Category Archives: Bilderberg

Not getting their way is exactly what they want (Part One)

What in the world is going on?

We have the resignation of Ron Paul from politics but not from life. The man for many years that stood for the principles of liberty, sound currency backed by gold, and the ceasing of needless, endless war stepped down.

We have an escalation in turmoil. Obama is under fire for his very eligibility with a phony looking, adobe acrobat layered birth certificate that was not scanned in even if fake to make it look real, oh no my goodness – – it was created in cyberspace and even to the man who knows the basics of adding content to an adobe document can see that it has layers of deceit that if we didn’t know any better was meant to create an issue.

Before Ron Paul retired, we know he got a generous campaign donation from none other than Peter Thiel, and according to Paul, he cannot control who donates to his cause or his coffers. So, I suppose Paul is saying that Thiel may have misdirected his payment and didn’t intend to line Paul’s pockets. What a fool Mr. Thiel is. Doesn’t he realize Paul stands for liberty and freedom and Thiel, well, he is a Bilderberger. Need we say more?

We have had Alex Jones supporting any idea that Ron Paul could and can muster, and sometimes supporting Paul’s ideas before Paul even thought them up first – amazing stuff.

Glenn Beck, although opposed and mocking of Alex Jones (and vice versa) were like the guys on the Austin Powers series: “We are not so different you and I”. These guys seemed to interlay similar government bashing with slight twists. Beck claims 911 truthers are dangerous like Van Jones, and  (Alex) Jones supports 911 truth supporters as the epicentre of all things conspiracy. Both however back the buying of gold. Beck leans towards Obama the communist, and Jones to Obama the puppet of the elite. Both create a following, slightly divided but both mad at their government.

Jones appears on Fox News once in a while, under attack, and being watched closely by the police around the studio, while Glenn Beck has never appeared on the Alex Jones Show. They are like arch enemies in a family that hates each other, but blood is thicker than water —  so they are so similar in so many ways you really have to wonder if they are somehow on the same team.

Yes, just about every week, Alex Jones has the “most important broadcast he has ever done”, and you are supposed to feel special. Well, do you?

We have the NSA spy scandal, the gun running Fast and Furious issue, Benghazi, and all the things that could take Obama to impeachment waiting on the brink.

All these issues. Isn’t it great we have guys like Alex Jones and even Glenn Beck to keep bringing us “the truth”? Wasn’t it great to have had the common sense politician bring it to us in clear, easy to understand language that the government is not really run by the people but the Federal Reserve who prints money out of thin air? Hasn’t it been great that the powers that be have been exposed and continue to be exposed without interruption day after day, broadcast after broadcast, year in, year out?

Aren’t we lucky to have been told the truth, and we can take it to our friends, and neighbours  and family and “wake them up to the same reality we now know”? Great, right?

Well, hold on a second will ya?

Let’s all take a deep breath, stand back, and look at a much bigger picture and see if it makes sense.

The minority that wants to control the world may or may not be all at Bilderberg, but that is where the bullhorn gets a lot of action. The world controllers responsible for the banking collapse, the Euro, the Euro zone, global warming propaganda, and eugenics are funnelled to a location every year that Jones and the troop can gather and exchange stories, heck who knows, maybe light a campfire and roast weenies, who knows?

Alex Jones in 2013 said that in the UK where the meeting was, there was likely anti-aircraft missiles at wait, standing by, but there was no doubt a no fly zone imposed over the Bilderberg confab. Yes, he said that in a BBC interview:

So, take a step back now. Deep breath. Relax. Ready?

The guys at Bilderberg that run the show are a few in number. Most are looking really old because they are old. There is no fountain of youth. They are frail and they are few. The world’s population on the other hand is vast. Billions of people. The vast majority of people are not going to allow a few to take over.

The FEMA camps that are claimed to be the new death camps are waiting for the trains to show up with the first of those that are to be taken to the “camps”, like in the days of Hitler. Jones makes several inferences to the similarity. Let’s also remember that the world fought Hitler and the world won.

How many people can fit in these camps, even at capacity? Will the billions of earth’s inhabitants fit? No, of course not.

The entire truth movement’s agenda is to get you to “wake up”, then wake up the masses to the takeover by the elite.

Guys like Jones claim the only reason the globalists have not killed him is because   his operation would take on a second wind and become more credible. Jones would think I suppose, that he would be a martyr. That is the reason why his exposing of the globalists is stopping them in their tracks. Sound credible? Really?

So, if the conspiracy theory leaders get enough people to wake up to the world takeover by the elite, we can “continue to expose them thus we can stop these people”. Exposing them is the way to ensure they slow down their global agenda of eugenics.

From Ron Paul, if we can end the Federal Reserve we can return to sound currency of gold.

Time to step back again.

If gold becomes the world reserve currency again, we need to ask ourselves who would have all the power if that were the case? If your assets and mine are in the current currency, including pension plans backed by stock market investments, who would stand to lose the most if the slate is wiped clean, and gold became the basis of money again (at this point)? Right: We lose. At least the majority of us would.

If Ron Paul, when running for President was able to implement his budget cuts, reducing food stamps to 30 cents a meal per person who would lose?

So, if we really listen to the leaders of liberty are we going to win or be wiped out, left to die on the streets?

If each state really seceded from the union would this be a division or a unification move? United we stand (and are strong), divided we fall (because we have been weakened). Who suggested it was our “right” to be informed of the right to secession? You got it – – Ron Paul. Who backed him on one of his “most important broadcasts he has ever done”? Right again – – Alex Jones. Starting to see something here?

