Category Archives: 9/11

The top 20 terrorist ‘targets’ are the bankers?: That was the reason for the tight G20 security?

Posted on December 9, 2010 | Leave a comment

A report in recent Canadian News had Andre Marin, Ontario’s Ombudsman saying the G20 fiasco in Toronto “amounted to Martial Law”.

Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty refused to acknowledge the violation on civil liberties, and explained it this way:

But McGuinty rejected Marin’s assertion that what his government did behind closed doors on June 2 was “illegal” and “likely unconstitutional.”

The Ontario Premier’s allegiances are in dire question already, and the way he handled the G20 security issues is not surprising. McGuinty was seen to be showing great attention to the Queen on her later visit to Canada, and he has pushed for all day kindergarten for children as young as four, a hallmark sign an Orwellian state is being implemented.

Assessing the strategy and planning for the G20 can vary by how one views the big picture. If it were merely to protect the banking representatives it went overboard, but if it were to stir the crowd,  conditioning them for the future the new world order it was right on target. It might best be described as living up to the globalists’ expectations.  There is an obvious pattern at the G20 summits of the past (including Pittsburgh) which  paints a picture of an agenda to condition the people to get used to abuse and violation of their rights. I wouldn’t buy the argument that there were mistakes made in letting people know.

 The bombshell reasoning for such tight security was the police request for assistance, as McGuinty explained:

“The government was acting on a request from police to deal with possible terrorist threats at the G20 summit and even the ombudsman said its motives were good, McGuinty noted.

“He said that we acted with good intentions, that the police came to us and said: ‘We need your help. We’re going to be hosting the G20 and there are possibly the top 20 terrorist targets on the face of this planet coming together in one city,” the premier said.

Apologies are in order. I thought the police were saying the top 20 terrorists would be at the G20 meetings in the crowd. What they meant was that the “targets” were the bank representatives. Well, if they are suggesting the bankers would be terrorist targets, who are they suggesting the terrorists would be?

It would seem that everyone was suspect.

Journalists were mistreated as well as innocent civilians. Known political activists that were attempting to cross the border from the U.S. representing the organization, We are Change were not allowed to enter Canada. The police targeted Charlie Veitch from England, and he was arrested and charged with impersonating an officer.

Veitch was simply doing his usual humorous rants with bullhorn, and calling himself the “Love Police”. When arrested, Veitch explained on video that the police knew who he was, and they commented that they had a real live dissident on their hands.

During the Bilderberg Group meetings in Ottawa in 2006, Alex Jones was similarly mistreated, being detained for several hours, and having his computer system checked.

I think we can see that either the G20 leaders and their handlers are sending a message that is clear that to protest the new world as controlled by bankers you will pay the price. The event was a mere show of power.

To believe a true terrorist would use the G20, and be part of the crowd is laughable. After all, it is often those accused as being public enemy number one that get the best treatment, and are “in on the joke”.  Especially since:

Al-Qaeda terror mastermind Anwar Al-Awlaki, the man who helped plot the aborted Christmas Day bombing, the Fort Hood shooting, the Times Square bombing attempt, and who also preached to the alleged September 11 hijackers, dined at the Pentagon just months after 9/11 documents obtained by Fox News show.

The supposed “real terrorists” are treated like royalty, because this is all just a game. The real terrorists most times are CIA operatives, or patsies drugged out of their heads like the underwear bomber on Christmas day. The real terrorists are an excuse to instigate right-stripping laws like the Patriot Act in the U.S. that now has videos at U.S. Wal-Mart stores urging people to look for anything suspicious.

It has widely been argued by Max Keiser and others that it is the bankers on Wall Street who are the true “financial terrorists”, responsible for the collapse of global economies the world over. A systematic destruction and ponzi scheme of derivative make believe turned real. The banks that are broke, desperately seeking comfort via the IMF and World Bank to go after all real assets including the pension plans of the working citizens of the world.

Thus, real terrorism is being reined on by the governments of the world on its citizens.

With as many as 800 FEMA camps reported on shows like Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura, someone should remind the American government who was accused of the events of 9/11. Here’s a hint: It wasn’t the current target – the American population. It seems the lack of memory extended itself not long after 9/11.

Fox News has shown us how the true terrorists are treated:

Conditioning or protection?

Either way, they must think we are completely stupid and terribly uninformed!

→ Leave a comment

Posted in 9/11, Banking System, Bilderberg, Canadian Politics, Corruption, Police State, Politics, US Politics

Tagged

How to bring the truth: Add lots of humor!

Posted on November 8, 2010 | Leave a comment

How humor can show the world those that are not “socially acceptable anymore”….from genital grabbing TSA agents to suicide bankers, who is going to want to prolong the agony of the jokes against them?

Make me laugh!

And when you’ve made me laugh, I will become more receptive to what you have to say.

Not being a psychologist, I don’t think I need to look up research that supports the fact that humorous means to bring a message will have a positive effect on those receiving the message. So, don’t be too heavy.

When people tune in to the Alex Jones show, or the Keiser Report with Max Keiser, serious issues of our liberty being at stake is the topic. So, a little laugh or two to go along with the situation can’t hurt – in fact it probably helps a lot!

There is another thing that humor brings – it sends a clear message of that which is ridiculous. For not only will those listening be receptive, they are likely to learn how to pass on this information.

After all, nobody wants to be the brunt of a joke. “They might laugh at me”.

The recent joking of Alex Jones about “Al Qaeda” during the fourth hour of today’s show made me laugh, as it no doubt made several others laugh.

Because when the TSA agents at the airport call out, “opt out” in a loud voice, you might want to chime in, “Oh no, they might have an Al-Qaeda terrorist over there, oh my!”

It might even make the workers for TSA think twice before reporting for work. Who wants to work at a job everyone makes fun of?

Mini Max

And, anybody that has tuned in to Max Keiser, complete with mini Max, and the headless Hank Paulson doll, can’t help but want to see the next episode.

no this is the "real" Blankfein, not "mini Blankfein....I know, hard to tellOr how about the Keiser Report below, that has a mini Lloyd Blankfein (2:00 mark):

And the follow up episode (2:15 mark):

Don’t miss seeing Ben Bernanke’s head at the 3:00 mark, and Hank Paulson’s head at the 3:20 mark, because there is always a new Ponzi Banker to replace the “beheaded” ones!

Because according to Keiser, the terrorists deserve decapitation. He has his box-cutter, because if it can take down the World Trade Centers, it can take care of the terrorists known as suicide bankers.
So don’t think it a bad thing that folks tune in for the entertainment.

And if you want to tackle that nasty, mocking neighbor who thinks you’re a crackpot, bring the truth with a grain of humor. Whatever works, and makes people receptive.

For example, would you have a good laugh if I told you we just witnessed a UFO? Yeah, thought so, so how do I bring that supposed truth humorously and at the same time, make you believe me? Hmmm…. “Did you hear the one about the chinese lantern that turned out to be a space ship, or an anti-gravity aircraft the globalists are using worldwide to scare the world into a global alien crisis?”

Did you laugh? Do you believe me? Well, I guess I need to work on that one.

