Tag Archives: John

Blowing the whistle on controlled opposition, the World Bank (or is it just divide and conquer?)

Here is a series of very interesting videos that have painted a picture of deceit from the John Birch Society, to Bilderberg, to Congress, and the Vatican.

Who can you trust? Are there secondary tiers of deception meant to further divide, confuse, and dilute any opposition to the powers in this evil-c0ntrolled world? Or, can we sift through the controlled, diluted opposition to find clues as to who is really being hidden from view, and who is really at the root of world domination in these dark times?

 

Advertisements

The Controlled Opposition Fronts have played truthers like a fiddle

I think we can all agree: the world is full of deception, greed, and the seeds of evil.

The truth movement has been led by some leaders, the greatest of these perhaps is Alex Jones and Infowars.com. He would probably like to think of himself as the tip of the spear as he often uses to describe his operation.

At the root of the beliefs of the truth movement is the John Birch Society, founded in the ’50’s, and exposing the globalist agenda ever since.

One might say that if the John Birch Society has exposed the truth for so long, how come they have not been able to wake up enough people over the years to agree with them? And, if they truly were followed, would this result in the destruction of the political process and the government as we know it?

What would really happen if everyone believed that their vote did not count; that their government officials were all crooked, self-serving sellouts; that there is no hope whatsoever for a free and democratic society, as verbed by John F. Kennedy?

Would the secret societies be able to pull off the mission of global enslavement by themselves, or would they have to have the masses wish for their own enslavement? Would it be easier to cull millions, if not billions of people by a few, or would it make more sense to use the very people, the citizens, to wish for the very change that the globalists wanted to effect?

I think that answer is clear.

Although Alex Jones would talk on several occasions to the metaphor in the movie Ants, that if the little ants knew they outnumbered the big ants by a sizeable margin, they could easily have victory over them. So, the drive is to make the little ants believe they have power, but more importantly, to pose as the little ants’ friend, and like a little voice in their ear, tell them exactly what it is they want.

For it would not be enough to control the little ants’ desires to take back control, you also would need to tell them how. And, this is the criticism that Alex Jones has been under for years, as his listeners start to question why he doesn’t elaborate on some political factions such as Zionism. Or, why he doesn’t talk about religious powerhouses that have been linked to the Nazis like the Vatican, Pope, and the Jesuits, SMOM, etc, etc. Why is it he downplays groups like the John Birch Society; play dumb with guests like Charlotte Iserbyt when she tries to tell him about the perilous Council for National Policy (CNP)? Why does Jones first say he has only a little knowledge when extracting his guest’s information, and then later come back with the notion that he has indeed researched these groups?

Why does Jones refute the arguments of Webster Tarpley when criticizing Ron Paul and his clan, refusing to dig deeper on the Freemasonic link; or dig on the campaign contribution of Peter Thiel to Paul, just before Paul goes into hiding while the dust clears on his son Rand’s endorsement of Romney?

And, why does Jones try to paint Webster Tarpley as a communist sympathizing friend who, he has tried to like, but come on Tarpley, you are making it tough to call you friend with your current aggressiveness. And, of course we have the support of the Koch Brothers, that suddenly in Jones pronunciation sounds like “coch” not “coke”, as if that is supposed to fool many.

So many questions, so little answers for those that are starting to question.

Over the years, there are many that have criticized the, let’s call them mainstream alternative media. Because, to make a comparison, the mainstream alternatives have a growing desire to grow their operations to get the word out better, and clearer. That would, my friends, include buying better microphones, backdrops, perhaps TV’s with videos playing in the background, and hiring staff, creating blog entries at rapid pace to keep up with the barrage of world events needing clarification, and on and on.

The other alternative media, have maybe a Youtube account, a handful of like-minded subcribers, and no intention of going mainstream. But the little guy is also much more likely to be critical of the mainstream alternative media like the Infowars, tip of the spear operation.

I like to call the official story of truthers the Jones-bourne truthers, because it is a game of follow the leader. The leader speaks, and the group all go back to write their own articles, Youtube videos, etc, all based on the talking points of the leader of the pack.

In this way, you can see a lot of the same argument. And we all know what happens when we see the same argument over and over again, right? Well, it must be true.

Where you get your news is important I guess. It is important to be completely turned off the the mainstream, mainstream, but it is okay to be tuned into the mainstream alternative, and if you are daring and rebellious, you might go outside the norm and become a rebellious alternative only type truther.

The man who would question the “Man who woke him up” must be a rebel, turncoat, and would need to be shunned as a bit of a whacko no doubt.

The man who woke up not once, but twice, the second time to the deception of the group that claims to have woken him up the first time.

What I am getting at is both complex and yet surprisingly simple. The opposition to that nasty untrustworthy government may actually not be against the global elite at all – – they may actually be working with them.

When you awake for the first time you are told that the political process is a fake. It’s called the left-right paradigm. When you awake the second time you realize that the truth movement has been equally hijacked, and the opposition to the status quo is a fake opposition – – a false paradigm of it’s own. But, funny enough, you wouldn’t expect that now would you?

