totally get it, having them myself. Yep, in the words of that T.V. game show, good answer!
Remember, Alex Jones’ recent comment that the photos were perhaps of a patsy used and killed to look “sort of” like bin Laden, but it was cartoonish because the man in the photos was obviously much younger, with a dark, youthful beard. Dang that photoshop program can show the birth certificate was layered, and reproduce the alleged death photo.
What’s that? The kid got lucky you say? Well, how about this one? Luck too?
Oops, training session this was not! No more so than the underwear bomber, and what snowjob was sold him to get onto the plane, assisted by the sharp-dressed operative.
But the creme de la creme has got to be the new drive for the Fox News Network to try to put the counter-Paul in the Republican seat. The mission now is to support the unknown, non-experienced Herman Cain.
Who is that you say? Herman Cain? Exactly. Let’s have an after -party won’t we Fox, with 29 supporters in an unprecidented display that support Cain. Wow, this is unprecedented the announcer came back with. Please people, really?
He “hit a home run” as one of the 29 on the panel suggested with his comment that when asked how the current politicians are doing. Cain was eluding to the fact that it is good that he has no experience in politics, because after all, with the guys in charge now, “How’s it working for you?”. Wait for the applause to end folks before volunteering to be one of the 29 that mirror exactly what the American Republican Party would want for the counter to the newly bolstered Obama.
‘Cause the Cain Train will roll over Obama! R-i-g-h-t.
Now, let’s also not forget the Hannity show after the debate, who ensured he mentioned that Ron Paul was not going to stick around, instead he was going to that crazy Tea Party event. Pshhhh…. missed the boat did he Hannity?
Seems Hannity got the memo on the looks and gestures that are a prerequisite to any news or comment that Ron Paul would make. If the audience applauds Paul, make sure you roll your eyes guys, and remind them to hold their applause. Good job! You are true lackies!
Contrived alert, contrived alert…..paying attention or still sleeping?
As Paul Watson of PrisonPlanet.com recently pointed out when discussing this debate in South Carolina, the only credible threat to Obama at this point is Ron Paul.
The boys at Fox should have been on their hands and knees asking Ron how he likes the buff on his shoes.
Instead, the game has shifted. Support the unknown to ensure the GOP has no chance in beating Obama.
And, what scares the Hell out of me is the revelation that the Book of Revelation tells us that the man would almost be killed (politically), but would bounce back.
Could this be it? Could the patsies be helping to fulfill what was destined to come all along? It might be worth paying attention if you aren’t already. What do you think?
Donald Rumsfeld wrote a book. They all do, don’t they?
He said they were wrong on the intelligence that drove them into Iraq to find the weapons of mass destruction. According to CNN that cost 4500 troops their lives. And, wasn’t it 100,000 plus innocent Iraqi citizens that died?
I remember the “intel”, as we reported that it was applied rather thick. Rumsfeld seemed too confident then, to be so willy nilly, and wishy-washy now on the subject.
Let’s bring you back, to the elaborate caves that Rumsfeld said were in Afghanistan where Bin Laden was hiding. Did they find these? No, they were a fictoid. But Rumsfeld jumped right in to justify not one, but many. Able to avoid radar; big enough to run tanks through; with electricity, ventilation systems, computers, etc. Where was this intel obtained that sounded so convincing?
Let’s not forget the need for bunker busting bombs, according to George Bush Jr.
Sure, really George?
On 9/11, wasn’t your dad dining with some of the Bin Laden family for breakfast, or lunch? I can imagine the dinner conversation – “Oh sorry, just to go off topic, we are looking for your son, do you mind telling us where the most wanted is right now – we need to pick him up”. Right.
Read more, click here
Maybe Anwar Al -Awlaki now occupies these mystery caves. Sure fits the M.O. doesn’t he? Got the Pentagon dinner one night, on the most wanted list soon after. Hint to those in the Middle East: Don’t take dinner invitations – you are really paying for it.
I can imagine that dinner conversation: “Anwar, we are looking for a new patsy. So, here is what we’ll do. You’re it! Okay? That’s as good as it gets. We will make it worth your while – we will never catch you. Set you up in new digs, the whole nine yards, what do you say Anwar?”
“The American public? Don’t worry, they buy everything the controlled media tells ‘em, not an issue. If we say the sky is green, they believe it. If we say the cold as heck weather is global warming, for crying out loud, they believe it. If we can pull of that scam, don’t you think we can pull this off too?”
“We got Donny Rumsfeld, guilty as sin writing a book. Because once the book is published, Don feels better, the people feel better, and if it is in a book, gotta be true! Know what I mean? Heck, we can even show the stupidity of the thing in shows like the Family Guy. People just laugh. But, they still believe it, the chumps!”
The hard-hitting Diane Sawyer (lovely lady) hit Rumsfeld with the tough question. The cat that swallowed the canary look on Rumsfeld’s face tells us everything I think we need to know.
Can we take the “wisdom” of Rumsfeld at least in one way. He said the things we know today are different. Applying that, was 9/11 not what we were told too? We have the evidence today to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt that “doubt” exists.
What drove the military into Iraq, at the root was a lie. It’s time to get to the bottom of it.