How about…..

Would you like fries with that Al Qaeda burger?

→ Leave a comment

Posted in 9/11, Banking System, Bilderberg, Corruption, Police State, Politics, US Politics

Tagged , , ,

Watch the Ivy, Canada: You don’t want our Universities going the way of Harvard

Posted on November 1, 2010 | 2 Comments

Ivy league, eh?

Wow, what a goal, and what an aspiration.

Hold on. What you see is not necessarily a good thing.

We are starting to see a push in Canadian Universities, recently being fought against at the University of Western Ontario at London, Ontario, and at Carleton University in Ottawa. The issues are key. The resistance important. The players are the faculty, and I would hope the students supporting the faculty to keep education real, meaningful, and outside of external influence and control.

Because, if the province is able to tether professor tenure then we in Canada will go by way of political retooling – where reality does not meet training; where the rubber of true thought isn’t allowed to meet the road of resistance and free thought.

As in our last article pointing out the resistance of Professors at Western University, the Orwellian State may be closer than we think. Our desire to have our children  get an ivy league education may have been a marketing smokescreen.

President Barack Obama was granted the Nobel Peace Prize but he hadn’t even done anything to deserve it.

Nobel officials said their stunning pick was meant to build momentum behind Obama’s initiatives to reduce nuclear arms, ease tensions with the Muslim world and stress diplomacy and cooperation rather than unilateralism.

So the Peace Prize is a political tool to support a direction or motive, but not for work already done? To shape agenda by rewarding behavior? The Nobel Prize therefore is nothing more than a tool of propaganda ; now just a means to effect a political end, and to shape public perception of both the desired agenda and to give credence and support to the recipient.

President Barack Obama has become the chosen one, while at the same time waning in popularity at home. I guess that’s okay if you know the world is your oyster; if you are aware your future has been laid out for you like the Nobel Prize before it is deserved. And, we wonder why the Republican campaign is taking aim at Obama the elitist? The Nobel Prize is just a measure of who is the New World Order golden boy of the moment.

What does this have to do with education? Why the talk about the “elitist” Obama, and the Nobel Prize that supports the facade of greatness?

It applies in another setting – that of the credibility and stature of leading the sheeple of society to aspire to the echelons of the highest learning possible. What university stands out as one of the elite? Which rings the bell of Ivy League stature? Harvard.

We probably don’t know why Harvard is mentioned as a place where the aspiring young adult can find the world waiting to be had, if only he can get to the Ivy League education the system of education would have us believe exists there. In truth, education is a combination of desirable environment, including the professors and the curriculum to promote the freedom to explore the universe. Hence the term university. It’s meant to be an experience not a sales forum.

Have universities been kept free of political influence? Or, have they been tainted by  political agendas, and the administrators and faculty moulded to effect elitist will and support political goals?

Like the branding of a president with a Nobel Peace Prize to effect a desired outcome, universities may shape young minds, but not in a desirable way.

And so, would universities such as Harvard be breeding grounds to give credibility to a direction of education that can surpass the hallowed halls of learning, and enter the mainstream media, influencing the world as a whole – economically and politically? The answer is yes. Yes, it can, yes it will, and yes it has.

One could argue that the current political shapings of society and world-view are supported by the very professors that shape our youth as they enter the “elite” roles the world has waiting for the Ivy Leaguers.

We have talked about some of that influence already when we looked at Martin Feldstein and Niall Ferguson, both very influential Harvard Professors. Their agendas –  that of Bilderberg.

Now, you may have heard of Harvard, and Ivy League, and you can be forgiven if you have not heard about Bilderberg. Suffice it to say, it’s time to put mainstream media aside, and to get an alter-education into the control grid awaiting you. You will not walk away from this education without a sort of disdain for culture as you might have known it. The journey to a new level of awareness and truth will become an obsession in all likelihood. And the way you view the world will forever change.

So, it’s quite easy to view the moves in Ontario Universities to push an agenda that seems to have similar roots.

Why, at Western University, did they push for the neo-con Ann Coulter to visit, where she brashly put our country down not long ago?:

“They better hope the United States doesn’t roll over one night and crush them,” she said onHannity & Colmes in 2004. “They’re lucky they’re allowed to be on the same continent as the United States.”

Or worse, why she was allowed to insult a Muslim student in front of her peers:

On second thought, perhaps the University of Ottawa President who felt bad for Coulter should allow her to come back – but this time – it’s open, politically correct season to let the students tell her exactly what they think of her poor taste, low-class, hate speech disguised as “free speech”. I would say, with all sincerity, that I have full confidence that the students of Ottawa University could teach her a thing or two, and the engagement – let’s just say –  would be well worth the cover charge.

The classic  question for these universities has to be: “Who invited her?”

The tainted, political activist in me that does not see the new world with rosy (O’Donnell) covered glasses sees a different pattern of reasoning emerging. Where do the Presidents of these universities get their bacon and funding from – politicians in Ottawa? Of course.

So if there were elitist agendas to promote the “official story of 9/11″,  to blame 9/11 on Bin Laden and other Muslims, and to the support of the war effort, it would be well served by promoting a visit from the not hard to look at, but hard to swallow likes of Ann Coulter. And, because most young men at universities are into beer and broads, it could easily be construed that they might be influenced by a shapely fembot. No room to suppose intellect and knowing what in the world is happening here I suppose. I don’t know, I would have to say it backfired, and the laughs, Annie, may have been for comedic slang, and not content. Sorry dear-y. Canada is not your oyster. Go back and tell your neo-con controllers it aint workin’ here.

That is, it would seem the vision of those parading this speaker series coast to coast. From what I understand – London, Ottawa, Calgary, and in the words of Buzz Lightyear – “and beyond”.

Political agenda to sell Canada out to a larger agenda perhaps? To shape the minds of our young, that we paid good money to send to school, to listen to this trash-talker that thinks Christianity can be bought at the barrel of a gun?

I don’t think Jesus would be too impressed. Not since, from what I know, the Muslims will be coming to Christ in large numbers with or without war.

I would be far more impressed to see a man such as Ron Paul, the true leader of the Tea Party Movement visit our schools – where issues of America including abolishing the Fed would be in primary focus. Not to mention a fresh investigation into the police state creating 9/11 issue, and the instigation of the Patriot Act to take us one step closer to an elitist run world.

The point is, if Ron Paul becomes President of the United States, he may have to call the Vatican to see who made the mode of transportation for the Pope. And, he might ask permission to use the term “Paul-mobile” when his car is made. A man that would have to live in a bubble so he doesn’t go by way of JFK.

Oh, there are issues in this world that the students at university know all too well.

It’s time to admit it, and stop trying to parade influence in front of them is a quest to support the new world order politics.

Let those taking the courses on “globalization”  run with it. Let the students tell their peers and their profs what they think of the right-stripping control that the world is trying to ram down their throats, and  what they think of the control being imposed on how the world is presented to them.

The game is over. It’s time to tell the administrators of higher learning in the United States and Canada that the students will support the professors that are standing up for freedom – the freedom to share without fear the issues of the world.

