Category Archives: Politics

Get this man a microphone, a megaphone, a radio or TV show, a spot on the NY Fed!

It all comes together: #occupywallstreet, where the shills come out to play

Ever have that moment when everything suddenly makes sense? All the dots that were still straggling come together to join the picture? The puzzle pieces that you thought were insignificant jump out and the pieces of the picture they represent just makes the whole thing complete?

 Well, it’s all happening now on Wall Street. The catalyst that will set the United States on the same path as Greece, Egypt, Syria, and Libya. It’s all coming down, and it’s coming down now. Did you say you want a revolution? Yeah, ah, we know, we all want to change the world. But, they know you want it, it’s now the mission to tell you all what you want.

For over two weeks people protesting in New York have noticed an incredible lack of mainstream reporting on their plight. The only real reporting it was noticed was the show of violence from the police to the innocents, the martyrs as many describe them. The poor ladies with pepper sprayed eyes from the white-shirted policeman who walked up from the crowd, unleashed the can, reholstered it, and walked away. Bizarre unless you figure it was all part of the theatre and the job to turn the protestors with no direction into the cause they wanted developed. Sure the pepper spray might have made people angry and more wanting to show up. And don’t think that isn’t the goal at this point.  Nothing like a little negative publicity spun to make the protesters look like they deserved the treatment.

 And, the coup de resistance, let’s tell the world they wanted to take over Brooklyn Bridge when we know that was a lie. More publicity, they must get the world to see their honesty, their struggle, but how? And just bear in mind the purveyors of false information reporting the story  – MSNBC. Keep that in mind, we”ll get back to it real soon.

 And eventually, when enough tired bodies yearned hard enough, when the lack of sleep would cloud better judgement — they would finally start to get the attention they so rightly deserved. Out of nowhere, the unlikely comrades would begin to parade around them in the big apple – - from Michael Moore, to Geraldo Rivera, to Chris Hedges, and Dylan Ratigan. And oh yeah, Dylan is from MSNBC, but suddenly can’t stop his conscience from telling him to jump and join his fellow man. Mhhh Mmmmm. What a mission folks, what a mission!

“I think you people are crazy”

Maybe that’s where Ratigan should have stopped. When he went on….

“I can’t believe I am here talking with you”

…it brings back memories of Glenn Beck when he said he could not believe he was doing this, exposing corruption (in the mainstream straddle the sheeple way of course). And when he drew attention to Obama on his Administration’s need to draw attention to his leadership with false flag terror, he probably went a little too far in the gaining credibility arena. What was interesting was his mention of “pressure from below”.

Pressure from below is what the co-opting of the #occupywallstreet movement is now all about. The shills in media are on an attack and mission to spin the disgruntled in America to the direction of attack on the upper middle class — those that own businesses and employ other people, to ensure the mutual self-destruction. As Alex Jones would put it, there will be burning homes in middle class neighbourhoods on the horizon.

So, how are they doing this co-opting?

Geraldo Rivera predicted they would come. “Others will follow if this sticks”, Rivera said.

 And come they are. Is Rivera a prophet, or part of Shill Inc., the arm of deceit otherwise known as the controlled media – - the spokespeople of sheeple control — the protectors of the true power brokers behind the Federal Reserve and other global central banking systems?  The ones that would ensure the world loses focus on the true enemy, and plunks their eyes firmly on themselves. The attack of one another with the latest goal to strip the remaining wealth against those that still employ people in the middle class. They would serve a mission to ensure the mutual destruction of the remaining free world, and Wall Street is now their playground.

It would be mainstream media and celebrities to the rescue with the attack, the game plan, and the singularity of purpose they needed.

Michael Moore on his visit and numerous support of the group wanted to ensure the focus was “capitalism” not the Federal Reserve and it’s owners.

Now, here are those waves of revelation. He creates the movie Sicko to show how bad the healthcare system in the U.S. is, and isn’t it thereafter we get the oppressive, insurance company written profit maker known as Obamacare? Hmmm….

