Category Archives: climategate

They’re here, or they will be on October 13th!: The most contrived piece of mainstream gibberish that may have been promoted

To save Global Carbon taxation!

Obscene is the word for the explanation that a man was made aware from aliens that a visit would come October 13, 2010 across the world to warn us all about the perils of carbon dioxide.

ROTFLMAO = Rolling on the floor laughing my ____ off!

Are they for real, I might add? So, let’s understand this. The U.N. and its’ cronies all push for the One World Government, and Global Carbon taxation for which Al Gore among con-men stands to gain large, and now a retired Norad employee comes forward with this?:

A newly-published book by a retired NORAD officer predicts October 13, 2010 as the tentative date for a fleet of extraterrestrial vehicles to hover for hours over the earth’s principal cities. Author says the event to be the first in a series intended to avert a planetary catastrophe resulting from increasing levels of carbon-dioxide in the earth’s atmosphere dangerously approaching a “critical mass.”

And let’s not forget what is vitally important – they will push for not only a One World Government but a One World Religion. This means Christianity will be looked down upon, and Christians will be persecuted in large numbers.

Fast forward to the 3:20 mark for the UFO story.


What were those “New Age” books again Stanley? Never mind, I don’t think I’ll be putting them on the must read list; instead, they must be put on the must stay away from them list.

Well, let’s look at one of the authors. A professor at UNC no less –  Bart Ehrman. Fulham says this book changed his life. Really?

When you speak to athiests, one of the most common reasons for a disbelief in God and Jesus is the issue of human suffering. Here is Ehrman on this issue:

Twenty-five years ago I taught a university course called “The Problem of Suffering
in the Biblical Traditions.” In it, we looked at different biblical answers to why there
is suffering in the world if there is a loving and all-powerful God in control of it. This
is the basic question of what is called “theodicy” (= the problem of God’s justice):
if God is all loving, he doesn’t want people to suffer, but to thrive; if he is all powerful, he is able to prevent suffering in all its forms; and yet there is suffering. How does one explain all three statements? How can they all be true at once? That’s the question of theodicy, and it was the question that, in my class, we asked of a
range of biblical authors and writings, from the Old Testament Prophets to the New Testament apostle Paul, from Job to Jesus, from Genesis to Revelation.

In the years since the course, I’ve continued to ponder, puzzle, wonder, and reflect on this problem. In those intervening years, largely because of these reflections, I moved from being a committed church-going Christian to become an agnostic. I no longer know whether God exists. But if he does exist, I’m convinced that he is not the God I was raised to believe in, a God who intervenes in history on behalf of his people to answer their prayers and to save them from their pain.

I suggest he rereads ‘Job’. If there was ever a man who had a reason to turn his back on God but did not, it was Job. He worshipped the Lord more with suffering.

It’s interesting that the Bible acknowledges the fact that good people are just as likely to suffer and experience an early death as evildoers.

Ecclesiastes 9:1-2: “This, too, I carefully explored: Even though the actions of godly and wise people are in God’s hands, no one knows whether God will show them favor. The same destiny ultimately awaits everyone, whether righteous or wicked, good or bad, ceremonially clean or unclean, religious or irreligious. Good people receive the same treatment as sinners, and people who make promises to God are treated like people who don’t.”

Yeah, it gets better. Ehrman even debated on the resurrection of Jesus from the tomb.

Refute Jesus you say? Errors in the Bible? Nasty stuff Mr. Stanley Fulham and Mr. Ehrman, nasty stuff!

I think we can see where the loyalty lies – in the duping  that aliens and “certain wonders” in the sky will bring – to convince us to not go along with the Bible as it is written. I think I’ve seen that movie.

Sorry Stanley, not working with this Christian. You see, I’ve already had a visit, and it wasn’t from aliens if you get my drift. Sorry, I digress.

I think we can see where desperation takes over from common sense when a plan that was to convince us all about the devastation of carbon on our planet meets E.T. I think I would prefer to live in the real world, and take the evidence that 9/11 was an inside job, used to effect the Patriot Act, where 800 reported FEMA camps are ready to house the disgruntled, and the Fusion Centers as reported by the show Conspiracy Theory are gathering data on the political dissidents as we speak.

Part 2, 3
You know, the stuff that IS real, as opposed to what they now feed us in the mainstream press as real, when it is so far contrived that it is literally out of this world nutty.

But, wait, don’t buy it yet, there’s more:

Fulham writes it is generally recognized UFOs function beyond our earth’s physical laws, and has concluded answers to questions regarding who they are, where are they from, why are they here, are they a threat, and the mystery of abductions could only be found at a higher dimension of reality.

For more than a decade, through the services of a world renowned channeler, the author has communicated with an ethereal group of entities known as the Transcendors — 43,000 very old souls who combine their vast experience and knowledge through eons of incarnations, providing advice and information to humans in search of basic realities of mankind’s existence. The book Challenges of Change reports on the author’s years of communication with the Transcendors in a question and answer format intended to inform and challenge. The Transcendors reveal through the author crucial information about urgent global challenges facing mankind such as earth changes, international terrorism, worldwide financial collapse and the environmental crisis. One revelation is al Qaeda has a dirty nuclear bomb and WMD, but faces a moral quandary over “containment of collateral damages.”

Utilizing the theme of the Four Horsemen as symbolic metaphor, Fulham warns mankind will survive all of these future challenges, except the CO2 pollution of our atmosphere. According to information provided to the author by the Transcendors, the build-up of CO2 pollution is rising 1% annually to a “critical mass” of 22% in which mankind could not survive ”without outside intervention.”

According to Fulham, the Transcendors state they have borne witness to countless thousands of alien civilizations who polluted their planets to total extinction where not a single being, animal or plant survived. They urgently warn planet earth is presently on the same self-destructive path. Fulham reports the aliens are well aware of our environmental crisis, and have benevolently decided to rescue mankind in this vast universal drama. Fulham has been in contact with a distinguished foreign ambassador who read the book with great interest and dispatched it to his home government, where it was translated and studied by hundreds of their top government officials.

Okay, got it?, as Glenn Beck likes to use the phrase – the aliens are here, and it’s in a book, so it must be true.

And let’s not forget it’s all over mainstream media, just before the release of the new alien movie, don’t cha know?

Well there is one thing that did come true – the aliens did visit on October 13th. I don’t know, was it a Friday too?:

So what did I and my family see that so many around the world saw (not on Oct 13th)?

Anti-gravity aircraft fashioned by the U.S. military? Perhaps. And I would be inclined to believe that since the “date” of arrival was foretold. The hype unquestionable. And the motive?

They need to save the Climate Change taxation that will put us all in bondage!

That’s a pretty powerful reason.

