Tag Archives: Bettman

Bettman: “..the situation is far too serious for such game play”

Barry Goldwater can rest peacefully knowing his vision may expose the con of another hidden agenda, ulterior motive

It was a tough decision. Do I go with the above quote for the title of this article, or do I use the other equally interesting and loaded quote of Mr. Gary Bettman, ” I quite frankly don’t know who the people there report to or accountable to”.

Well, one thing is clear, they don’t answer to the same people Mr. Bettman answers to, and they aren’t concerned about anything other than making sure the taxpayers aren’t getting the shaft. I can see how that could get confusing for some people.

For Olsen of the Goldwater Group a private meeting wasn’t enough sweet battatas. Bettman  did  not want to do a joint press conference.

Darcy Olsen, head of the Goldwater Group, can probably see when a payoff is sweet. Come on to a press conference with me Mr. Bettman, she must be thinking to herself. Let’s tell the good people what’s really up. It’s probably like when you get to work in the morning, and the 60 Minutes news crew is waiting in your office. Oh, dang!

The issue he was addressing Tuesday night was the Goldwater Group’s insistence to stick to their principles; their mandate to protect the taxpaying public.

Uh oh! Can you see the wheels spinning folks? Do you think the “game” is being called by the Goldwater Group? Have the shenanigans of the NHL and their urban development deck of cards been met by the windstorm so to speak? Is it all ready to blow over, becoming exposed?

When Gary Bettman served Jerry Moyes proxies for the league’s assistance, he told Ron McLean on HNIC that it was to stop him from doing anything radical.

Let’s think for a moment. If this league had nothing to hide, why would there be need for proxies from the Commissioner to one of the “partners” in the club that supposedly should be privy to the privilege of deciding where arenas get built, etc, etc? Would the rules be have been different for Jerry Moyes because he wasn’t in on the “development pie”?

Was Quebec City and Winnipeg told to build new arenas or we’ll send one of the teams to Phoenix where they were never sure hockey in 105 degree heat would really heat up? Why take hockey away from hockey-crazed Canadians and see if it works in the deep south, for no better reason that I can think of, than to look for the City willing to sell out to urban development?

There’s a sucker born every minute you know. The real sales job was finding that sucker, and they did in the City of Glendale. The NHL has contributed to building a deck of cards, and the only way to keep everyone happy is to continue to build.

They may have lost focus on the fans.

It would sure explain why hockey went where hockey is not popular. Why the bottom teams have to suck off the fat of where true profits lie — in the great White North (cu-loo-coo-cu-cu-coo-cu-coo!). Why the teams in the south will always need approved welfare. Where it made no sense to most of us, it makes perfect sense, in the sense, that it may never have been about hockey operations making a profit on pure hockey operations.

Where owners were truly not happy with just getting in the green because ticket sales were greater than player salaries. The salary cap is a joke.

And so, Tuesday night, Commissioner Bettman had his bluff called. The Goldwater Group wants to air to the world, without ability to read well-written speeches, that they believe this sports league has overstepped its bounds and is taking advantage of the residents and taxpayers of a City.

The Goldwater Group knows exactly what it has here.

Ironically, we laughed at the City of Glendale’s seemingly feeble legal team and argument in court. Glendale likely laughed at Goldwater.

Who’s laughing now?

To close, let’s watch the low-key Mr. Bettman tell Edmonton why they need to cough up the big tax bucks. And for God’s sake, is he trying the “sustainability as a franchise” garbage still in Canada – - the home of hockey? Surely Mr. Bettman is aware that argument is wearing thin! And Bettman has the gall to hold the card that he will pull the plug on the Oilers if a new arena is not built??! Not a threat, eh?

So where does he propose to build the next white elephant instead?!

Where is the priority? Putting hockey where market demands, or is the real money in land and urban development? It’s time we take that to a “press conference” of the NHL. The sooner the better, for the sake of the fans and the game!

It’s quite baffling how he admits the truth, but in a way that has most of us buying into the con. Is he ready to air to the world all the evidence to show who holds bonds behind the scenes, and open up the books to the profits that surround the game? Didn’t think so!

We could look at the comment that the Coyotes were never in jeopardy, and the notion was silly, when you factor in the true source of revenues. Silly us – - the taxpayers were going to pay the freight for the true “revenue streams”, right Mr. B? Masterful means to tell us the truth while we were sleeping. A marvel!

Game over Gary! Game on Canada!

Stopping the unstoppable fight!

For the bullet summary, please go here. To contact your MP regarding the Veto issue, please go here.

Thanks again to the panel at the Make it Seven roundtable rant page for digging deep. Patrick Romanoski, Gregory Galante, Jay Martin, Joe Smith, Bryan Kirkham,Ken Connolly, Corey Schlueter, Aaron Mernick, Wade Tiefenbach,  Jennifer Zarull, and if I have missed anybody, don’t worry , it won’t be because I wanted to, but I will find you! Insight abounds, and is making this summary very easy indeed.

Wind them up and watch them go!

Wind them up and watch them go!

Have you ever had a chance to play the ‘Lemmings’ computer game? I remember one Christmas, they had a version on the internet with little Santa Lemmings, all decked out. You had to build certain paths that kept them safe, and if you didn’t, they didn’t have enough sense to save themselves. Set them on the wrong path, and they’d fall off the edge of a cliff, one after the other, with no ability or concern for trying to find a solution on their own.

To me, the National Hockey League, it’s executive, and employees responsible for trying to stop Jim Balsillie, are acting like those Lemmings. No matter what happens, they continue on the path over the virtual cliff, with no apparent consideration for the ridiculouslness of their own actions. With no apparent concern for the ramifications or long term consequences of what lies ahead.

And, with the changing of the guard in the NHLPA, the writing is becoming even more quickly apparent. There is a mutiny on the bounty in the works.

Can we figure the Lemmings will figure that out? Or, are they headed for the cliff with the same speed as ever?