Or how about that other of Moore’s gems where he wraps Wall Street in Crime Scene tape, and the nice officer he spoke to said it was okay, we are with you Michael. How nice. Now, the focus is on the evil Wall Street Empire.

We should not forget that bankers on Wall Street are like children given the opportunity to stay up late by their parents, the Federal Reserve and the corrupt in government controlled by the Federal Reserve. If I am saying Federal Reserve more than you think I should say Federal Reserve it’s because the point is the focus of the guilty should not be to blame the kids for bad behaviour, you need to look at the true power brokers. Should I say the name again?

And so, on and on we go, with the likes of more celebrated and documented visits from the shills.

We had Chris Hedges, ex NY Times give his take in a multi-part interview for which I had to turn off once he admitted that he believes “belief” is fantasy.

Yesterday, it was Dylan Ratigan of MSNBC. More focus on Wall Street and none on the Federal Reserve System. But have no fear, there is a counter-attack, refocus machine and his RV that plans to change all that.

The shills may come out of nowhere and do their thing.

It will take men the likes of Alex Jones to instill truth. And hopefully his tank is full, and his spirit is high:

The Secret of Oz

For the past week, you could watch the protestors occupy Wall Street.

Maybe this is the beginning of the U.S. insurrection against banker occupation, with a little occupation of their own.

You can visit them here (http://www.livestream.com/globalrevolution)

They have discovered the Secret of Oz, and they don’t like it. How about you?

 

 

Tony Gossling on operations ‘Gladio’

In this multi-part report, Tony Gossling discusses with his colleague the events of 7.7 and 9.11, and the name of the show says it best: “Now that’s weird”.

The facts surely are weird.

Gladio, is now the new term to describe an operation to effect an agenda, used by government to further their objectives, whatever they may be. False flag events can be classified as events of “gladio-proportion”.

Can we tie in the key points with the goal for new wars of occupation to take over the resources of the world as the US economy tanks?

Is Janet Napolitano’s “see something, say something” campaign suddenly taking on an ah ha meaning now that we see the evidence from Norway suggesting the blond haired, blue eyed guy next door is the new Al Qaida? Anders Breivik was the guy next door who bought a farm to get the fertilizer, to build a bomb, to go along with his two-gun purchase to terrorize Norway. Breath, breath breath……whooo. And he made sure he put it all in a manifest of suspect proportions. Like who does that?

Why is it there always seems to be evidence beforehand to warn those awake that something is coming.

While the Obama administration commented that they need a new “Oklahoma City” to further Obama’s approval rating, the warnings have always been there that governments throughout history have used what are called “false flag” events to further their goals.

This interview gives the points once again worth thought. And, you have been warned, once you start to think on your own, critically, you might become the new terrorist – - those who question and think, and ponder. Remember, you have been warned. Once transformed, according to a BBC reporter, you will not likely be able to return to your old life of trust, and you will be demonized.

The new terrorist is the guy next door!

Does Ron Stand Alone?

If you are an American, you might want to vote for Newt Gingerich because he likes American Idol. Can you relate?

If you are a Constitutionalist and believe that the rights and freedoms of Americans are under attack, then you might want to vote for Ron Paul. But don’t expect for the establishment to share your sentiment.

And, for the other GOP candidates, who among them would stand with Ron Paul? Who would want to reduce the war effort to near zero, attack the privately run Federal Reserve, go after Obamacare and go to a fully private system, reduce government interference in the free market to zero? Who would dare stand with Ron Paul?

In the clips below, let’s start with RT and Gerald Celente, and then move to the close, the GOP debate broadcast on CNN.

The best question John King asked the other night was who would Ron Paul have run with him? Paul was quick-witted and understanding enough to leave that to them.
After all, would the candidate look at the honor with pride or the kiss of political death? Who would dare take the real stand to address the issues that are wrong in the United States?

Does Ron Paul stand alone?

Once a Conspiracy theorist, no chance to be saved!

Funny thing about conspiracy theorists, they tend to never go back to their old life. We’ve heard that type of situation before. Those that are born again Christians tend to never go back to their old selves. Don’t get me wrong, they still sin, and are tempted to sin.

