The top 20 terrorist ‘targets’ are the bankers?: That was the reason for the tight G20 security?

A report in recent Canadian News had Andre Marin, Ontario’s Ombudsman saying the G20 fiasco in Toronto “amounted to Martial Law”.

Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty refused to acknowledge the violation on civil liberties, and explained it this way:

But McGuinty rejected Marin’s assertion that what his government did behind closed doors on June 2 was “illegal” and “likely unconstitutional.”

The Ontario Premier’s allegiances are in dire question already, and the way he handled the G20 security issues is not surprising. McGuinty was seen to be showing great attention to the Queen on her later visit to Canada, and he has pushed for all day kindergarten for children as young as four, a hallmark sign an Orwellian state is being implemented.

Assessing the strategy and planning for the G20 can vary by how one views the big picture. If it were merely to protect the banking representatives it went overboard, but if it were to stir the crowd,  conditioning them for the future the new world order it was right on target. It might best be described as living up to the globalists’ expectations.  There is an obvious pattern at the G20 summits of the past (including Pittsburgh) which  paints a picture of an agenda to condition the people to get used to abuse and violation of their rights. I wouldn’t buy the argument that there were mistakes made in letting people know.

 The bombshell reasoning for such tight security was the police request for assistance, as McGuinty explained:

“The government was acting on a request from police to deal with possible terrorist threats at the G20 summit and even the ombudsman said its motives were good, McGuinty noted.

“He said that we acted with good intentions, that the police came to us and said: ‘We need your help. We’re going to be hosting the G20 and there are possibly the top 20 terrorist targets on the face of this planet coming together in one city,” the premier said.

Apologies are in order. I thought the police were saying the top 20 terrorists would be at the G20 meetings in the crowd. What they meant was that the “targets” were the bank representatives. Well, if they are suggesting the bankers would be terrorist targets, who are they suggesting the terrorists would be?

It would seem that everyone was suspect.

Journalists were mistreated as well as innocent civilians. Known political activists that were attempting to cross the border from the U.S. representing the organization, We are Change were not allowed to enter Canada. The police targeted Charlie Veitch from England, and he was arrested and charged with impersonating an officer.

Veitch was simply doing his usual humorous rants with bullhorn, and calling himself the “Love Police”. When arrested, Veitch explained on video that the police knew who he was, and they commented that they had a real live dissident on their hands.

During the Bilderberg Group meetings in Ottawa in 2006, Alex Jones was similarly mistreated, being detained for several hours, and having his computer system checked.

I think we can see that either the G20 leaders and their handlers are sending a message that is clear that to protest the new world as controlled by bankers you will pay the price. The event was a mere show of power.

To believe a true terrorist would use the G20, and be part of the crowd is laughable. After all, it is often those accused as being public enemy number one that get the best treatment, and are “in on the joke”.  Especially since:

Al-Qaeda terror mastermind Anwar Al-Awlaki, the man who helped plot the aborted Christmas Day bombing, the Fort Hood shooting, the Times Square bombing attempt, and who also preached to the alleged September 11 hijackers, dined at the Pentagon just months after 9/11 documents obtained by Fox News show.

The supposed “real terrorists” are treated like royalty, because this is all just a game. The real terrorists most times are CIA operatives, or patsies drugged out of their heads like the underwear bomber on Christmas day. The real terrorists are an excuse to instigate right-stripping laws like the Patriot Act in the U.S. that now has videos at U.S. Wal-Mart stores urging people to look for anything suspicious.

It has widely been argued by Max Keiser and others that it is the bankers on Wall Street who are the true “financial terrorists”, responsible for the collapse of global economies the world over. A systematic destruction and ponzi scheme of derivative make believe turned real. The banks that are broke, desperately seeking comfort via the IMF and World Bank to go after all real assets including the pension plans of the working citizens of the world.

Thus, real terrorism is being reined on by the governments of the world on its citizens.

With as many as 800 FEMA camps reported on shows like Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura, someone should remind the American government who was accused of the events of 9/11. Here’s a hint: It wasn’t the current target – the American population. It seems the lack of memory extended itself not long after 9/11.

Fox News has shown us how the true terrorists are treated:

Conditioning or protection?

Either way, they must think we are completely stupid and terribly uninformed!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s