In 2011, an email from Calgary was sent to Hamilton City Council urging them to cease fluoridation in water after Calgary had made the decision to do so in 2011. Part of this material contained a Tribune article from Mesa, AZ which has Limeback answering why he had a change of heart, after being a strong fluoride proponent at the start.
Of the speakers mentioned in the Hamilton Spectator article we reported on – - Dr. Chris Mackie (Associate medical officer of health), Dr. Arlene King (Ontario Chief medical officer of health), and Dr. Peter Cooney (Health Canada chief dental officer), again, it cannot be stressed enough the names of the speakers who were absent from the Spec article – - chiefly, Dr. Paul Connett.
Does Alan Watt have a point in his suggestion that they parade the names and titles out to you in an effort to comfort the public, and have us go back to sleep?
The so called experts are the only ones you need to hear about people, come on! The others? They are just nutjob conspiracy theorists – - no need to hear their side of the argument. If we linked their names to their websites, you would just get confused and we don’t want you to pay attention and actually think. So, go back to sleep public while we mess with your mind, and give you only the names of the pros who know how to look out for you.
You have been conditioned to accept these leaders as right, and everyone else is an anarchist.
Come on, the expert told you the fluoride is at “safe levels” so what are you worried about. We’d tell you if it was at unsafe levels, so go back to your work, and leave the big boy studies and regulations to us.
Okay, let’s have a look at the arguments, in brief.
Dr. Chris Mackie didn’t seem to have too much evidence, but mentioned over and over again that there has been “research on safety”. He even put this paper out to suggest fluoride is great for teeth and they should have annual reporting at the Municipal level (what a comfort!), and I suppose he is saying by ingesting it into the body, it will somehow be beneficial for teeth. Where’s the evidence to support this? We know where there is plenty of evidence that is ongoing to refute it.
Dr. Arlene King stated that there were 90 national and international studies to support that drinking water is safe.
So, I suppose the facts presented in this video are wrong?:
Dr. Peter Cooney informed that Health Canada did a peer reviewed study in 2006 that suggested that there was no conclusive evidence to suggest health issues as a result of fluoride, and went on to state the healthy range that is in the water, specifically stating that there is 1.5 mg per litre of water in Canada.
Logically, would a safe level for a baby be the same safe level for an adult?
By Dr. Cooney’s argument of safe levels, is he suggesting that too much, beyond the safe level would be unsafe? What about the accumulation effect in the body? Why would fluoride in the blood stream be beneficial for teeth? And, have they really done adequate study to ensure what happens to the human body?
The anti-fluoride side would seem to have arguments that paint a different picture
Shane Coleman of the Hamilton Farmers Market pointed out that there seems to be a lack of “Safety Data Sheets”, but what is listed as “DSL” is known to be toxic.
Cindy Mayor of fluoridefreehamilton.ca emphasized the concern of Peel Region and their investigation, and questioned why Health Canada was present at the meeting, as they have no jurisdiction to determine if fluoride is present in municipal water supplies. Is there a national mandate and goal to promote fluoride use?
And then, Dr. Paul Connett came to the podium to state a little bit of what he has researched over the years. Connett pointed out that there has been a lack of investigation in Canada to prove or disprove the lowering of IQ, behavioural issues, bone fracture, hyper thyroidism, or Alzheimers disease to the fluoride.
Where there is plenty of evidence to support these findings, Connett pointed out Canada has not done anything to ensure they are not having ill health effect on Canadians.
Again, interesting to ask why Health Canada came in to the Hamilton debate on fluoride.
One thing I forgot to mention earlier is that I sent a link to my original article to Emma Reilly (erielly@thespec.com) on April 17th, after reading her reporting.
It should be noted that the Hamilton Spectator is owned by the same corporation that owns the Toronto Star, and we can certainly say they are aware of the evidence that goes beyond what the experts in Health Canada and the Provinces have to say.
Perhaps it is time that they inform the public, as we do in alternative media, that there are two sides to a debate. Showing one only may be construed as a means to influence the public to view one side as more credible.
And that, in the opinion of Alan Watt, would be leading the people to the desired goal. And, that would not be too nice, now would it?