Just because it says Ivy League does not mean it is elite. No more so than the title of Nobel Prize. Unfortunately politics has shaped opinion.

I for one am proud of the professors at Universities such as Western, in London, Ontario.

And if you don’t think there is a world-wide drive to political conformism, perhaps you haven’t seen these speeches by John Howard and Stephen Harper, related to the war effort in Iraq:

Or, if you were around during the War in the Gulf, you would no doubt have not seen this piece of fabrication fashioned by CNN:

Or, to make it a little clearer!:


Who writes this stuff?

I understand there is a department in the Canadian government to address “wrong ideas” out in the blogosphere. I will await their call!

But the issue here is the bastion of freedom in education. All eyes should be watching. The world is at stake.

Postscript: Here is an interesting article that has this to add:

This “One World” order will be brought about by a shift in the political, economic, environmental, and education arenas. The political arena is crucial because of its ability to engage whole nations with the stroke of a pen. Government leaders play significant roles in making internal changes that will ultimately affect their national sovereignty. In bringing about such a new age of international cooperation, national sovereignty will have to be surrendered. Therefore, it is not surprising that President Bush went to the United Nations first in order to obtain approval for using force against Saddam Hussein. Many wonder if he now sees the U.N. Charter as more important than the U. S. Constitution. There are those who are presently calling for a constitutional convention to bring about a change in our nation’s way of governing itself.

→ 2 Comments

Posted in 9/11, Banking System, Bilderberg, Canada, Canadian Politics, Corruption, education, Police State, Politics, Spirituality, Stephen Harper, US Politics

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Welcome to the ‘New Commie Order’

Posted on September 29, 2010 | Leave a comment

Alex Jones may be right. Check that. Alex Jones is probably right.

For months, those of us that know Jones’ style and substance have watched  the Jones alternative, Glenn Beck.

Beck’s goal, it becomes clear is to bring only the version of truth that fits a certain agenda.

Beck’s appeal is in his “mom’s apple pie”, nice, reformed drinker success story.

It would seem Beck is quite pleased with his audience’s perception of him – from down and out in the bottom of a bottle to making it large working for a network with deepening pockets. The “pockets” are filling, largely because Beck has the number two cable news show – he pointed that out yesterday. People are listening.

What is most disturbing is the cleanup job. To help the flag waving, war supporting American public, Beck represents a parallel universe to Jones’, but lacks the bigger meat and potatoes of the fuller, rounder explanation of where the world is heading. Beck claims he was not aware of any of “this” two years ago, but that is blatently and easily proven less than true – since at least 2008 reporting on CNN, Beck came out with the terminology One World Government and New World Order. ” The world you and I grew up in is gone, and it may be gone forever”. That was Beck in his “drinking days” of 2008,  that by Beck’s suggestion can be shrugged off by no no better explanation than “drinking”, “a lot”. This is the part where the tip of the tongue goes out and in, with rapid motion, to further the goal to sell the moment.

Growing public awareness may help explain why Beck, Limbaugh and other neo conservative supporters have been “forced to” cover the current drive to world government awareness. . It could then be argued, Beck represents the other argument, parallel to Jones, but making it more palattable to the citizens as a whole. You can hear the relief “Thank God our child’s going to war in Afghanistan is not a lie, and not for reasons other than finding and fighting terrorism.” Can you imagine how hard to swallow it would be to think otherwise?

Jones brings up a strong point that these guys are forced to keep up to stay relevant. They may be keeping up because as more and more focus heads to the real source of the problems – the Bilderberg Group – the more deflection sales jobs need to come in. And what better way than to use a mom’s apple pie approach to admit many things, deflecting away from Bilderberg, and to support the troops, and those that have died fighting for the cause?

In short, the Jones’ take is hard to accept from the point of view of what it ultimately represents. Yet, it is almost impossible to find an angle that supports any chance of inconsistency or lies. And, I am getting really good at finding inconsistencies. Again, with Jones I am having quite the impossible time. If you have listened for a while, you will likely agree – there is no reason to have to make excuses. How many times he may have dipped into the bottles of Jack (Daniels) or Jim (Beam) is not an issue.

Beck, on the other hand has repeatedly explained the reason he is so different from only a few years ago, because, his admission is “he used to drink a lot”. Don’t get me wrong, this isn’t a bash of the courage it took to leave that life, but using it as an excuse for altered character is hard to swallow.

I suppose the argument is that character can be shaped by alcohol. I suppose this is where the expression “I must have been drunk at the time” came from. But, the new rub from Beck is that it affected his morals, and he was reporting things that he didn’t agree with, because he was a down and out drunk. Is that it?

So, as beaten to death many times here, the clip of him exclaiming that the sky is falling, and the new world order is coming, with one world government on CNN in 2008, he would tell us now that he should not have said that because “he drank a lot”? I’m having a hard time seeing the connection.

Yesterday’s show had Beck clicking the magnetic pictures of his band of Commies on the blackboard. He hit us with the notion Obama was pushing the New World Order over the last couple of days, and yesterday, the attack was on communism. The tie we are supposed to make is that it is a world-wide drive to communism? I hope he has about two decades to bring this argument to it’s logical conclusion.

Is Beck suggesting there is a worldwide conspiracy to bring the world to a New World Communism? Where are the connections to other communist interests throughout the world to explain how the world is working toward unified communism?  There is a far greater compilation of evidence and witnesses to support it is the Bilderberg Group connected to the bigger picture.

The motive for Beck to draw the conclusion to communism versus the Bilderberg Group is obvious – his boss is Rupert Murdoch – a Bilderberger.

Bilderbergers, Waterbergers, the build a bear people at the mall. there is no sense talking about any of these people, Beck would explain. When he says we shouldn’t, the big red bell sound, ding, ding, ding, should be going off – red alert – that is exactly what we should focus on. The motive to protect is clear, and fairly obvious.

What the Bilderbergers do that is worth protecting is the bigger question. Why it is held in secret meetings is the bigger question. Protecting and deflecting attention away from them, and earning the big bucks to do it is an admission that they have something to hide, as the people catch on.

Bilderberg is using Beck no doubt to counter the argument that Jones’ makes. That’s why he has hired a team to mirror the issues Jones brings to the table. It also would explain why he can’t admit that he struts behind Jones to take what is brought to the table, and spin it to his version of reality.

It would also explain why FOX would use Jones any chance they get to make him out to be the proverbial kook.

Admitting there is doubt about who is responsible for 9/11 would blow FOX news and their argument sky high. It would open up the doubt of the war effort, and the reason for the occupation occuring in the middle east.

And, only by spinning the army as farmers tolerant of the culture could Rivera give credence to the “toleration” of those folks hooked on opium in Afghanistan. Never heard that one before? If you looked at the occupation in Afghanistan as a means to fund the CIA directed drug trade, reported by many not seeing it through Fox-colored glasses, you would not be surprised.

Are we to believe the heroine and opium isn’t finding its way into the North American drug trade?