Part of the problem with the NHL head office, is the arrogant attitude that self policing has earned them. They like to not be told what to do, and they intend on keeping it that way.

Well again, the people ‘they’ serve, the players and the fans are starting to voice an undying opinion that ‘we aren’t going to take it anymore’.

There is a mutiny in the works. Can anybody see it?

Let’s begin with material readily available for fan and player consumption. The depositions of Bill Daly, Gary Bettman, and Craig Leipold.

To start, Mr. Daly…

In deposition, Bill Daly had made a very confident statement  regarding his comments made on May 7th, 2009:

Daly: "We don't usually like to pick fights, but we end them."

Daly: "We don't usually like to pick fights, but we end them."

Reiterated comment from Daly of May 7th :

“Mr. Balsillie is acting again in total disregard of any rules or any structure, I’d be very surprised if the Board would look favorably on the way that Mr. Balsillie has conducted himself in this instance.”

Question from counsel: “Did you make that statement?”

Daly: “Yes, I did.”

And, another quote that Bill Daly had made:

“He makes his own decisions. And he’s making a decision that this is the way he wants to get into the National Hockey League. We don’t usually like to pick fights, but we end them.”

Now, the obvious question to Mr. Daly is, ‘how would you propose to end this fight?’

Let us guess.

You would, as league officials do ANYTHING necessary to end this fight?

After all, Jim Balsillie has decided how he is going to enter the National Hockey League, and Mr. Daly is of obvious opinion that Mr. Balsillie does not have the right to exercise his rights to use legal processes to do just that.

Would that be accurate?

It might even give league officials enough willpower to decide to structure ‘an attack’ to counter this man who does not listen to the league and it’s rules.

Would there be motive to alter and withhold information to suit the needs of a league desperate to stop a man with strong will?

The deposition of Bill Daly continued…..

Q from counsel: “Mr. Daly, are you familiar or did you see the various Kroll Reports that were prepared on Mr. Balsillie?”

Daly: “I’m familiar with them.”

Q: “Have you seen them?”

Daly: “I’ve seen them physically, but I can’t tell you – other than potentially skimming them, I didn’t read them in any great detail.”

Q: “Do you know why there are different versions of the report prepared, one on June 15th, which was of James Balsillie and Heidi Balsillie, and then one on July 23rd, which is just of James Balsillie, and yet another on of July 21st, which was a separate memorandum to Mr. Zimmerman? Do you have understanding of why there are different versions floating around?”

Daly: “No”

Q: “Were you involved in any discussions about taking materials in the Kroll Report out or including some materials in the Kroll Report?”

Daly: “No”

Q: “Do you know why the Kroll Reports were not given to the executive committee or to the Board of Governors before making their decision?”

The document cuts off before we get Mr. Daly’s answer. How appropriate that mishap is. What do you suppose his answer was? Tough one?

Anyhow, May 7th and already directing a bias toward the Board of Governors. Perhaps enough of a bias to ensure the Board members are not given a clear, unbiased amount of information to make a good decision on Mr. Balsillie?

I think Mr. Daly had better take a very important fact into consideration. It isn’t his hide on the line should the Board members be held accountable as directors and league authorities. It is the directors. Nice to be making decisions for them, if that is the case.

On to Mr. Bettman……

In his deposition, Gary Bettman starts to wash his hands. This should be a huge red flag to the Board of Governors, and I will explain more as we go along.

As an employee of the National Hockey League, Gary Bettman reports to the Board of Governors. The problem with any leader reporting to the Board, is the fact that Board Members tend to take the direction of the leader (commissioner in this case), and don’t necessarily ensure they understand all the liability and problems that they, not the commissioner is going to be held accountable for.

So, for Gary Bettman to advise the court what comes next is a key warning to those Board members that you had better obtain good counsel of your own, or it’s their  (Board members) collective and individual hides on the line.

On to the point.

In the deposition, Gary Bettman discussed article 4:

Q: “Is it correct that any ammendment of article 4 has to be evidenced by an instrument in writing signed by all members of the league?”

Bettman: "I have on repeated occasions advised the Board that there's an aspect of article 4 of the constitution which is unenforceable and will not be applied."

Bettman: "I have on repeated occasions advised the Board that there's an aspect of article 4 of the constitution which is unenforceable and will not be applied."

Bettman: “Not necessarily”

Q: “Not necessarily. And why would that be?”

Bettman: “Well, there are a couple of reasons. One, when you’re referring to article 4 of the constitution, it needs to be reconciled with bylaw 36; and secondly, I have on repeated occasions advised the Board that there’s an aspect of article 4 of the consitution which is unenforceable and will not be applied.

 Is Gary Bettman saying his only obligation is to advise the perhaps stubborn Board members that there are aspects of the constitution that are unenforceable? Is this a ‘washing of his hands’ and responsibility? Would Gary Bettman be better advised to inform the Board that in the current form the constitution is flawed and creates a great potential liability to the members of the Board?

Gary Bettman was under oath. He likely knew there were questions and a line of questioning that would implicate him responsible. What does he choose to do? He washes his hands and defers responsibility to the Board he serves. Board of Directors, this is your wake up call.

It continued….

When asked if he as commissioner had the right to interpret the league rules and establish policies regarding the constitution and bylaws, and that he (Commissioner) had the right to change provisions of the constitution by his (Bettman’s) interpretation, Bettman said:

“If they need to be reconciled either with other documents, resolutions and applicable law, yes.”

I wonder if that law would include the Competition Act of Canada?

So, is Gary Bettman saying he as commissioner has the right to change aspects of the constitution as required by applicable law, in this case the Competition Act of Canada? I would think so.

Regarding article 4.3, the counsel asked a specific question:

“I’m asking you a very narrow question. Has there ever been a written ammendment to that provision of the constitution signed by all members of the league?”