What is it you want the most right now if you are a conspiracy theorist? Do you want it to be over? Do you want to be proven right? Do you want the collapse to occur to prove to your friends and your family that you were not crazy?

Take a step back and think this over.

Is it better to be right or happy? Is it more important to be right than secure financially? Is it most important to be right, if it means the globalists got their way and we are all slaves?

What has your conspiracy theory following done to you?

Are you living off government subsidies because you don’t have a job, have reduced ambition, and given further reason to give up by your daily following of Alex Jones telling you how hopeless we are, and that the American Dream is Dying?

What has been the result of following the leaders?

Have you stocked up on guns and ammunition? Have you stockpiled food, water, and other weapons waiting for the apocalyse? Have you succumbed and resolved the fact that this is coming and there is no way for you or anybody else to stop it?

Do you really think that those that have will not help those that don’t? Have you been convinced that your gun is going to protect you from the military on the streets (someone’s dad, uncle, aunt or mom) from coming to your home and dragging you off to one of those death camps?

Do you really think those few old people, some of whom might be at Bilderberg are capable of controlling and pulling so many strings, and capable of convincing so many people that this is the way it needs to be, and you have no power?

Well, the conspiracy theory leaders would lead you to believe that now wouldn’t they? And, aren’t they doing that right now to you? Aren’t they telling you to prepare because the all powerful elite are going to get their way?

That is, unless the leaders like Alex Jones can convince you to wake up your friends in large numbers and stop them, right?

If you are convinced that the Fed needs to end, and the government is evil, you can overthrow your government, end the Fed, return to sound currency, and watch a whole bunch of peoples’ wealth and income, and food stamps go down the drain, hooray!!

You will have won if you can do that. Great work. Where will it get you?

Well, they would tell you that it is better to bite the bullet, face the music now and rebuild. That would mean wiping out your income, security, and basically the future of your family, kids, and grandchildren. It’s the way it has to be, and well, like you say, let’s get it over with already – – bring on the collapse! Yes, you can rebuild and become heros if you don’t get to watch sitcoms anymore.

We will continue to expand on this. But for now, beware of who you listen to.

Are you really sure the guys that are the leaders of liberty are really out to serve your best interests, or could they be directing the masses to wish for their own destruction? Are you really certain what you are wishing for isn’t what the elite want you to want? Are you sure by winning you are not losing?

With Alex Jones and other leaders fighting them off and protecting humanity, are the elite really losing? By not getting their way, are the elite getting what they desire because you are wishing for your own demise?

Could they be using certain (controlled opposition) leaders to win so you feel victorious, but in reality getting you to want what they want? Clever if true, right?

We will continue soon…..

Advertisements

“They got a plan”

Alex Jones is the man holding the NWO (New World Order) from infiltrating the room! Help Alex hold back the door everyone. He can do it alone, but it would be better if you helped him.

Wait, is Jones suggesting that his operation, and you, the guy with the blog or YouTube account is holding back the power elite (count ’em according to Jones as a “few dozen”)?

Sooooooo, if Alex Jones and his “operation” weren’t around the NWO would have finished their manual. That is, according to Jones he knows what their plan is because he “reads their manuals”. How simple is that? Kind of like getting mommy to read you a bedtime Dr. Seuss book as she gives you warm milk and tucks you into beddie by. Only difference between mommy and the tip of the … (you know) is that mommy leaves the book beside your bed, and Jones, he never shows you much of anything no matter how much you ask him to show you more than newspaper clippings.

Where does this man have time to research all this stuff and stay one step ahead of all those boogie men, my word?

No, there is a pattern in the “operation” Jones professes to run that has had similar strategy for all the years he has been on air:

  • if we keep exposing them, they will not be able to move forward on their evil plans (help me hold the door!)
  • there is a massive conspiracy from all the big guys, regardless of secret society affiliation. So forget the Zionists, SMOM, Jesuits, Freemasons, and others. There are no links, just a smattering of big guys from all these mixed in like a stew of deceit. No ties, that’s why Jones pays no heed to criticism why he doesn’t dig deep on relationships.
  • he has his list of who he can tear to shreds that includes just about everyone at FOX News, and as a hit on him, they invite him to comment every once in a while because they are masochists over there) CNN, same. BBC, same. They don’t like him, but they give him mainstream exposure because (scratching head).
  • he parades a long list of “experts” that are ex this and ex that. And BTW, the ex this and that’s are all exes of organizations which you are now supposed to despise, and clean your guns in joyful hope for the crap coming down. Lock and load soldier! Oh, and pay no heed to the fact that these guys are all big time supporters of the mastermind conspiracy theory group at the John Birch Society. Take careful note, because it’s the one time when interviewing these people, Alex doesn’t have to add his constant interruptions at a disturbing pace. That would suggest something, wouldn’t you think?
  • The political faction supported is the guy(s) in politics that stand for “liberty”, and what they say goes. That would have been the case before the Ron Paul bail out on the truthers, and after. But in between, we had a flip-flopping Jones try to rationalize the flop of Paul, and come up with all kinds of rhetoric that contradicted himself. That analysis could write volumes of bloggery that cannot be done here. You may recall that time of flopping like a fish on air. I think he also said Obama would be better to have in office as the “devil we know” kind of thing.

Yes, there is more, but I cannot think clearly right now. My mind is clouded by all the sky is falling stuff that the followers of Jones are bombarded with daily.

And, aren’t you happy the next time you are told that “this is the most important broadcast I have ever done on air”? Aren’t you happy you awoke just in time to be part of the earth shattering news?