But let’s get back on point. The conspiracy people who don’t tend to go back to their old level of belief.

Interesting, that this is the belief of a BBC reporter, David Aaronovitch, that conspiracy theorists once “transformed” cannot be returned to their former selves. Effort therefore, must be put in to stopping them from crossing over to the other side, so to speak. And thus, the push to not discuss conspiracy theories like 9/11 and Bilderberg. Okay, now we get it.

I guess this kind of flies in the face of the hungry news hounds of old looking for the next great scoop. Now instead, the job is to explain away with some knowledge that it is no big deal, go away and don’t listen to conspiracy theory. It’s the new way to be a journalist.

It is interesting that these “reporters” have a certain level of knowledge when discussing the insignificance of these topics.

Let’s have a look at this first clip, on US Broadcaster, Fox News. Here, you will get the party line, but no explanation how the information was obtained. It was provided to these people no doubt by the network, and they are simply conveying it. How else would they be able to form an opinion unless they either a) actually did an investigative journalist job, or b) were handed over some info to convey as if they themselves figured this out on their own:

Laugh it up, the Bilderwindbags, as explained by one of the guests, go to these meetings out of an ego boost. Wow, you want to invite me to this expensive event, then I’m coming!

They are former this and former that? Worried about agreements they enter into?

We just need to give them less influence, says the lady on Fox. Right, but the point is they have influence. Easier said than done.

The ideas, once put on the floor of the House of Representatives will be shot down another guest claims. Checks and balances are in place? That’s it?

And on what information did you folks get the content for the discussion if it wasn’t important enough to investigate?

I wonder if they had a red flashing light in studio for the guests, “Laugh, laugh, laugh”. And on queue they all laughed. A little too much for credibility.

Now, an even more telling clip from BBC to downplay Bilderberg. But this one has the interesting point that ties the fact that conspiracy theorists are goners once they get these “false beliefs”.

Well, let’s think about this for a moment.

To become a conspiracy theorist you have to first, sheepishly go “into the closet” to study the evidence, and decide for yourself if the picture forming supports the “nutbags” or the media. Then, to come out of the closet and admit you are a conspiracy theorist would require you to have enough evidence to see a picture worth defending. And, then the realization that the only defense the media has against your belief is to try to make others see you as a nutbar, gone over the edge mentally unstable fellow (or gal).

So, the pattern would support that there must be a whole lot of evidence that the media would sooner not show.

It would seem that on slow newsdays, they would sooner report on shark attacks than why the most powerful and influential meet in private. They would sooner label those that look at things seriously with terms like “truthers”, “birthers” and the like. Did they think of a name for those that study the Bilderberg group yet? How about Bilderbergers? No, I guess that wouldn’t work.

Good analysis on this loaded clip from the BBC.

I suppose they would have us laugh it off, and not pay attention or wonder why Henry Kissinger would chance arrest for war crimes, to attend the “pipe smoking” good boys club. Insignificant to a point that is worth risking incarceration? Not really seeing that sorry media.

Nor am I seeing it when a prominent Swiss Politician, Dominic Baettig is concerned about Bilderberg and their policies. He can’t understand why his government would allow the Group to enter his country to discuss such things as abuse of the people of the world.

 

There are those who don’t like to admit they are on the official guest list who have deadly agendas. Like Bill Gates. He was spotted and photographed at Bilderberg 2011, but apparently was not on the list. Unlike the coming out Conspiracy theorist, who sees the information worth risking his reputation for, certain individuals would prefer to remain anonymous as they carry on their deadly agenda. Hate to spoil it for you, but the number that Gates says has to get close to zero is carbon. That would mean people must be reduced:

Some of the clowns of “Cirque de Bilderberg” in 2011

"Don't worry people, nothing to report here"

The above pic is from a German newspaper. It shows some of the attendees at this year’s Bilderberg meeting. Henry Kissinger is a regular attendee, and is wanted on charges of war crimes in Switzerland.

Earlier in the weekend, an emergency on an airplane was reported, where an ambulance showed up, but not before a red carpet was laid from the plane. The ambulance was later reported to be pulling into the hotel where the Bilderberg meeting was to take place. Could it have been a diversion for Kissinger to avoid Swiss authorities?

