The Complicated deceptions of Conspiracy Theory: How one side refuses to bring it all to the table

This is the first in a new train of thought in the examination of the very interesting infighting taking place amongst conspiracy theorists, and what the theater may actually mean.

It was not that long ago that a conspiracy theory funny man, Charlie Veitch, shocked the conspiracy world with his sudden about face on his belief that 9/11 was an inside job. Suddenly, Veitch seemed to drink the kool aid of the official story of the governments, and defended the collapse of the buildings official story that fires could have been responsible.

Not long before that time, Veitch was in Toronto to join Dan Dicks, a Canadian liberty fighter, filmmaker, and conspiracy theorist, who defends Alex Jones as just an honest guy that seems genuine.

Dicks has added in early November 2012, that Veitch is now attacking him. Nothing like a little turncoat backstabbing to promote your more credible stance on things, and give the people something to latch on to.

It’s interesting that amongst the conspiracy theorists, there are apologists that will defend one another while under attack from former followers that notice something quite not right in the consistency department with the so-called leaders of the truth movement.

Dan Dicks, when defending Alex Jones, admitted that some have called him cointelpro as well, and the questioning amongst the libertarian types continues. There would be good reason for Dicks to want to keep the cash train rolling off the backside of Alex Jones’ support of the Canadian faction. It was not long ago we were told there would not be a Press for Truth without subscribing members, and well, it just would not exist. So, I suppose we must excuse those who get their fame from the guru’s endorsements, and the defense of the big guy is I suppose, understandable. But for those of us wanting it all on the table, it is not good enough, especially when films are being made to supposedly give us the big picture.

According to Dicks, “He seems legit. He seems credible”.

The Youtubers following Jones become conspicuous by their content. The “Alex Jones talking points” are noticeable in their arguments in their videos. There are some fundamentals of the direction these conspiracy theorists take.

The real question to Dicks should be, “Have you looked into the evidence to support the fact that he is controlled opposition? For a researcher and filmmaker, don’t you owe it to your audience to give it justice?”

Let’s have a look at the universal explanation why the world is so screwy

For one, it is a universal belief that the name Rothschild was derived from a “red shield” above a store of one of the Rothschild family members many, many years ago, and they adopted the name. In the quest of freedom and understanding of the big, bad bankers responsible for the collapse of modern society, a cartoon explaining how the Rothschilds used their power to take over the money supplies of the world through the Federal Reserve and other central banking systems emerged. The cartoon of course having the head of the beast sport a red shield to drive the point home, and sit in the subconscious so no other explanation would be needed, nor should be desired.

I am going to tell my family that I saw a rock on the road, and it moved me so much that I am changing our family name to the “Stoners”. That’s the heritage I want to have the world remember us by.

To drive the credibility home for good, a few years back, the guru of conspiracy theory, the self-determined “tip of the spear” Alex Jones interviewed the book pushing David de Rothschild, Jones made a point to ensure the “red shield” facade was driven home when he told de Rothschild, “I’m calling you out red shield!” Sure he is. Or, could it simply be a confirmation from one buddy to another that I am driving home a deception to his flock that “red shield” is the reason for the name Rothschild?

Only after questioning the entire truth movement would one want to learn the other potential explanations where “Rothschild” was derived from. And, googling “Barbara Aho, Rothschild”, you will find a reason that fits with counter-conspiracy idea that Zionism and the Biblical reasoning could hold merit. And, you would realize that what is taboo is very interesting. Could mainstream conspiracy theory be a front to confuse what might otherwise become apparent? Could the likes of Alex Jones and the flock be controlled opposition to throw us off the trail of the real enemies, their roots, affiliations and goals?
Well, when Barbara Aho explains that Rothschild means “Ruth’s Child”, the lineage of Jesus Christ, then this should get anyone’s attention. Prepare to want to delve deeper into the religious link to what is happening, and opening your mind to what is taboo to the Jones contingent – – the possibility that there exists a controlled opposition to bring many facts, but shape them in such a way to take you off an interesting course.

For those that “were” on Jones’ side at one time but had a bit of a wake up call to question the motives of their leader, they might, like me start to look for an explanation as to who he might really be, and what motive he may actually have.

For me, the interview with Webster Tarpley at the close of the Bilderberg 2012 meetings was that moment. Jones blasted Tarpley, defended Ron Paul, and downplayed some pretty significant points that Tarpley had about the Paul clan that should have been explored by a true truth seeker. But, the cover up seemed more important, and raised a big red flag for me and many others.

For one, why did Ron Paul accept campaign donations from Peter Thiel, a Bilderberger, and explain it away with the simple excuse that he cannot control who donates to the cause. If it were anybody else, the truth movement would have been bringing this up forever, and ensuring it was a talking point to bring others to the movement. But because it was the consistent Ron Paul, friend of the liberty movement and grandfather of the cause, it was brushed under the rug of the Jones-spawned truthers. And, after confronting a few of these guys on their YouTube accounts, they certainly have stuck to their guns.

And, ironically, where being “Illuminati” is bad, being a high level Freemason as Paul has been explained to be, it suddenly is an excuseable, avoidable topic.

Rand Paul’s coincidental endorsement of Mitt Romney had father Ron go into hiding for a period, as we all wondered if his political career was over. Speculation that Paul was a sellout for the advancement of his son went viral.

The defense of Ron Paul is an obvious sign of the Jones-bourne contingent toeing the party line. The man of liberty needs defense to keep the explanation of the big picture alive. If he were proven a fraud, what would that do to the “red shield”, evil banking, Federal Reserve enemy that is at the epicenter of the movement. It’s the big bad banking families and elites from Bilderberg that are responsible for the collapse of the world, and the ones responsible for wanting to reduce the world’s population.

But then there are the taboos.

As a Jones-bourne conspiracy theorist, you do not touch on the significance of Zionism, the Jesuits, the Vatican, or the Pope. You do not bring up Mossad as a potential perpetrator of the events of 9/11, nor do you go deep on the John Birch Society, or the Council for National Policy (CNP).

In that group you will find Dan Dicks, Fabian for Liberty, Mark Dice, and Adam Kokesh.

In the next segment, we will examine Mark Dice, and the possible reason he trashed Alex Jones, and later went on Adam vs. the Man to explain that we should not look to any one man for all the truth. The red flag in me says that it could be the potential of Jones working with the John Birch Society as a controlled opposition that needs to be countered.

And, that would be an interesting use of a friend to counter his “ex” buddy, and yet again throw us off the trail as to why we need to look to no one man. You would expect the unexpected to occur then, like in desperate times, desperate measures are needed.  The conspiracy herd that are growing in questioning their ex leader will need to be told why, and it would seem Mark Dice has answered the calling.

If the exposure of Jones is now going to put the con on red alert, you can expect more from Dice and others to say the man must have gone off the deep-end, is now egomaniacal (as described by Dice), and has lost it trying to cover his overhead with the pushing  of his MLM kool aid drink, tangy tangerine.

They all want to grow the operation, don’t they? They all want to improve their microphones, sets, and become, well, like the mainstream media they all detest. My word, do they really want to be alternative, or more like the status quo?

One Youtube comment said it best. “Where did Jones go?”.

Well, we are here to find out. Stay tuned for more.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s