Bettman: “I don’t believe so, but that shouldn’t matter because I’ve advised the board-”

Bettman: “- on repeated occasions that we are not enforcing that provision, and there hasn’t been any objection to that, and in fact, the competition bureau in Canada has affirmed our policy and practice in that regard.”

“There hasn’t been an objection to that”? What about the letter from the Toronto Maple Leafs hand delivered to the office of the National Hockey league in 2006? Was this part of the information given to the Competition Bureau in Canada? Somehow, I think not.

So, Mr. Bettman in 2009 states that there was no objection, but clearly the Toronto Maple Leafs did object.

As pointed out by Patrick Romanoski, methinks we have a problem here. Would this be lying under oath?

Would this include withholding material evidence from the Competition Board of Canada?

I think we leave it for now on those valid issues. We will continue next time with more Gary Bettman deposition analysis, and for Craig Leipold.

The NHLPA got a fresh leader, eh?

Hmmmm……

Well, I must make a final comment to Mr. Bill Daly. Bill, you as a league know how to end a fight?

I don’t think you will be able to ‘end’ this one.

Time to send a 'personal' email to your MP on the MLSE veto issue (article 4.3 of the NHL Constitution)

For the bullet summary, please go here.

 We will be posting comments from MP’s of Canada related to Canadian rights, and the Competition Act

It's time to support Canadian Hockey once again!

It's time to support Canadian Hockey once again!

 

 

This is what our elected officials ‘live for’…..

 To serve the people. Give your local MP a chance to stand up for your voice in Parliament!

We had discussed the idea of using a form letter, but a personally worded letter stating how you feel is always more effective. MP’s will be comparing notes.

Thanks to Corey Schlueter and Bryan Kirkham for their efforts to bring us this information!

  

 

 

 

 Canada

 Click Here to see the list of MP’s to find yours!

Key points to include in your email:

  • Veto rights that Toronto Maple Leafs and MLSE  ‘think’ they have
  • Competition Act and the new issue included to stop the ‘Conspiracy to avoid Competition’, and to fix prices and supply
  • Mention Jim Balsillie and his group, PSE
  • Mention Sheila Copps and her current support and drive to get answers in Parliament
  • Urge your constituent to speak to the press and encourage them to set up press conferences to address this issue
  • Thank your representative for their support
  • Ask them to get back to you personally with a progress report
  • Ask them to brush up on the case by visiting http://haveavoice.makeitseven.ca/rants, and http://makeiteighteh.com, and other mainstream media and blogs.

Alternatively, use one of the emails already sent in the comments below, and change the contents to suit you.

It’s time to help our ‘Braveheart’, Jim Balsillie, and stand united for hockey rights in Canada.

Please make comments in this post below, when you send, and any information you get back! Post your letter if you choose!

Here is a sample letter (courtesy Patrick Romanoski):

Hello Ms. Charlton,

My name is Patrick Romanoski.

Living on Hamilton Mountain, you are my MP.

Ms. Charlton, I need you to work along with the efforts of Sheila Copps, who is looking for answers to the question of illegal veto rights as it infringes on the laws of Canada, and specifically how it applies to the Competition Act.

Section 4.3 of the NHL constitution grants each team exclusive control over its “home territory,” stating that, “no other member of the League shall be permitted to play games … in the home territory of a member without the latter member’s consent. No franchise shall be granted for a home territory within the home territory of a member, without the written consent of such a membership” Since the Coyotes franchise is not “GRANTED” by the NHL, this point is moot, it will be purchased!

The previous section stating, “no other member of the League shall be permitted to play games … in the home territory of a member without the latter member’s consent.” stands on its own. Thus this section is illegal & a pure case of restraint of trade!!!

The Toronto Maple Leafs had a lawyer send a letter to the NHL in 2006, which in essence stated clearly that any team that wants to enter the territory of another must have “unanimous” support of all teams. In other words, MLSE thinks they can stop the locating of a team in Hamilton, as they say it would infringe on their territory.

Jim Balsillie and PSE are looking to purchase the Phoenix Coyotes and move them to Hamilton. If successful in the auction, his company will continue to meet resisitance from MLSE.

According to the Competition Act, any company or companies conspiring to restrict a product or supply of a product could be guilty of a criminal offence. Changes were proposed in March 2009 to effect potential jail time as much as 14 years imprisonment and fines as high as $25 million per occurence.

In a previous review the competition bureau was deliberately misled by the NHL by witholding this letter. Their responses to questioning was therefore not the whole truth and resulted in no wrongdoing being discovered.

This fact added to the facts uncovered in the PSE purchase attempt to move a team to Hamilton suggests a new review under oath is required.

Ms. Charlton, if you could provide clarification on the new changes too, that would be appreciated.

If you would be so kind, please acknowledge receipt of this email, and send progress reports on your efforts.

Thanking you for your representation and help in this matter,

Yours truly,

Patrick

Or, alternatively, Corey Schlueter came up with a terrific one too:

Dear Dr. Albrecht,

I am sure you are aware Jim Balsillie as PSE has made an offer to purchase an NHL team through the US bankruptcy system. While this issue at first seems trivial and of no concern to the Government of Canada; I must assure you that is not the case.

The Toronto Maple Leafs had a lawyer send a letter to the NHL in 2006, which in essence stated clearly that any team that wants to enter the territory of another must have “unanimous” support of all teams. In other words, the Leafs think they can stop the locating of a team in Hamilton, as they say it would infringe on their territory.

According to the Competition Act, any company or companies conspiring to restrict a product or supply of a product could be guilty of a criminal offence. Changes were proposed in March 2009, where potential jail time as much as 14 years imprisonment, and fines as high as $25 million per occurrence.

In a previous review the competition bureau was deliberately misled by the NHL by withholding this letter. Their responses to questioning was therefore not the whole truth and resulted in no wrongdoing being discovered.

This fact added to the facts uncovered in the PSE purchase attempt to move a team to Hamilton suggests a new review under oath is required.