To close (for now, but not for good), I will leave you with this thought. Where will they put the millions of people in the FEMA camp operations? Won’t they fill up rather fast? Won’t the families of the detainees start to question and demand release of the first batch they want to put on the trains?

Is it really like Hitler’s final solution? Are we really there? Will it really work?

Aren’t we lucky Mr. Jones is “holding back the door” to ensure we can all live free another day?

Does Scotty need some dilithium crystals because she is breaking up, and he can’t hold it any longer captain? Remember, the ship was breaking up for many years, almost every show, and it is now still breaking up in hokey reruns.

Still intact. Perhaps we owe it to the guy holding the door, or perhaps it is all just a pile of bunk designed to get you to take action and get mad, and get ready for a time that will require you and your gun. And to that I say, don’t do it.

Uh oh! The BBC catches Jones off guard on controlled opposition accusation

On the barge, and always on the verge

No, it’s not Gilligan on the Island. It’s Alex Jones on “the Bilder-Barge of Liberty”.

Year after year, month after month, and day after day, Alex Jones explains to his followers that the end is near.index

For the better part or perhaps longer than 20 years, the sky has been crashing down. Turkey Lurkey has been running to find a hiding spot to take cover for as long as can be remembered. Who knows, maybe that story was written by a conspiracy theorist too.

And, now you are likely getting the idea that I am not a conspiracy theorist. Well, that is not entirely true. I may be the new brand of conspiracy theorist that sees through the game of exposing the global elite. I might be an example of who I see online in chat areas, infiltrating  and trying to counter the leaders influence on those that are supposed to be awake. The ones trying to inject some degree of alternative, alternative information are like “trolls”  — don’t rain on our parade the consiracy theorist hardcore would say. Yes, the FACT that the global elite are controlling every aspect of our lives is the only truth, and if you don’t agree you are a troll. Oopsie, don’t let confusion  create  cognitive dissonance suggesting it may be cultish.  If it doesn’t fit  the TRUTH movement’s agenda laugh it off.  Rationalize the enemies as the followers do on the TV show The Following. (Okay, I did see the brainwashing FOX TV  was putting on the public in the TV show, The Following,  when they showed the Don’t tread on me flag in one episode bashing militia.)

Cognitive Dissonance

If you have become a hard core truther, you would need to put the world around you in a self-explained box.

Why are they still building strip plazas, and look at that, another asleep builder with a new subdivision underway – – the fool! Doesn’t he or the people that fund the project get in on the “truth” that there is no sense building nice things for people because they are all doomed to lose everything to the globalist .1%? Now, is it .1% or a lesser number? If these few were to take over the world and have everyone lose their homes, would these freaky people get off on occupying your home, and mine, and his and hers for a few hours just because they can? Would the bulldozers come out eventually as the tent cities grow, and level our homes – – you know – – the ones we could no longer afford?

Would the FEMA camps need to grow to become FEMA cities, and then they would build apartment complexes of FEMA concentration camps, and perhaps give FEMA housing to those that show a little more acceptance to the world domineerers who have taken over?

Will it become like David Icke recently expressed at Bilderberg 2013, that there will be the tiny rich majority at the top of the pyramid, and a huge glut of police and military in the middle, and the vast majority at the bottom?

I wonder where that would leave the families of the police and military. Will they get to stay in the middle, or will they need to go to the bottom, perhaps allowed to have conjugal visits with the cops that hold privilege and then need to return to where the billions are – – at the bottom where they belong.

I guess the housing developments, and road improvements you see every summer will become redundant at some time, and REALLY SOON RIGHT?

How many years have you been in on the sky is falling party – – one, two, three, or more? Are the road crew still out on the streets fixing the potholes you don’t deserve to have fixed for you slave? Are they still offering to sell you the big screen TV’s you don’t deserve to have as the new poor class?

At what point does the sky finally fall, and they can stop pretending to care about us anymore? At what point will the conflicts in information side with the “government hates us” conspiracy dudes like Alex Jones and the clan of wannabees that hang off his every word, at 11 AM Central every day? In short, when does Alex become really right, instead of the bunch of “told ya so’s” he constantly rams down the minds of those he is supposedly protecting in the “war on for your mind”?

When does the proverbial sh_ _ really hit the fan? When? I mean if you are in and agree with this dude and the rest of the menagerie pranced in front of you daily you must want the final countdown to start paying off right?.

just get it over with already, you can’t wait any longer, right? Am I right?

Okay, you might agree with me on some of the inconsistencies but are far from on my side. Well, it gets worse. Look at the Book of Revelation to learn or refresh your memory. When the stuff really hits the fan, they will have you forgetting about Jesus and worshipping the sun, the sky, the land, and the dirt where your house used to be.

I really wish I was wrong on the conspiracy leaders. I really wish I didn’t think they are controlled by the very elite that the conspiracy leaders profess to be “exposing”. But, I fear that the leaders that can get on a barge on a river in the UK, with bullhorn in hand, and bark at the Bilderberg attendees are not so opposed to them after all. They may just have a mission the likes of which you have not considered.

I really wish they weren’t alive and in business to corral those that turn disgruntled, and use them like the violent revolution cult that they will be useful for. Because without violence, there is no game, anarchy, chaos, and the resulting order that they can implement globally.