UFO’s?: What are you “HAARP”-ing about?

First, read this article describing fireballs in the sky:

Vancouver, WA — Brenda Ellis was getting ready for bed Thursday night when her brother called her outside and pointed to the sky. Before she could respond, Ellis said her daughter, Ashley Ellis, let out a shrill scream.

Darting back and forth in the night sky were what Ellis described as four unidentified flying objects. Yes, UFOs.

To be specific, they were four orange bulbs that dashed overhead until they ascended higher and higher, turned to white and disappeared, according to Ellis.

“They were super quiet, and so bright and so close,” said Ellis, who was in the backyard of her Cascade Park home when she saw them taking off into the southern sky.

The National UFO Reporting Center in Seattle confirmed Ellis’ report and noted there were two other UFO accounts Thursday, one each in Vancouver and Seattle.

“What the objects were? I have no idea,” said Peter Davenport, the director of the UFO center. “My suspicion is we’ll never know.”

The local reports, though, come on the heels of nearly 100 reports Davenport said the center has received since July 1, all detailing similar sightings. Reports, he said, have stretched from California to Connecticut.

He said details of the events depicted Thursday all came in shortly after 11 p.m.

He described the other Vancouver reporting party, whom he declined to identify, as a “credible, sober-minded, solid-sounding witness.”

“I have no idea what happened,” said Davenport, “but I am all but satisfied the people were reporting something other than fireworks.”

On his website, Davenport describes the across-the-country reports he’s been receiving: “Witnesses have described seeing strange red, orange, or yellow ‘fireballs,’ which have been seen either to hover in the night sky, or to streak overhead, sometimes individually, and on some occasions in clusters. In some instances, the objects were observed against a clear, cloudless sky, and in other cases, they were observed below solid or broken overcast.”

That matches closely with Ellis’ description, who watched the phenomenon with her brother, Mark Quam, one of his friends, and her two children, Ashley Ellis, 18, and Mikey Sumerhill, 11.

“My daughter was sitting there screaming, ‘What is that? What is that?’ ” she said. “It was so weird.”

According to a copy of the anonymous Vancouver report received by Davenport, “As far as brightness goes, I would say maybe 10 times as bright as a normal star, and maybe half as bright as the lights I see on the commercial aircrafts flying in and out of PDX.”

Jim Todd, Oregon Museum of Science and Industry’s planetarium manager, said through a spokesman there was “nothing unnatural in the sky” Thursday that provides a scientific explanation.

“At least we know it wasn’t the planets aligning in a weird way, which happens from time to time,” said Lee Dawson, an OMSI spokesman.

A Columbian reader suggested the sightings may have been a TR-3B, a triangular-shaped spy plane created for the National Security Agency and the Central Intelligence Agency at Nevada’s famed Area 51. The alleged top-secret craft is the subject of much Internet chatter, but its existence is not confirmed.

Of the three reports Thursday night, Davenport said the one in Seattle came a few minutes before the back-to-back local accounts.

Local police said they were not aware of any strange activity.

“Dispatch has no record of calls coming in and we didn’t respond,” said Kim Kapp, a spokeswoman with the Vancouver Police Department. “It’s probably, what, about two minutes to travel from Seattle to Vancouver in a UFO?”

They need to convince us about climate change, global warming, and perhaps the little green men that have come to save us from the evils of carbon.

Jesse Ventura to the rescue:

Weather changing technology known as HAARP?

With the inherent dangers:

The greatest concern of New Age scientist Nick Begich, in his book, “Angels Don’t Play This HAARP”, is that scientists and the military are so very arrogant in their ignorant, reckless use of focussed energy into the ionosphere. Military scientists talk about “kicking this thing in high gear to see what would happen”! This attitude is complete arrogance. What if they set off an unintended reaction in the atmosphere that cannot be controlled or stopped?

Or are they UFO’s housing aliens looking to protect us, disarming nukes, and not creating weather changes. like this one caught on tape in Haiti before the earthquake?:

Or how about this one?:


Wouldn’t these guys like to know?:

magnify this user 9 Nov 10:15:11 Firefox 3.6 WinVista unknown Netherlands Noordwijk,
Zuid-holland,
Netherlands
Planet Technologies (IP REMOVED) [Label IP Address]
makeiteighteh.com/2010/11/06/whats-that-red-burning-glowing-object-in-the-skies-of-hamilton/
No referring link

The (new) World, according to McGuinty

He's here......

...and all around her!

When the Queen of England came to Canada, apparently Premier of Ontario, Dalton McGuinty was close at her side. Her every move was monitored closely to ensure she was happy. Sharing the 3D experience, to the Blackberry explanation, it must have been a nauseating vision to watch. I wonder how the Queen felt about the suck up?

The National Post adds this:

This morning’s prayer at the Cathedral Church of St. James, attended by the Queen, Prince Philip, and Premier Dalton McGuinty and his wife, Terry, saw thousands of well-wishers thronging in bright sunshine, fittingly on King Street, to cheer their monarch; the parishoners belted out God Save Our Queen and O Canada with gusto.

Read more: http://news.nationalpost.com/tag/royal-visit/#ixzz14QGZbdQW

We must forgive any view that the Queen has had about the New World. She was in New York not long ago addressing the United Nations, and said the “waging of peace” would be difficult on the leaders of the world. Whatever could she have meant? We have seen the waging of peace as an excuse before. It is similar to the argument of some war supporting Bilderbergers.

Perhaps too, we should forgive Prince Philip for practicing the new world jargon when he said he would, well, let’s let him tell us:

“In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.” — Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, in 1988

That’s swell Prince. Glad to have folks of your calibre visit us folks in Canada. Don’t mind me if I choose not to shake your hand.

The mission of the Globalist hobnobbers is to reduce and control the remaining population of the world. There are too many people, and they are out of control would be the argument.

Funny it would be church that the visitors would go to, seeing as how Christianity and Globalism does not seem to jive:

The Christian family represents even more of a threat to the globalist agenda. The Christian’s belief in the authority of the Bible is especially a concern for the internationalist. Christians who believe in God, in sin, in salvation through faith in Jesus Christ alone, stand in the way of the globalist plan for a one-world religion, whereas liberal Christianity does not pose such a threat.

The coming world religion or what I refer to as “cosmic humanism,” will bring all faiths together into one central belief system. It will be tolerant of all faiths with the exception of those that absolutize. All the religions of the world will be able to sign off on its basic tenets; however, orthodox Christianity, Judaism, and Islam will not allow absorption.

The article was written in 2003, and it is uncanny as a predictor of what is happening today.