As you can see the issue has become extremely important. MLSE and the NHL wish to protect their market share contrary to the law. Also by blocking this move the NHL is costing Ontario thousands of possible new jobs and the revitalization of Hamilton.

As my MP I am sure this issue is of great concern to you as well and I look forward to your representation in this matter.

Sincerely,
Corey Schlueter

 

Time to send a ‘personal’ email to your MP on the MLSE veto issue (article 4.3 of the NHL Constitution)

For the bullet summary, please go here.

 We will be posting comments from MP’s of Canada related to Canadian rights, and the Competition Act

It's time to support Canadian Hockey once again!

It's time to support Canadian Hockey once again!

 

 

This is what our elected officials ‘live for’…..

 To serve the people. Give your local MP a chance to stand up for your voice in Parliament!

We had discussed the idea of using a form letter, but a personally worded letter stating how you feel is always more effective. MP’s will be comparing notes.

Thanks to Corey Schlueter and Bryan Kirkham for their efforts to bring us this information!

  

 

 

 

 Canada

 Click Here to see the list of MP’s to find yours!

Key points to include in your email:

  • Veto rights that Toronto Maple Leafs and MLSE  ‘think’ they have
  • Competition Act and the new issue included to stop the ‘Conspiracy to avoid Competition’, and to fix prices and supply
  • Mention Jim Balsillie and his group, PSE
  • Mention Sheila Copps and her current support and drive to get answers in Parliament
  • Urge your constituent to speak to the press and encourage them to set up press conferences to address this issue
  • Thank your representative for their support
  • Ask them to get back to you personally with a progress report
  • Ask them to brush up on the case by visiting http://haveavoice.makeitseven.ca/rants, and http://makeiteighteh.com, and other mainstream media and blogs.

Alternatively, use one of the emails already sent in the comments below, and change the contents to suit you.

It’s time to help our ‘Braveheart’, Jim Balsillie, and stand united for hockey rights in Canada.

Please make comments in this post below, when you send, and any information you get back! Post your letter if you choose!

Here is a sample letter (courtesy Patrick Romanoski):

Hello Ms. Charlton,

My name is Patrick Romanoski.

Living on Hamilton Mountain, you are my MP.

Ms. Charlton, I need you to work along with the efforts of Sheila Copps, who is looking for answers to the question of illegal veto rights as it infringes on the laws of Canada, and specifically how it applies to the Competition Act.

Section 4.3 of the NHL constitution grants each team exclusive control over its “home territory,” stating that, “no other member of the League shall be permitted to play games … in the home territory of a member without the latter member’s consent. No franchise shall be granted for a home territory within the home territory of a member, without the written consent of such a membership” Since the Coyotes franchise is not “GRANTED” by the NHL, this point is moot, it will be purchased!

The previous section stating, “no other member of the League shall be permitted to play games … in the home territory of a member without the latter member’s consent.” stands on its own. Thus this section is illegal & a pure case of restraint of trade!!!

The Toronto Maple Leafs had a lawyer send a letter to the NHL in 2006, which in essence stated clearly that any team that wants to enter the territory of another must have “unanimous” support of all teams. In other words, MLSE thinks they can stop the locating of a team in Hamilton, as they say it would infringe on their territory.

Jim Balsillie and PSE are looking to purchase the Phoenix Coyotes and move them to Hamilton. If successful in the auction, his company will continue to meet resisitance from MLSE.

According to the Competition Act, any company or companies conspiring to restrict a product or supply of a product could be guilty of a criminal offence. Changes were proposed in March 2009 to effect potential jail time as much as 14 years imprisonment and fines as high as $25 million per occurence.

In a previous review the competition bureau was deliberately misled by the NHL by witholding this letter. Their responses to questioning was therefore not the whole truth and resulted in no wrongdoing being discovered.

This fact added to the facts uncovered in the PSE purchase attempt to move a team to Hamilton suggests a new review under oath is required.

Ms. Charlton, if you could provide clarification on the new changes too, that would be appreciated.

If you would be so kind, please acknowledge receipt of this email, and send progress reports on your efforts.

Thanking you for your representation and help in this matter,

Yours truly,

Patrick

Or, alternatively, Corey Schlueter came up with a terrific one too:

Dear Dr. Albrecht,

I am sure you are aware Jim Balsillie as PSE has made an offer to purchase an NHL team through the US bankruptcy system. While this issue at first seems trivial and of no concern to the Government of Canada; I must assure you that is not the case.

The Toronto Maple Leafs had a lawyer send a letter to the NHL in 2006, which in essence stated clearly that any team that wants to enter the territory of another must have “unanimous” support of all teams. In other words, the Leafs think they can stop the locating of a team in Hamilton, as they say it would infringe on their territory.

According to the Competition Act, any company or companies conspiring to restrict a product or supply of a product could be guilty of a criminal offence. Changes were proposed in March 2009, where potential jail time as much as 14 years imprisonment, and fines as high as $25 million per occurrence.

In a previous review the competition bureau was deliberately misled by the NHL by withholding this letter. Their responses to questioning was therefore not the whole truth and resulted in no wrongdoing being discovered.

This fact added to the facts uncovered in the PSE purchase attempt to move a team to Hamilton suggests a new review under oath is required.

As you can see the issue has become extremely important. MLSE and the NHL wish to protect their market share contrary to the law. Also by blocking this move the NHL is costing Ontario thousands of possible new jobs and the revitalization of Hamilton.

As my MP I am sure this issue is of great concern to you as well and I look forward to your representation in this matter.

Sincerely,
Corey Schlueter

 

Something’s rotten in the state of ‘Glendale’

For the bullet summary, please go here.

But nothing is stopping the NHL from bidding $220 million except its constitution, BOG, and business ethics – nothing it can’t get around.
Joe Smith

 

“Something is rotten in the state of Denmark“. ..as said by the minor character, ‘Marcellus’ in Shakespeare’s play ‘Hamlet’ in act I, scene IV.