It’s interesting that if Rivera and FOX have had Jones on would Jones  not become  one of their “regular contributors”, as so many other experts are. When Rivera said to Jones, “we’ll stay in touch”., the question is when? When you need to discredit the 9/11 truth movement again? How about Jones as guest on the sheltered Glenn Beck show? That would be entertainment worth a ratings boost.

There is far deeper evils than the New World Order created communism.

The argument and belief are that Bilderberg and other groups are working the world over to use political influence and groups to play against each other. Communism is a means to control. Bilderberg will use political dissidence between political parties to fight each other, while the true enemies can escape.

Beck still paints those that would say 9/11 was an inside job as nut jobs. No debate even though he would in another breath say is important. Debate, just not on 9/11. It is almost wrong to say 9/11 was an inside job, because it was a job of a military force not in this country, being allowed to operate by a few in government in position to allow it. That would make it terror from within, but not within (inside).

The enemies foreign and domestic that Beck would tell us today need to be dealt with must include the very real possibility that there are enemies domestic operating within the U.S. government.

By not wanting to put these pieces together will be the ultimate sticking point for Beck.

He does not want to address:

  • the possibilities of enemies domestic responsible for 9/11
  • the right-stripping effected by the Patriot Act
  • the Bilderberg Group

Why is everything else on the table? If he were truly willing to explore, he would prove the issues above are invalid.

Simply saying 9/11 truthers are nut jobs, or saying “we don’t need to go to the Bilderbergers” is not consistent with the probing he does on every issue surrounding them.

The logical reason is that there is an ulterior motive to bypass the Bilderberg Group, 9/11, and the Patriot Act.

If the goal is to blame Obama and other left-leaning radicals (communists) then he would explain all right-stripping laws as being instigated by controlling communists. He would therefore be able to bypass the events of 9/11 leading to the Patriot Act that can paint anyone as a terrorist, even if they are simply war-protesters.

It would seem to be a mission of “spin” more so than a mission of real truth. It may be the truth, but presented in a way to protect certain parties that do not want to be brought to the forefront.

That would be consistent with history. The false Republican-Democrat battle takes eyes away from Bilderberg. Talking about all bad things as a result of the commies is another angle now being pushed.

Bilderberg is the hand that feeds Beck. No matter what truth he brings, he forgets to bring lots of other truth worth looking at.

Beck follows and studies Jones. That is obvious. What this means is there is reason to deflect Jones’ message. That gives Jones’ message more meaning and more credibility. If it isn’t worth tainting, it isn’t a threat. Well, the message is a threat. The message is consistent, and unfortunately is hard to impossible to refute.

If Beck would be able to discredit Jones, I am sure he would have already tried by having him on as a guest. That, like a confrontation with Jessie Ventura is not going to happen. Jones and Ventura are real. Beck blows with the wind, and serves “today’s” purpose. When the purpose changes, so does the message. No amount of excuses can explain the inconsistency of argument. The fact that he was a drinker proves using that as an excuse is weak. What will the next excuse be when the message changes yet again?

It may go something like this, ” I used to ______ a lot”.

I’m sure the blank will be filled in by another excuse to explain past behavior, when really it is just a cover up to try to explain how the new “mission” is different from the old one.

→ Leave a comment

Posted in 9/11, Banking System, Bilderberg, Corruption, Police State, Politics, Spirituality, US Politics

Tagged

Faith, Hope & Charity: Only if we were to wipe the slate clean yet again

Posted on September 14, 2010 | Leave a comment

We cannot deal fairly in a corrupt world.

We cannot listen to those telling us to give up whatever security we have, when there are those that would like us to give it all away. The reason: to enslave us! Not to be fair.

We are dealing with the battle of good vs. evil. Evil wins a battle if it convinces everyone that evil in any form can be “dealt” with. No folks. If evil is in control, you cannot trust evil, even just a little. You also cannot operate in good faith, when evil is controlling the game.

The game. Yes, the game of how to fix it, without facing who the true enemy is.

John F. Kennedy was assasinated by the very government he represented. He was not keen on an aspect of the evil control and that was not acceptable. JFK had to go. He had to be destroyed because he was on the side of good. JFK proved you cannot “work around” evil. There is only one solution. You crush evil.

Glenn Beck, in a myriad of ways has inspired me to expose the error of the message.

Faith, hope, and charity. That is the answer according to Beck. Yes, that might work in the world created by the founding fathers. But the revolution came first to wipe the slate clean, to end the corruption, and give America a fresh start. The concern: Can you “keep” the Republic?

The founding fathers, few could argue, could see where human nature, driven to be deceived by evil would yet again look at a fresh Republic as the target to be manipulated. Like a chocolate parfait at a Weight Watchers convention, there would be a lot of lip-licking going on as the desert cart rolled past the tables of hungry guests. Temptation like the apple in the Garden of Eden.

If you promise someone enough riches and fame, eventually that person might start to think highly of himself. So highly, that it might not matter in his mind that God could take it all away in a heartbeat. The only reason he has anything is through God’s grace, but how many times have we seen people corrupted by power and greed.

And, this is how evil takes control.

When the Fed was privatized it dealt a serious blow to the environment where Faith, Hope, and Charity would have a remote chance of survival.

When John F. Kennedy was assassinated because he knew the Fed must be altered, it confirmed the evil that had taken hold in America.

And, when the planes flew into the towers of the World Trade Centers on 9/11 of 2001, we may have been fooled for a while. But, the puzzle that has mounted evidence since that time places three towers imploding into their own footprint as further proof that there is a terrible process underway. Evil is taking more steps to crush the good in this world.

So, should I apologize if I do not think you can give up everything in a world of corruption?

Beck would have the unions give up the pension plans and security. Unions are one of the last beacons of power left for the globalist forces to take control of America. The other important force is the independence of the States that are now battling the health care bill.

Strange that Beck would discount both forces that protect the citizens of America?

We will continue to flog the message that is unclear, twisted, and manipulating.

In the last desperate push, they will pull out all the stops to say God would want it that way.

We’ll see, now won’t we?

→ Leave a comment

Posted in 9/11, Banking System, Bilderberg, Corruption, Police State, Politics, Spirituality, US Politics

When what sounds good really just sucks!

Posted on August 4, 2010 | Leave a comment

Gordon Campbell, the Premier of British Columbia attended the Bilderberg meeting this year in Sitges, Spain.

He told us all that the taxpayers of B.C. paid for it, because, I suppose, it was information that would be useful to an official in charge of a large province in Canada. I suppose, he would argue, it was justified.

And when further pressed, Mr. Campbell explained that although he could not give specifics, he learned that the group of Bilderberg discuss things like this:

“We talked about the economy, we talked about trade, we talked about health care and the challenges that health care presents to all economies with the changing demographic”

Sure, this is “old news”, no biggie, just another government official going to a meeting of the elites, and “hobnobbing”. All good, who cares — the same old, same old.

Perhaps. Go back to sleep everyone, nothing to see here.

I wonder if Gordon Campbell, when discussing his visit and the meetings he attended met Bill Gates.