We can look at another aspect that might support the reasoning Premier McGuinty was more than accommodating to the Queen and the Prince. Let’s have a look at the aspects of education in the New World:

The last arena that the globalists have used to bring about their “One World” order is education. They are fully aware that if they are successful in capturing the minds of this generation they will be able to usher in a new global agenda that will change the world as we know it forever.

The traditional family poses a threat to globalism for two reasons. First, it is still the primary socializing unit in our society. Parents pass on social, cultural, and spiritual values to their children. Often, the values of the traditional family are not in harmony with the goals of globalism. Goals such as tolerance for a one-world religion are not acceptable to the Christian.


Second, parental authority in a traditional family clearly supercedes international authority. Children are taught to obey their parents in such families. Parents and not the state have authority over their children. Globalists, therefore, see the traditional family as an enemy and not an ally in meeting their agenda.

Ashley Montagu, a humanist and a globalist, told a group of educators that “the American family structure produces mentally ill children.” From his perspective, the traditional family which teaches such things as loyalty to God and loyalty to country is not producing mentally fit children for the next century.

Globalist educators seek to educate children at an earlier and earlier age in order for them to indoctrinate the young minds of the future. The earlier they can reach children with global ideas the more likely they can break the influence held by the family.

Okay, creepy enough for you?

Wait, check out this video clip of Sir McGuinty explaining how good it will be to take your kids and put them in “state” control as early as possible (no diapers please):

Give us time, I am sure there will be plenty more evidence to surface to suggest the new world advantage McGuinty says we will all have will be “really good” for the people of Ontario, Canada, and the World.

Just one little glitch. We’ll have to give up all of our rights and freedoms and hope we are not the victim of the virus ‘ol Prince Phillip wants to return as.


Does Stephen Harper seem uncomfortable with the agenda?: By his resistance, we can see where the enemy is

I have both supported and questioned Stephen Harper. But, there is always a point that man must forgive his fellow man, when true repentance is obvious. After all, who are we to judge another. We are all “dirty rags” when we compare our own humanity to that of divinity. We have seen evidence to support that there is questioning going on. I might be seeing resistance of an agenda by our Prime Minister. Whether a blessing or a curse, let’s just say I have a sixth sense that helps me put pieces together.

First, watch this clip, that was posted earlier on another article related to poison in drinking water:

Prime Minister Stephen Harper told reporters in Edmonton on Wednesday that he would receive the H1N1 vaccine if it was recommended. Aides later clarified Harper's statements, saying he would get the vaccine if it was approved. (Jimmy Jeong/Canadian Press) Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2009/10/14/h1n1-research-funding.html#ixzz14PWXlz9F

Now, read this article from way back in 2009, of the questioning of our Prime Minister, if he would be taking the H1N1 shot that was pushed so heavily in media.

If Alex Jones’ research and experts are painting a strong argument that the flu vaccines will become vessels to alter the brain, dumbing us down by injecting live, damaging viruses into us , then the resistance would be understandable. Harper may know full well. He of course was not alone.

Just as interesting as the article by the CBC, is the first comment below it, linked to Prison Planet.com. It’s all about profit at the price of health – a perfect double whammy by the globalists. Let’s not even talk about the “water war crimes”.

The H1N1 shot last year proved to be a hoax, so the question is, why did the WHO (World Health Organization) push its’ marketing so hard? And, why did the U.S. come out in the same, drive to forced vaccinations, when resistance was clear:

When asked on CNN to respond to several nationwide polls indicating that Americans do not trust the vaccine because it has been rushed through safety procedures, Sebelius said that it was “targeted specifically at the H1N1 virus”, despite the fact that the pharmaceutical companies themselves admit that there is “no clinical experience in the elderly, in children or in adolescents” with their new vaccines.

It’s almost flu season again….food for thought indeed.

Switching gears, headlines out of the Toronto Star November 3rd, bring us this piece, “Harper has burned bridges abroad, Ignatieff says”.

Ignatieff does not see the clear mission of the United Nations as a vessel of globalist control, or he is part of the mission, when he criticized Harper:

In a major foreign-policy speech on Tuesday in Montreal, Ignatieff says that Canada’s failure to obtain a seat on the United Nations Security Council should be a wake-up call about the country’s dwindling reputation abroad.

“The world forced us to look in the mirror and we don’t like what we see,” Ignatieff says, calling the UN rebuff a “clear condemnation” of the way the Harper government has conducted its politics abroad.

“We should be building bridges, not burning them,” Ignatieff says.

It’s about Christianity fighting the New World Order, as described well in this article:

This “One World” order will be brought about by a shift in the political, economic, environmental, and education arenas. The political arena is crucial because of its ability to engage whole nations with the stroke of a pen. Government leaders play significant roles in making internal changes that will ultimately affect their national sovereignty. In bringing about such a new age of international cooperation, national sovereignty will have to be surrendered. Therefore, it is not surprising that President Bush went to the United Nations first in order to obtain approval for using force against Saddam Hussein. Many wonder if he now sees the U.N. Charter as more important than the U. S. Constitution. There are those who are presently calling for a constitutional convention to bring about a change in our nation’s way of governing itself.

It was interesting to note a while ago that Harper has the Christian influence in his government:

In the wake Marci McDonald’s newly released book The Armageddon Factor: The Rise Of Christian Nationalism In Canada, a political firestorm has erupted on Parliament Hill, igniting debate about just who’s influencing the policy decisions made by Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

The release of McDonald’s book comes amid the brewing tension of apparent ideological moves made by the Harper government, including the ‘Mexico City Policy’ for the upcoming G8 maternal and child health initiative, the rescinding of funds of women’s organizations who promote a full range of family planning options, and the denial of federal tourism funds for Pride Toronto.

With public focus being drawn to the back rooms of the PMO, the Harper government lashed out following a CBC segment featuring an interview with McDonald and a glimpse at some of the people discussed in the book. The Conservatives accused the public broadcaster of “fomenting religious division” and waging a “faith war” in an “ongoing campaign against the Conservative Party.” (Take note, this is just the latest in a string of baseless allegations made by the Conservative Party and Right Wing pundits against the CBC.)

Interesting that it is the CBC that has criticized the Christian influence in the Harper backoffices, considering Peter Mansbridge attended Bilderberg this year in Spain, along with several Canadian banking officials for the T.D., and the Premier of B.C. After all, Bilderberg is in bed with the powers that be in the U.N. to effect a One World Government that promises the guise of Climate Change to effect what can best be described as world population reduction.

Sounds crazy, eh? Yeah, wish it were. When Gord Campbell said the Bilderbergers talked about the issues of feeding the world, we wondered if he became privy to the mission to use inoculations to sterilize and climate change taxation to reduce the food supply so millions in third world countries would starve. I wonder if an initial visit to Bilderberg would have jerked into high gear like that, or would it be like a PR gesture to say, “see, we are GOOD PEOPLE”, go home and tell your countries it’s all just a bad joke that we really are eugenicists. Okay?” “Go home little insignificant minions, go home now”.