If you have, you may have noticed that the fresh mind makes certain assumptions. Driving is a battlefield where expectations can come back to haunt you in a heartbeat:
I thought he was going to stop
I didn’t realize the driver wasn’t paying attention
He should not have cut me off
I didn’t know she couldn’t see me
And on and on we go…..
Assuming, as so eloquently put makes an “ass” out of “u” and “me” (ass-u-me).
In driving it can wreck your car, cause bodily harm, and create financial and other issues, especially if the accident is severe enough to affect your quality of life, or ability to work, and earn an income.
So, it would be prudent to understand that “assuming” something is not a good idea, and can put you at risk.
Let’s take this principle to what we have all around us in the world today. What could be more important than the issues of freedom, liberty, of corruption, lies, deceit and potential criminality in high places.
Through the following series of videos, we are going to take a look at aspects of current events that have missed the radar of mainstream media. And, the question you must ask yourself first is why?
The next question you should ask is should I assume that the reason they are missing the beat in mainstream press and TV is because they are non-issues, or is there some other reason “news” of this magnitude and importance is absent?
Could mainstream media be covering up truths or important issues because of the people they serve? And, logically, you should not assume that news is impartial and not biased. If you believe in politics in the fundamentalist of examples, take a look at kids’ sports as a glaring example to prove it isn’t what you know, it’s who you know. Or in the case of crony capitalism, it’s who strokes your campaign, or business, and how you suck up to those in power to get favor. But that gets us ahead of ourselves here. Back to the issue of what’s reported in the news, and if people for the most-part trust what they read in the paper or see on T.V.
To test my theory that big important issues that are taboo are off the radar of most, I asked a group of family members if they knew there might be impeachment proceedings in the offing for U.S. President Barack Obama over his eligibility as president. The absence of valid birth records and answering to the U.N. not congress to justify war should have been a massive elephant in the room, but not too many were aware in the slightest these were in the works.
Most people would sooner assume what’s not right in their face can’t be significant, and any “conspiracy theory” outside the mainstream must be nutty and not true. It is easier to assume the powers that be are looking out for our best interest, and they have no ill harm towards us.
Don’t rock my view of the world as presented to me sir – - it’s just fine the way it is
Or, put another way
It hasn’t affected me, I don’t care, and what are you going to do about it anyway?
Take a look and listen to this clip with the “no spin” Bill O’Reilly, and his reasoning for not covering any kind of investigation on the Obama birth certificate issue:
Two separate birth announcements in Hawaii is good enough for Bill O’Reilly. And those, he should “assume” are proof positive of a natural born U.S. birth? Better yet, that is supposed to have you side with the man that you have watched for years as Mr. No Spin – - the guy that is hard hitting, and in your face. (No, not the guy who really does that – - Sorry Christopher Greene for the use of your phrase with O’Reilly in the same breath).
Perhaps then, by O’Reilly’s logic, we should just need to produce newspaper clippings to support our own birth, and birth certificates and other information should not be required when obtaining driver’s licenses, passports, or becoming a leader of a country. No spin Mr. O’Reilly? In the words of your friend Glenn Beck, “really?”.
If that was the case, they wouldn’t be groping us, and certainly not our kids at airports, nor would they be suggesting you snitch on your neighborhood Wal Mart shopper as a potential terrorist. Interesting to note, in Nazi Germany, only 15 % of all arrests were as a result of true police work. The majority (85%) were because someone was suspected of wrongdoing and snitched upon by a neighbor, or friend, or family member. Evidence wasn’t necessary or sought after. They were looking for excuses to lock people up. And in Canada, with lowering crime rates, the Harper government’s mandate is also to lock as many away as possible without hope of rehabilitation, parole, and other means to put people back into society who have paid the price. And, to justify the new prisons, the introduction of Bill C-10, the omnibus crime bill.
It’s only the jews and Gypsies they are taking away honey, we are good….doesn’t affect us. Trust the government dear. They must have a reason to take those people away, and lock them up.
