Let’s first take a look at the bigger, global goings-on:
Black is now white; right is now wrong; slavery is now freedom; the Constitutions and Rights of the people are being quashed globally; police beat citizens dressed up like Darth Vader; Perceived Democracy has been replaced with dictatorships clamping down on the people ; criminals go free for global financial fraud while farms that provide raw milk are swat teamed, and non-medical people get to now decide how to medicate the population. Yeah, that about sums it up.
Don’t believe me – - google it.
So, with our water supply…..
Health Canada shows up to support the municipalities “deciding on their own” to maintain the fluoride in their water. The municipalities look to the Feds to provide evidence of fluoride safety, yet the Federal Government has no say whether a given municipality should put fluoride in the water. I suppose it fits the New World Disorder and by standards of today makes sense.
Who then determines the so-called safe fluoride levels? And, who ultimately is responsible for making that judgement? If fluoride has been linked as a toxin to cause dental fluorosis, bone cancer, and other cancers, not to mention autism, etc, is it really worth spending money on it?
Ingesting fluoride is supposed to be beneficial to your teeth? Think about this.
If car wax made the paint last longer, would you put it in the oil reservoir or in the gas tank? Ingesting into the bloodstream is going to find it’s way to your teeth, and the drug will know the exact proportion to “bathe your teeth”? Is that what we are supposed to believe?
And, again, the best part, is the municipality gets to decide if the toxin is added to the water supply. The councillors of the City, because they are all trained and experts in medicine, toxicology and how it affects the human body?
At the risk of repeating myself again, is this sounding crazy to anyone else?
Is there a rational person in the house? Or how about a sharp lawyer who sees where his client could get some compensation for negligence due to a municipality playing doctor with its’ citizens – - a slam dunk? Careful counsel, you might think you are helping but may end up being disbarred for being the new criminal – - dare I say a conspiracy theorist. How dare you?
I picked up the Hamilton Spectator on April 17th and needed a moment to adjust – - was that a report on Hamilton Tap Water that is heating up at City Hall? It sure is.
I remember thinking , great, some good debate.
For the last two years, since Alex Jones of Infowars brought out the awareness campaign of “Poison in the Tap Water”, I also jumped on the bandwagon, and wrote my article in support, and linked youtube videos of Christopher Bryson interviewed on his book, “The Fluoride Deception”. The narrator of the interview was none other than Dr. Paul Connett, a speaker supporting removal of fluoride who has been active in the movement for several years.
Strange, the article in the Hamilton Spec mentioned many from the pro-fluoride side, but didn’t mention the main opposition, Dr. Connett. Yikes! Could we have our own little Hamilton Fluoride deception geared to paint the “experts” that we have been conditioned to accept as the ones in the know, at the expense of the experts they would sooner not have you hear about?
According to Alan Watt (Cutting ThroughTheMatrix.com), in interview with Alex Jones a couple years ago on the subject of fluoride, he mentioned that media has conditionedthe masses to accept people with official titles as the ones that should be viewed as the only authority, and this keeps the public following like sheeple.
Thankfully, we can get a better, truer picture that supports these poll results from a video shot from Terry Wilson of CanadianAwareness.org. I learned of Mr. Wilson from Dan Dicks’ daily video report on PressForTruth.TV.
Here is a portion of what went on at City Hall that day:
What makes the City of Hamilton so sure the water is safe? And, why do they need to “sell us” on the idea?
A billboard sells the safeness of Hamilton, Ontario tap water - photo, CF, makeiteighteh
Click here to get to the article complete with full page flyer
>>>> Is our water safe ? <<<<
Why does the City of Hamilton feel the need to “sell” us on drinking the water?
One possible scenario to explain this may be in a possible sequel billboard, where the caption reads: ” We told you to drink Hamilton water, and now we will tell you why” — you really need to stop buying bottled, spring water, because the plastic is getting out of control. You may recall seeing the lady in the kitchen on a tv ad as they show her drowning in the plastic water bottles she consumed in a year or so. Is that what they will pull out next? I’ll have my camera ready and waiting…….
How often do you reach for a “convenient” single use bottle of water before you go to the tap to fill your glass or reusable bottle? It’s become a wasteful and expensive habit many of us have developed, one that the Water and Wastewater Group at the City of Hamilton wants to stop in its tracks.
Hamilton even won a “best tap water in the world award”, and the tasters said it tasted sweet. So, taste is important, but would it be enough to prove Hamilton tap water is the best, as in the safest, and most beneficial healthwise?
Is the choice really that “clear”?
Why the advertising push to sell us on this chug it down, bottoms up idea? As in the video on the above website, is it “convenience”, “price”, or other reasons? How about your health?
The video would argue that bottled water is actually tap water. So, when it says from the springs of _____ it is really the spring of a tap? I don’t think so. Poor argument, but arguably there are some brands that are indeed tap water, but come on people, not all of them. But, again, what about the health issue?