Let’s switch gears yet again.

Let’s look at Harper’s resistance to the Bank Tax that would have been used to bail out failing global central banks.

Not to mention the other tax de resistance, the 2% Climate tax (2% of Canada’s GDP) that was to be given to the United Nations as a good will gesture on Climate Change. Remember, Hillary Clinton was the first to suggest the cheque book be pulled out for that cause.

Clinton’s announcement, made during a packed news conference, represents a major breakthrough in the U.N.-led talks, which had all but ground to a halt last night. But Clinton emphasized that the money is only on the table so long as fast-growing nations like China and India accept binding commitments that are open to international inspection and verification. If other countries don’t bend, she warned, the poorest countries will suffer.

Of course Hillary, because at the end of the day, it’s all about control of those nations the U.N. cannot get a handle on. But China and Russia are still not in bed, so as Webster Tarpley has so well pointed out, the goal of Brzezinski is not for the U.S. to attack Iran, but to set the stage for Iran to fight Russia and/or China, cutting off valuable oil supplies:

Brzezinski argued that no more direct military

Click here to see why he believes the world is "waking up" to reality

attacks by the United States should be made for the time being, and that US policy should rather focus on playing off other states against each other, while the US remained somewhat aloof. Brzezinski’s model was always his own successful playing of the Soviet Union against Afghanistan in 1979, leading to the collapse of the Soviet empire a decade later. A centerpiece of Brzezinski’s argument was evidently the claim that color revolutions on the model of Ukraine 2004 were much a better tool than the costly and dangerous US bombing and US invasion always championed by the monomaniacal neocons. There was clearly an implication that Brzezinski could deliver a color revolution in Iran, as he had done in Ukraine.

And Ignatieff cannot understand Harper’s lack of interest in being represented on the U.N. Security Council? Phewie!

Back to the climate duping, yeah sorry….

Of course, if you don’t know Cap n’ Trade, and the Bilderbergers being in on that charade, you probably haven’t seen the evidence yet. We did a piece when Earth Hour became just too much propaganda to bare. Sorry, the bank tax, yes. Well, in another move that has Harper seeing the light, and doing what can be done to stop New World Order enterprises, here is the gist of the G20:

The dispute over bank taxes is shaping up as a key point of debate in Toronto when Canada hosts the G20 June 26-27, immediately after Canada hosts the G8 in Huntsville, Ont.

Rather than taxing banks, Mr. Harper said, he wants the G20 to focus on plans to tackle growing deficits and improve financial-sector regulation. But that agenda is at risk of being eclipsed by events tied to the Greek debt crisis.

Call me crazy, but there is a picture of Bill Clinton and Stephen Harper in Davos Switzerland that sticks in my mind. The look on Clinton’s face tells it all. It’s as if he were looking at a man that should be doing more to further the cause.

Clinton’s look is one of looking tired, worn down, and exhausted with the impossibly idiotic mission the effectors are supposed to bring to the table. You know the mission, that according to Charlie Skelton is “expected to be implemented”.

Well, let’s have a laugh to end this piece of support of P.M. Harper. I see resistance. The pieces are there. I hope I’m not wrong, and I hope for Harper’s sake he really is genuine with the Christian influence, and the resisitance to all things Bilderberg.

As for the B.C. Premier, I will leave you with this comment from Charlie Skelton. Just think about it Gord, okay?:

The premier of British Columbia, Gordon Campbell, is 62. Still a little young to be put out to grass, a little too spry to be waggling his willy at past glories, especially when you consider that a trip to Bilderberg often means a career leap is just round the corner. (David Cameron 2008, Tony Blair 1993, Bill Clinton 1991). Congratulations, Prime Minister Campbell!

Web Analytics Image

Splattergate replaces Climategate as the biggest slip up of the eco-fascists

Remember Bill Gates slipped into Bilderberg this year under the guise of going to a “different” meeting. The “meeting” didn’t exist. Gates was in Sitges, Spain this year to be there to explain how vaccines can “reduce” the population.

Some call it “soft kill” weapons, and vaccines in the hands of eugenicists like Gates should impact you…..but you may not believe it.

You might want to ask yourself how Hitler was allowed to carry on in his reign of terror. Hitler was also concerned with the environment, and people were not willing to admit he looked like a madman. The belief was that he was a little off but there was no way he could be as insane as he later proved to be.

Are we giving the proponents of Global Warming the same shrug of the shoulder? They are not “that bad” are they?

James Delingpole, in this article paints a different picture. Warning, the video you will see will shock and anger you. Small children should not be allowed to watch this clip. Incidentally, it is the same small children that schools might be “selling” the global warming scare to.

http://www.youtube.com/v/AmBnVjy4vag?fs=1&hl=en_US

Don’t worry, the final cut of the commercials that made it to television are so much more controlled. The eco-fascists were “toned down a notch” after likely being reminded that the world just isn’t ready to learn the true reason for climate change taxation…..you know, to strip us all of all our wealth, then rights, then put us into bondage, and then…..
http://www.youtube.com/v/rAz7jyG0qfw?fs=1&hl=en_US

Here is James Delingpole discussing this with Alex Jones. I hope you are as mad as I was when learning of the globalists’ gall to look at us all like “cannon fodder with bloated bellies”, as George Washington Hunt has explained.

It might change the way we think of our childrens’ safety, and might remind us of the announcer on T.V. years ago. This time the announcement might be, “It’s 10 AM, do you know what propaganda your children are enduring?”

Did I say welcome to the New Commie Order?.. check that, Beck now means the New ‘anti-colonialism’ order, yeah, that’s it, I think

What did we do to deserve this “field day”?

According to Beck's latest expert, Dinesh D'Souza, this is Obama in secret gesture to say, well, you know to America!

Just the facts ma’am, just the facts. Give it to us straight. That’s Beck’s new message to prove who he parades in front of the camera is going to solve the world’s problems and give us the real truth.

Forget all about the New World Order, that was so, what was it, two, three days ago? Forget Beck mentioned it in 2008 either. The new push to put focus on is the President that Beck and his family “pray for” every night for safety –  the same President he hopes will ring the hot line in studio, and the one he paints as a mad-man shortly after 5 PM EST nightly.

Pray alright, because if the kooks start to listen to Beck and the cronies he brings on as “experts” then the President of the United States might really be looking to boost security. Pray harder Glenn, you are creating a self-fulfilling prophesy.