 What did Marcellus mean by the ‘state’ addition to his comment? Well, according to scholars, the fact that Marcellus mentioned the ‘state’ is to suggest the ‘rotting fish’ of the political situation is from the top down. The reason the state is in terrible, corrupt condition is directly a reflection of the head of the state.

Is something rotten in the state of the NHL?

Gary Bettman: Doth he protest 'too much'?

Gary Bettman: Doth he protest 'too much'?

At this stage, many would argue yes. It brings back the other quote of interest, “”The lady doth protest too much, methinks”", in Hamlet, Act III, Scene 2.

The queen said this to suggest that when someone complains ‘too much’ it suggests they have something to hide. What is so important to protect in Glendale? What is so important and potentially damaging that cannot be uncovered in the ‘state of the NHL’?

Can we conclude the NHL and in particular, the Commissioner protests ‘too much’?

It brings us back to a previous article or two. One, where I question why Gary Bettman is putting his identitiy in this, and protesting too much. Another, that suggests there is a tremendous amount at stake in land and taxes to want to ensure the bricks stay in place. A political reasoning could be at the heart.  But why would the commissioner of hockey be involved in the political infrastructure of America? Would it explain the systematic placing of hockey teams in locations where municipal infrastructure growth was desired?

 Just take a look at an aerial photo of Arizona and see how much sand there is to turn to cement. Lots of potential, and we know now that Glendale is not the only city going for broke in the strategy to have the rich, private equity develop their cities.

When Ron McLean, in a now famous interview with Gary Bettman asked if there were indeed folks in Glendale that wanted to have a hockey team there, Bettman said he believed there was.

Now, after Jerry Reinsdorf has pulled out amongst a myriad of uncovering of the truth, we have Bettman scrambling to Plan C. Plan B of course is the addition of the backup bidders, Ice Edge.

Ice Edge, had a bid of similar proportions to Reinsdorf, but bid $2 million more. Reinsdorf was on record as saying they would not get in a bidding war. Ice Edge a convenient backup plan if the truth be known in Glendale? Likely yes, and how convenient.

Research Edge (Ice Edge) has been shown to be a close relation to the friends of Glendale by the article mentioned above, and really brings us back to the question of who Gary Bettman said he would tell. To McLean: “I will tell them before I tell you”. The question again, is ‘Who is them?‘.

When Jim Balsillie was rejected by the NHL Board of Governors, we asked the question whether the inmates should be allowed to police themselves, to the detriment of some other inmates. Dirty Harry (Balsillie) needs to come in to handle the corruption brewing in the NHL. Will the court system be able to see there is something rotten too, and will the government powers that be be able to send in the troops to audit the affairs of the NHL?

Believe me, there is enough ‘protesting’ to raise those red flags quickly in a flag store running out of stock. Time for the government to police the unpoliceable, before Gary Bettman takes his puck from the sandbox, and goes home.

How much control does a league and it’s chief think they can have? How much bending of the rules and constitution can one man and league bend?

There is surely something rotten with the state of the NHL, and we must understand that without external influence and reigning in at this point will spell disaster.

The United States Bankruptcy system and U.S. Court system is being played the fool.

When a man can take his puck from the sandbox, turn around go home, and sell it to who he wants, what does that say of the power of a sports league, despite legal processes?

Is the commissioner protecting the league by wanting to buy the team in Glendale? Or is the commissioner, at all cost, trying to avoid certain people from opening a door of transparency?

When Jerry Moyes at the beginning of this process said that he would allow the court to bring transparency, I don’t even think Jerry Moyes knew the magnitude of his statement.

The U.S. Department of Fiscal Policy and the U.S. Justice department happened by to this site one day.

I would suggest they ‘happen by’ the offices of the National Hockey league, magnifying glass in hand.

There is much more to be told, and we are just getting restarted. Where are the concessions needed by Glendale? But let’s start at the beginning.

There is something rotten in the states of Glendale, and the NHL.

 

 

Something's rotten in the state of 'Glendale'

For the bullet summary, please go here.

But nothing is stopping the NHL from bidding $220 million except its constitution, BOG, and business ethics – nothing it can’t get around.
Joe Smith

 

“Something is rotten in the state of Denmark“. ..as said by the minor character, ‘Marcellus’ in Shakespeare’s play ‘Hamlet’ in act I, scene IV.

 What did Marcellus mean by the ‘state’ addition to his comment? Well, according to scholars, the fact that Marcellus mentioned the ‘state’ is to suggest the ‘rotting fish’ of the political situation is from the top down. The reason the state is in terrible, corrupt condition is directly a reflection of the head of the state.

Is something rotten in the state of the NHL?

Gary Bettman: Doth he protest 'too much'?

Gary Bettman: Doth he protest 'too much'?

At this stage, many would argue yes. It brings back the other quote of interest, “”The lady doth protest too much, methinks”", in Hamlet, Act III, Scene 2.

The queen said this to suggest that when someone complains ‘too much’ it suggests they have something to hide. What is so important to protect in Glendale? What is so important and potentially damaging that cannot be uncovered in the ‘state of the NHL’?

Can we conclude the NHL and in particular, the Commissioner protests ‘too much’?

It brings us back to a previous article or two. One, where I question why Gary Bettman is putting his identitiy in this, and protesting too much. Another, that suggests there is a tremendous amount at stake in land and taxes to want to ensure the bricks stay in place. A political reasoning could be at the heart.  But why would the commissioner of hockey be involved in the political infrastructure of America? Would it explain the systematic placing of hockey teams in locations where municipal infrastructure growth was desired?

 Just take a look at an aerial photo of Arizona and see how much sand there is to turn to cement. Lots of potential, and we know now that Glendale is not the only city going for broke in the strategy to have the rich, private equity develop their cities.

When Ron McLean, in a now famous interview with Gary Bettman asked if there were indeed folks in Glendale that wanted to have a hockey team there, Bettman said he believed there was.