So, if you come to the same realization I have, the equivalent view of the man on a barge is like in 2013 watching the show, “Lost in Space” and seeing it for the hokey acting and scare tactics that worked on you then, but in no way have the same effect on you now. The thought will be that you see right through it and view it as a charade. You will  see it as a duping for those that are under a spell, and under the conspiracy brainwashing that started with someone getting you to watch a couple of movies. Remember that counter-culture shock? Yes, way more effective than simply talking with your buddies so they get it. Get ’em to watch the movie, and sit back and enjoy the show, right?

Wait a minute Mr. Jones, are you saying billions can not take on about 36 ( a few dozen) world leaders? Really, Mr. Jones? How exactly would they pull that off? Would they need us shooting each other, creating anarchy based on anger and a violent cult-like following of worshippers?

If you are at a crossroads in your life and vulnerable, you will be drawn in to the acceptance of a group that explains why you do not have a job. It’s the globalists that have done you in, don’t feel bad, come and be a crusader of truth with us they will say. Come and devote your life like Alex, and David, and Max, and be a big time conspiracy leader.

All you need to do is spread the word, and when you can, get a better microphone for your YouTube account. Then, watch the Alex Jones show, take notes, and use it on “your broadcast that day”. Blow the minds of your friends and family with how much you know, while you shake your head in shame when they show their ignorance for not having woken up like you had. Those poor sheeple, you can tell yourself, as you live in a fantasy land of self importance, and “I’ll show them” rebelliousness. Just make sure you come up with excuses why you spend time talking about how you are all collectively helpless to the takeover by just a few, and there is really no sense in looking for work because we have become whiners, and unemployable depression cogs.

Go ahead, succumb to the notion that the elite are in control as you ironically follow them around like groupies, informing them of their powerlessness over you. Huh?

Remember that you are helpless, and you can’t even become self-employed if you choose, and do what it takes, because that is not really a good idea. They will just take it all from you at the end of the day.

Support the man on the barge that does not know your wife, or your kids, or your friends, and he is the one that you spend your time with. Forget those that don’t yet get it. Move on, get that divorce and find a conspiracy theorist like you who “gets it”. That will show them!

The man on the barge, this year, like in all years passed will pull out the bullhorn and pretend to confront the global elite. Ironically, if he didn’t draw attention to them, they wouldn’t be a factor in any of our lives. Funny how that works.

The Complicated deceptions of Conspiracy Theory: How one side refuses to bring it all to the table

This is the first in a new train of thought in the examination of the very interesting infighting taking place amongst conspiracy theorists, and what the theater may actually mean.

It was not that long ago that a conspiracy theory funny man, Charlie Veitch, shocked the conspiracy world with his sudden about face on his belief that 9/11 was an inside job. Suddenly, Veitch seemed to drink the kool aid of the official story of the governments, and defended the collapse of the buildings official story that fires could have been responsible.

Not long before that time, Veitch was in Toronto to join Dan Dicks, a Canadian liberty fighter, filmmaker, and conspiracy theorist, who defends Alex Jones as just an honest guy that seems genuine.

Dicks has added in early November 2012, that Veitch is now attacking him. Nothing like a little turncoat backstabbing to promote your more credible stance on things, and give the people something to latch on to.

It’s interesting that amongst the conspiracy theorists, there are apologists that will defend one another while under attack from former followers that notice something quite not right in the consistency department with the so-called leaders of the truth movement.

Dan Dicks, when defending Alex Jones, admitted that some have called him cointelpro as well, and the questioning amongst the libertarian types continues. There would be good reason for Dicks to want to keep the cash train rolling off the backside of Alex Jones’ support of the Canadian faction. It was not long ago we were told there would not be a Press for Truth without subscribing members, and well, it just would not exist. So, I suppose we must excuse those who get their fame from the guru’s endorsements, and the defense of the big guy is I suppose, understandable. But for those of us wanting it all on the table, it is not good enough, especially when films are being made to supposedly give us the big picture.

According to Dicks, “He seems legit. He seems credible”.

The Youtubers following Jones become conspicuous by their content. The “Alex Jones talking points” are noticeable in their arguments in their videos. There are some fundamentals of the direction these conspiracy theorists take.

The real question to Dicks should be, “Have you looked into the evidence to support the fact that he is controlled opposition? For a researcher and filmmaker, don’t you owe it to your audience to give it justice?”

Let’s have a look at the universal explanation why the world is so screwy

For one, it is a universal belief that the name Rothschild was derived from a “red shield” above a store of one of the Rothschild family members many, many years ago, and they adopted the name. In the quest of freedom and understanding of the big, bad bankers responsible for the collapse of modern society, a cartoon explaining how the Rothschilds used their power to take over the money supplies of the world through the Federal Reserve and other central banking systems emerged. The cartoon of course having the head of the beast sport a red shield to drive the point home, and sit in the subconscious so no other explanation would be needed, nor should be desired.

I am going to tell my family that I saw a rock on the road, and it moved me so much that I am changing our family name to the “Stoners”. That’s the heritage I want to have the world remember us by.

To drive the credibility home for good, a few years back, the guru of conspiracy theory, the self-determined “tip of the spear” Alex Jones interviewed the book pushing David de Rothschild, Jones made a point to ensure the “red shield” facade was driven home when he told de Rothschild, “I’m calling you out red shield!” Sure he is. Or, could it simply be a confirmation from one buddy to another that I am driving home a deception to his flock that “red shield” is the reason for the name Rothschild?