Yesterday I made the comment that if Beck wants to prove that the New World Order driven by Bilderberg is not so, and if he wants to now prove that if it all can be explained by  the New Commie Order driven by the madmen Obama has surrounded himself with, then Glenn had better have two decades to piece it together to show how it ties into a “global” issue, not American.

Beck has got himself down another rabbit hole of focusing yet again on soley America, as if Alzheimer’s must have set in somewhere.

Do we need to remind his writers that just a couple of days ago they were thrashing the One World Government and George Soros, complete with “spooky dialect” that is rather entertaining by Beck. Let me guess, Beck will next tie Soros in with the flavor of the day (I’d say week, but focus changes daily now) with a book no doubt, which will bring yet another “expert” to the chalkboard. Poor George in his youth was neglected too by his father, and the dreams he had were surprisingly to be an “anti-Colonialist”.  Stay tuned. I am starting to see why his show is number two in cable ratings – it is far more entertaining than other “reality shows”. You see, other reality shows like Jersey Shores at least are consistent, and therefore boring.

Yes, the rabbit holes are popping up in FOX studios, and the funny thing is, does anybody there even still believe the bologna that is being served? Talk about clutching at straws. Is it a coincidence the most outrageous things they bring to the table on the show are preceded by Beck telling his audience how “smart” they are? Wrinkle up the face and nod in a no pattern. I don’t think so.

Is the clock ticking? Is there something coming down fast somewhere that we don’t know about? “Just keep them distracted for a few more days Beckie, then our master plan will be effected, muha, muhahahaha”.

The more outrageous the drive to prove anything but Bilderberg, the more ridiculous the Glenn Beck Show becomes.

If the show was entitled, “Glenn tells you a million different versions of the truth, and none have any connection to the night before”, then we could all start bobbing our heads in realization – of course, now it makes sense!

I was wrong. There is a consistency in Beck’s approach. It’s consistently inconsistent, and doesn’t focus on any issue long enough to be able to elaborate.

It’s like a kid caught shoplifting in the local candy store. As the shopkeeper questions what he did, the kid comes up with elaborate reasoning, that changes with new suggestions. “There was a gust of wind, and the candy blew into my pocket”. That suggestion, because the shopkeeper asked him if it was when he went outside to bring in the items because of heavy wind. “Yes, the wind was so strong, it blew into the store, knocking the candy bar into my pocket”.

So, when Beck had the next expert on the show yesterday, the first google search was to see if he was linked to Bilderberg. You know, like good ‘ol Niall Ferguson, the professor at Harvard and Bilderberg attendee. Nope, this one wasn’t.

Further digging led me to this interesting little article of someone having lunch with the new guest. It would seem the good professor sees hand gestures of Obama on camera as meaning he is saying “F___ you” – a secret little slip. Yes, this is the expert Beck had on yesterday. My, my, my.

Oh, right, we need to back our argument up with the “facts”. So, here is the evidence I needed to see.

Just when the ObamaCare debate was heating up, I was dining with a renowned conservative professor with impeccable Ivy credentials when the conversation suddenly turned surreal. Encouraged that I too had deep misgivings about the direction in which the new president was taking the country, the good professor opined that America had put in the White House a subversive radical. Obama wasn’t a well-intentioned but misguided liberal, he insisted, he was motivated by actual malice toward America. What evidence did he have for this rather bizarre suggestion, I asked, shocked? Among the things the professor cited was that in his public appearances, Obama communicated with a cabal of fellow America haters in secret hand gestures. For example, during one speech, Obama stroked his cheek with his middle finger extended to convey “fuck you, America,” the professor said imitating Obama.

We must be nearing some pinnacle – the level of desperation on the part of the Beck show is becoming laughable. I suppose there will be someone willing to come to the plate to explain how climate change was a design of the “anti-colonialists”, those nasty, nasty people.

Globalist banks prove worldly muscle is real, and affects every one of us!

It’s called “snatch and grab”. and if you were to ask those thrown into the back of vans at the G20 in Toronto, they would probably tell you there was no rhyme nor reason for the abuse!

Snatched, grabbed,  and thrown into the back of vans ready to speed away for maximum effect…..of course, staged for the cameras to see.

The street the stage, the crowd, the “extras”, and the purpose – to scare the living beejeeslies out of those that see it. As for the criminality that justified the poor treatment – are you kidding me?

Here is the clip from the G20 showing the drama in action. It shows the poor acting. If you know of these poor folks that were violated, please let us know, we would love to know what awful deeds they did to deserve being thrown to the ground and for no good reason abducted, in an inhumane way.

We would also like to know who the abductors are. Are they Canadian police? Does anybody know them? What would drive them to be a part of a process of stripping the rights of Canadians and showing how law enforcement can be mentally manipulated, and driven to the brink of doing what we all think is currently unimaginable – the acting like the Gestapo in Hitler’s Germany.

Here’s the Act, parts 1 and 2:

Sure, the argument against discussing this now is that it has been a while. It’s old news. We would sooner put this behind us. Wouldn’t we all?

Most significant is not the horror of the moment, but the pattern. The pattern is global, expected, and means that Canada is not immune to the globalist banking system control.

We have proven we are not immune as we had the CEO of T.D. Bank attend this year’s Bilderberg meeting in Spain (Edmund Clark). We also had the Deputy Chair of the T.D. Bank (Frank McKenna). I guess it was T.D.’s turn this year. Most significant, a Canadian bank, perhaps deciding how it would be part of the globalist push.

We had $1.2 billion or more spent on the hot button, good boy business of the century – security. As if Canada could justify the expense. Canada, the supposedly conservative, thoughtful spenders.

The use to be powerhouse of the world, the U.S. continues to police the world on a budget they can’t afford for military spending, while there is talk that all money from pension plans will have to invest in the bonds of the country. Soon, there will be a takeover of private pension plans to continue to erode the security of the people. Black vans that will hood the captives could soon be for those protesting their pension payments being taken. It’s conditioning, one video at a time, until we no longer think it strange. Security that, if it doesn’t happen to us, is, I suppose, okay.

Britain is looking for total monetary control of private company paycheques. Don’t complain, you may be next thrown in the back of a van with a black hood over your head.

Here is another video of a snatch and grab at the G20 meeting, this one at last year’s meeting in Pittsburg. I think we can safely say we are starting to feel the “globalism” reality they are pushing us towards.

Global similarity. Who are they in control of supposedly separate, national sovereignty? Who are they that can dictate how taxpayer money is spent? Who are they that can control the nature of police action leading to violation of human rights? Who are they?

Bilderberg.

If I was a rich crook, would I continue to pay an employee to expose me because he is “right”?

A significant jump in world affairs  and admission of truth may have just been taken

Twisting, turning, spinning, or the truth? Which is it? I think it safe to say, we are all confused at this point.