Now, after Jerry Reinsdorf has pulled out amongst a myriad of uncovering of the truth, we have Bettman scrambling to Plan C. Plan B of course is the addition of the backup bidders, Ice Edge.

Ice Edge, had a bid of similar proportions to Reinsdorf, but bid $2 million more. Reinsdorf was on record as saying they would not get in a bidding war. Ice Edge a convenient backup plan if the truth be known in Glendale? Likely yes, and how convenient.

Research Edge (Ice Edge) has been shown to be a close relation to the friends of Glendale by the article mentioned above, and really brings us back to the question of who Gary Bettman said he would tell. To McLean: “I will tell them before I tell you”. The question again, is ‘Who is them?‘.

When Jim Balsillie was rejected by the NHL Board of Governors, we asked the question whether the inmates should be allowed to police themselves, to the detriment of some other inmates. Dirty Harry (Balsillie) needs to come in to handle the corruption brewing in the NHL. Will the court system be able to see there is something rotten too, and will the government powers that be be able to send in the troops to audit the affairs of the NHL?

Believe me, there is enough ‘protesting’ to raise those red flags quickly in a flag store running out of stock. Time for the government to police the unpoliceable, before Gary Bettman takes his puck from the sandbox, and goes home.

How much control does a league and it’s chief think they can have? How much bending of the rules and constitution can one man and league bend?

There is surely something rotten with the state of the NHL, and we must understand that without external influence and reigning in at this point will spell disaster.

The United States Bankruptcy system and U.S. Court system is being played the fool.

When a man can take his puck from the sandbox, turn around go home, and sell it to who he wants, what does that say of the power of a sports league, despite legal processes?

Is the commissioner protecting the league by wanting to buy the team in Glendale? Or is the commissioner, at all cost, trying to avoid certain people from opening a door of transparency?

When Jerry Moyes at the beginning of this process said that he would allow the court to bring transparency, I don’t even think Jerry Moyes knew the magnitude of his statement.

The U.S. Department of Fiscal Policy and the U.S. Justice department happened by to this site one day.

I would suggest they ‘happen by’ the offices of the National Hockey league, magnifying glass in hand.

There is much more to be told, and we are just getting restarted. Where are the concessions needed by Glendale? But let’s start at the beginning.

There is something rotten in the states of Glendale, and the NHL.

 

 

The Passion that Unites us All!

With all your 'passion' Canadians, you'll get over it!

With all your 'passion' Canadians, you'll get over it!

For the bullet summary, please go here.

Just in case things don’t go the ‘Canadian’ Way in the Glendale Court…..

Fellow hockey fans of Southern Ontario, Canada, and the World:

Perhaps we are just not that important.

We can come to that conclusion based on the attitude of the National Hockey League, the Toronto Maple Leafs, the NHL’s Board of Governors, the reporting from major newspapers in the GTA, and others.

We are just not that big a deal.

Who are we kidding? After all, we are hockey nuts, right? Or, are we just nuts that like hockey?

We are powerful and have a strong voice that will really impact the NHL and they had better treat us right. Or, are we just a minor inconvenience that will blow over, and the true hockey fans located for the mostpart in the U.S. don’t know or for that matter, even care that we are upset. Is that it?

It must be OK for the NHL head office and the teams voting against Jim Balsillie to give it to Jim and to us. We’ll get over it. We are true fans, and we really can’t stay away from the game. We will get over it, and flock around our television sets once again when the puck drops next season. We will watch as the cameras scan over the crowds in the sunbelt U.S., strategically placed to ensure it looks like the stands are full.

We will watch, and we will wonder what it would be like to walk up to a ticket booth on game day, and buy some really good seats to see a couple of teams, and a game that looks much faster in person. Those lucky fans, we will think, as we blog, and gossip with other Canadians in Southern Ontario, that gather in front of the TV to watch the Canadian game, in the only way we can. Artificially that is.

We will continue to wonder if the circumstances that surrounded Winnipeg and Quebec City were truly as bad as we would be led to believe. We will wonder how they feel when they, on a Saturday night, gather with their memories and passion, around their collective TV sets to see the game in the only way they now can. Virtually.

We will wonder how they feel as they watch their old teams. Do they still have the passion for their team? The players are mostly if not all gone. Do they still think of the team as ‘their team’? We will wonder because that’s all we can do.

From coast to coast, the Leafs remind us of a passion that unites us all. The Toronto Maple Leafs would hope it was their team that unites us. The question is, does it?

The NHL must know something we don’t. The Toronto Maple Leafs too don’t seem too concerned. They must think this urge and desire to see real NHL hockey in person is a dream we can get over.

We will put our differences aside, and our resentment to the Toronto Maple Leafs organization for the obvious attitude of superiority, and we will learn again to love those Leafs, despite how dismal a display they will have on the ice again this year, like all the other years.

We’ll get over it because we are hockey fans, and they are banking on us not being able to resist the game.

They know we are saps that will continue to take whatever they dish out, and come back. And, if we are lucky, really lucky, perhaps we will win the lottery, and someone will offer to sell us a couple of seats to a Leaf game this year.

We will get over our hope to have hockey for the masses. Where a family can go online and buy a few seats to an upcoming Hamilton game, and treat the family to true, professional hockey. We will survive. Our kids will survive. It’s just the way it must be.

And, we will get over the memory of knowing that the Phoenix Coyotes hockey team to the City of Glendale, AZ was more to do about land and area development, and that ‘that hockey team’ was simply a means to achieve city growth. We will learn to put our differences aside. We will learn to forgive the snow job fed the people of Arizona when the team is relocated. After all, all the hype of the court case by that time will have blown over, and reality will be easier to palate.