If politics is to give you a sense of having choice that you can relate to a political party, but in reality both parties are driving to a similar agenda, the false opposition group would want to lead you to believe you can put up resistance to the globalists even though they are fooling you, and perhaps using you to effect what they desire. Is it really that much of a stretch to think the globalists would think that far into the future, as to plan that too?

I mean, seeing the tip of the spear standing with bullhorn in hand at Bilderberg, a mere fence away from the world leaders then becomes a laughable image when you realize it is a scam designed to suck you in, make you shout with glee, but in reality do nothing.

It would certainly explain why the big guy could ask a guest if they are suicidal, to suggest the information that is being leaked on air was not carefully screened for effect moreso than content. How it will affect the psyche of those listening is more important than the material it covers. Getting you to defend the grand poobah the goal. Getting you to see your hero the ultimate mission. Are you there? Are you getting mad enough to defend the man that woke you up, and how dare I tell you it has been a scam? Is that where you are at right now?

Ron Paul once said on the Alex Jones show, that the globalists are very patient. They have effected their plan over a long period of time.

But on the topic of 9/11 at the GOP debates, Paul would adamantly deny the truthers’ belief that he supports them on the theory that 9/11 was as inside job. Paul was quick to distance himself from the fundamental root that makes a truther a truther – – that if the powers that be would pull off 9/11, they would do anything. The same patient globalists that Paul would describe are either secretly believed to be responsible for 9/11 by him, or he truly believes they are not. But where does that leave the truther looking to latch onto the Ron Paul train? Can they truly trust the aloof man that watched his son endorse the other guy, walking away from his old man? Where is the allegiance really of the Paul clan? A mystery worth investigating, wouldn’t you at least agree to that?

And so, we come back to the notion that the globalists thought far enough ahead to be patient yes, but also to be patient building their opposition that will give a support group as the world wakes up to them. They had to create the same false paradigm, giving those that woke up a place to go. They had to patiently create the tip of the spear, who would in turn create the ripple effect of support to build on an idea whose time has come, so to speak.

Liberty and the Constitution would become the ideals of the movement. Sound currency based on gold would have to be the basis of world economies. If the globalists snatched all the gold while the scam was underway, yes they would become filthy rich controllers, but you were not supposed to realize that. Just buy as much as you can little serf, and laugh at those that aren’t awake yet.

I can say this with conviction because what I experienced so far in this cesspool of contaminated truth is the same you have experienced. I too was a Ron Paul, go get him grandpa, supporter. But, like the saying goes, you can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all the people all the time. And, that’s true.

If the real truth is what I now believe it to be, the globalists will be using the first time wake uppers to destroy their own government. Did you hear that? Destroy your own government leaving no choice but World Government. The ants will have been herded to take the action desired by the few controllers.  They will have them listening to grandpa Paul as he tells them to go ahead, secede from the union, and divide yourselves little children. Because when you do, you will be helpless to the global empire.

Funny, Ron Paul is a libertarian right? He should be thinking united we stand, divided we fall you would suspect. But divided it is in his mind now. Reminds me of his stand on 9/11. Who the hell really knows what he is thinking? A little slippery I would say. No, check that – – a lot slippery.

The John Birch Society has many supporters that lo and behold have appeared without interruption on the Alex Jones Show. The Society was founded by a high level Freemason, and funded by a globalist.

Ron Paul is a supporter of the Society, as is Alex Jones, and Jones’ father was a member.

If you google Barbara Aho, controlled opposition fronts right now, and give it the justice it deserves, I am willing to wager you too will get that sick feeling in the pit of your stomach like I did not too long ago.

Alex Jones: Have a Koch and a smile

I am beginning to read the demeanor of Alex Jones. When he deflects criticism away from certain groups or individuals, his facial expressions give it away for one, and his pattern is interesting as well.

In this video, watch how Jones tries to suggest that to look at the Koch brothers as part of the NWO ‘right’ is not that big a deal, and he attempts to suggest that it is a complicated issue, and well, I suppose, you should therefore not bother trying.

Excellent points Jones expressed to the caller before the commercial break, and on returning to the air, Jones had the book open from Jesse Ventura and Dick Russell to (remind him guys) complement Russell on the book, except for that not so nice section on the Koch brothers.

It’s the bad George Soros, communist type guys that are really bad. (See John Birch Society talking point 101)

“People try to put us in a box, because they can’t figure out reality”, said Jones. Who is us? The same “us” that Jones was aboard with on the other ship as the famous politician, anti-communism talking point John Birchers, Ron and Rand Paul. If you listen carefully to Jones, he makes these comments that don’t make sense, that is, unless he is talking about himself as one of the team. Which team is the big question. Is there funding from more than DVD and membership sales?

Deflecting away the blame on the Koch’s seemed to be the goal in this clip:

Controlled Opposition Fronts: Because there really is a war on for your mind

Tarpley is bang on when it comes to pension plans and trade unions: So why is Alex Jones now drumming a different beat?

The game of bait and switch to keep you distracted from the goal of wealth stripping may have a partner to Glenn Beck. Perhaps there are more than one “truth teller” that is guilty of deceit!