It has to start with some excuse, and then gets a little bigger and bigger, and finally, we are all subject to tyranny. Sorry, not a word you heard in the news lately? Me bad!
So you could assume what they tell you is for the benefit of mankind, and not see it as a means to work toward the politically dissident types.
Bill C-10? Yes, that is for the victims of child pornography, and to lock up those nast drug dealers, keeping them from affecting society. Yes, it’s justifiable.
Could it be a first step along the Nazi German handbook to strip people of rights, and control those opposed to whatever the government wants to do to it’s citizens. But what if your assumption gives way too much credit for honesty, and doesn’t look at the big picture with clarity?
Now, O’Reilly cites the first reason that he has not looked at the birth issue for Obama as being important, was his reasoning that Sheriff Arpaio had no real evidence. Okay, let’s take a look at what he has:
Having seen this, how’s the excuse of a couple of newspaper birth announcements sounding now?
What are the implications of this alleged identity fraud? What possible inferences would this have to suggest there is more beneath the surface of how a President gets elected? Should you continue to assume that the powers that be are honest, looking out for your best interest, and fair?
Turning now to financial corruption, Mark Melin (Uncorrelated Investments) asks the very important question: Has the MF Global fiasco exposed the “Damnation of the U.S. Financial Industry”?
Before Mark has his 15 minutes with Max Keiser, please note the first segment also explains the state of many in the U.S. – - the “Unbanked” – - those without a bank account, credit, or means to grow financially.
The roots of the takeover of the financial sector were well served when Larry Summers apparently talked Bill Clinton into repealing that silly Glass-Steagall Act. I guess we can either look at Clinton as “assuming” it was not important and trusting Summers, or if you were to dig deeper, way beneath the surface of mainstream media, you would find that there is far more to his ties to the dark side.
But, if you didn’t want to be bothered, and still chose to trust the system and the people elected as, gosh, golly, gee, shucks, nice people, this little show you love so much would have you going out and buying a Clinton dolly to place on your bed:
We will have more to say on this, but I will leave you with this. The more you bypass mainstream press, the less you assume, and the more you dig for facts, the greater the chance you will critically measure the news you see, and the more likely you will be to seek the reason they don’t tell you everything.
There is not much to be added to this article, so well written in Feb 2010 by the Canada Free Press.
Our PM used to believe in balanced budgets but something changed.
Solidarity has been replaced with Harper’s “new reality” that the world is now a global economy, and well, sovereignty must be reshaped to take into account the fact that the world will impact Canada, and we really don’t have freedom any more. As if we ever really did.
We have been living in an illusion that the Queen is a mere figurehead that we get to see once in a while — like a passing celebrity worth making a trip to gaze upon. But, there is a nasty underbelly to a beast that professes that the “waging of peace” is the hardest form of leadership of all.
The minions are all toeing the New World Order party line, whether because they have been blackmailed or paid off; whether they truly believe that Lucifer is the bringer of light, or whether Moloch holds merit. This might explain why abortion is now being justified for kids as old as three. You heard that right, there are scholarly papers suggesting these humans are not yet people. And, no, I am not making this up.
Whatever the reason, they have collectively bought into collectivism, and the view that the herd of humanity must first be culled and then put to work for the new god — the earth and sun.
Should you pick up a Bible, you may find the stories of idol worship hard to digest, unless you realize mankind has not changed in thousands of years.
Wars have taken place throughout history, and inhumanity has not ceased. Yet, we have fooled ourselves into thinking we have learned our lesson.
And so, the powers that be feed us that boogie men exist when they are likely already dead. From Osama bin Laden, buried at sea, conveniently just after a helicopter full of witness Navy Seals mysteriously crashed. And bin Laden’s replacement, Kony, to justify the reason for the invasion and occupation of Africa. After all, you have to want it for it to be okay with them. Yeah, get that nasty Kony, we don’t care how many innocent people must die. Sure, send in predator drones wiping out hundreds of civilians because you say there is a bad guy in their midst. Good enough for us.
It sure smacks of marketing to manipulate the masses to stay of the trail, while they have their way with the free world. Are you one of those buying their boogie man stories?