We will learn to forgive the notable hockey players in the NHLPA that didn’t squeek a rah rah when we were in time of need. We will learn to forgive the Canadian hockey players that have a better tax deal playing and living in the U.S., because despite the fact they are Canadian, we must forgive the fact they need to bank the millions now, while they are still healthy. We will learn that to be a Canadian playing the NHL game means sacrificing your heritage and patriotic pride.

It is much more important to have NHL hockey in the deep southern United States, where to sell a seat, you must throw in a program, perhaps a burger, and maybe that beer.

It is much more important to see if Gary Bettman and the NHL can get a lucrative TV deal despite the fact that college wrestling stands a better chance.

It is much more important to ensure NHL hockey gets exposed in a geographic manner so that more merchandise can be sold as a novelty to people that don’t really like the game necessarily, but think the clothing looks cool. And, let’s not forget Gary. Gary gets a piece of the profits of that merchandise. That is so important. What were we thinking?

Yes, we Canadians are expected to get over it.

We will not sign petitions, or stop buying merchandise, or revolt against the machine.

Yes, the Toronto Maple Leafs have a slogan, the Passion that Unites Us All!

I guess they will ensure the passion to see hockey will remain a passion to see ‘Leaf’ hockey, come hell or high water.

There may be a new passion building in Southern Ontario, in Winnipeg, in Quebec City, and other parts of Canada.

Will we get over it? They certainly hope so.

The new breed of ‘passion’ of the Canadian hockey fans may tell a different story in the coming days, weeks, months, and years.

There may be a new and improved passion that unites us all. Let’s see what that is!

Have ‘concessions’ biased the opinion of the Chairman of the NHL’s Board of Governors?

For the bullet summary, please go here

Have conflicts of interest tainted the vote against Jim Balsillie as a proposed owner for the NHL?

Did the vote literally go to the ‘dogs’?

What if the Board of Governors had to revote on the eligibility issue? Would it go something like this?

Jacobs: OK, we have to do this thing over, because of some crazy rules they gave us….to make it easier, please just raise your hand if you think you DO NOT have a conflict of interest…….anybody?……….no?………….What do we do now?…..They didn’t tell us what to do if this happened…….

 

I must thank a fellow Hamiltonian (please see the about section) for bringing to my attention Jeremy Jacobs, owner of the Boston Bruins. Jacobs is the Chairman of the NHL Board of Governors.
 
Could Jeremy Jacobs really vote against client Jerry Reinsdorf?

Could Jeremy Jacobs really vote against client Jerry Reinsdorf?

Mr. Jacobs is not only the owner of the Boston Bruins, but he operates a concession  and gaming company that provides the catering to many major league baseball stadiums, NHL arenas, and other venues,  named Delaware North.  He has parlayed his business into a multi billion dollar empire.

 
As we have seen time and again, in order to get ahead, you must network. Sometimes you have to be a little bit shrewd it would seem. Well, in the news now, Jeremy Jacobs is in a court battle with ex partners over a Buffalo casino opportunity. I won’t get in specifics, but suffice it to say that there are allegations of using information from the old partnership in order to get unfair advantage in negotiations direct with the powers that be. You can read the article on this lawsuit here. But, here is the skinny:
Delaware North took confidential information and used it against former partners in its bid to develop a major casino at a downstate racetrack, its former partner alleges in a new lawsuit.
 
As I have been told, it’s a dog eat dog world . It’s just business. Nothing personal, just business. Sounds like the book tycoon in the movie, ‘You’ve Got Mail’. ‘Go to the mattresses! 
 
A friend told me that very rich people in business think differently than you and I. They are in a league all their own. Well, that may be true, but if getting ahead means operating unfairly, that’s when I have a problem, I don’t know about you.
 
But when you are in a position on a Board, you should and really must put personal ties aside. You must be impartial and fair. This is the issue. This is the question. How could there have been a unanimous ‘NO’ vote against Jim Balsillie as a potential owner? The reason: Poor character?
 
Well, again, you would hope that as a member of the NHL Board of Governors, the members would take their roles seriously. And, in doing so, you would hope that every consideration would be looked upon with non-biased eyes.
So, if a new, proposed owner should be introduced as a candidate to be approved, you would hope that his application would be fairly treated. Why is Jeremy Jacobs leading the fight against the RIM boss, whose company is claimed by Forbes to be one of the world’s fastest growing, and most succesful successes of all time?
 
My fellow Hamiltonian friend mentioned Jeremy Jacobs related to the issue of the court case. But, I have a sneaking suspicion he knew of a bigger issue related to the case against Jim Balsillie. He may deny it, but, I would say he is a wise man. He is just letting me present it to you.
 
It would seem that we have a pattern brewing here, as we dig deeper into the relationships that seem to intertwine amongst the members of the NHL Board of Governors. Relationships that seem to transcend one sport, and spill into others. And, as we have seen already with Tom Hicks, it can even cross industry, and potentially goes into land development as well.
 
Without reiterating the obvious, the Phoenix Coyotes case is all about land development and opportunities that surround it, almost making hockey operations a ‘loss leader’ to get to the true prize that exists with deals with government.
 
Tom Hicks has benefited from such arrangement with his Dallas development, Victory Park.
 
As mentioned in the title of this article, Jeremy Jacobs may have had a hard time being fair to Jim Balsillie, as he supplies refreshment services to many major league ballparks including the one that hosts the Chicago White Sox.
So, put simply, if Jacobs had a choice of choosing Jerry Reinsdorf, a client, or Jim Balsillie (his competitor for the team), which one would he choose? And, more importantly, is there any way he’d be able to put aside his business interests in order to be fair? It would not seem likely.
 
So, we have looked at the chairman here, and the vice chairman of the NHL Board of Governors, and we can see that relationships most likely have gotten in the way of fair assessment of Jim Balsillie.
 
Let’s hope the bankruptcy court, and Judge Baum will ensure that there is no further bias against Jim Balsillie, as he determines what is truly fair. It would seem the relationships run fairly deep. More importantly, these relationships seem to have biased at least some members of the Board of Governors, possible quite a few more.
 