Only after questioning the entire truth movement would one want to learn the other potential explanations where “Rothschild” was derived from. And, googling “Barbara Aho, Rothschild”, you will find a reason that fits with counter-conspiracy idea that Zionism and the Biblical reasoning could hold merit. And, you would realize that what is taboo is very interesting. Could mainstream conspiracy theory be a front to confuse what might otherwise become apparent? Could the likes of Alex Jones and the flock be controlled opposition to throw us off the trail of the real enemies, their roots, affiliations and goals?
Well, when Barbara Aho explains that Rothschild means “Ruth’s Child”, the lineage of Jesus Christ, then this should get anyone’s attention. Prepare to want to delve deeper into the religious link to what is happening, and opening your mind to what is taboo to the Jones contingent – – the possibility that there exists a controlled opposition to bring many facts, but shape them in such a way to take you off an interesting course.

For those that “were” on Jones’ side at one time but had a bit of a wake up call to question the motives of their leader, they might, like me start to look for an explanation as to who he might really be, and what motive he may actually have.

For me, the interview with Webster Tarpley at the close of the Bilderberg 2012 meetings was that moment. Jones blasted Tarpley, defended Ron Paul, and downplayed some pretty significant points that Tarpley had about the Paul clan that should have been explored by a true truth seeker. But, the cover up seemed more important, and raised a big red flag for me and many others.

For one, why did Ron Paul accept campaign donations from Peter Thiel, a Bilderberger, and explain it away with the simple excuse that he cannot control who donates to the cause. If it were anybody else, the truth movement would have been bringing this up forever, and ensuring it was a talking point to bring others to the movement. But because it was the consistent Ron Paul, friend of the liberty movement and grandfather of the cause, it was brushed under the rug of the Jones-spawned truthers. And, after confronting a few of these guys on their YouTube accounts, they certainly have stuck to their guns.

And, ironically, where being “Illuminati” is bad, being a high level Freemason as Paul has been explained to be, it suddenly is an excuseable, avoidable topic.

Rand Paul’s coincidental endorsement of Mitt Romney had father Ron go into hiding for a period, as we all wondered if his political career was over. Speculation that Paul was a sellout for the advancement of his son went viral.

The defense of Ron Paul is an obvious sign of the Jones-bourne contingent toeing the party line. The man of liberty needs defense to keep the explanation of the big picture alive. If he were proven a fraud, what would that do to the “red shield”, evil banking, Federal Reserve enemy that is at the epicenter of the movement. It’s the big bad banking families and elites from Bilderberg that are responsible for the collapse of the world, and the ones responsible for wanting to reduce the world’s population.

But then there are the taboos.

As a Jones-bourne conspiracy theorist, you do not touch on the significance of Zionism, the Jesuits, the Vatican, or the Pope. You do not bring up Mossad as a potential perpetrator of the events of 9/11, nor do you go deep on the John Birch Society, or the Council for National Policy (CNP).

In that group you will find Dan Dicks, Fabian for Liberty, Mark Dice, and Adam Kokesh.

In the next segment, we will examine Mark Dice, and the possible reason he trashed Alex Jones, and later went on Adam vs. the Man to explain that we should not look to any one man for all the truth. The red flag in me says that it could be the potential of Jones working with the John Birch Society as a controlled opposition that needs to be countered.

And, that would be an interesting use of a friend to counter his “ex” buddy, and yet again throw us off the trail as to why we need to look to no one man. You would expect the unexpected to occur then, like in desperate times, desperate measures are needed.  The conspiracy herd that are growing in questioning their ex leader will need to be told why, and it would seem Mark Dice has answered the calling.

If the exposure of Jones is now going to put the con on red alert, you can expect more from Dice and others to say the man must have gone off the deep-end, is now egomaniacal (as described by Dice), and has lost it trying to cover his overhead with the pushing  of his MLM kool aid drink, tangy tangerine.

They all want to grow the operation, don’t they? They all want to improve their microphones, sets, and become, well, like the mainstream media they all detest. My word, do they really want to be alternative, or more like the status quo?

One Youtube comment said it best. “Where did Jones go?”.

Well, we are here to find out. Stay tuned for more.

Tarpley is bang on when it comes to pension plans and trade unions: So why is Alex Jones now drumming a different beat?

The game of bait and switch to keep you distracted from the goal of wealth stripping may have a partner to Glenn Beck. Perhaps there are more than one “truth teller” that is guilty of deceit!

We contributed in exposing the Bilderberg Agenda to Infowars.com, and this article submitted in June 2010 outlined Beck’s mission to attack pension plans and trade unions, because of the argument that the union leaders are corrupt.

This is exactly what Webster Tarpley discussed with Alex Jones, but later in discussion, Jones talked with Aaron Dykes about how corrupt union heads are part of the globalist mission. The issue is the protection of the innocent worker. If the head of their unions are corrupt, why should the workers be put at risk?

This makes Alex Jones suspect to further the globalist goals, no different than Glenn Beck.

Here is an excerpt from the above-mentioned article entitled, Creating The Great Union Divide:

According to Beck, you cannot blame the bankers when times get tough. And, we all know that Beck supported the banker bailout claiming a very weak argument that if the banks failed, the economy would have failed. He defended his position on this, but what matters is action not words. Supporting the bank bailout and attacking labor unions puts Americans at risk.

When Beck has not addressed the big picture adequately – that is, the magnitude of George Soros and the New World Order, how does he justify putting the average American union employee at risk of financial insecurity? Are the union members that are honest guilty by association? Kind of a sorry about your luck, you were duped by your union – a pawn and you must be  sacrificed argument?