The Hamilton Water billboard goes on to tell us that the water has been tested over 47,000 times. Great, right? Not according to some selling filters. No, there are some big issues with tap water, including what the government may not want us to know, and likely won’t appear on a billboard in your town anytime soon:
Government Outlines Potential Health Effects From Tap Water Government department recently described more than 80 contaminants in tap water that, when consumed, can cause a host of problems including: diarrhea, vomiting, cramps, legionnaire’s disease, pneumonia, headaches, nausea, an increased risk of cancer, liver, kidney, central nervous system problems, eye/nose irritation, stomach discomfort, increased blood cholesterol, decreased blood sugar, skin damage, problems with the circulatory system, increased chance of developing benign intestinal polyps, intestinal lesions, allergic dermatitis, gastrointestinal distress. Further, these toxins can afflict people with Wilson’s disease, nerve damage, thyroid problems, and bone diseases. Worse still, your children could suffer from delays in physical and mental development, attention-span deficits and learning abilities. Infants below the age of six-months could become seriously ill, experience shortness of breath, blue baby syndrome, hair or finger nail loss, numbness in the fingers or toes, intestinal and liver problems, nervous system problems, spleen problems, anemia, cardiovascular or reproductive problems, adrenal gland problems, weight loss, cataracts, skin changes, thymus, gland problems, immune deficiencies, and ill-functioning adrenal glands. This is more than enough to cause great concern!! Therefore, it is not a question of whether tap water is dangerous or not, the question is what action you are going to take to make sure your family’s drinking water is safe. A high quality water filter will can protect your drinking water. See more here: We are poisoning ourselves with tap water.Government’s list of potential contaminants in drinking water that are health risks.
Point first, there is a strong argument that the value of fluoride is a deception. Christopher Bryson was so convinced of it, he wrote a book, The Fluoride Deception:
So, when Hamilton’s tests are performed — all 47,000 of them — are they including the risks as outlined above?
Even with DDT, you don’t have the consistently strong data that the compound can cause cancer as you now have with fluoride.’
Sorry but a little money savings doesn’t quite cut the mustard.
There is great concern now that authorities in the U.S. (not sure about Canada) are talking about adding “lithium” to the water supply, on top of the already questionable fluoride.
This prompted a hit piece by Wired Magazine on Alex Jones, citing that Jones is lying about the government wanting to add lithium.
Lithium additives to the water supply ARE being proposed, ostensibly as a way to lower the suicide rate. Sodium Floride WAS used by the Nazis to make jewish populations more docile. The CDC and the corporate mainstream media urged pregnant mothers and children to use the flu shot last season, assuring them it was safe, and deriding the “paranoid conspiracy theorists” who warned against it – and I myself, in administering it, read the package insert which clearly stated “The safety of this vaccine for use with pregnant women and children has not been evaluated.” This is about money and power. Give yourself an education in both before you join the simian hooting against “liars” and “paranoids” that follows fact-challenged ad hominem attacks such as the above article,” concludes another commenter.
So we have questionable motives of vaccinations, fluoride in the water, and now lithium. And let’s not forget what was also peddled as good, that should have us scratching our heads in worry — the gardasil vaccine.
Alex Jones in a serious warning:
Could there be alterior motives that would have us questioning the sales pitch? To answer that question is to wonder what accepting their promise of harmlessness is at face value. Unfortunately, the more you learn, the more you question, and when you watch an overview of governments past and their motives for using chemicals in vaccines and water supplies, we must all become very aware of our surroundings. Here is the interview with Alan Watt by Alex Jones:
Strange timing and coincidence the City of Hamilton is selling us on drinking the water? Perhaps.
When 47,000 tests are done on the water, are they ensuring there is no fluoride? How about lithium, mercury, and lead? Or one of the other horrendous ingredients as outlined above. So, go ahead, drinky drinky?
I’d love to know who sold the budgeting department on the need to spend money promoting this. A very interesting investigation that perhaps a mainstream investigative journalist might probe.
Sorry if I’m a little more than a bit suspicious. We can’t help but wonder as we piece this all together now can we?
At best, experts may agree that the only benefit of fluoride for teeth is when it is in the mouth.
Proponents of fluoride in drinking water claim it helps populations with tooth decay. But, we are ingesting this and the bigger issue is, why swallow it?
Here are some interesting articles related to fluoride:
Lester the dentist that learned that calcium fluoride is not what is put in drinking water, it is far more sinister (do dentists really know why fluoride is safe?)
Fluoride is a pollutant – a by-product of copper, iron and aluminum manufacturing. The problem of how to legally dispose of fluoride was solved in the 1930′s when a study (funded by one of the country’s largest aluminum companies) concluded that fluoride prevented tooth decay.Even more alarming the chemicals most used to fluoridate drinking water are silicofluorides, contaminated waste product of industry, that were never safety tested on humans or animals. As a result what we are actually doing is conducting a massive toxicological experiment with our children as the test subjects.
A long term study published in 1988 found that even low levels of aluminum-fluoride in drinking water delivered more aluminum to the brain than concentrated aluminum fluoride. The same study found that low levels of aluminum fluoride and sodium fluoride found in “optimally” fluoridated water cause severe kidney damage and lesions to the brain similar to those found in Alzheimer’s and other forms of dementia.
“In the 1930`s, Hitler and the German Nazi`s envisioned a world to be dominated and controlled by a Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass-control which was submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies. By this method they could control the population in whole areas, reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place. …
Systemic fluorides can also give topical protection because ingested fluoride is present in saliva, which continually bathes the teeth providing a reservoir of fluoride that can be incorporated into the tooth surface to prevent decay
Are the same people that promote fluoride, now telling us that “lithium” added to water is going to be beneficial?