Are you aware from watching North American media that there is actually a current push to impeach Obama? Of course the answer would be no if you got your news from the truth tellers of Fox, MSNBC, or CNN.
It might be too hard to grasp that they are all controlled and are trying to control you as their mandate. Bill O’Reilly is “too busy” to care about the vast evidence that has backed up Michelle Obama’s admission that they visited the home of Obama in Kenya — the home of his birth.
Layers photoshopped producing the fabricated birth certificate have no place in Bill O’Reilly’s mind, when he has witnessed some much more credible birth announcements. He bashes Obama as a front, but when the rubber meets the road, too busy is the reason for not delving deeper. Reminiscent of his fellow truth teller, Glenn Beck, who calls truthers of 911 no better than Van Jones, and to birthers, well, you know. The rubber doesn’t meet the road, but the controlled opposition sure exists to make you believe you are on the conservative side, yeah.
They advertise no spin, when apparently they are all spun themselves.
So, without further adieu, here is an article that needs a second and third read. Why Harper has sold out his country. I hope he can live with himself.
Remember Canada, our PM wants us to know it’s the less invasive “global governance”, not “global government” that should have you duped into acceptance. Are you buying the difference and the con job?
Ron Paul hounded while Scandal that undermines Santorum’s “family values” swept aside
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, January 9, 2012
While the establishment media has ceaselessly smeared Ron Paul for the controversial content of decades-old newsletters that were not even written by him, the comparatively shocking scandal of Rick Santorum having sponsored alleged child molester Jerry Sandusky has been almost universally ignored.
Santorum, who has cultivated an image as a clean-cut social conservative trumpeting family values, nominated Sandusky for a “Congressional Angels in Adoption Award,” after Sandusky had already been accused of at least five cases of child molestation.
“Its philosophy is simple,” said Santorum of Sandusky’s charity, “It is easier to develop a child than to rehabilitate an adult.”
“Since the scandal broke into the news, Santorum has been circumspect in his comments about it. He has said he does not know Sandusky personally,” the Philadelphia Inquirer reported back on November 9.
Following the revelation of the charge that a Penn State graduate assistant spotted Sandusky allegedly anally raping a young boy in a shower and then told head football coach Joe Paterno, Santorum defended Paterno, who did not inform the police of the alleged incident.
Despite Santorum’s surge before last week’s Iowa Republican primary that enabled him to virtually tie with Mitt Romney in first, the establishment media has uniformly failed to highlight how his sponsorship of Sandusky underscores Santorum’s hypocrisy when it comes to “family values”.
On the other hand, Congressman Ron Paul has been hounded by the media for weeks about the contents of decades-old newsletters that were not even written by him.
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
Almost every day, the corporate media contrives to manufacture a new smear against Ron Paul – today it’s the ludicrous claim that Paul was to blame for having to abandon a meet and greet at a New Hampshire diner after the media itself caused a fracas.
And yet establishment candidates such as Santorum and Romney have virtually been given a free pass despite their past associations and policies being far more odious and abhorrent to conservative values than Paul, who has the most conservative voting record in Congress.
“Why has Rick Santorum not been questioned about his connections and support of Jerry Sandusky?,”asks the Daily Paul.
“Ron Paul overlooked a couple sentences that went into his newsletter decades ago, and has been scrutinized and questioned repeatedly about it for the last 14 years.”
“So why not the same scrutiny for Santorum’s sponsorship of Sandusky to receive the congressional angels in adoption award? Paul has disavowed anything to do with the racism that appeared in his newsletter which he never knew about, but we still haven’t heard if Santorum disavows his outright honor of Sandusky.”
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infiowars Nightly News.
Seemed crazy it did that the Bloc Québécois wanted to get elected in the national elections in order to separate Quebec from Canada. Ridiculous you might say. Of course, they never got their way, largely because they made no bones about their agenda. Their mandate never seemed to make any sense. But don’t let their confused honesty fool you. The world of politics in Canada is far from what most believe.
We all knew using a national election for provincial needs was ludicrous. But what about using a national election to further the cause of globalization and complete lack of democracy? Would that be any nuttier?