Gates, officially found his way to Bilderberg by way of another meeting that did not happen. And why? Because the other meeting actually didn’t exist. It was a diversion. It was a smokescreen to cover for Mr. Gates’ visit to Bilderberg. But, that shouldn’t be a surprise either, because the rich will often shake off the paparazzi of sorts, and cleverly end up where they want. So, arguably, the persona of the Bilderbergers being a secret cabal of elitists trying to control the world may just be the jealous types that “wish” they could be in the shoes of these elites. That seems to be the argument. That, and the fact that these conspiracy cooks must not have a very fulfilling and succesful life, so they make up stuff and create a false sense of purpose and entitlement to abuse others. That is what we are to understand.

The famous, such as our Canadian icons - - Mr. Campbell and Mr. Mansbridge – may have been curious and flattered to attend. Remember, nothing to see here people, move along. A couple of great Canadians being honoured with an invitation to attend the “anyone who is anyone will be there” event of the year. So, hey, why not? It’s a world stage, and Canada needs representation. Even if the taxpayers of B.C. had to pay for it. That’s expected. Let’s not forget, Mr. Mansbridge paid his own freight.

And, would Mr. Campbell, when he mentioned the economy of the world, and “health care and the challenges that health care presents” have been eluding to a presentation that Mr. Gates may have made?

According to Gates, the world’s population of 9 billion presents an issue for food, and health care. In a We are Change article, Gates is cited as saying:

“I’m one of those who will be present,” adding that he will take part in a debate with fellow globalists on the subjects of “energy and the needs of the poorest,” as well as climate change, renewable energy and the economic crisis.

Here we go again, right. You’ve heard of “We are Change”. They are one of “those” conspiracy theory groups, aren’t they?

They might just be trying to spin what Mr. Gates says, and take it out of context to suit their purposes. They may just be disgruntled people, you know, the jealous of his success types, that constantly try to discredit him and the rich people like him.

We all know the world works like this: You become a success, you get rich, and then you start a “Foundation” to help the poor. In Mr. Gates case, he and his wife started the  Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Right, move on, nothing to see here.

The Rockefellers, after all, too started the Rockefeller Foundation. And, surprisingly, they too care about the world. See, nothing to be concerned with. It’s how it works. The rich people helping the poor people — move on already, and get a life of your own!

Some of these “conspiracy groups” even have claimed that the Rockefeller Foundation is into a form of cleansing called Eugenics and they assisted the Nazis. “In its extreme, racist form, this meant wiping away all human beings deemed “unfit,” preserving only those who conformed to a Nordic stereotype. Imagine the gall of the people accusing the fine, upstanding Rockefellers of that!

Even other rich people claimed the Rockefellers were into controlling the earth, and microchipping people. Aaron Russo, the movie director of acclaim was said to have met Nick Rockefeller, after starting a “Mad as Hell” show

Aaron Russo and Nick Rockefeller

and no, he wasn’t going to take it anymore. Russo, claimed that Nick Rockefeller gave him an offer — join us Aaron! We’ll give you a card that will be like an f — you card, a kiss my a– card, and you will not have to be like the other people. You will be special. Apparently Russo didn’t go for it. He was a terrific Patriot of American liberty. Too bad he isn’t alive to keep up the “unnecessary fight” though.

Makes me think what Mr. Campbell and Mr. Mansbridge are thinking post-Bilderberg.

Are they thinking, thanks but no thanks? A little embarassed for being there? Where’s the exit? How am I going to keep this smile until I can get the heck outta here? Maybe.

But there will always be the ones that buy into the concepts, and believe the intent is good. Why else would the group be so large?

Although Russo goes against the grain of the normal conspiracy theorist, he would have been nonetheless a malcontent, I suppose.

Remember, these people got rich, built “Foundations”, and are helping those less fortunate. Don’t look any further, there is no need.

And, if Russo complained about America pre 911 becoming a police state, and Totalitarian empire, his fear would have been justified after speaking with Nick Rockefeller.

“There would be an event in 2001″ he was told that would start this New World. Nah, not a rich guy with a foundation. That is not how the world works. Nothing to see — move on.

There should really be no reason to look beyond the Gates’, or the Rockefellers, or the “Progressive Movement”. Everything they do is for our good as humanity.

Look, we have wide-screen T.V.’s made by these rich people who own the technology. Move on. We have good healthcare, advances in medicine — move on. What the conspiracy theorists are saying doesn’t jive with the real world, so we must continue to listen to men, good men, like Bill Gates when he and his foundation tell us they are just nice people who don’t even want to be recognized until found out.

That too, is how the world works. The humble, good guys that are so humble, so nice that they don’t even want the world to know they are part of a group of other humble, nice rich people who have foundations, and all that good stuff.

They are working behind the scenes for our good, because that is how the world works.

So, when they are pushed, they must tell us what they are doing.

And when Bill Gates was pushed by those conspiracy guys to fess up as to what he was going to discuss at Bilderberg 2010, he did:

Stating that the global population was heading towards 9 billion, Gates said, “If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services (abortion), we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 per cent.”

And if we were sleeping we would say, see. move on. Nothing to see here.

But if we paid attention, something might not fit. We might be dumfounded. No, he couldn’t have said that vaccines were designed to “reduce” the population could he have?

No, we might even think to look up further evidence to support it. Perhaps a different meeting, in a different place? Yes, but what if the message was the same?:

Along with the scientifically absurd proposition of reducing manmade CO2 emissions worldwide to zero by 2050, approximately four and a half minutes into the talk, Gates declares, “First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”

That might suck!

That might make us want to learn more ugly truth.

That might also, make us wonder why Alex Jones is so upset about the fluoride, lithium, and other drugs that are in the water supplies to dumb us down, and make us servile. That too would suck.

We might become one of those people who are disgruntled, that are jealous of the nice people that meet up and discuss the world’s problems, and are succesful with generous Foundations.

We might question these people.

And in doing so, we might have a chance to stop them.

We might wonder what would suck more — knowing what we know and acting on it, or allowing it, and watching these people get away with it, destroying the future for our children and their children.

And, we might finally realize why these people — the Bilderberg Group — want to meet in secret.

We might then understand that what we were led to believe may not be true.

We might have to stand up, and like Aaron Russo,  say “we are mad as hell, and we aren’t going to take it anymore”.

→ Leave a comment

Posted in 9/11, Banking System, Bilderberg, Canada, Canadian Politics, climategate, Corruption, education, Fake News, Gordon Campbell, Greece, Healthcare, Money, Police State, Politics, Spirituality, Stephen Harper, US Politics

Bilderberg’s John Keane & Jessica Mathews: The Waging of Peace

Posted on July 19, 2010 | Leave a comment

At 84, it seemed odd that Queen Elizabeth II made a special trip to New York to pay respect to the 9/11 victims, and in addressing the  U.N. assembly claimed, “the waging of peace is the hardest form of leadership of all.” We don’t usually hear the term, “waging of” followed by anything other than “war”. So, in this case, it was indeed an odd twist.

But, the comment is actually in keeping with the intent of the globalist leaders that, according to Queen Elizabeth II, must wage peace  to address the issues of “terrorism” and “climate change”. The Bilderberg Group must have been comforted to get the support of the Queen of England. And, it would seem, the Bilderberg influence has shaped U.S. military efforts over the past while as well. The “waging of peace” has support by those responsible to sell the concept to the American people and the world.