Posted in 9/11, Afghanistan, Bilderberg, Carlyle Group, climategate, Corruption, Fake News, Police State, Politics, US Politics
Tagged Anwar Al-Awlaki, Iraq War, Rumsfeld
From the show Conspiracy Theory on the Pentagon strike on 9/11:
Perhaps as significant as what is unknown about the Pentagon attack is what has been forgotten. Just prior to the September 11 attacks in 2001, it was announced that the Department of Defense could not account for more than $2.3 trillion dollars. Donald Rumsfeld was questioned about it the day before by Rep. Cynthia McKinney, with little to say in accounting for the astonishing sum of money. But all the evidence of this accounting fraud, or error, was destroyed in the 9/11 attack during which the Pentagon was fortuitously struck in the very area where some of this evidence was being held for investigation. Oddly, a great deal of important financial & investigative information was also destroyed in the collapse of WTC7 on the same day.
Here is the segment from the show:
Posted in 9/11
Scary it is!
Everywhere you look, there are ex-Goldman Sachs guys (and gals) in powerful positions – positions of authority, influence, and power.
The argument for hiring these guys has always been that, like a Harvard grad, they are smart, and the doors open for these people.
Or, is that simply an excuse to say that top talent comes from Sachs, when really it is an excuse to put in place those to effect a treasonous agenda. And, like a terrorist cell, could the power be exercised when needed?
I like to use the analogy of a terror cell , as we heard enough of that from George W. Bush shortly after the very iffy 9/11 explanation that it was Al Qaida responsible for the attacks that day. Didn’t it seem a little odd that blame was laid so quickly, the thermite dust hadn’t even settled yet from the pulverized buildings?
And by the way, now would be a good time to suggest you have a look at the recent Conspiracy Theory episode about the Pentagon and 9/11 – good stuff that puts the issue of who is the terrorist and why did the Patriot Act really come into control:
And, in case you missed the original on 9/11, here you go:
Back to Goldman Sachs.
Where there was talk of the financial meltdown, we didn’t have to look far to see that Goldman was right there in the thick of suspicion. The teflon of being a great entity is wearing off as we find more and more underlying corruption associated with Goldman Sachs and their involvment with the derivative scandal.
Remembering back, it was Goldman Sachs that gained large as an investment bank, once it became open season with the repeal of the Glass-Steagal Act by Bill Clinton. And who was it that was involved in convincing him? Was it Robert Rubin, and ex-Goldman boy?
Teflon is definitely getting rubbed off I’d say. The reputation of Goldman has taken a major hit. And it is becoming worrisome.
More evidence:
Observers will point to the firm’s near obsessive focus on recruiting, which has seeded its ranks with an enviable roster of talent, ripe for the poaching. They will highlight Goldman’s record of public service over the past six decades, and the succession of leaders who were encouraged to cap off their lucrative Wall Street careers with a stint in government. And of course, they will reference the company’s unparalleled command of risk: In an era where most of its blue-chip peers have been torched by lax lending standards and questionable bets – think Citigroup, Bear Stearns, UBS and Lehman, to name a few – Goldman has emerged with merely a few singes.
All of these factors go some way toward explaining the ascendancy of so many Goldman alumni amid the debris of the credit crisis. Yet the nature of the crisis has also played a role. Much of this disaster was manufactured on Wall Street, and it is here, at the epicentre of the U.S. financial system, that much of the punishment is being meted out. Given the complexity of the products underlying the collapse of the subprime mortgage market and the potential for a devastating domino effect if some of these major banks fail, it’s little surprise that officials in both the public and private sectors have looked to industry experts for help. And where better to turn than the investment bank that managed to sail through the downturn reasonably intact?
Goldman was indeed a “teflon tim” of the banking industry – no blame or responsibility seems to stick.
Suspicion points to the potential explanation for the longevity of the firm – was it skill or advantage? Was it sound business practice based on a terrific talent pool, or was it due to political favoritism, and the effecting of a political agenda? And are we to see the instilling of these ex-Sachs folks as being recruited to finish off their careers in government, or can we look at the careers in Goldman as the training ground for the real job of government positions?
As Jesse Ventura pointed out on the Wall Street episode, why should the bankers effecting the crisis be given bonuses for destroying the lives of Americans? The more damage you do, the bigger the bonus?:
And Jesse Ventura is not the only critic of Goldman Sachs’ role in the destruction of the American economy. Alternative media is rife with support to suggest that Sachs are financial terrorists bent on the destruction of the middle class. Max Keiser is one such expert with roots on Wall Street, and plenty of ammo:
And, note that the crisis is global – Goldman is in thick everywhere.
And Canada, we are not immune. Check out our Bank of Canada Governor’s roots – you got it – Goldman Sachs!
Along with Mr. Paulson, there was Mr. Carney, who had taken up his job as head of Canada’s central bank only a couple of months earlier, and Bank of Italy Governor Mario Draghi, who was a London-based partner at Goldman from 2002 to 2005. Mr. Draghi also leads the influential Financial Services Forum of central bankers and regulators, which spent six months preparing the report that became the basis of the G7′s demands for more transparency by banks and other regulatory changes.
And the article continues to paint a necessary background on the same sh__, different issue when it comes to what can be expected:
The people at Goldman Sachs are not so successful because they are smarter than the rest of us, just a lot more cunning and crooked in many cases and have the audacity to pull off tricks like Mark Carney’s income trust tax, that steals from the poor to line the pockets of the wealthy.
Let’s not kid ourselves Canada. Time to wake up if not already. There is a plan taking effect. The players are taking position. And the one in Canada is already here.
Posted in 9/11, Banking System, Bilderberg, Corruption, Greece, Police State, Politics, US Politics
Tagged banking system, financial terrorism, Goldman Sachs, Mark Carney