Harper used the promise of sovereignty to win a majority in this election. The problem is, he has repeatedly told Canada we have no real sovereignty.
But, the only way he was to ensure a majority and win the national election in Canada was to appear patriotic. Wave the flag, even though your past actions have suggested Canada should be patriotic, at the same time as telling Canada that there is a new reality; that Canada is part of a global economy; a reality that means we have to give up our sovereignty.
Now, had Stephen Harper been as brazen as the Bloc in Quebec, he might have come out and said that he wants Canada to give up it’s sovereignty and join a North American Union, leading to the new global government model when enough pain has been dished out. And that would be a bottom line of losing our political process, to go the way of the European Union, where democracy has been replaced by a “corporate-like” autocracy.
There are no true democratic elections to decide the leaders in Europe, it is simply a board of directors appointing their lackies to follow the bigger agenda, regardless if the people want it or not.
Would Harper have gone by way of Iggy and the Liberals if presented his platform that way?
Now, let’s look at a film that is well done, and well worth the two hours it will take to watch. It’s called the Global Hostile Takeover, and it paints a picture based on fact that irrefutably brings home the mission that has transcended party lines, countries, and perceived differences.
It shows a mission that may make you have that ah ha moment when you realize they are taking away our prosperity, and shaking the foundation of our security with the resurrection of the Al-Qaeda threat.
All part of creating the two problems before they roll out the solution. The first, your prosperity and financial wealth is under attack. Second, your safety will be challenged with the promise of more terror attacks. Goodbye security.
Hence, the Security and Prosperity Partnership rolled out in Canada first by Paul Martin, and then furthered by Harper with Bush’s support, not to mention Mexico, was designed as the solution to the created problems that we are witnessing today. Boy, they sure knew what was coming, didn’t they?
It may leave you wondering if those conspiracy people had a point after all. When they told you of the problem-reaction-solution nature of the globalists ploy to create problems, watch the people squirm, and then come in as the heroes, you might realize that the events that have taken place the world over are absolutely no random acts – - oh the contraire — this has all been planned a long time ago, and is just being unraveled as we watch the horror of the globalists’ current panic.
The bin Laden hoax has had many lies and inconsistencies and backtracking to cover lies. It is horrifying not so much because it is a government caught in a lie, but what it represents and clarifies.
The Bush Administration working with the current Obama Administration, working with leaders the world over to support a lie, to further wars and occupations; to give excuse to get at Pakistan, and one step closer to disaster.
The bin Laden “going for broke” announcement is the globalists playing the joker card, and proving there is no turning back now. The Jeannie is out of the bottle, the full circle effect of 9/11 is going to give some more people the realization that the globalists pulled off 9/11, the ensuing Patriot Act, and are part of something purely sinister.
But if you haven’t got the big picture yet, here’s a great place to start:
Preparing "20 minutes" : the result of much research and thought
I want to throw this out there because rumor has it there are many that know Charlie Sheen’s famous phrase, “Winning, duh!”, but don’t know where it came from.
Fair enough, you too can say “really” when you realize that his problems and the vilification of the mainstream media and entertainment industry all started when he questioned 9/11. No, check that, when Sheen started to flex his knowledge muscle on 9/11 let’s say it that way instead.
Mr. Sheen is a brave man that knew vilification would come. But, he is a Sheen after all. Damn the torpedoes attitude. Nothing to prove has he. No reason to care if anyone likes him, hates him, or is indifferent.
I asked a family member who knew someone that went to the recent Charlie Sheen torpedo of truth event.
I asked what Charlie talked about. When she didn’t know I realized that more people need to know the reason Charlie has been placed under the popularity heat lamp is because he did ask for an investigation into the events of 9/11.
I wonder what he thinks of the ninth time Osama bin Laden, the CIA asset has been used as a scapegoat and killed. Interestingly, he likely died of a weird disease in 2002, not related to the kidney disease he had, but more deadly.
They had to use his death as a means to concoct the villian of 9/11.
With no body, no pictures, and inconsistent stories, the full circle lie is coming around to rear it’s true ugliness.
We need more Sheens to bring it to the surface. Damn that torpedo of truth is a good idea!