We could look at the “waging of peace” as the military strategy for Iraq. The trickle in strategy of U.S. troops would suggest a war of occupation not with intent of “victory”.

The Bilderbergers, looking for world domination,  would have no reason to win and leave the Middle East – not if they were intending on controlling the world. They would need to spin the occupation as a war of peace; the selling feature would have to be to sell the need to  build the democratic infrastructure of government, and eventually do the same for Afghanistan.  In 2007 and beyond, The Bilderberg Group would need a marketing plan to sell the occupation war. They would require a team of marketers with credibility, stature and title.

They had their team – Retired General John (Jack) Keane and Jessica T. Mathews, President of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Both long-term Bilderberg attendees – especially at critical times leading in to 2007. Both attending the 2006 Bilderberg meeting in Ottawa, and the 2007 meeting in Turkey. And yes, of course they were attendees in Spain this year.

In January 2007, John Keane and Fred Kagan (no relation to Elena Kagan) wrote “Choosing Victory: A Plan for Success in Iraq” which supported the implementation of 30,000 more troops into Iraq, because , “Kagan emphasized that it was critical to reduce the levels of violence before attempting any political solution”. The trickle in strategy was underway, and the strategy to occupy was being sold to the U.S. citizens.

2008 was the election year in the U.S., and with November fast approaching, Obama was poised to suggest a troop withdrawal as a selling feature of his candidacy. As we all know, whether a Democrat or Republican, the voters of America were getting a Bilderberg rep, whose job it would be to continue the agenda of world domination, occupation and control.

In June 2008, an article came out by the Independent in the UK entitled, “Revealed: Secret plan to keep Iraq under U.S. control”. Secret or not, it would affect Obama’s promise to the people who promised the troops could start to withdraw. Bilderberg had their way again.

In the video below, Jessica Mathews, in the Iraq Debate in 2007, sells the war to suggest it necessary as a means of peace – a ” political ” battle.

According to Mathews, there was only a “political solution”, suggesting there was no sense to  pull out or to push to “win” the war by deploying the number of troops that later would be  proven the argument as well for Afghanistan.

Recently, General McChrystal sought  the means to “win” by a surgence of troops (80,000).  Obama, the puppet of the Bilderbergers had to counter-argue and replaced McChrystal with Petraeus, citing, among other things that they had to make ” …. sure we’re doing a good job in building capacity on the civilian side.”

McChrystal, frustrated with the lack of military force  in Afghanistan, was critical of  Richard C. Holbrooke, a Bilderberger on the inside, holding title of Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan. Did he realize the Bilderberg Group never intended on leaving the region or winning?  And, wasn’t it fitting that John Keane’s good friend taking over the Afghan mission, Gen. Petraeus, said he is in it to win it. Good luck general!

In the Iraq War debate in Senate, Republican  John Warner,” one of the Republican Party’s most respected voices on military affairs” could not hold his disgust, as can be seen in this video:

David Frost, looking much older than in his historic interviews with President Nixon during the Watergate Scandal, allowed John Keane to summarize for us the sales points of the wars that were sold as political structure building in countries far removed from the United States. Ironic, isn’t it, that the Bilderberg Group is currently destroying the free world, and Keane explains how America is “freeing” the Middle East?

Are we to believe that the enemies were CIA groomed operatives by the names of Bin Laden and Hussein? Or would the Bilderberg Group have used the “boogie men” to create the reason to occupy the Middle East, to surround Iran, and effect their plan for world government and world domination? And as importantly, were Bilderberg members Jessica Mathews and  John Keane the sales agents to sell the continuation of the wars in the region?

→ Leave a comment

Posted in 9/11, Afghanistan, Bilderberg, Carlyle Group, climategate, Corruption, Politics, US Politics

Murdoch’s mouthpiece: It’s not what Beck exposes, it’s the issues he deflects and who he discredits that counts

Posted on July 9, 2010 | 6 Comments

If you are a businessman and need to hire a potential employee, what is standard procedure when “checking out” your prospective employee?

Well, one prudent thing to do would be to contact the previous employer.

Can you imagine FOX News, as it called CNN to get a character reference for Glenn Beck? What do you suppose CNN would report?

Well, they would likely tell FOX that Glenn was good at following orders, toeing the “station line” and reporting what he was asked to do. For CNN, that would be the “liberal line”. Did he do a good job? Would CNN tell FOX he was great for CNN? Or, would they say, well Glenn became too “Republican” for our liking, and so we realized he had to go. Kind of like Lou Dobbs?

Well, Dobbs would have been a bit of a different issue we might all agree. Dobbs was looking at the North American Union and was disgusted by what he saw. He could not contain his disgust, and his position made his staying at CNN impossible. His position made going to FOX impossible too.

How about MSNBC? No good either, sorry Lou!

Dobbs had nowhere to go because exposing the dark side about the North American Union was faux pas broadcasting. It didn’t matter if it were on FOX (conservative) or CNN (liberal), the issue of exposing the NAU was off-limits. Any news anchor that voiced his own opinion on the subject was undesirable. And, why is that? Most of us know the answer, but there remains many of us that need to learn.

As mentioned over and over, it is significant that Beck, for CNN interviewed Ron Paul on the Presidential campaign trail in 2008. It is significant that Beck mentioned his own understanding that the NAU would lead to a World Government, and he asked Paul if he agreed. Of course Ron Paul did. Was it Beck’s personal opinion and concern as it was for Lou Dobbs?

While Dobbs put his career on the line to stand up for principle, the comparison to Beck is important. To my knowledge, like water off the backside of a duck, Beck shelved the thought and discussion because it no longer served the purpose his employer required. It looked more like a “call out” of Paul to make him look radical than a pure seeking of truth and concern for the ravages of what the North American Union would do to the United States, Mexico, and Canada. Dobbs knew what it meant, and he stood up to it. Beck? He was likely doing what he was told to fulfill the political agenda his employer needed him to carry out.

So, when FOX checked Beck’s employment history, did CNN tell FOX he does what he is asked to do? Does Beck toe the station line?

The nature of the show and FOX itself would have us believe they are the counter to all crappy news sources. Nobody tells you the “truth” like FOX!

Now, onto the point.

Who owns Fox News? Rupert Murdoch.

Not long ago, when Beck was explaining his wonderful ability to bring the truth, he mentioned Rupert Murdoch as the man that allowed him to tell us all what is going on.

It’s interesting that Beck bashes communism so freely. Interesting because his boss has long strived to get his news into China:

Mr. Murdoch has flattered Communist Party leaders and done business with their children. His Fox News network helped China’s leading state broadcaster develop a news Web site. He joined hands with the Communist Youth League, a power base in the ruling party, in a risky television venture, his China managers and advisers say.

Okay, forget Murdoch’s ties to communist China, how about Bilderberg.