The boys on the NHL’s  BOG seem to have quite a ‘good boys club’ going. Isn’t it high time to crack that lineup?
When 'fairness' doesn't stand a 'dog gone chance'

When 'fairness' doesn't stand a 'dog gone chance'

 Conflicts of interest? It would appear ‘black and white’ in this one.

 

And, if it is indeed a dog eat dog world, it would seem that Jacobs wants to ensure the dog being eaten at Chicago White Sox games continues to be supplied by his company.
Next article: With the court reconvening two weeks today on some outstanding issues, there are folks staying up late listening to others ‘beacon-ing’ off! It seems there are lots of people busy to come to terms and get prepared for what comes next!

Have 'concessions' biased the opinion of the Chairman of the NHL's Board of Governors?

For the bullet summary, please go here

Have conflicts of interest tainted the vote against Jim Balsillie as a proposed owner for the NHL?

Did the vote literally go to the ‘dogs’?

What if the Board of Governors had to revote on the eligibility issue? Would it go something like this?

Jacobs: OK, we have to do this thing over, because of some crazy rules they gave us….to make it easier, please just raise your hand if you think you DO NOT have a conflict of interest…….anybody?……….no?………….What do we do now?…..They didn’t tell us what to do if this happened…….

 

I must thank a fellow Hamiltonian (please see the about section) for bringing to my attention Jeremy Jacobs, owner of the Boston Bruins. Jacobs is the Chairman of the NHL Board of Governors.
 
Could Jeremy Jacobs really vote against client Jerry Reinsdorf?

Could Jeremy Jacobs really vote against client Jerry Reinsdorf?

Mr. Jacobs is not only the owner of the Boston Bruins, but he operates a concession  and gaming company that provides the catering to many major league baseball stadiums, NHL arenas, and other venues,  named Delaware North.  He has parlayed his business into a multi billion dollar empire.

 
As we have seen time and again, in order to get ahead, you must network. Sometimes you have to be a little bit shrewd it would seem. Well, in the news now, Jeremy Jacobs is in a court battle with ex partners over a Buffalo casino opportunity. I won’t get in specifics, but suffice it to say that there are allegations of using information from the old partnership in order to get unfair advantage in negotiations direct with the powers that be. You can read the article on this lawsuit here. But, here is the skinny:
Delaware North took confidential information and used it against former partners in its bid to develop a major casino at a downstate racetrack, its former partner alleges in a new lawsuit.
 
As I have been told, it’s a dog eat dog world . It’s just business. Nothing personal, just business. Sounds like the book tycoon in the movie, ‘You’ve Got Mail’. ‘Go to the mattresses! 
 
A friend told me that very rich people in business think differently than you and I. They are in a league all their own. Well, that may be true, but if getting ahead means operating unfairly, that’s when I have a problem, I don’t know about you.
 
But when you are in a position on a Board, you should and really must put personal ties aside. You must be impartial and fair. This is the issue. This is the question. How could there have been a unanimous ‘NO’ vote against Jim Balsillie as a potential owner? The reason: Poor character?
 
Well, again, you would hope that as a member of the NHL Board of Governors, the members would take their roles seriously. And, in doing so, you would hope that every consideration would be looked upon with non-biased eyes.
So, if a new, proposed owner should be introduced as a candidate to be approved, you would hope that his application would be fairly treated. Why is Jeremy Jacobs leading the fight against the RIM boss, whose company is claimed by Forbes to be one of the world’s fastest growing, and most succesful successes of all time?
 
My fellow Hamiltonian friend mentioned Jeremy Jacobs related to the issue of the court case. But, I have a sneaking suspicion he knew of a bigger issue related to the case against Jim Balsillie. He may deny it, but, I would say he is a wise man. He is just letting me present it to you.
 
It would seem that we have a pattern brewing here, as we dig deeper into the relationships that seem to intertwine amongst the members of the NHL Board of Governors. Relationships that seem to transcend one sport, and spill into others. And, as we have seen already with Tom Hicks, it can even cross industry, and potentially goes into land development as well.
 
Without reiterating the obvious, the Phoenix Coyotes case is all about land development and opportunities that surround it, almost making hockey operations a ‘loss leader’ to get to the true prize that exists with deals with government.
 
Tom Hicks has benefited from such arrangement with his Dallas development, Victory Park.
 
As mentioned in the title of this article, Jeremy Jacobs may have had a hard time being fair to Jim Balsillie, as he supplies refreshment services to many major league ballparks including the one that hosts the Chicago White Sox.
So, put simply, if Jacobs had a choice of choosing Jerry Reinsdorf, a client, or Jim Balsillie (his competitor for the team), which one would he choose? And, more importantly, is there any way he’d be able to put aside his business interests in order to be fair? It would not seem likely.
 
So, we have looked at the chairman here, and the vice chairman of the NHL Board of Governors, and we can see that relationships most likely have gotten in the way of fair assessment of Jim Balsillie.
 
Let’s hope the bankruptcy court, and Judge Baum will ensure that there is no further bias against Jim Balsillie, as he determines what is truly fair. It would seem the relationships run fairly deep. More importantly, these relationships seem to have biased at least some members of the Board of Governors, possible quite a few more.
 
The boys on the NHL’s  BOG seem to have quite a ‘good boys club’ going. Isn’t it high time to crack that lineup?
When 'fairness' doesn't stand a 'dog gone chance'

When 'fairness' doesn't stand a 'dog gone chance'

 Conflicts of interest? It would appear ‘black and white’ in this one.

 

And, if it is indeed a dog eat dog world, it would seem that Jacobs wants to ensure the dog being eaten at Chicago White Sox games continues to be supplied by his company.
Next article: With the court reconvening two weeks today on some outstanding issues, there are folks staying up late listening to others ‘beacon-ing’ off! It seems there are lots of people busy to come to terms and get prepared for what comes next!