Some of the controlled-media headlines included such blatant opposites to reality as “May the Holy Spirit be with them”. Something tells me the Holy Spirit may be monitoring  them, but certainly not with them.

Fox News in the U.S. are reportedly telling viewers and listeners that it is no big deal that over 130 of the most powerful in the world are meeting in secret. And the little coverage they did have was meant to pacify those Fox-believers – - that have not taken a serious look at the issues, and who choose to believe what mainstream media feeds them.

But, not all in power see it that way. Yesterday, members of the Swiss Parliament were going to walk in on the Bilderberg party, and confront them, demanding for the arrest of Henry Kissinger wanted on charges of war crimes.

Today, at 12 PM Swiss time, there is an international protest rally scheduled, that you may be able to catch live at this JustinTV feed or this one.

This year’s Bilderberg meeting should prove to be the most controversial ever, as the world is catching on to the agenda, in direct contrast to the media’s feeble attempt to downplay the importance of the decisions made in secret, that control the goings on in our world.

Bilderberg 2011 from Switzerland

Live feed from Bilderberg

Choose a side, scum!

Oh, suck it up slave! We don’t want to listen to your “middle class” sniveling.

Violated? You ain’t seen nothing yet anarchist!

But thanks for showing up to the “show” because without you, we’d have looked pretty stupid.

Bob, did you get me throwing that scum in the back of the van? Do you think lots of people filmed it? Yeah, do you think it will end up all over you tube? Go viral? Awesome! Yeah, I pounded that slave, that conspiracy whackjob! Whoohoo!

Yeah, but Phil, did you catch how I hit the gas and sped away. Too bad that van didn’t have more power or I could have left some tread on the street. That would have looked cooler.

Canada, you have a choice. You can decide that you are okay, the rest are not, or you could decide you are no better than the rest of those losing wealth, with too much time on their hands.

“Those people” tend to drift to the internet to see what the heck happened. And with all that investigation, they get their minds all filled with knowledge and facts, and other nasty things. Then, they form an opinion, perhaps have waves of what they call “revelation”, and then they get a glazed look in their eyes.

Kind of like the Return of the Living Dead movies.

The Black Bloc in a show where the phone rings in the ambulance and the zombie says, “Send more Paramedics”. Yep, they’ve gone mad. Gotta stop ‘em zombie conspiracy dudes. More jails to contain these ‘problems’.

So choose Canada. Support the filling of the new jails that are to be built by our P.M. and his new majority or don’t.

And hang in there if your neighbor turns conspiracy zombie too. Don’t let it get to you. Hang on as long as you can.

This is a game, and whether you like it or not you are a player. But they need you to keep turning a blind eye to those that become whacky, and remember, they deserve what they get.

Harper wants to build more jails: Whoopie!

If you build it, they will come. If you build it, you will make sure you fill it. And, unfortunately, there is a new revelation that crime will be on the rise. The question is, what kind of crime? Is it time to make thought the new taboo worth being locked up for?

Go away conspiracy theorist!

Sure, you might have read the recent article in the May 23rd, 2011 edition of Maclean’s Magazine, on bin Laden and the ‘Culture of Conspiracy’. Ewwwww… which side are you on “Conspiracy Theorist“?

They’ll scrap the long-gun registry, and sign on for 65 F-35 fighter jets, and build a lot more jails.

Don’t question that move Canadian, unless you want to be a conspiracy theorist. Our leader has his majority now, so accept it, do not question, and hope all is good for a long, long time.

Obvious which side Maclean’s is on. But don’t let me tell you what to believe you conspiracy theorist, you dirtbag. You  who has lost your mind, perhaps your marriage, and is living now on donations! Don’t let me tell you what is politically correct, and what the majority is thinking; and if you think that way you must be becoming paranoid. No, don’t let me sway your decision to have a right to look into evidence and form an opinion.