If you were to have taken a television vacation for say, two or three years, and came back to watch the Glenn Beck Program yesterday, would you be a little freaked out that the chalkboard blatantly shows the truth – that the heads in Washington are “selling” a one world government run by elites?

No conspiracy theory. Beck confirms what Jones has not pulled any punches on for 15 years – the New World Order drive is real, and it’s in full, “in your face” mode.

As a matter of fact, does this not make it easier for you to not look like a nutbag when bringing this up at the water cooler? Does this not make it less of a faux pas, like the pyramid -scheme-like products that, if you sell enough memberships will help you quit your day job some day? If only you can convince your friends and family, hmm…….

What happened to the good ‘ol U.S. of A.?

Where’s the true battle? What’s the real truth? What do I mean by that?

Many months ago, when it appeared Glenn Beck was working along the same lines as Alex Jones, I got excited. Wow, this was key. Like that nasty “pyramid scheme” sales opp it would be less tough to use Beck and his Fox Network to get people to visit infowars.com.

After all, Infowars is a  very “in your face”, hardcore admission of “what in the world is this” reality. The newbies would have a hard time digesting it for themselves, let alone share the dazzling counter-world it represents.

In short, the infowars site is like something you eat that at first shocks your system, but later you acquire a taste for it, and then after that, you are a regular. Anyone that is a Guinness dark beer drinker may know what I’m talking about, but for me….no thanks….don’t slide one of those down the bar, thank you.

Enough rambling, what’s the point?

Confusion. That’s the point.

At first Jones flipped out on Beck, exposing him as a NWO shill. Hard to take at first, with further investigation, it became fairly clear, the quick-firing Alex Jones was right again, leaving us to figure out how he knew so fast.

But something has not seemed right lately.

The key is Rupert Murdoch.

Murdoch was and perhaps still is a Bilderberger. If he has seen the light, God bless him. But, until proven innocent, He is for all intents and purposes in the group of Elite that Beck is exposing as the world government being pushed by Washington to become our fearless, unelected leaders.

Bilderberg meets once a year, giving “marching orders” to the delegates they bring to the table, and expect changes to be implemented.

Underlying this group is secrecy and a secret mission of global population control.

Beck, no doubt is aware of the precarious position he finds himself in. Anybody who knows enough about the Bilderberg Group knows they are an integral link to the underground dealings of the New World Order, and absolute global chaos.

There could only be one explanation or saving grace for Beck and Murdoch. Could we have heard a hint of it yesterday? Is Murdoch a turncoat of the Bilderbergers? Has he had enough, and seen the light? Is he doing what he can to bring some truth because even he cannot accept the reality of the nightmare being imposed on the world?

The elites are to take control! Of you, of me, of everything and everybody!

Beck brings up the point whether to admit Murdoch is repentant, or to fool us further when he reiterated the point of contention –  why Rupert Murdoch would allow him to tell us this if it were not true.

It is fully understandable that there would be those people who would entertain all the opportunity the rich guys would bring to the table. Like the devil telling you he will grant your every desire, with just one little catch….the elevator at the end is going down, as you sacrifice your soul.

You would have to figure there would be those that live in denial – that it could not possibly be for real, and not in my lifetime. The price would not have to be paid, making the fame and fortune truly attractive to our nature.

So, to go along with it might have  seemed easy.

Realizing things are getting out of control, and the freaks are for real, there would be those that would want to turn to the side of good.

Could this be the case? Are there those that have played along with the Bilderberg Group, and are freaked out realizing the representative devil is coming to collect?

Are there those that are realizing the price is real and far greater than they are willing to pay?

And this is why it is now becoming confusing what Glenn Beck is up to.

The neo-cons may have been played. Bilderberg may have fooled them much in the same way they appealed to the “progressive” nutjobs  in the White House, including Pelosi and Cass Sunstein.

The game was a ruse. The ship must therefore be turned around, and we can only hope to get help from some of those duped by true evil. |Look at the new bailout in Washington led by the departure of Peter Orszag, and continuing in drabs. We saw that coming.

So, is Rupert Murdoch a repentant ex-Bilderberg minion?

If there is a genuine interest to bring the truth, and Rupert Murdoch is really trying to help us all understand the evil he has seen, then God bless him.

If it is just another attempt to pull the wool over our eyes, at the end of the day, the “down elevator” is going to be filled to capacity. The level of evil will have even surpassed my imagination.

Beck could be just trying to reel in some more fish? Or, he could be using limited ability and every avenue to help the cause of good.

Bilderberg and exposing this group continues to hold the key. So does 9/11 and exposing the true purpose of the Patriot Act.

Beck and Murdoch are still far off from credible.

The real truth will challenge Beck to get beyond the neo-con  mindset, which will mean admitting the war effort is also a lie. That may be tough for him and Murdoch to swallow.

Beck would be wise to interview Murdoch on a coming show, and let us decide for ourselves if he and Murdoch are remotely credible.

Beck’s show is a roller coaster ride at best. He mirrors Jones on many issues and mannerisms, it’s true. But why is there no team work? Why is there no admission Jones holds credibility?

We can remember not too far before, Beck’s attack on the credibility of Russia Today. He also made fun of Daniel Estulin appearing in the following news clip. What are the odds that news on Bilderberg will appear on Fox News any time soon? Right, not likely. But to note the “matter of fact” reporting on Bilderberg by Russia Today should make us more aware of news networks and their anchors as mere shills of the agenda, admitted to by Murdoch himself in the past.

Beck as the counter-Jones, to spin and reel in the dangling fish continues to be the underlying theme. He has a long way to go yet.

When what sounds good really just sucks!

Gordon Campbell, the Premier of British Columbia attended the Bilderberg meeting this year in Sitges, Spain.

He told us all that the taxpayers of B.C. paid for it, because, I suppose, it was information that would be useful to an official in charge of a large province in Canada. I suppose, he would argue, it was justified.

And when further pressed, Mr. Campbell explained that although he could not give specifics, he learned that the group of Bilderberg discuss things like this:

“We talked about the economy, we talked about trade, we talked about health care and the challenges that health care presents to all economies with the changing demographic”

Sure, this is “old news”, no biggie, just another government official going to a meeting of the elites, and “hobnobbing”. All good, who cares — the same old, same old.

Perhaps. Go back to sleep everyone, nothing to see here.

I wonder if Gordon Campbell, when discussing his visit and the meetings he attended met Bill Gates.