Of course, that would be in direct contradiction to those experts that predict soaring gold and silver as the dollar continues to deflate with quantitative easing.
Have they shaken your tree yet? Are you feeling that what evidence you have witnessed of late that supports a picture of corruption has suddenly tainted and perhaps been wrong? Well, hold on, there’s more they want to show you. And, it all ties in to the war on terror and the fact that the wicked old man is dead. Osama (Usama) bin Laden is no more.
Last night, CNN poured it on and while reporting the death of bin Laden, they strategically slipped in the notion that the Pakistani government will have a lot of explaining to do. After all, bin Laden was found in a region of the country that they should have known he was there. Will this be the start of more propaganda to support further occupations of the Middle East?
This morning on Fox News, the further suggestion that information was obtained from interrogation at Guantanamo Bay countered the criticism that Obama dropped the ball on promises to close Gitmo, as one of his key election platforms.
And while it seems assemblies in the U.S. that protest the government are becoming a risky proposition, the show of youth at the White House last night at midnight was telecast as a great show of patriotism. No police in sight! It’s okay to support what they want supported, just don’t assemble in protest.
“We are at war with radical Islam” was echoed on Fox News this morning before 8:30 AM EST.
Yes, it’s time to bring it all home with news of a man blamed for terrorism.
It is also time to kill criticism of the American government in the process.
They are rolling out reactions from George Bush, Dick Cheney, even Geraldo Rivera. And interesting that the latter would show his joy, as he famously not long ago was agreeing with some of the victims families on their “Building What” Campaign to bring further awareness that Building 7 came down in it’s own fottprint at freefall speed. This of course, dispelled the myth that the families of 9/11 wanted closure and the stoppage of the 9/11 truth movement, which included archtects and engineers for 9/11 truth.
For those of us skeptical to the ploy of mainstream media as a tool of globalist propaganda, we would have noticed the “talking points” and the way they have been used to create doubt in the minds of those yet undecided. Some of these include:
bolster the political process as valid, tying in both the Republican (Bush) administration of the past, with the Obama administration, and “what were you thinking” if you doubted them on their mission against terror,
open up the war on terror as a focal point, and to warn that there will likely be retaliation by Al Qaeda and it’s supporters,
to further the reason for Guantanamo Bay to remain a viable resource for counter-terrorism,
to support the Patriot Act, and the right-stripping powers of the Federal Government to detain without reason (You can disappear and they do not have to account for you),
to bolster Obama’s image as a leader going into the next election,
to create division amongst the American people as true Patriots will be pitted against those that believe the mainstream media’s current account of 9/11 and bin Laden’s role,
to further take blame for 9/11 away from being an inside job to put it back on the shoulders of bin Laden and Al Qaeda,
to create confusion in the minds of those that didn’t believe the official story of 9/11, and those that were questioning their government(s),
a psy-op (psychological operation) to confuse and separate the power of the people who are “awakening” to a different reality than that presented and supported by the mainstream press,
to take the minds of the American people off the collapsing of the economy and onto “patriotism” despite their economic woes,
to further funding at the expense of the economy to the military industrial complex, and the war on terror
The fact that this opens the door for more globalist (U.N. directed) occupation of the Middle East is of grave concern. Enemies will be everywhere in the eyes of the governments and will be reflected in mainstream media.
There is a war ongoing – - the war of perception designed to confuse and pit man against man – within countries and abroad.
“We got the guy” Fox News reported this morning. I suppose it’s that simple. It’s us against them.
For those of us that have looked at the evidence, this is simply another sign that there is a growing campaign to stop people from defending themselves, create confusion, and panic in all things that would otherwise lead to freedom and independence.
Whether it would be by buying hard assets like gold and silver to protect our wealth, to trying to wake up our friends and neighbours to the evidence that cannot be refuted.
What may have shocked some of us is the reaction of those that would choose to listed to mainstream media and not their own family. But don’t take it personally. It is more a reflection of denial and fear, and wanting to believe the world is not what it might be. Hopefully, we can still save some from the fate of the system we have all been subjected to from cradle to grave.