Not long ago, you might recall Beck defended the Bilderberg Group. You don’t need the Bilderberg Group to explain anything Beck told us. Why would he deflect concern or investigation from the Bilderbergers? Could it be because (and I know this is not a shock to most of us) Rupert Murdoch is a Bilderberger too?

Glenn Beck is the mouthpiece for Rupert Murdoch and it is not likely he is doing anything any different from what he did for CNN – he is following the station’s agenda, and Murdoch’s will.

So, if Murdoch is a Bilderberger, is it a surprise Beck would deflect concern about Bilderberg?

And, check out Murdoch himself admit that the news is used to “further the agenda”, and “disclosing certain things can shape the agenda in a limited way”. What agenda? The Bilderberg agenda no doubt. And, Beck is his means to “disclose” only certain information in a “limited way”. Sure fits the Glenn Beck persona and show. Here is Murdoch admitting manipulation of the news:

And, this brings us to the final point.

We do not need to address the issues of Bilderberg. They are the big picture Beck refuses to address.

Bilderberg would lead to 9/11 truth, which is also taboo. Attacking the Democratic President is not taboo, as it fits the agenda of false left-right politics.

But there is a way to watch Beck that will help you understand the pattern.

It is not what Beck exposes that is most significant under these “manipulations”. It is who he discredits, and what he tells you to ignore or brush off as crazy.

Recently, he has attacked Russia Today (RT).

We all know that RT has some very insightful programs and interviews, including Max Keiser (Keiser Report), and interviews with Tarpley and Alex Jones on a regular basis. We know they pose a significant threat to bringing out the truth, and exposing Bilderberg.

And expose Bilderberg they do:

Deflect and discredit Glenn, hurry!

Murdoch wouldn’t like that.

Is it a coincidence Beck is attacking RT?

As you watch Beck, and you still think he holds merit of the truth, keep in mind who butters his bread, and who his new master is. Know that he works for Murdoch, a Bilderberger, who admittedly tampers with the news to fulfill an agenda.

In this case, it is the Bilderberg agenda. It is the globalist agenda.

Beck will continue to do his part to further it, whether it is to create division among races, social groups, unions vs. non-unions, and attack anyone that fulfills the mission of his new master. At this stage in the “game”, the Bilderbergers need to create a social divide, create violence and civil unrest, and deflect away the truth. That is the new agenda. Just watch it come to life on the Glenn Beck show.

→ 6 Comments

Posted in 9/11, Banking System, Canada, Canadian Politics, climategate, Corruption, Politics, US Politics

Is the Queen making peace with God?

Posted on July 7, 2010 | 3 Comments

It’s never too late to repent. Let that absorb for  a moment won’t you?

No matter what one has done in one’s lifetime, it is never too late to ask forgiveness from God the Father in Heaven. And, please take another moment for that to absorb.

That is what makes God, God.

I’m no preacher but that much I know. I’m not big on organized religion, but  do communicate with God on a fairly regular basis - and he has been communicating a whole lot lately. How about  you? Is it politically correct to talk about this? Probably as correct as handing out the Gospel of John on the streets and getting arrested. Sick (and not in the way some teenagers view the word “sick” as meaning cool or gnarly).

The world is getting rough. There have been terrible tragedies occurring, and it seems of late, there has been an acceleration of events to make the world a visibly shaken place to be. People the world over know something is not right, but are finding it hard to put a finger on the feeling in the pit of their stomachs. And what of those directly involved in the scandals? How are they coping with their responsibilities and involvement?

Why is it that if you watch the news, it is as if there is a cover up of how bad “everything is”? It’s almost as if there is a stall tactic being employed while a deep, dark agenda is unfolding beneath the surface. You can feel it, can’t you?

The Gulf oil spill’s latest victim is the conveyance of truth, as reporting and filming the region is now a crime.  It is the nation’s largest environmental disaster that the people are forbidden from seeing for themselves. The people don’t count or matter.  Stories are leaking from those in Louisiana  and Florida to suggest it is far worse than anything that is even close to being reported. Is it any wonder, when reporting is not allowed? Is there an agenda? And the Gulf situation is part of a very real pattern of cover ups, lies, and supports the the bigger fear – the hidden agenda to which  the world’s top leaders are incredibly involved. And if the big picture is as incredible as it is shaping up to support, there will be guilt and souls seeking forgiveness.

For the riot police acting unethically at the G20 in Toronto -are there some that might feel remorse?  Are they fully proud of their involvement, with  clear conscience? Is there any remorse felt for actions taken that were less than ethical, or for partaking in crowd control that took several steps beyond humanity by all accounts – complete with reports of torture, humiliation,  even rape ?  The makeshift detention zone cleverly compared to it’s long unknown Cuban cousin, appropriately described as Torontonomo Bay. Surely there must be some remorse. Are there police officers seeking repentance  in the aftermath? Did our Queen mention the mark it left on our Country’s image?

Simply, twisted and sick is the only way to describe the goings on in the world – sick and twisted.

And of course we have the symptoms of the stages of awareness and acceptance in full play. Apparently, the new Canadian way of coping with the world’s trouble is to put it in perspective. “We are good and strong. Thank God our country isn’t in debt like the rest of the world. We are strong, and will remain strong. Yeah Canada!”

And as the world looks to make sense of it all, and people hunger to get some semblance of normalcy in their view of the world, the Queen of England appears as she has in the past. At 84 years old, there must be a lot of wisdom in her yet. She doesn’t look too bad for someone 84, complete with busy agenda. She must be eating well.

 ”Hello Queen! We are ready to celebrate your “coming home”, now more than ever! We are proud Canadians. Thanks for being harmless and insignificant even if the Governor General tells you everything major we want, and you have to okay it. You are insignificant, but a welcome, mysterious charm of our country’s heritage.”

 Meanwhile, we conveniently have overlooked that our Queen of Canada is also the Queen of England, and they don’t have it so good. But, don’t tell the Brits because it might spoil their memory of dancing and mocking Americans on the streets of England on the fourth of July. They can mock because they are better off. It’s kind of like the hospital patient’s rationale - ” At least I don’t have cancer like that guy!” Oh yeah you do, they just haven’t told you yet.

Not long ago we Canadians didn’t have an identity, and the talk on the street was that we were the subsidiary of the U.S. economy, complete with McDonalds, Home Depot, Lowes, Wal-Mart, and ” look, “we have a Starbuck’s now!” Time to put away the denial and realize we have all been railroaded down the same track. But that’s okay, the Queen has visited, and she says Canada is like coming home. Just like England, and just like the U.S .. And, could that be why she made a five-hour visit to New York to pay homage to the 9/11 victims? Or was she more concerned perhaps with checking out the damage of the Royal Family controlled BP Oil company? And interest she does have, the harmless 84-year-old Queen of ours:

“The British Crown is franchisor of all corporate entities operating under or out of Britain and The Commonwealth. Legal title to said corporations is held by The Crown with equity operating position of corporations held by agents under corporate charter whose management and stockholders are subject to Crown authorities.

“Thereby all acts or omissions of said corporations are attached to The Crown through license and provably so by taxes collected on operation of said corporations.

“The Crown holds ownership position in BRITISH PETROLEUM in conjunction with partners through interlocking directorates, disclosed and undisclosed.”