We contributed in exposing the Bilderberg Agenda to Infowars.com, and this article submitted in June 2010 outlined Beck’s mission to attack pension plans and trade unions, because of the argument that the union leaders are corrupt.

This is exactly what Webster Tarpley discussed with Alex Jones, but later in discussion, Jones talked with Aaron Dykes about how corrupt union heads are part of the globalist mission. The issue is the protection of the innocent worker. If the head of their unions are corrupt, why should the workers be put at risk?

This makes Alex Jones suspect to further the globalist goals, no different than Glenn Beck.

Here is an excerpt from the above-mentioned article entitled, Creating The Great Union Divide:

According to Beck, you cannot blame the bankers when times get tough. And, we all know that Beck supported the banker bailout claiming a very weak argument that if the banks failed, the economy would have failed. He defended his position on this, but what matters is action not words. Supporting the bank bailout and attacking labor unions puts Americans at risk.

When Beck has not addressed the big picture adequately – that is, the magnitude of George Soros and the New World Order, how does he justify putting the average American union employee at risk of financial insecurity? Are the union members that are honest guilty by association? Kind of a sorry about your luck, you were duped by your union – a pawn and you must be  sacrificed argument?

The document obtained mysteriously from 1966 is a convenient backup to the quashing of trade unions, and here is an excerpt from the video’s description:

The most alarming portion of Harris’ hand-written notes concern a speech given during the Bilderberg confab by one time Communist Party member and union leader Walter P. Reuther, who was politically active from the 1930′s up until his death in 1970. Reuther was a leading force in the United Automobile Workers (UAW) and later helped set up the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/leaked-bilderberg-documents-nationalism-is-danger…
by Paul Joseph Watson

Useful minions that write articles and are under the direction of the master with little knowledge of what it means perhaps to the average guy?

Tarpley would have to get some brownie points. Look at who is being attacked and ask yourself who does it serve? In this case, again, with the sudden appearance of this “leaked” document, they can go after trade unions, furthering the Bilderberg agenda.

The analysis of similarity between Beck and Jones will continue. It may not paint a pretty picture. Where they both tell us some truth, there could be a slipping in of the true agenda to distract the masses with one issue, while they strip us of our rights beneath our noses.

We are just getting warmed up!

Words of Wisdom from a young mind more than two years ago: Ron Paul, Alex Jones, and the John Birch Society

“When the bill comes due, whenever that is, you must comply”

Oh me, oh my, the “vatican assasins” joke between Charlie Sheen and Alex Jones seems so much more funny now, tee hee.

“Jones never talks specifics who’s doing this stuff”

Alex Jones works with the John Birch Society?!

In April 2006 Jones interviewed John McManus, the president of the John Birch Society. Jones told him:
“I want to work with you guys, to see you grow.”
infowars.com/articles/commentary/alex_jones_interviews_mcmanus.htmMcManus replied that he was:
“looking forward to seeing the relationship continue”.

What relationship? Why would Jones be working with the John Birch Society? Jones avoids articles from Hufschmid and Bollyn, but he promotes articles from the John Birch Society, such as this silly article about the 4th of July:
infowars.net/articles/july2007/040707Meaning.htm

The John Birch Society is lying about the September 11 attack, and other Jewish crimes. It may have been an honest organization when it was founded, but it is definitely controlled by Zionists today.

The John Birch Society doesn’t blame Israel or Zionists for anything, which is why David Eisenberg joined and was promoted to the JBS Council:
jbs.org/node/1285

The latest rationalization of the critical-thinking, conspiracy theorist

Okay, conspiracy theorists…you have been blown away with the Ron Paul turncoat….how are you going to think your way through this one?

I have come across a terrific, critical thinker but obvious Alex Jones, Ron Paul supporter. And, don’t get me wrong, I was one of those just a few days ago. I guess if Alex Jones can flip-flop, Ron Paul can join in too, and it seems anyone at will can change friends and affiliations to serve their purposes, who am I to be any different, eh?

We have to all assess the new conspiracy possibilities with an open mind and open heart, and look into the relationships that might give us a clue on what up with that, dog?

Who really is Ron Paul? He doesn’t seem on one hand to be the guy we thought he was, that is, unless we can rationalize the move to save our image of him as the conspiracy believer, playing the game as long as he could, to have some influence over the world, to tell us all what’s really going on.

But shhhhh, don’t bat an eye when Ron can’t admit that 911 was an inside job, even though the John Birch Society professes it, and he can stand up as a speaker once in a while to rousing applause. Play the game, won’t you?

Well, here is my good YouTube friend who is rationalizing now for himself. He is a great critical thinker. I would describe him as possibly where a typical Ron Paul supporter who wants to hold onto the ideal that the Pauls are good, Alex Jones is for real, and we are party to a group that will eventually wake everyone up. Our job has just begun, and the keyboard is looking to smoke over the next several weeks:

So welcome, from Lexington, Kentucky and the rest of the world, to the new game of Conspiracy theory, part two!