Gates, officially found his way to Bilderberg by way of another meeting that did not happen. And why? Because the other meeting actually didn’t exist. It was a diversion. It was a smokescreen to cover for Mr. Gates’ visit to Bilderberg. But, that shouldn’t be a surprise either, because the rich will often shake off the paparazzi of sorts, and cleverly end up where they want. So, arguably, the persona of the Bilderbergers being a secret cabal of elitists trying to control the world may just be the jealous types that “wish” they could be in the shoes of these elites. That seems to be the argument. That, and the fact that these conspiracy cooks must not have a very fulfilling and succesful life, so they make up stuff and create a false sense of purpose and entitlement to abuse others. That is what we are to understand.

The famous, such as our Canadian icons - - Mr. Campbell and Mr. Mansbridge – may have been curious and flattered to attend. Remember, nothing to see here people, move along. A couple of great Canadians being honoured with an invitation to attend the “anyone who is anyone will be there” event of the year. So, hey, why not? It’s a world stage, and Canada needs representation. Even if the taxpayers of B.C. had to pay for it. That’s expected. Let’s not forget, Mr. Mansbridge paid his own freight.

And, would Mr. Campbell, when he mentioned the economy of the world, and “health care and the challenges that health care presents” have been eluding to a presentation that Mr. Gates may have made?

According to Gates, the world’s population of 9 billion presents an issue for food, and health care. In a We are Change article, Gates is cited as saying:

“I’m one of those who will be present,” adding that he will take part in a debate with fellow globalists on the subjects of “energy and the needs of the poorest,” as well as climate change, renewable energy and the economic crisis.

Here we go again, right. You’ve heard of “We are Change”. They are one of “those” conspiracy theory groups, aren’t they?

They might just be trying to spin what Mr. Gates says, and take it out of context to suit their purposes. They may just be disgruntled people, you know, the jealous of his success types, that constantly try to discredit him and the rich people like him.

We all know the world works like this: You become a success, you get rich, and then you start a “Foundation” to help the poor. In Mr. Gates case, he and his wife started the  Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Right, move on, nothing to see here.

The Rockefellers, after all, too started the Rockefeller Foundation. And, surprisingly, they too care about the world. See, nothing to be concerned with. It’s how it works. The rich people helping the poor people — move on already, and get a life of your own!

Some of these “conspiracy groups” even have claimed that the Rockefeller Foundation is into a form of cleansing called Eugenics and they assisted the Nazis. “In its extreme, racist form, this meant wiping away all human beings deemed “unfit,” preserving only those who conformed to a Nordic stereotype. Imagine the gall of the people accusing the fine, upstanding Rockefellers of that!

Even other rich people claimed the Rockefellers were into controlling the earth, and microchipping people. Aaron Russo, the movie director of acclaim was said to have met Nick Rockefeller, after starting a “Mad as Hell” show

Aaron Russo and Nick Rockefeller

and no, he wasn’t going to take it anymore. Russo, claimed that Nick Rockefeller gave him an offer — join us Aaron! We’ll give you a card that will be like an f — you card, a kiss my a– card, and you will not have to be like the other people. You will be special. Apparently Russo didn’t go for it. He was a terrific Patriot of American liberty. Too bad he isn’t alive to keep up the “unnecessary fight” though.

Makes me think what Mr. Campbell and Mr. Mansbridge are thinking post-Bilderberg.

Are they thinking, thanks but no thanks? A little embarassed for being there? Where’s the exit? How am I going to keep this smile until I can get the heck outta here? Maybe.

But there will always be the ones that buy into the concepts, and believe the intent is good. Why else would the group be so large?

Although Russo goes against the grain of the normal conspiracy theorist, he would have been nonetheless a malcontent, I suppose.

Remember, these people got rich, built “Foundations”, and are helping those less fortunate. Don’t look any further, there is no need.

And, if Russo complained about America pre 911 becoming a police state, and Totalitarian empire, his fear would have been justified after speaking with Nick Rockefeller.

“There would be an event in 2001″ he was told that would start this New World. Nah, not a rich guy with a foundation. That is not how the world works. Nothing to see — move on.

There should really be no reason to look beyond the Gates’, or the Rockefellers, or the “Progressive Movement”. Everything they do is for our good as humanity.

Look, we have wide-screen T.V.’s made by these rich people who own the technology. Move on. We have good healthcare, advances in medicine — move on. What the conspiracy theorists are saying doesn’t jive with the real world, so we must continue to listen to men, good men, like Bill Gates when he and his foundation tell us they are just nice people who don’t even want to be recognized until found out.

That too, is how the world works. The humble, good guys that are so humble, so nice that they don’t even want the world to know they are part of a group of other humble, nice rich people who have foundations, and all that good stuff.

They are working behind the scenes for our good, because that is how the world works.

So, when they are pushed, they must tell us what they are doing.

And when Bill Gates was pushed by those conspiracy guys to fess up as to what he was going to discuss at Bilderberg 2010, he did:

Stating that the global population was heading towards 9 billion, Gates said, “If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services (abortion), we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 per cent.”

And if we were sleeping we would say, see. move on. Nothing to see here.

But if we paid attention, something might not fit. We might be dumfounded. No, he couldn’t have said that vaccines were designed to “reduce” the population could he have?

No, we might even think to look up further evidence to support it. Perhaps a different meeting, in a different place? Yes, but what if the message was the same?:

Along with the scientifically absurd proposition of reducing manmade CO2 emissions worldwide to zero by 2050, approximately four and a half minutes into the talk, Gates declares, “First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”

That might suck!

That might make us want to learn more ugly truth.

That might also, make us wonder why Alex Jones is so upset about the fluoride, lithium, and other drugs that are in the water supplies to dumb us down, and make us servile. That too would suck.

We might become one of those people who are disgruntled, that are jealous of the nice people that meet up and discuss the world’s problems, and are succesful with generous Foundations.

We might question these people.

And in doing so, we might have a chance to stop them.

We might wonder what would suck more — knowing what we know and acting on it, or allowing it, and watching these people get away with it, destroying the future for our children and their children.

And, we might finally realize why these people — the Bilderberg Group — want to meet in secret.

We might then understand that what we were led to believe may not be true.

We might have to stand up, and like Aaron Russo,  say “we are mad as hell, and we aren’t going to take it anymore”.

Robert Rubin and the Band of Bilderberg Ponzi Schemers: Would a crook turn over a crook?

In October of  2005, in one of many speeches, Robert Rubin addressed a group of students at Princeton University. When he was done, a round of applause was offered from the audience. After all, Rubin had taken time out from his busy schedule to address concerns of the future  bright young hope of the United States – the students –  the next generation that would take the reins moving forward.

He told the students of Princeton that day, that there might be a chance that the economy was going to take a nosedive. Like pulling out a fry pan and a couple of eggs, it would be easy to predict that the eggs will be cooked, especially since you intend to cook them. We should give the intelligent youth in the lecture hall that day some credit – they probably knew it wasn’t eggs on the fry pan, it was more like a few gooses – as in, our goose is cooked!