The Conspiracy Theorists, who are really just investigators and thinkers,  are quick to realize that Globalists tend to support each other. If they are short on praise, they get support from other Globalists to bolster their image and give more creedence to their message. That would explain  the lead in by Ban Ki-Moon, Secretary-General of the U.N. when he introduced our Queen to the assembly with, “In a changing and churning world, you are an anchor for our age.” Of course the Queen supports the taxation of the world for the very iffy austerity that will accompany Global Warming.

With all the talk of World Government, World Governance, Global Taxation, and a new Global Currency (Special Drawing Rights) coming to the forefront, there is concern that what was once dismissed as conspiracy theory, is now mainstream admission and fact.  Which makes this sick feeling beg the bigger question - how much more of what the conspiracy theories have foretold are also true? Dare we go there? Dare we face what has been staring at us all along? Is the Queen really “insignificant” and will a global government make her “insignificant” yet again? Or will she emerge a player, with more power than we were led to believe she ever had?

As conspiracy theory is rapidly being proven to be fact, what other strange evils will become known? Should we ‘go there’ on the supposed harmlessness of our beloved Queen?

In a couple of paragraphs, the Queen mother proved she has more influence than the little old lady, waving her hand to the masses. She has kept abreast, perhaps in there like a dirty shirt, when she justified world events by saying you asked for it, you got it, and like war being waged, peace will come at a price:

“Many of these sweeping advances have come about not because of governments, committee resolutions or central directives — although all these have played a part — but instead because millions of people around the world wanted them,” she said.

Acknowledging that the body faced important new challenges like terrorism and climate change, she said, “It has perhaps always been the case that the waging of peace is the hardest form of leadership of all.”

“The waging of peace”? The last time we heard the expression, the “waging of…” usually was followed by the term “war” not peace. But, in this sick, twisted new version of the world, where everything good is spun to have the opposite affect on the world, it is not surprising to hear the words “waging of peace”. It just seems to fit the way the rest of the world is going. It is no stranger than President Obama saying grandma will be fine, only to learn the death panels in the Healthcare Bill  are real. No conspiracy theory, just fact.  So, waging peace it is then. Why not?!

As the press suppresses and covers up the festering truth, we must ask if the Queen spoke of the events of the world from a point of regret, or as a mission that must be endured. Was she in pain with the rest of us, or was she justifying the events around us? Was she more like Michelle Obama telling the children of the U.S. that hard changes must be endured, or was she trying to preserve the world as she has in the past led us to be comfortable with?

Is the Queen acting like a supporter of those effecting global government and austerity, or as one saddened by its invasion?

She told the world we asked for it. It wasn’t the governments of the world that decided it – we asked for it. I don’t recall asking, do you?

On the question of why an 84-year-old Queen visited the site of 9/11, does she have reason for regret or remorse? She is the only one that can answer that question.

As more and more consiracy theory becomes fact, there will be plenty of opportunity for those guilty to seek forgiveness and redemption.

After 84 years, does the Queen have anything to say to God?

→ 3 Comments

Posted in 9/11, Banking System, Canada, Canadian Politics, climategate, Corruption, Healthcare, Police State, Politics, Spirituality, Stephen Harper, US Politics

Creating the Great ‘Union’ Divide

Posted on June 24, 2010 | Leave a comment

According to Glenn Beck, the reason Obama can not allow the cleanup in the Gulf from the oil leak is the “Jones Act”, which gives the Unions power to effect control over who works on boats. No foreigners are allowed. Yet, Obama has no problem with allowing illegal immigrants. Good point Glenn, or is it?

It would appear just as Beck fed enough truth and good information on George Soros and his involvement in Brazilian oil giant Petrobras, he has diverted once again from the true issue, and is on the attack of labor unions and their pensions.

We mentioned repeatedly before that the New World Order would need a convenient antagonist to Obama, who rode the labor union ticket into office. It could not be Obama to kill the unions and strip wealth from the union membership. While Obama is expected to serve one term as President, with waning popularity, he would not be able to pull off the mission of the globalists.

The mission is to create division among the people of the United States. Obama is allowing the flood of illegal immigrants, and going as far as to challenge Arizona and other states legally that have effected their own laws where the Feds have failed. Beck has put up a front to attack the Obama decision to allow illegal immigration, but has added a different “division” – the attack on the history of labor unions that discriminated against minorities such as the blacks and Chinese.

We have Obama bringing in illegals as a voting block and economic drain on the system, and now Beck is suggesting further racism to divide the union membership from the general public. On two fronts, the people of America are being played against each other to effect the agenda that would benefit only one group – the global elite striving for the New World Order.

If Beck truly believes that “Crime Inc” as he would describe it is the biggest problem facing America, why would he want to take power away from the people in stripping labor unions and their pension plans? That would serve the elites goal of quelling union power and accumulated wealth – the same goal of Obama.

According to Beck, you cannot blame the bankers when times get tough. And, we all know that Beck supported the banker bailout claiming a very weak argument that if the banks failed, the economy would have failed. He defended his position on this, but what matters is action not words. Supporting the bank bailout and attacking labor unions puts Americans at risk.

When Beck has not addressed the big picture adequately – that is, the magnitude of George Soros and the New World Order, how does he justify putting the average American union employee at risk of financial insecurity? Are the union members that are honest guilty by association? Kind of a sorry about your luck, you were duped by your union – a pawn and you must be  sacrificed argument?  

It would appear Glenn Beck is doing the equivalent of fly fishing for the disgruntled, but at the same time furthering the globalist agenda.

He has:

  • sabotaged the true Tea Party Grassroots movement, with the help of Sarah Palin and brought the Republican twist into the mix
  • mocked and criticized 9/11 truthers and Obama birthers as radical and dangerous, and famously put Van Jones in the group
  • supported the banker bailout
  • has in the past criticized or ignored Ron Paul, and where is the mention of Rand Paul’s success and message?
  • claimed you “do not need a conspiracy theory”, nor do you need to look at the “Bilderberg Group” to explain the situation

Ironically, Crime Inc is a Bilderberg design. George Soros one of it’s key members.

Glenn is fly fishing to attract a crowd of viewers. When his ratings go down as a result of propaganda, he brings some truth back in. Then he tugs the line, hoping to have some fish dangling from the hook.

Ask the important question.

What will attacking labor unions serve? What effect does bringing in racial divide to criticize the labor union movement serve?

Will what Beck suggests create unity or create division?

Will the attack on the labor pensions protect the wealth of the average worker in America, or further the globalists goal to strip wealth and effectively put more Americans at the mercy of the very government Beck claims is corrupt?

I guess we can safely answer a previous question. Beck is not likely to give 9/11 a fair trial either, and will never join the dot that started the right-stripping ball rolling.

Beck as the counter-Obama will in effect take care of those opposed to the Obama regime, and will continue to attack the wealth of America. The greatest remaining wealth is in labor union member pension plans, and the attacks will be harsh and unforgiving.

→ Leave a comment

Posted in 9/11, Corruption, Politics, US Politics