Just know one thing conspiracy theorist – -what we want you to know — the moment, yes the very moment you start to pay attention to things around here that challenge the government or the governments of the world, and the very second you think for a milisec that the government may not tell you 100% truth, you are, dare I say, a full-fledged, whackjob conspiracy theorist! Okay?

Don’t pay attention to the fact that Anwar al_Awlaki dined at the Pentagon shortly after 9/11. Forget that, conspiracy theorist, and just tune-in to when the media says he is a huge threat, and Canadians are a threat too if they have any business with him. The Pentagon? Forget it, they are okay because they are the Pentagon. They are allowed to give the guy a dinner. If you did it – -  terrorist!

Don’t for God’s sake, look into the idea that al-Qaeda is a CIA creation. That would lead to more thought. And thought, well, that gets you into trouble my friend.

The key to staying in good stead is to not pay attention to anything except the official stories the governments tell you. Then you will be politically correct, stay off the watch lists, and not be a conspiracy theorist.

So go ahead, read the article in Macleans magazine  on the Culture of Conspiracy  (sorry, not yet available online!), and if you are smart, you will snub your nose at those that have gone from father, mother, architect, military official, doctor, and all other walks of “normal” life to the dark side. Yes, that’s what we’re talking about, the dark side of becoming a conspiracy theorist, because that explains the state of crazy mind of anyone that doesn’t believe that the government is good, and caring, and looking out for you. Remember the words of Glenn Beck, you are not one of those are you?

They are so caring that the Harper government is going to build more jails as a primary initiative now that most Canadians were trusting enough to vote for him, and give him the control he needs to implement that decision.

But when you starve the education system and the kinds of supports that build healthy families (definitely the first things chopped under conservative or right-wing governments) you’re going to get more social problems.

And while Dalton McGuinty has washed his hands of guilt for the injustice to Canadians rallying in protest to the banking system at the G20 meeting, McGuinty was quick to point to Harper. Hmm, the very same Harper that wants to build more jails. Hmmm, well what about more funding for student loans, healthcare, other things good for the Canadians that trust him? No, sorry folks, more jails is the priority.

And how did I know he wants to build more jails for the nasties in Canada?

Well, that’s easy, I read that article in Maclean’s before reading why a conspiracy theorist has lost his mind.

I just have one question and one worry. If I say Harper wants to build more jails, does that make me a conspiracy theorist?

And, I don’t know if this makes me a conspiracy theorist, but I do agree with the words eloquently pointed out:

So you need to build more jails. And if you build more jails, you need to find some way to fill them. Did you know the US spends more on jails than it does on education? That the state of California in the last decade laid off 10,000 teachers but hired 10,000 more prison guards?

Golly, and as I try not to think the way of the nasty conspiracy theorist, I can’t help but drift back into thinking that the article telling us it is dangerous politics to challenge a government, your government; that there is a chance that the new criminal may be a criminal of the mind — a thought criminal.

And, those thought criminals would not be cold blooded, maximum security types, but they could be the types that would have protested the “new world” as Harper has told us, that Canada has to give up it’s sovereignty because that’s just the way the world is now. What was that again? A global reality? Something like that.

Well, I can certainly see where a media source like Maclean’s would have to paint a picture of the new, low risk criminal worthy of jail space.

Those conspiracy theorists that pose a threat to government, who challenge the leaders whether they are truthful or not.

And remember, Maclean’s would like you to believe they are as “fair and balanced” as Fox News in the U.S.. Yep, they have not reported with a negative spin on conspiracy theorists before, nope, not a chance. Nope, they make sure they give you the facts without trying to shape your opinion with various hit pieces over time. Because, if they did that, they would be challenged on their motives, and might be questioned on who they serve.

Those nasty conspiracy theorists might form a group called people for media truth or some such thing.

Don’t question media Canada, no more so than questioning government. Take both as 100% gospel truth. And, those jails you will simply drive by, not occupy.

And that would go double for journalists turned conspiracy theorists that don’t buy everything the government tells them too. Too bad, they could have been a contenda!

I wonder if some reporters for Maclean’s were treated poorly at the G20 too. Just wondering, because they may be creating a nightmare for themselves too. Just a thought.