Some of the excited group at Princeton probably didn’t know Robert Rubin was working with the power elite of the world. Their educations, and more, their dreams would become futile in a world where freedoms were being stripped, educations would be slated to become mere tools for slavery, heck, one’s very existence would be in question. The group responsible for the world’s change to bondage – The Bilderberg Group.

Rubin, as former Secretary of Treasury, worked his post in the mid to late ’90 ‘s under Bill Clinton (wait for it – a fellow  Bilderberger). Clinton’s wife Hillary, we all know today as a regular Bilderberg contributor. Don’t be alarmed if she was missing from this year’s list of delegates . It means little.

In 2008, Clinton slipped into the now infamous Bilderberg conference in Washington, accompanied by the next President of the United States. Little chance she was on the official, secret list then either,so don’t be confused – her loyalty was not in question.

Breaking a few rules to get things done, I’m sure could easily be argued by the Bilderbergers, when important decisions need to be made. On  that evening in 2008,  the group of the most powerful in the world would decide whether Clinton would step aside leaving Obama to assume the American Presidency. Reporters to this day are no doubt still scratching their heads in wonder why Obama never got on the flight to Chicago that evening. That’s easy – the press weren’t invited to witness real news.

This June, in Sitges, Spain, Robert Rubin was in attendance, and was there listed as the Co-Chairman for the Council on Foreign Relations. Let that absorb a moment.

The CFR “….is a very old and very prestigious group of Americans actively engaged in shaping U.S. foreign policy at a professional and/or academic level. The membership includes almost every prominent name in U.S. foreign policy including most presidents and secretaries of state over the last 75 years.” I suppose it even includes those accused of Ponzi schemes. I suppose if Bernie Madoff was in the U.S. government, he would be eligible to maintain membership in the “prestigious group”. The self-acclaimed, ” prestigious group”.

Rubin, among others, was at the meeting illegally, as outlined under the the Logan Act which clearly defines that it is against the law for federal officials to attend secret meetings with private citizens to develop public policies”. But, like other things worth repeating, we already know that, don’t we? We know that laws in America, as Gerald Celente would tell us are ” just for us” – his explanation to describe the current state of law and justice (pron. “just-us”). That would explain how Bilderberg has now drafted up their own website as if to mock the world.

Let’s face it….’ Logan shmogan’, the law does not apply to the elite, so what are you gonna do about it? It would be like telling the mafia they just committed a crime. Yeah, so?

Worth taking note. We are not talking about government officials taking liberties. We are talking about crooks taking government positions and using that influence, power and control to effect the goals of the relatively few that want to take over everything and everyone. The good news is, it is not the government in control – it is the Bilderbergers in government that have sabotaged the Constitution, who are conspicuous by their actions –  stomping on our rights. We can identify the crooks – we have a list! And, even if they can prove they are “innocent”, they are, individually and collectively “suspect”.  With full certainty, we have our suspect list. It’s time to get busy. It’s time to expose the criminality stressing and shining a light on how each has contributed.

What precious time we have needs to be spent, not on the Black Panthers, not on the Unions of America,  or the ethnic group of the week, not on Democrats vs. Republicans,  or the for Glenn Beck people vs. the ones that are not so happy with him. No, we need to continue to expose the criminals and the criminality that is right in front of us. Forget the distractions. Forget the media controlled by Bilderberg telling us to attack each other, and let’s crumble the cookie.

As Rubin would argue on the collapse of the economy, it was Americans not living within their means. Your own fault America!

It would have nothing to do with Rubin, supposedly “convincing” Bill Clinton that derivative deregulation is good.

It would have nothing to do with Bill Clinton, one Bilderberger, covering up for another Bilderberger, and pulling the wool over our eyes by this explanation:

“On derivatives, yeah I think they were wrong and I think I was wrong to take [their advice] because the argument on derivatives was that these things are expensive and sophisticated and only a handful of investors will buy them and they don’t need any extra protection, and any extra transparency. The money they’re putting up guarantees them transparency,”

I suppose when you have to clarify what “is” is, anything this complicated would be a stretch.

That last little bit about transparency is in the course, Ponzi Scheme 101. Unfortunately, not available at time of print at Princeton U.

For, it is all about consumer and economic confidence.

Again, the Bilderberg talking heads, whether it is Feldstein, Rubin, or take your pick, will discuss the economy in terms of “confidence”. Confidence in the markets, known as investor confidence. We can translate that into Ponzi terms to be read, confidence in the government, in the Bilderbergers, in the Ponzi schemers, and in the derivative selling clowns on Wall Street. Put another way, are you still buying their stories and promises that if you keep investing, you will eventually get rich?

As long as the market “confidence” is there, the crooks know the suckers are still on the hook,  still ready to hand over their wealth to the banksters.

The Bilderbergers benchmark to monitor progress is in consumer/investor confidence. It means they can open for business and off the radar of suspicion. They can carry on their looting. The people have not caught on to the scheme yet.

But, as the economy continues to sour, there is a good chance more and more people will stop listening to the rhetoric. They will stop buying the lies. If America riots, Bilderberg wins.

They will have won because they will have fooled enough Americans long enough  to effect their plan.

The street riots, the police brutality, the armies in the streets will all be signs they avoided true justice.

We have a choice. We can take the list of suspects (the Bilderberg list), and hold them accountable for their actions. We can press them for roles in effecting world government not represented by the people.

We can use the muckety map of Robert Rubin and investigate every crevice of relationships. They are all intertwined. As the cliches go: “the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree“, “birds of a feather flock together”, “be careful of the company you keep”. All good cliches that have stood the test of time and hold wisdom.

We are just getting warmed up. The exposure is just starting. If the U.S. courts won’t expose these criminals, then it is up to us, as citizens of the world to do it.

Robert Rubin is a symptom of the greater darkness that plagues our countries. He is a player in the Bilderberg gang of criminality. We could say more for now, including the lack of reporting in media that few would touch regarding his role in the Citi fiasco, but more important is the question how he got away with it. How, if Bilderberg is argued to be diplomats would they want such types in their group?

We know the answer. They are all the same. They cover for each other. There is more to be uncovered.

We don’t have much time. We must turn our attention to Bilderberg, and how they all fit together.

We must join the pieces of the puzzle and expose their game of world enslavement.

They must and will be stopped.

In the clip below, please forgive the mechanical voice that was used. We should ask ourselves what we have to be afraid of. Why wouldn’t a real voice have been used?  Does it reflect our  fear in getting involved? Shouldn’t we be forthright in bringing truth?