The document obtained mysteriously from 1966 is a convenient backup to the quashing of trade unions, and here is an excerpt from the video’s description:

The most alarming portion of Harris’ hand-written notes concern a speech given during the Bilderberg confab by one time Communist Party member and union leader Walter P. Reuther, who was politically active from the 1930′s up until his death in 1970. Reuther was a leading force in the United Automobile Workers (UAW) and later helped set up the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/leaked-bilderberg-documents-nationalism-is-danger…
by Paul Joseph Watson

Useful minions that write articles and are under the direction of the master with little knowledge of what it means perhaps to the average guy?

Tarpley would have to get some brownie points. Look at who is being attacked and ask yourself who does it serve? In this case, again, with the sudden appearance of this “leaked” document, they can go after trade unions, furthering the Bilderberg agenda.

The analysis of similarity between Beck and Jones will continue. It may not paint a pretty picture. Where they both tell us some truth, there could be a slipping in of the true agenda to distract the masses with one issue, while they strip us of our rights beneath our noses.

We are just getting warmed up!

Words of Wisdom from a young mind more than two years ago: Ron Paul, Alex Jones, and the John Birch Society

“When the bill comes due, whenever that is, you must comply”

Oh me, oh my, the “vatican assasins” joke between Charlie Sheen and Alex Jones seems so much more funny now, tee hee.

“Jones never talks specifics who’s doing this stuff”

Alex Jones works with the John Birch Society?!

In April 2006 Jones interviewed John McManus, the president of the John Birch Society. Jones told him:
“I want to work with you guys, to see you grow.”
infowars.com/articles/commentary/alex_jones_interviews_mcmanus.htmMcManus replied that he was:
“looking forward to seeing the relationship continue”.

What relationship? Why would Jones be working with the John Birch Society? Jones avoids articles from Hufschmid and Bollyn, but he promotes articles from the John Birch Society, such as this silly article about the 4th of July:
infowars.net/articles/july2007/040707Meaning.htm

The John Birch Society is lying about the September 11 attack, and other Jewish crimes. It may have been an honest organization when it was founded, but it is definitely controlled by Zionists today.

The John Birch Society doesn’t blame Israel or Zionists for anything, which is why David Eisenberg joined and was promoted to the JBS Council:
jbs.org/node/1285

The latest rationalization of the critical-thinking, conspiracy theorist

Okay, conspiracy theorists…you have been blown away with the Ron Paul turncoat….how are you going to think your way through this one?

I have come across a terrific, critical thinker but obvious Alex Jones, Ron Paul supporter. And, don’t get me wrong, I was one of those just a few days ago. I guess if Alex Jones can flip-flop, Ron Paul can join in too, and it seems anyone at will can change friends and affiliations to serve their purposes, who am I to be any different, eh?

We have to all assess the new conspiracy possibilities with an open mind and open heart, and look into the relationships that might give us a clue on what up with that, dog?

Who really is Ron Paul? He doesn’t seem on one hand to be the guy we thought he was, that is, unless we can rationalize the move to save our image of him as the conspiracy believer, playing the game as long as he could, to have some influence over the world, to tell us all what’s really going on.

But shhhhh, don’t bat an eye when Ron can’t admit that 911 was an inside job, even though the John Birch Society professes it, and he can stand up as a speaker once in a while to rousing applause. Play the game, won’t you?

Well, here is my good YouTube friend who is rationalizing now for himself. He is a great critical thinker. I would describe him as possibly where a typical Ron Paul supporter who wants to hold onto the ideal that the Pauls are good, Alex Jones is for real, and we are party to a group that will eventually wake everyone up. Our job has just begun, and the keyboard is looking to smoke over the next several weeks:

So welcome, from Lexington, Kentucky and the rest of the world, to the new game of Conspiracy theory, part two!

Missions Impossible: Which will be harder – analyzing Alex Jones, or ensuring once bitten, twice shy?

Alex Jones says he has known the Paul family for 17 years, but doesn’t have a clear handle on where Ron Paul stands on a fundamental issue like 911, and it is unclear how much influence Jones has had directing the Paul political campaigns

Well, today was Alex Jones’ litmus test.

The politician turned traitor that Jones claims he has known well for 17 years has suddenly turned on his followers. It was a sudden  shock for most of us, but not for Webster Tarpley, who said he has professed the turncoat of Ron Paul as early as January of this year. For Alex Jones, despite covering for Ron Paul just days ago amidst bombshell information from Webster Tarpley, he now says he saw it coming for a while now. Make sense? No, not really.

Today, on his radio show, Alex Jones came to the conclusion that “he isn’t going down with the ship”, but bizarrely seemed to know what the Pauls were thinking.  Where did he get confirmation of this, when he later said he would need to speak with Ron Paul to clarify his position? Which was it – – he knew their reasoning or he would need answers?

It would seem it was time to put a little distance between him and the Paul connection to save his own hide. Yet, the apologies and direction were still on the agenda, and Jones went as far as to tell his audience that it would be better to have Obama in office again, so we could expose his agenda.

Alex explained he could see the problems with the Paul campaign strategy taking form, yet was vague on his understanding of who was at the helm directing the Pauls. There was inconsistency in his account of events: first claiming he figured it out on his own, but later said he spoke to the Paul family, and told them “not to go down that road”. So, which is it: communication with his friends of 17 years, or completely on his own?

And evidence shows that Ron Paul has consistently denied being a 911 truther, but Jones explained that four years ago Paul admitted to false flag terror.  Are we to believe that with Jones’ warning before 911 that it was going to happen that Ron Paul would not have been party to that information? Friends for 17 years and not a tip off to stop Ron Paul for voting in favor of the Afghan invasion?

You would think knowing the Paul’s, Jones would have a better grasp on the stance Ron Paul had on something so fundamental as the 911 attacks, but we are still left with little to back the closeness of him to the Paul family.

A strange aura of cult-like qualities come to the Jones game-plan.

His staff, we are told, were all in shock to admit that Jones was right again, on his assessment of the Ron Paul errors.  Aside from always being right, he also seems to command total control at all times.

The off the cuff, end of day sharing of ideas over a few drinks the other night had Webster Tarpley in the driver’s seat for a change, and he made the most of it.

Those nasty batteries just would not die,. They kept going, and going, and going. It was not in the cards to come up with an excuse to control the “crazed” Webster Tarpley, as Jones described him,  who really rose to the occasion and did really well to get some well thought out information to the fore. It was a proud moment. Divine intervention as Tarpley described it.  Jones claimed he was not censoring Tarpley. And why should he?

Censorship? Strange for a man that prides himself on honesty and a “bring it on” attitude. After all, isn’t Jones the guy who never screens the calls, and also doesn’t need a teleprompter. And by extension, wouldn’t care how good intel came out, or how it was unleashed, right?

The radio show today was full of interesting tidbits of unleashed frustration. Jones said he is a little tired of those who have little knowledge trying to tell him the way it is. It got me thinking to research when else that has been an issue.

In this YouTube clip, Jones  explains that those who refute him are losers, and jealous, powerless people. Half of the alternative media sites out there, he says “talk about Alex Jones”. Don’t start to focus on Jones, because he wants it “to be about the information”. Why would fellow Christians be jealous of a man that sees power as something that should be strived for, and despite the constant pounding that it is not about Alex Jones, whenever he looks over his shoulder, he sees those jealous types that wish they had as much influence and visitors to their site as Jones does. In a cult, there is always the explanation to refute the outcasts that are critical of the cause, is there not?

I’ve been down the block a few times and have witnessed the warning signs to watch for that would have people influenced in a cult-like setting, For one, there needs to be vulnerability, and what better way than to explain that the sky is falling and Turkey Lurkey is going down?

I am not saying there isn’t a global problem. And I am easily swayed by people who fight corruption or stand up for human rights and liberties. You will recall perhaps that I started this blog quite convinced I would stick to the injustice suffered by Jerry Moyes being taken to the cleaners and once of little value to the shift in the NHL, he was tossed aside like last year’s laundry. Kind of like the feeling many of us have today with the news of Ron Paul.

Today was damage control and perhaps too to see where he stood, and how bad it was.  To that end, Jones was quick to summarize how we felt: betrayed and feeling that the campaign was a cash grab perhaps in the latter months. Not too nice a feeling. Can you imagine those that were hoping Ron Paul was for real, and perhaps also bought Facebook at $38, and maybe had some money in MF Global? Don’t show those guys a rope, okay?

In the end times, there would be plenty of deception and isn’t it a strange vision that two men can mirror the metaphor – – the vision of Obama standing in front of an adoring crowd not much different that that of Ron Paul serving a similar pose over the last several months.

It was time to direct the anger of the masses. To focus on what to be mad about. It was Ron Paul’s comment to “be respectful”. 

Did you listen with a half-hearted zeal today? Were you assessing Alex Jones and wondering if he were part of the club that would justify not wanting to “go down with the ship”? Were you thinking back on past claims and wondering where Alex got his intel?

Alex is real, right? That’s what he tells us all the time. “At least I’m real”.

With a heavy heart I cannot at this stage fall hook, line and sinker. Instead I have a mission. To analyze Jones as I have done for Glenn Beck, and see what I find.

This will require looking at inconsistencies. It will mean analyzing demeanor. It will require research to check what was unleashed in the very loaded Tarpley interview that Alex has advised us he was thinking about today. A little late I would say, and only when a caller mentioned Webster Tarpley did Jones mention he wanted him on the show soon.

Think to yourself. Have you ever been tough loved by a friend that tells you something you disagreed with, but later learned was true? Where and who is the first person you run to: your friend of course, and with it some remorse. That, I was waiting for on the show but it did not surface until late in the game.

Also, when Webster Tarpley had informed Jones in the interview that he had pegged Ron Paul since January, Jones did not acknowledge him for that today or give him credit, but instead seemed to backpedal to look like he had it all figured out. Sorry, but the way it seemed to be. Either Alex Jones does not like to admit being schooled, or there is another reason.

Tarpley had mentioned Freemasonry and that Ron Paul was part of that club in the interview. And wasn’t it downplayed by Jones in the interview and not brought up today on the show.

We were left with repeated “they are good people” comments on the Paul family, with no mention that he is willing to turn a critical eye to what Tarpley had uncovered based on good research. Jones is inconsistent in defending as insignificant this matter when he has explored this aspect of Freemasonry as significant at higher levels, which there is evidence of for Ron Paul. Masonry at high levels is considered a satanic cult, and it’s members looking to control the earth (globalists).

I also learned from other sources that Ron Paul supports no minimum wage. That would be consistent with the globalist’s job to drive down wages, as when we looked at Roger Altman and his ties to Chinese investment in the failing U.S. economy. Couple this fact with the proposed budget cut that Ron Paul had, leaving most to suffer who are on food stamps, and masonry seems to be sounding possible here.

So, prepare for a ride. We will be watching Jones carefully as we did with Glenn Beck, as he does the same to Ron Paul.

A couple “missions impossible”. Deep down I feel like Sheriff Joe Arpaio, I’d prefer to come to the conclusion that Alex Jones IS for “real”, but I will not fall victim to being sucked down the rabbit hole. I have allowed that one too many times already.

Why so much reflection on Ron Paul now?

The worst form of “ineptness” may be in deceiving those who look up to you

It is my belief that the support of Ron Paul by the Patriot Movement has been based largely on the assumption that Paul was really a truther after all.

After his comment in the early part of 2012 related to 911: “Bush knowing about this?”, I have to solemnly question where exactly he remains on the issue of 911 truth.

In the now, dare I say famous can of worms interview with Alex Jones, Webster Tarpley dropped an important bomb of infomation that would suggest Ron Paul may not be the man with the mission many of us thought he was.

Specific allegations from Tarpley were based on fact. Ron Paul supported the Afghan invasion because he truly believed bin Laden was responsible for the attacks on 911. He has not changed his point of view on that despite Alex Jones’ reasoning in the interview that Paul was aware of false flag attacks. Even in the GOP debates, with Paul in battle with Rick Santorum, the infamous booing of Paul  occurred  because of his mention of the US’s aggressive foreign military policy. What it really did was slap 911 truth in the face, and solidify the false belief that bin Laden was the culprit. In hindsight, it could have been brilliant political theater.

The reason a critical eye of Ron Paul must be had now is because of the supporters he has accumulated that would likely buy into everything he suggests. Dare we ask how many Paul supporters are on food stamps out of the 60% + that would be out of luck with the $ 1 Trillion slashing of the Federal budget?

In the GOP debate, we can think back on how much time was spent on national defense strategy. Odd when the economy was tanking, you would think it would be down on the list of priorities. Again, it solidified the argument that 911 was  instigated from cave dwellers in Afghanistan not because of a conspiracy. Have we all been duped into believing that Ron Paul secretly agrees with us, while over the years dodging the bullet, or in some cases coming out boldly to whole-heartedly spell it out? And if Ron Paul can be persuaded to vote for war because of bin Laden, would Rand be equally accomodating at the suggestion Iran held dangerous nukes?

If we look at Tarpley’s argument that Ron Paul was there to take votes away from Romney’s GOP competition, that should make us more careful not to assume Paul was there to support the Patriot movement unquestioningly. He has not given us assurance that he is indeed on our side. That is, that there is a global mission to a One World Government. Liberty and Freedom at home is not good enough, when you don’t admit the bigger picture. However, he has discussed his fear of a North American Union, but isolating that issue without admission of the bigger picture is in itself suspect.

And, the cash infusion from Bilderberg at this stage is extremely suspect. The stretched argument that Paul cannot control who injects $2.7 million into his campaign is weak, and as Tarpley points out, it did not come from just any Bilderberger, it came from Thiel, who sits on the Bilderberg Steering Committee.

Ask some waitresses in Europe how generous a Bilderberger who just hit the winfall like Zuckerberg was, when he wouldn’t tip. $2.7 million must come with some strings attached for sure.  And rumor has it that the Bilderbergers weren’t too generous inside the Marriott in Chantilly either. So the big campaign infusion is very questionable. Ride off in the sunset, huh? Imagine how Alex Jones  would use that information against any other candidate that got the windfall from a Bilderberg steering committee member.

Friend or no friend, it’s time to separate the job from the bias and get down to work. We will see if the friendship of Tarpley and Jones can endure the truth that Tarpley dropped. And, if I might add, having analyzed the interview again, Tarpley is genuinely a friend to Jones, and his suggestion Alex should have run for President seemed rather heartfelt. Tough love if you will. I think Jones needs to do some soul searching on this one, and decide which friend is more honest and forthright – – the guy who eludes to be on his side, or the one who blasts reality square between the eyes.

And, are we left with a mystery to solve on where Ron Paul and now Rand Paul really stand? Is that grey area really good enough at this point in American history? At a crossroads doesn’t even begin to explain the magnitude where truth is needed, and clarity should be a given.

Ron Paul is at best a mysterious, mythical father figure that we “hope” sees it the way we would like him to see it, and we must somehow read between the lines, because, “shhhh, he can’t lead on that he is really one of us, and he can’t bring it up”.

That argument has now become dangerous for a myriad of reasons, most of which were uncovered eloquently by Webster Tarpley.

As Dan Rather would now reflect on his memoirs of past, and future moving forward, “follow the money”.

Money and promise of payoff are there. Ron Paul may have conveyed some interesting ideals over the years, but he is ready to retire and hand it over to Rand from here.

Some say that it is Rand that is to blame and will ruin what dad has accomplished. I prefer to think based on the support one has for the other, that the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. The mission at this point might be to accept the limitations of not taking it to where it needed to go a long time ago. To compromise oneself on exposing full truth is not good enough. Or, to deceive or have some faction of supporters wishing you were on their side may even be worse.

We are talking life and death here.

Tarpley mentioned something that should be important to us all. He suggested that Rand may be persuaded to allow a war with Iran. That would mean he would be a bigger ally to Romney, and might explain why a meeting took place between them. You would have to surmise that the “meeting” was the result of past “working together”, and to get to the point of deciding if he would be second in command must suggest they are pretty good bedfellows regardless of the outcome. Stop making excuses that I hear, like, “well, if Rand turns out not to be VP, then we can all go back to the Paul love-in, right?”

I don’t think so. For now, I will leave you with this. Despite the exposing of the shill who is Glenn Beck, we can safely say he did his political hit piece in 2007 for a time like this:

Might explain why a third party run is not in the picture. It would take votes away from Mitt Romney, and it would not allow a show of how many Patriots would support Ron Paul. A shame if it was all a smokescreen.